Calls For "Retroactive Assessment" Begin After US Arrests Two Mid-East Refugees On Terror Charges
“There are reasonable concerns about the safety and security of the citizenry of the State of Texas regarding these refugees.”
That’s a quote from federal court documents filed in connection with a lawsuit the state of Texas brought against the State Department last year in an effort to block the Obama administration’s plan to settle Syrian refugees in the Lone Star State.
On Thursday, Alabama sued the federal government as well.
The lawsuits came on the heels of the Paris Attacks which prompted a number of Republican governors to insist that Washington cancel plans to place some 10,000 Syrian refugees across the country. Here’s a look at a map we highlighted back in November when the debate began to heat up in earnest:
On Thursday, Texas got more ammunition for its fight against the resettlement of refugees in the state when US officials arrested Omar Faraj Saeed Al-Hardan in Houston. Al-Hardan and Aws Mohammed Younis Al-Jayab (who was arrested in Sacramento), are charged with supporting Islamic militant groups, but not with plotting an attack on US soil.
Both Al-Hardan (who came to America in 2009 from Iraq) and Al-Jayab (who immigrated from Syria in 2012) are Iraqi-born Palestinians. "Al-Hardan was charged with providing material support to the Islamic State militant group and for making false statements about ties to the group when seeking U.S. naturalization," Reuters reports, adding that "Al-Jayab was arrested on Thursday on a federal charge of making a false statement involving international terrorism."
Al-Jayab stands accused of "traveling to Syria to fight alongside terrorist groups, including Ansar al-Islam," The New York Times adds before outlining the men's specific crimes as follows:
Prosecutors said on Thursday that Mr. Hardan has been associated with the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, since 2014 and was trained to use automatic machine guns. He has been charged with one count each of attempting to provide material support to the Islamic State, procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlawfully, and making false statements, prosecutors said.
In California, the indictment accuses Mr. Jayab of discussing his experience fighting against the government of Syria, and planning to return to fight alongside terrorist groups, over social media in 2012 and 2013.
“O God, grant us martyrdom for your sake while engaged in fighting and not retreating; a martyrdom that would make you satisfied with us,”
Mr. Jayab wrote in one online exchange from April 2013, according to the indictment.
It said he wrote to an associate in another online exchange, “America will not isolate me from my Islamic duty. Only death will do us part. My only wish is to see you and start the action.”
Prosecutors said that Mr. Jayab traveled from Chicago to Syria, by way of Turkey, on Nov. 9, 2013, and fought alongside terrorist groups, including Ansar al-Islam, until January 2014, posting about his experiences with the group on social media along the way. He returned to the United States on Jan. 23, 2014.
Here's the Justice Department on Al-Hardan:
The indictment alleges that Al Hardan attempted to provide material support and resources, including training, expert advice and assistance, and personnel – specifically himself – to a known foreign terrorist organization. According to the allegations, he also knowingly responded, certified and swore untruthfully on his formal application when applying to become a naturalized U.S. citizen. He allegedly represented that he was not associated with a terrorist organization when, in fact, he associated with members and sympathizers of ISIL throughout 2014, according to the charges. The indictment further alleges that during an interview in October 2015, Al Hardan falsely represented that he had never received any type of weapons training, when he allegedly received automatic machine gun training.
And on Al-Jayab:
According to the complaint, Al-Jayab is a Palestinian born in Iraq, who came to the United States as an Iraqi refugee in October 2012. Between October 2012 and November 2013, while living in Arizona and Wisconsin, he communicated over social media with numerous other individuals about his intent to return to Syria to fight for terrorist organizations. In those communications, according to the complaint, Al-Jayab discussed his previous experience with firearms and with fighting against the regime in Syria. On Nov. 9, 2013, he flew from Chicago to Turkey, and then traveled to Syria. Between November 2013 and January 2014, Al-Jayab allegedly reported on social media that he was in Syria fighting with various terrorist organizations, including Ansar al-Islam, a designated foreign terrorist organization since 2004. He returned to the United States on Jan. 23, 2014, and settled in Sacramento.
Needless to say, both Texas governor Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick jumped at the opportunity to say "we told you so."
"I applaud the FBI for today's arrest of this dangerous subject. However, this is precisely why I called for a halt to refugees entering the U.S. from countries substantially controlled by terrorists," Abbott said. "I once again urge the President to halt the resettlement of these refugees in the United States until there is an effective vetting process that will ensure refugees do not compromise the safety of Americans and Texans."
“Based on the facts, as we know them, today’s action may have prevented a catastrophic terror-related event in the making and saved countless lives,” Patrick chimed in. “This is exactly what we have repeatedly told the Obama administration could happen and why we do not want refugees coming to Texas.”
Both suspects appeared in court on Friday. Authorities say it's exceedingly possible the two men communicated with each other over the last several years. The complaint against Al-Jayab says he spoke with an unnamed Texas resident about training in Syria.
"I need to learn from your weapon expertise," the Texas man wrote to Al-Jayab.
Al-Jayab wrote back: "We will make your abilities very strong."
"Our concern now is only to arrive there," Al-Jayab went on. "When you arrive to al-Sham [Syria] you will be trained."
You can expect the backlash against Mid-East asylum seekers to grow in the US on the heels of the arrests. "This is an extraordinary snapshot of what we're facing now -- the challenge of vetting individuals and maintaining the beacon of hope that America has been for the world over," Michael Wildes, an immigration attorney and former federal prosecutor said.
Of course the fact that the two men have been in the country for an extended period of time raises questions about the existence of sleeper cells. "I commend the law enforcement for apprehending these two individuals, but their apprehensions raise the immediate question: Who else is there? What are they planning next?," Ted Cruz asked on the way to suggesting that America may need to conduct "retroactive assessments" of refugees living in the country.
That raises the following questions. Will the US soon begin to catalogue and round up refugees already living in the country for questioning and interrogation? If so, how will authorities decide who to scrutinize? Will it be based country of origin? Religious affiliation? How does one create an archetype for "terrorists"? Is Cruz's suggestion materially different from Trump's Muslim database and ID cards?
* * *
Al-Hardan indictment
Al-Jayab complaint:
(6 votes)
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Right, but the reaction to a crisis like this will be the opposite of what progressives want. Too many people are saying "Ya know, whether we created some of those monsters or not, we don't want them here." If the government imports them, then a few of them carry out an attack, it will likely be miniscule compared to what goes on in, say, Chicago, but the effect on the American psyche will be huge. People will realize to an even greater extent that not only can't the government protect them, but it won't. Where do Americans turn when they realize that their government can't and won't protect them? Their friendly firearm dealer.
Those of us who understand that our government actually did have a hand in creating these boogieman orginizations and then was fucking dumb enough to populate them with actual boogiemen sure as hell don't expect the government protect us. As I've said time and time again, the biggest thing that has protected us from the blowback of our actions in the MENA is an ocean. Europe is going to feel the full force of the blowback.
"Who else is there? What are they planning next? "
Well, there's the Criminal Psychopathic Pure Evil CIA / FBI who arm, fund, & train the CIA duh terror organizations.
What are they planning next? More False Flags & manufactured fear to take away more of your rights & control.
Philly in on the action this morning. Looks like a wannabe tried to take out a cop
owebomba is (inwardly) pleased.
philly action http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/08/philly-mayor-isis-cop...
one report says perp gun was previously stolen from Police!
perp says he did it for moo-slime
mayor says no no perp misspoke
"Stolen from" the police? LMFAO ok.
Fired 13 times. Hit the cop three and he survived. I'm beginning to wonder what all the fuss is
They'll get a few years in prison where they can further expand their jihadi contatcts.
They'll go on the list of recruits for when the CIA wants to create another ISIS.
“Based on the facts, as we know them, today’s action may have prevented a catastrophic terror-related event in the making and saved countless lives,” Patrick chimed in.
"Chimed in"?
Texas has been taking in refugees from all over the world for decades, but didn't do so stupidly or foolishly. Obutthole and his fairy fornicators demand we now ignore common sense and bend over and our reply is fuck off. Send them to SF and NYC since they want'em so damned much........
this latest batch are sub fucking human
They were human when they were born, but were raised Islamic. Sucks for them but it isnt my fault or responsibility. They are dangerous to our health and wealth and happiness. Fuck em.
Son of a ........Trump was right. Go figure.
Law Abiding Citizen Gun Owners: need more enforcement, more regulation, more rules, more tracking, less ammo, smaller calibers, no semi-auto ability, less reciprocity.
"Refugees" from predominantly terrorist controlled countries: settle 'em and forget 'em.
Got it.
Speaking of stirring the hornets nest, a Zionist group known as "Institute for Contemporary History" (created by the allies to study contemporary German history) has republished a critical version of Hitlers Mein Kampf in Germany.
So they have dumped refugees that contain ISIS onto Germany, a creation of theirs, while at the same time providing incindiary literature for the masses. Except the criticisms throughout the book should direct anger away from Hebrews judging by the fact that......
"Germany's main Jewish group, the Central Council of Jews, says it does not object to the critical edition, but strongly supports efforts to prevent any new “Mein Kampf” without annotations."
https://www.rt.com/news/328301-hitlers-mein-kampf-published/
Long war and social upheaval.
It's pretty fucking boring. I've tried to read it a few times and I can't get through it. Hitler talking about how he wanted to be an artist and not follow his father into the government bureaucracy. Terrible.
And I'm pretty much a full blown neo-nazi at this point.
I think that is what they want, in a sense.
The following is from the second part of Mein Kampf. It's brilliant and accurately describes what happens in Western democracies today.
"It was evident that this new movement could gain the public significance and support which are necessary pre-requisites in such a gigantic struggle only if it succeeded from the very outset in awakening a sacrosanct conviction in the hearts of its followers, that here it was not a case of introducing a new electoral slogan into the political field but that an entirely new world view, which was of a radical significance, had to be promoted.
One must try to recall the miserable jumble of opinions that used to be arrayed side by side to form the usual Party Programme, as it was called, and one must remember how these opinions used to be brushed up or dressed in a new form from time to time. If we would properly understand these programmatic monstrosities we must carefully investigate the motives which inspired the average bourgeois 'programme committee'.
Those people are always influenced by one and the same preoccupation when they introduce something new into their programme or modify something already contained in it. That preoccupation is directed towards the results of the next election. The moment these artists in parliamentary government have the first glimmering of a suspicion that their darling public may be ready to kick up its heels and escape from the harness of the old party wagon they begin to paint the shafts with new colours. On such occasions the party astrologists and horoscope readers, the so-called 'experienced men' and 'experts', come forward. For the most part they are old parliamentary hands whose political schooling has furnished them with ample experience. They can remember former occasions when the masses showed signs of losing patience and they now diagnose the menace of a similar situation arising. Resorting to their old prescription, they form a 'committee'. They go around among the darling public and listen to what is being said. They dip their noses into the newspapers and gradually begin to scent what it is that their darlings, the broad masses, are wishing for, what they reject and what they are hoping for. The groups that belong to each trade or business, and even office employees, are carefully studied and their innermost desires are investigated. The 'malicious slogans' of the opposition from which danger is threatened are now suddenly looked upon as worthy of reconsideration, and it often happens that these slogans, to the great astonishment of those who originally coined and circulated them, now appear to be quite harmless and indeed are to be found among the dogmas of the old parties.
So the committees meet to revise the old programme and draw up a new one.
For these people change their convictions just as the soldier changes his shirt in war – when the old one is bug-eaten. In the new programme everyone gets everything he wants. The farmer is assured that the interests of agriculture will be safeguarded. The industrialist is assured of protection for his products. The consumer is assured that his interests will be protected in the market prices. Teachers are given higher salaries and civil servants will have better pensions. Widows and orphans will receive generous assistance from the State. Trade will be promoted. The tariff will be lowered and even the taxes, though they cannot be entirely abolished, will be almost abolished. It sometimes happens that one section of the public is forgotten or that one of the demands mooted among the public has not reached the ears of the party. This is also hurriedly patched on to the whole, should there be any space available for it: until finally it is felt that there are good grounds for hoping that the whole normal host of philistines, including their wives, will have their anxieties laid to rest and will beam with satisfaction once again. And so, internally armed with faith in the goodness of God and the impenetrable stupidity of the electorate, the struggle for what is called 'the reconstruction of the Reich' can now begin.
When the election day is over and the parliamentarians have held their last public meeting for the next five years, when they can leave their job of getting the populace to toe the line and can now devote themselves to higher and more pleasing tasks – then the programme committee is dissolved and the struggle for the progressive reorganization of public affairs becomes once again a business of earning one's daily bread, which for the parliamentarians means merely the attendance that is required in order to be able to draw their daily remunerations. Morning after morning the honourable deputy wends his way to the House, and though he may not enter the Chamber itself he gets at least as far as the front hall, where he will find the register on which the names of the deputies in attendance have to be inscribed. As a part of his onerous service to his constituents he enters his name, and in return receives a small indemnity as a well-earned reward for his unceasing and exhausting labours.
When four years have passed, or in the meantime if there should be some critical weeks during which the parliamentary corporations have to face the danger of being dissolved, these honourable gentlemen become suddenly seized by an irresistible desire to act. Just as the grub-worm cannot help growing into a cock-chafer, these parliamentarian worms leave the great House of Puppets and flutter on new wings out among the beloved public. They address the electors once again, give an account of the enormous labours they have accomplished and emphasize the malicious obstinacy of their opponents. They do not always meet with grateful applause; for occasionally the unintelligent masses throw rude and unfriendly remarks in their faces. When this spirit of public ingratitude reaches a certain pitch there is only one way of saving the situation. The prestige of the party must be burnished up again. The programme has to be amended. The committee is called into existence once again. And the swindle begins anew. Once we understand the impenetrable stupidity of our public we cannot be surprised that such tactics turn out successful. Led by the Press and blinded once again by the alluring appearance of the new programme, the bourgeois as well as the proletarian herds of voters faithfully return to the common stall and re-elect their old deceivers. The 'people's man' and labour candidate now change back again into the parliamentarian grub and become fat and rotund as they batten on the leaves that grow on the tree of public life – to be retransformed into the glittering butterfly after another four years have passed.
Scarcely anything else can be so depressing as to watch this process in sober reality and to be the eyewitness of this repeatedly recurring fraud. On a spiritual training ground of that kind it is not possible for the bourgeois forces to develop the strength which is necessary to carry on the fight against the organized might of Marxism. Indeed they have never seriously thought of doing so. Though these parliamentary quacks who represent the white race are generally recognized as persons of quite inferior mental capacity, they are shrewd enough to know that they could not seriously entertain the hope of being able to use the weapon of Western Democracy to fight a doctrine for the advance of which Western Democracy, with all its accessories, is employed as a means to an end. Democracy is exploited by the Marxists for the purpose of paralysing their opponents and gaining for themselves a free hand to put their own methods into action. When certain groups of Marxists use all their ingenuity for the time being to make it be believed that they are inseparably attached to the principles of democracy, it may be well to recall the fact that when critical occasions arose these same gentlemen snapped their fingers at the principle of decision by majority vote, as that principle is understood by Western Democracy. Such was the case in those days when the bourgeois parliamentarians, in their monumental shortsightedness, believed that the security of the Reich was guaranteed because it had an overwhelming numerical majority in its favour, and the Marxists did not hesitate suddenly to grasp supreme power in their own hands, backed by a mob of loafers, deserters, political place-hunters and Jewish dilettanti. That was a blow in the face for that democracy in which so many parliamentarians believed. Only those credulous parliamentary wizards who represented bourgeois democracy could have believed that the brutal determination of those whose interest it is to spread the Marxist world-pest, of which they are the carriers, could for a moment, now or in the future, be held in check by the magical formulas of Western Parliamentarianism. Marxism will march shoulder to shoulder with democracy until it succeeds indirectly in securing for its own criminal purposes even the support of those whose minds are nationally orientated and whom Marxism strives to exterminate. But if the Marxists should one day come to believe that there was a danger that from this witch's cauldron of our parliamentary democracy a majority vote might be concocted, which by reason of its numerical majority would be empowered to enact legislation and might use that power seriously to combat Marxism, then the whole parliamentarian hocus-pocus would be at an end. Instead of appealing to the democratic conscience, the standard bearers of the Red International would immediately send forth a furious rallying-cry among the proletarian masses and the ensuing fight would not take place in the sedate atmosphere of Parliament but in the factories and the streets. Then democracy would be annihilated forthwith. And what the intellectual prowess of the apostles who represented the people in Parliament had failed to accomplish would now be successfully carried out by the crow-bar and the sledge-hammer of the exasperated proletarian masses – just as in the autumn of 1918. At a blow they would awaken the bourgeois world to see the madness of thinking that the Jewish drive towards world-conquest can be effectually opposed by means of Western Democracy.
As I have said, only a very credulous soul could think of binding himself to observe the rules of the game when he has to face a player for whom those rules are nothing but a mere bluff or a means of serving his own interests, which means he will discard them when they prove no longer useful for his purpose.
All the parties that profess so-called bourgeois principles look upon political life as in reality a struggle for seats in Parliament. The moment their principles and convictions are of no further use in that struggle they are thrown overboard, as if they were sand ballast. And the programmes are constructed in such a way that they can be dealt with in like manner. But such practice has a correspondingly weakening effect on the strength of those parties. They lack the great magnetic force which alone attracts the broad masses; for these masses always respond to the compelling force which emanates from absolute faith in the ideas put forward, combined with an indomitable zest to fight for and defend them.
At a time in which the one side, armed with all the fighting power that springs from a systematic conception of life – even though it be criminal in a thousand ways – makes an attack against the established order the other side will be able to resist when it draws its strength from a new faith, which in our case is a political faith. This faith must supersede the weak and cowardly command to defend. In its stead we must raise the battle-cry of a courageous and ruthless attack. Our present movement is accused, especially by the so-called national bourgeois cabinet ministers – the Bavarian representatives of the Centre, for example – of heading towards a revolution. We have one answer to give to those political pigmies. We say to them: We are trying to make up for that which you, in your criminal stupidity, have failed to carry out. By your parliamentarian jobbing you have helped to drag the nation into ruin. But we, by our aggressive policy, are setting up a new philosophy of life which we shall defend with indomitable devotion. Thus we are building the steps on which our nation once again may ascend to the temple of freedom.
And so during the first stages of founding our movement we had to take special care that our militant group which fought for the establishment of a new and exalted political faith should not degenerate into a society for the promotion of parliamentarian interests.
The first preventive measure was to lay down a programme which of itself would tend towards developing a certain moral greatness that would scare away all the petty and weakling spirits who make up the bulk of our present party politicians.
Those fatal defects which finally led to Germany's downfall afford the clearest proof of how right we were in considering it absolutely necessary to set up programmatic aims which were sharply and distinctly defined.
Because we recognized the defects above mentioned, we realized that a new conception of the State had to be formed, which in itself became a part of our new conception of life in general."
file:///F:/NS/AH/MeinKampf%20in%20ENG%20Algazira/2-01.HTM
I'll place it hear again....
Trained by America's finest at Langley and Ft. Bragg ready to do whatever they need to do CONUS/OCONUS just like the last time!
Cologne, Paris, London, Prague, "Syria", Iraq, Lebanon, Libya.. L.A. Washington D.C. New York, Boston... "You pay for it"! And we'll make it happen Guaranteed!!!
And when they get injured the U.S. government sends 'em here to get all "better" with the fat fuck for a PM supervising to show you just how important it is to him and his government!!!
Sure Vlad... BTW Hows the weather in Moscow?
Actually I'm in Washington D.C. where it's mild and the furnace of hell that it is just keeps getting "stoked" for what is coming further North in lower Manhattan!
Certainly won't be needing 3 major skyscrapers to collapse this time around! Wall Street and the Fed got the final act squared away!!!
Wouldn't want to be Janet or Ben moving into the second quarter of this business "boom"!!!
Why not? I think they are well paid with bennies.
Kill yourself, hasbara pig
It is so amazing : All of the reports that Israel and allies support ALL OF THE TERRORISTS, including ISIS. We created them and use them throughout the world for manipulation of public opinion and crippling governments.
Yet ISIS is the worst terrorist group of all, forever.
If those people are indeed crossing the border, it is a US operation, another False Flag, just like 9/11. The goal is controlling American political opinion, and keeping their necks out of nooses.
Israeli-Neocons and the US Corrupt Military and Deep State are the existential threat to America.
D
Unfortunately I live in the place I just mentioned, and if I had to pick "the one" that needs to be completely wiped off the map first with Manhattan, London and Tel Aviv, second... third... and fourth... -Then Russia and China make it happen!
Cause the American people certainly don't care what it is doing to them or anyone else for that matter!
We can get pissed off about Israel being the most dominant silent partner all we want... But Washington's actions always speaks for itself and they call the "shots" like it or not!
God dammit, stop this insanity of calling for more war. WTF?
Simple, simple, simple. The world, reality, are not simple, and no simple solution can possibly be an improvement.
That idiocy is how we got here.
Agreed!
But how do we get 2 million Americans to show up in Washington like the "Bundy" standoff in Oregon and say we're not leaving till you make it Stop!
By the way 500,000 to 750,000 would shut D.C. down in it's tracks. And we already know how many Americans are unemployed and out of work which would make that task rather easy...
But as I said. Don't and Won't see it happening in our lifetimes because all of the charismatic leadership in this Country is dead and "six feet" underground long ago!
All that bullshit -- and all you do is pontificate like a whiny little bitch whilst simultaneously doing nothing. Well played...
Your'e right alpha
Special delivery for all the cunts in Washington, London and Tel Aviv that won't be doin shit in your neck of the woods courtesy of the "new Sheriff"...
I'm up arrowing ya because the Russians are about ready to take the thing you value more than your own soul "control and dominion" along with the banks to move it with the Yankee Doodle goy and that dacha that ain't gonna EVER happen for you in Crimea overlooking the Black Sea!
We're ALL little "cream filled" bitche(s) now aren't we Yid Boy!!!!
Lol...
You do know that your mailman, your neighbor and your neighbors neighbor are all Mossad right?
Just out of curiosity -
can anyone name 3 famous muslim novelists (Mohammed doesn't count), 3 renowned muslim artists, 3 respected muslim statespeople?
can anyone name 3 famous muslim novelists (Mohammed doesn't count), 3 renowned muslim artists, 3 respected muslim statespeople?
I certainly can Dex!
Are you inquiring because you wish to have that knowledge?.. Or are you just using shameless rhetoric to showcase how "pig shit" stupid you are?...
We know!...
They hate us for our Freedoms... Even after you have documented evidence like this read that your government is doing it intentionally to control energy interests it no longer has or controls along with it's flagging currency!
Fluoride in the "water" was probably the greatest brain damaging contribution by the U.S. Federal Government next to the Motion Picture Association and the Mainstream Media and I guess Dex you're proof of that!
well sir, with all due respect ---- you named no names; you listed no one. you insulted a man who posed a legitimate question.
yet you miserably failed to answer his question
Do you speak Arabic?... Maybe this will peak you and your friends curiosity and interest in learning more about the language and it's history first as a necessary prerequisite which is kind of extensive.
If you don't know anything about the language or the culture or deliberately have no intention to, then I'm pretty certain you wouldn't know the names of the literati in those cultures -past and present.
If the U.S. government keeps blowing it to hell and creating more genocide in those places then I'm fairly certain that there will be far fewer scholars of literature in those places which I will concur with Dexter supports his arguement rather well!
Well, needless insults aside, I was asking to have that knowledge. I'm am aware of the many marvelous and variied accomplishments of the Arabian world in ancient times, but not so much since 700ad. Seriously, please name 3 of each as I would like to learn more about these people and their repressive culture and how it breeds intellectualism, if in fact it does. To overcome that repression would truly be a great accomplishment.
Arab does not equal Muslim, Moharnmed didn't come along spreading his doctrines of hate until the 700's, so I would be talking about devout muslims garnerering these accomplishments, not Arabs in general.
You can even find a famous muslim Nobel Peace Prize winner - and no, not hussein obama:
Yasser Arafat
An even better winner of a peace prize than obama...
They need Khalil Gibran.
Fakestinians. That should surprise nobody who's been paying attention since 1948.
File this as "Kahane Was Right, Exhibits 456784 and 456785."
"Only the moderates will be allowed in." Fixed?
Zero Immigration = Problem Solved
If your last name begins with "Al-" you are guilty.
Next case please.
I may be in deep shit; I ate a Shish-Kabob once.
Am i guilty?
Did it stare back at you?
Just part of our ISIS Terrorist visa program. What's the big deal?
Define "our" Mr. Putin...
Another FBI patsy sacrifice. And they were "handlers" themselves, responsible for sending ppl to Syria, or at least appearing to facilitate such an operation, quite early in the Syrian faux-civil war. Who were THEIR handlers, is the question..
And when will young men of the world learn to not take jobs like this? Never I suppose.
The Muslim "migrants" are being used . They are the Lee Harvey Oswald .NWO is now planting evidence, like Oswalds rifle, all over the Western world.Sick, but obvious.
The govenrment has decided you are an unreliable electorate, and are choosing themselves a new one.
NONE of this madness will end, unless and until the Whites rise up, of course they have NO IDEA who is perpetrating this GENOCIDE upon them, they don't even realize that it IS genocide.
GOOGLE's Schmidt wants algorithms to censor Internet for 'hate speech' Google's Sergey Brin got into America under the special privilege for Soviet Jews immigration law.
Germany: Facebook, Twitter and GOOGLE Clampdown on Immigration Criticism: Dec 15 2015
Posting xenophobic views online in Germany could cost you your job & child 28 Sep, 2015
STASI-veteran will Assist German Government in Facebook Censorship
Stasi Roots of the German-Jewish “Anti-Racist” Left and Its Program of Destroying Ethnic Germany
Washington Post:
Tribal member and former Stasi agent Anetta Kahane in Germany saying MASS IMMIGRATION of non-whites into Germany is a MUST:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuYKtwnzG7M
German-Jewish politician Gregor Gysi calls native Germans "Nazis" and their extinction "fortunate"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riQh4Qpvxm4
Haaretz, Israeli newspaper
Professor Kevin MacDonald’s ‘The Culture of Critique’ Reviewed This review, written in 1999, explains EVERYTHING that has happened to the White nations.