UBS has warned that the seven-year cycle in equities is rolling over, we could see a sharp 30% correction in stocks and that as per the headline of their ‘Technical Outlook 2016...
She'll go full emotional and press ALL the buttons, launching the world into 1000 years of darkness, forcing humanity into a genetic bottleneck after billions perish.
I used to see "I'm ready for Hillary" bumper stickers on cars a few months ago.
I thought of printing up a bunch of "to die" stickers and add them to any car that had the hilderbeast stricken on it. I think it qualifies as completing the sentence.
However I have not seen one of her stickers in months now.
I used to see "I'm ready for Hillary" bumper stickers on cars a few months ago.
I thought of printing up a bunch of "to die" stickers and add them to any car that had the hilderbeast stricken on it. I think it qualifies as completing the sentence.
However I have not seen one of her stickers in months now.
Yeah right, like they're really going to start holding her accountable now. Keep dreaming. Her voters don't give a rat's ass what she's done. After all she stands up for the women and children.
Just wait until the State Department and Hillary's 'dump' are done - then we will get some of the missing emails leaking out and making everyone wonder why neither State nor Hillary released them.
Destroying other countries and everything that entails is an American tradition. No punishment will come about--except in a post revolutionary society. And the chances of that are---?
Unless that Nasty fucking cunt dies in prison, she is WINNING! She'll walk off with her $200M campaign warchest as well. Fucking Republicans and that stupid fuck Gowdy should be ashamed of themselves...this shitshow has goone on way too long. LOSERS!
Gowdy was such a spectacular disappointment. Maybe it had something to do with that fucked up haircut. I wound up staring at it instead of listening to anything he said.
What Republican offers improvements for the Israeli-Neocons?
You really ahve to give up this D v R, Progressive vs Social Conservative, etc. Those are certainly centers of some power and budget but far from the entire store.
Recently there was an article about Rahm Emanual's leading the Ds, and how he recruited a bunch of neocon Ds and got few elected because voters wouldn't vote, despite the great AIPAC contributions to their warchests.
Israeli-Neocons are a power center in the world, funded by massive fraud everywhere they touch.
MSM controls all of our minds to levels we can't immagine, they are the frame for everything for nearly everone. The few outside their influence are at least odd by normal standards, and thus of limited social influence.
Myself, for example. My mother-in-law is the only person who has ever listened to me, and that was because she was learning English.
Clinton is too entrenched in the oligarchy for them to actually go after her. There's something else going on here. I find the private email server to be odd to begin with... why would that even be a thing? And even if that was teh case, don't tell me the NSA didn't fucking know about it. Something stinks here. There's an agenda, and Clinton herself is probably a part of it.
Kolomoisky and the rest of the Oligarchs put up $13 million channeled thru the Clinton Foundation and other probably Canadian affiliates around September 12' / 13' - in prelude to Victoria exiting Benghazi mess to create the Coup de etat in Kiev
I'll bet these O guys were bragging on the phone and the Russians have it all on tape - all the O's ended up as Governors of Oblasts without much issue from the Puppet as POTUS
I think Putin already did. Don't you remember about 3 weeks ago or so Kerry went to Moscow and did a complete about-face on our 4-year old policy for Assad regime change in Syria. Our media barely covered it as if it were no big deal. Means our foreign policy has been wrong for 4 years and a horrible mistake.
Putin has something on Kerry and Barry, the new Marx Brothers.
Clinton has no idea how computers work. Part of it i think is the processes of government are becoming streamlined digitally. The worker lemmings fill out forms, and things get triggered, people get notified, backups get made. Of all the shit she has been into here the only thing she is getting in trouble for is what there is a hard digital copy of. Kind of like how a cop can't tear up a ticket anymore once it gets written on, all tracked. Oldschool hubris is my theory. You can be sure the rest will learn to keep their digital trails clean.
“The [FBI] has so much information about criminal conduct by her and her staff that there is no way that they walk away from this,” Joseph diGenova, formerly the District of Columbia’s U.S. Attorney, told Laura Ingraham in a Tuesday radio interview. “They are going to make a recommendation that people be charged and then Loretta Lynch is going to have the decision of a lifetime.
“I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general. It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable.”
DiGenova is referring to the Watergate scandal’s “Saturday Night Massacre” Oct. 20, 1973, when President Richard Nixon sacked Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox and Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus resigned in protest.
DiGenova is well-sourced throughout the law enforcement community and his assessment has to be taken seriously. But interviews with other knowledgeable Washington insiders present a somewhat less concrete scenario developing around the former secretary of state.
Clinton clearly didn’t abide by federal regulations requiring officials like her to use government computers and email accounts to conduct official business and take all of the necessary steps to preserve all such correspondence concerning official business.
As first reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation, Clinton emailed Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden Sept. 7, 2010, asking for advice on what she, President Barack Obama and Democratic campaign officials should do to prevent a Republican victory in the upcoming congressional elections.
“Do you and CAP have any ideas as to how to change the dynamic before it’s too late? Losing the House would be a disaster in every way,” Clinton told Tanden. The CAP chief responded at length with clearly partisan recommendations, noted her supposedly non-partisan think tank’s polling efforts to identify winning themes for Democrats and described her conversations relaying her advice to Obama and other senior White House officials.
On its face, the Sept. 7 Clinton email appears to be a violation of the Hatch Act, which bars partisan political activities by officials using government property while on official duty. But Clinton found a clever way to get around the law, according to a senior non-profit official with extensive experience investigating such activities. The official spoke on condition of anonymity.
First, that official said, by not preserving her email records until after she resigned as secretary of state, Clinton avoided an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which handles Hatch Act violations. The reason is simple — OSC has no authority over former federal employees in Hatch Act matters.
Second, by refusing to comply “with Federal Records Act requirements to use an approved system for preserving records, [Clinton] arguably did not engage in political activities while on official duty or while using federal resources because she communicated with a personal computer,” the official said.
In other words, “had Secretary Clinton used a State Department e-mail address and a government computer and had Secretary Clinton complied with federal record-keeping and open government laws, [her] violations would have been discoverable under the Freedom of Information Act and could have been remedied while Secretary Clinton was still in office.”
Thus, don’t expect a Clinton indictment for a Hatch Act violation.
But Clinton is far from out of the woods, according to a congressional source who is deeply involved in the multiple investigations of Clinton. This source, who also spoke only on condition of anonymity, pointed to the hundreds of Clinton emails that contained classified information.
“Her problem is the sheer volume of emails that were deemed classified,” said this source. “Her first defense was that she didn’t send any classified information in her emails. But that claim has been clearly rendered false because so many of the emails were later marked classified.”
As the Department of State has released the Clinton emails she provided after leaving office, more than a thousand were marked classified after being reviewed prior to their public release. So what about Clinton’s subsequent distinction that she sent no information in her emails that was “marked classified” when it was sent?
“The volume matters because a reasonable person knows somebody who like the Secretary of State, who is allowed herself to classify materials, who has handled it for 25 years or more, at some point the law says you are responsible for recognizing classified material when you see it. That gets to the negligence issue,” the issue said.
Negligence is critical because Clinton signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in 2009 regarding classified information that stated, among much else, that “Sensitive Compartmented Information involves or derives from intelligence sources or methods that is classified or is involved in a classification determination …”
Clinton and several of her closest aides must have read information “derived from intelligence sources or methods” on a daily or near-daily basis.
There is an ominous sentence buried in that agreement Clinton signed: “Nothing in this agreement constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violations.”
What if Clinton is indicted for negligence in handling classified information? DiGenova predicts a showdown within a couple of months that will put Lynch in the same hot seat that prompted Nixon to fire Cox for getting too close to the truth about Watergate.
A Republican with direct knowledge of the investigation predicted political chaos if Lynch doesn’t decide to prosecute Clinton, a chaos that “would be the gift that keeps on giving right through the election.”
With or without resignations of FBI officials to protest such a decision, there would be a blizzard of news releases from congressional GOPers condemning Lynch, followed by hearings in which both the attorney general and FBI Director James Comey would be put under oath and asked about their actions.
Two points.
One is that because the emails have been made public, is there any possibility of a fair trial; purely a legal question, it would probably be the first line of defense. However there may be even more unpleasant details that have not been published.
Second is, if there are no prosecutions, there is no law. Laws have to be universal otherwise they are not laws at all.
If Hillary stumbles, I would not be surprised if the Dems broker their convention and nominate someone who is not even running (Biden? Warren? Or even an unknown?).
"Stumbles"? If this cunts' actions from Watergate/Cattle trades to Benghazi/Emails arent "stumbles" then let's just elect Caligula's horse, officially recognise the White House as a whore house and stop with the kidding around.
She'll go full emotional and press ALL the buttons, launching the world into 1000 years of darkness, forcing humanity into a genetic bottleneck after billions perish.
She'll do it.
You'll be surprised how many fucktards will vote for her.I see Hillary 2016 bumper stickers from time to time.
Usually on a Prius or a KIA. Never a 'Benz or pickup.
Every man-hating, estrogenite will vote for her. Others, not so much.
My dad is going to vote for her. He says Trump isnt qualified because during an interview he once said "you bet your ass".
Sorry for your loss.
Yea me too. I gave up a long time ago trying to open his eyes.
Your dad is retarded.
A steaming dump from Trump is more qualified than she.
+1000. Always a Prius or hybrid with a coexist bumper sticker ... and then they flip you off when they cut you off in traffic.
I used to see "I'm ready for Hillary" bumper stickers on cars a few months ago.
I thought of printing up a bunch of "to die" stickers and add them to any car that had the hilderbeast stricken on it. I think it qualifies as completing the sentence.
However I have not seen one of her stickers in months now.
I used to see "I'm ready for Hillary" bumper stickers on cars a few months ago.
I thought of printing up a bunch of "to die" stickers and add them to any car that had the hilderbeast stricken on it. I think it qualifies as completing the sentence.
However I have not seen one of her stickers in months now.
I'm putting a "I'm voting for a lying sociopathic narcissist in 2016" sticker on my car. That should piss both sides off...
Yeah right, like they're really going to start holding her accountable now. Keep dreaming. Her voters don't give a rat's ass what she's done. After all she stands up for the women and children.
But she has a royal vagina.
Dosent the wiki leaks dude have a data dump he's Gona drop on her?
Just wait until the State Department and Hillary's 'dump' are done - then we will get some of the missing emails leaking out and making everyone wonder why neither State nor Hillary released them.
The Witch of Charn, who, when confronted by her enemy, speaks the "Deplorable Word", killing everyone on Charn except herself. She finally won.
paraphrased from "The Magician's Nephew", by C. S. Lewis.
I want a cattle trade like Hillary got.
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/220099/hillary_camp_freaking_out_as_this_video_goes_viral_no_way_to_stop_it_now/
(Ok, I won't keep posting this link no matter how relevant it is.)
C'mon Justice Department, you know what you need to do......
They are too busy investingating local jurisdiction crimes in Podunk Missouri.
Destroying other countries and everything that entails is an American tradition. No punishment will come about--except in a post revolutionary society. And the chances of that are---?
Very low until the stage that enough people are pissed off enough to start baning pots and pans every night at 9PM for 20 minutes. Also fireworks.
That is the social support we need to know this is a sustainable campaign. That will kick off Gandhi's terrorists.
Let 'er rip!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It couldn't happen to a more corrupt and dispicable party of villains...
Unless that Nasty fucking cunt dies in prison, she is WINNING! She'll walk off with her $200M campaign warchest as well. Fucking Republicans and that stupid fuck Gowdy should be ashamed of themselves...this shitshow has goone on way too long. LOSERS!
Gowdy was such a spectacular disappointment. Maybe it had something to do with that fucked up haircut. I wound up staring at it instead of listening to anything he said.
What Republican offers improvements for the Israeli-Neocons?
You really ahve to give up this D v R, Progressive vs Social Conservative, etc. Those are certainly centers of some power and budget but far from the entire store.
Recently there was an article about Rahm Emanual's leading the Ds, and how he recruited a bunch of neocon Ds and got few elected because voters wouldn't vote, despite the great AIPAC contributions to their warchests.
Israeli-Neocons are a power center in the world, funded by massive fraud everywhere they touch.
MSM controls all of our minds to levels we can't immagine, they are the frame for everything for nearly everone. The few outside their influence are at least odd by normal standards, and thus of limited social influence.
Myself, for example. My mother-in-law is the only person who has ever listened to me, and that was because she was learning English.
What about your wife?
Clinton is too entrenched in the oligarchy for them to actually go after her. There's something else going on here. I find the private email server to be odd to begin with... why would that even be a thing? And even if that was teh case, don't tell me the NSA didn't fucking know about it. Something stinks here. There's an agenda, and Clinton herself is probably a part of it.
Kolomoisky and the rest of the Oligarchs put up $13 million channeled thru the Clinton Foundation and other probably Canadian affiliates around September 12' / 13' - in prelude to Victoria exiting Benghazi mess to create the Coup de etat in Kiev
I'll bet these O guys were bragging on the phone and the Russians have it all on tape - all the O's ended up as Governors of Oblasts without much issue from the Puppet as POTUS
if you were Putin would you use it?
I think Putin already did. Don't you remember about 3 weeks ago or so Kerry went to Moscow and did a complete about-face on our 4-year old policy for Assad regime change in Syria. Our media barely covered it as if it were no big deal. Means our foreign policy has been wrong for 4 years and a horrible mistake.
Putin has something on Kerry and Barry, the new Marx Brothers.
Clinton has no idea how computers work. Part of it i think is the processes of government are becoming streamlined digitally. The worker lemmings fill out forms, and things get triggered, people get notified, backups get made. Of all the shit she has been into here the only thing she is getting in trouble for is what there is a hard digital copy of. Kind of like how a cop can't tear up a ticket anymore once it gets written on, all tracked. Oldschool hubris is my theory. You can be sure the rest will learn to keep their digital trails clean.
Every security professional assumes EVERYONE read Hill's email.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/lebowski-enlightenment-1/
The question is, why don't we all know that?
By
Mark Topscott
DAILY CALLER
A former U.S. Attorney predicts a Watergate-style showdown in the Department of Justice if Attorney General Loretta Lynch overrules a potential FBI recommendation to indict Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
“The [FBI] has so much information about criminal conduct by her and her staff that there is no way that they walk away from this,” Joseph diGenova, formerly the District of Columbia’s U.S. Attorney, told Laura Ingraham in a Tuesday radio interview. “They are going to make a recommendation that people be charged and then Loretta Lynch is going to have the decision of a lifetime.
“I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general. It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable.”
DiGenova is referring to the Watergate scandal’s “Saturday Night Massacre” Oct. 20, 1973, when President Richard Nixon sacked Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox and Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus resigned in protest.
DiGenova is well-sourced throughout the law enforcement community and his assessment has to be taken seriously. But interviews with other knowledgeable Washington insiders present a somewhat less concrete scenario developing around the former secretary of state.
At the center of Clinton’s difficulties is her use of a private email account and a home-brew server located in her New York home to conduct official business while serving as America’s chief diplomat between 2009 and 2013. Several of her closest aides also used the private server.
Clinton clearly didn’t abide by federal regulations requiring officials like her to use government computers and email accounts to conduct official business and take all of the necessary steps to preserve all such correspondence concerning official business.
As first reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation, Clinton emailed Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden Sept. 7, 2010, asking for advice on what she, President Barack Obama and Democratic campaign officials should do to prevent a Republican victory in the upcoming congressional elections.
“Do you and CAP have any ideas as to how to change the dynamic before it’s too late? Losing the House would be a disaster in every way,” Clinton told Tanden. The CAP chief responded at length with clearly partisan recommendations, noted her supposedly non-partisan think tank’s polling efforts to identify winning themes for Democrats and described her conversations relaying her advice to Obama and other senior White House officials.
On its face, the Sept. 7 Clinton email appears to be a violation of the Hatch Act, which bars partisan political activities by officials using government property while on official duty. But Clinton found a clever way to get around the law, according to a senior non-profit official with extensive experience investigating such activities. The official spoke on condition of anonymity.
First, that official said, by not preserving her email records until after she resigned as secretary of state, Clinton avoided an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which handles Hatch Act violations. The reason is simple — OSC has no authority over former federal employees in Hatch Act matters.
Second, by refusing to comply “with Federal Records Act requirements to use an approved system for preserving records, [Clinton] arguably did not engage in political activities while on official duty or while using federal resources because she communicated with a personal computer,” the official said.
In other words, “had Secretary Clinton used a State Department e-mail address and a government computer and had Secretary Clinton complied with federal record-keeping and open government laws, [her] violations would have been discoverable under the Freedom of Information Act and could have been remedied while Secretary Clinton was still in office.”
Thus, don’t expect a Clinton indictment for a Hatch Act violation.
But Clinton is far from out of the woods, according to a congressional source who is deeply involved in the multiple investigations of Clinton. This source, who also spoke only on condition of anonymity, pointed to the hundreds of Clinton emails that contained classified information.
“Her problem is the sheer volume of emails that were deemed classified,” said this source. “Her first defense was that she didn’t send any classified information in her emails. But that claim has been clearly rendered false because so many of the emails were later marked classified.”
As the Department of State has released the Clinton emails she provided after leaving office, more than a thousand were marked classified after being reviewed prior to their public release. So what about Clinton’s subsequent distinction that she sent no information in her emails that was “marked classified” when it was sent?
“The volume matters because a reasonable person knows somebody who like the Secretary of State, who is allowed herself to classify materials, who has handled it for 25 years or more, at some point the law says you are responsible for recognizing classified material when you see it. That gets to the negligence issue,” the issue said.
Negligence is critical because Clinton signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in 2009 regarding classified information that stated, among much else, that “Sensitive Compartmented Information involves or derives from intelligence sources or methods that is classified or is involved in a classification determination …”
Clinton and several of her closest aides must have read information “derived from intelligence sources or methods” on a daily or near-daily basis.
There is an ominous sentence buried in that agreement Clinton signed: “Nothing in this agreement constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violations.”
What if Clinton is indicted for negligence in handling classified information? DiGenova predicts a showdown within a couple of months that will put Lynch in the same hot seat that prompted Nixon to fire Cox for getting too close to the truth about Watergate.
http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/2015-12-20T030539Z_1_L...)" action="http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/daily_caller/ajax.php" method="post">A Republican with direct knowledge of the investigation predicted political chaos if Lynch doesn’t decide to prosecute Clinton, a chaos that “would be the gift that keeps on giving right through the election.”
With or without resignations of FBI officials to protest such a decision, there would be a blizzard of news releases from congressional GOPers condemning Lynch, followed by hearings in which both the attorney general and FBI Director James Comey would be put under oath and asked about their actions.
Two points.
One is that because the emails have been made public, is there any possibility of a fair trial; purely a legal question, it would probably be the first line of defense. However there may be even more unpleasant details that have not been published.
Second is, if there are no prosecutions, there is no law. Laws have to be universal otherwise they are not laws at all.
Your avatar,,,,the Russian sleep experiment...
Excellent creepy pasta.
This whole thing takes me back: (National Lampoon)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcqjKA1SRpY
"This is L. Patrick Gray of the FBI... I know I'm in there... If I don't come out with my hands up, I'm coming in after me..."
Maybe a change of venue would help..like Nurenmburg..surely 50k dead count for something
If Hillary stumbles, I would not be surprised if the Dems broker their convention and nominate someone who is not even running (Biden? Warren? Or even an unknown?).
Exactly.
It will likely be Warren. As big a communist as Sanders, but with tits and a rottenbox - and then follow the "war on women" shit show.
Warren Buffett.
"Stumbles"? If this cunts' actions from Watergate/Cattle trades to Benghazi/Emails arent "stumbles" then let's just elect Caligula's horse, officially recognise the White House as a whore house and stop with the kidding around.
Unfortunately I believe Caligula's horse would turn the offer down.......LOL
Maybe Katherine's the Great horse is avail3.
Barbara Streisand for President and Raoul Castro or El Chapo for vice-president.
The FBI has 100 times more hard evidenct than they would need for any of us.
If they don't press charges, then there is no FBI.
Truth is we don't know what they have. we don't have any information from trustworthy sources.
Truth is they won't do shit and are part of the problem
....or US Department of Justice.
You mean the Dept. of JUST US??