2016 Was Just Revised Down To The Worst Year For US Productivity Since 1982

Tyler Durden's picture

US non-farm productivity rose 0.9% QoQ in Q2, slightly better than the 0.7% growth expected and a notable bounce off the 'zero' in Q1.This rebound was largely due to disappointment in the growth of unit labor costs (which rose just 0.6% in Q2), but saw an outrageous upward revision in Q1 (from +2.2% to +5.4% QoQ).

And while there was no market reaction to the data, the most surprising facet in today's productivity and labor cost report was not the latest, Q2, data which came in slightly stronger than expected on productivity at 0.9% vs the 0.7% expected, and slightly weaker on labor costs at 0.6%, half the 1.2% expected, but the dramatic revisions to the prior quarter data, which pushed Q1 labor costs from 2.2% to a whopping 5.4%, even as productivity remained relatively subdued at -0.1%, down from the original 0.0%.

Normally, the sharp upward revision to labor costs would have been enough to prompt a bounce in yields and the dollar, suggesting hotter than expected all-in comp (including bonuses and benefits in addition to wages), but today the market has bigger things to worry about.

Meanwhile, going back to the elephant in the room, America's moribund productivity growth, as Bloomberg writes, paltry productivity has been a disappointing characteristic of the current economic expansion that’s managed about 2 percent growth on average over the past eight years. Without more gains in efficiency, the economy’s so-called speed limit -- the pace at which it can expand without stoking inflation -- is reduced. Weaker output per hour has its roots in less corporate investment in equipment and a slower pace of innovation. Subdued productivity also helps explain why companies have been slow to boost worker pay that would boost the standard of living.

Other Details

  • Productivity rose 1.2 percent from the second quarter of 2016; unit labor costs, which are adjusted for efficiency gains, were down 0.2 percent from a year earlier

  • Adjusted for inflation, hourly earnings rose at a 1.9 percent rate last quarter, after increasing at a 2.3 percent pace in the first quarter
  • Output rose at a 3.4 percent rate, the fastest since the first quarter of 2015, following a 1.8 percent gain
  • Hours worked rose at a 2.5 percent pace, the most in more than a year, after a 1.6 percent gain; compensation for each hour worked rose at a 1.6 percent annual pace following 5.5 percent
  • Latest rise in productivity compares with the 1.2 percent average over the period spanning 2007 to 2016
  • Among manufacturers, productivity rose at a 2.5 percent rate in the second quarter on gains at durable-goods factories, after a 0.3 percent gain
  • Annual average productivity change for 2016 revised to 0.1 percent decline from 0.2 percent increase, marking first annual decrease since 1982; productivity gains revised upward for 2014 and 2015 to 1 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively.

Now that's a legacy.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
LawsofPhysics's picture

More good news, better normalize those interest rates and sell that balance sheet Mr. Yellen you criminal cunt!!!

StackShinyStuff's picture

Good enough for the BTFDers to ramp the open. Just watch.

NoDebt's picture

"Everything is great today.  It was actually, upon further reflection (and numbers manipulation), much much worse in the past.  That's why today is so much better."

We are making great strides in the fields of misdirection and obfuscation.

And, of course, beating expectations ALL the way down.

 

 

Blue Balls's picture

The magic negro will make a correction.

GUS100CORRINA's picture

2016 Was Just Revised Down To The Worst Year For US Productivity Since 1982

My response: Yes indeed, revising down 2016 to make 2017 look better. Relativistic thinking vs absolute thinking. Postmodernism 101 in full bloom right before our eyes!!!

FIGURES LIE and LIARS can FIGURE.

END THE FED!!!!

Racer's picture

Fake, fake and more fake "statistics"

Bill of Rights's picture

All the Trump Hating homos heads go boom

Silver Savior's picture

I am anti Trump but not a homo. Still trying to figure out what you are. You always seem angry.

bshirley1968's picture

You should really change your call sign to 'All About Trump".  

You talk as if he is a king rather than a president.  As if he has any control over any of this shit.  He can't get jack shit passed in congress.  The idiot spends his days bickering with the press and trying to get his appointees to do their job.  Got to love that AG pick.......how's that working for him?  He is great with a cell phone and golf time.  When it comes to leadership, policy making, and picking his staff.....not so much.  Right now, the only thing he is king of is clusterfuck. 

libertyanyday's picture

how about a fix? trump is a breath of fresh air to DC. He is hammering mcconnell and ryan......by name.  He calls a spade a spade.  As president he has very little real power other than as a megaphone for what the voters wanted him to do, and he is doing it.  Truimp is our last attempt to right this giant train wreck.  Too bad 52 percent of the electorate is comletely worthless.

P'Od_Accountant's picture

you're a closet fag who wants to suck Trumps dick.

JackMeOff's picture

Waiting for the left to demand a higher minimum wage...

Jason T's picture

The economy is draiing the non productive governement employees and replacing them with goods producing employees.

NoDebt's picture

Oh, yes.  That's the reason.

 

I am Jobe's picture

Beatings wil continue until morale improves. Signed- American Corporations. 

Silver Savior's picture

Morale sucks. People keep leaving and they give us lazy dumbshits as replacements.Then when we exceed sales plan and get a small bonus they up the sales plan the next year. Fuck.

divingengineer's picture

Biggest drop......
Since Lehman?

stitch-rock's picture

Thanks!

I've been missing that hyperbole round these parts..

two hoots's picture

How is rorbotic labor separated from human labor and is robotic labor making up for unproductive employees?  What is the  human only production rate?

DEMIZEN's picture

obviously, you see the issue - but here is the problem: 

 

you take a truck and deliver 1T of goods using a forklift from point A to point B. what is the share of human labor?  tax productivity and a whole lot of incentives are gone.

 

how would you separate productivities without creating more moral hazard incentives?

Silver Savior's picture

I don't want to be productive at work anymore. All it does is give them incentive to keep the skeleton crew well........Skeleton. I think productivity is mostly bad. It only benefits those on top. I don't get more money for being productive either. 

There is just no incentive and if it means I might lose my job somehow then I will gladly cash out and leave. It will be a big burden lifted because I never plan to return to the workforce. What's left of it.

VW Nerd's picture

Maybe the American public are wising up and are not going to trade so much of their time and talent for the fraudulent Bennie/J bucks they are forced to accept in exchange.  If the Bennie/J buck wasn't enforced around the globe at the end of a barrel of a gun and had to compete on it's actual demand value, it would eat shit. Actually, it's already showing.  Thank goodness for ZH!!

DemandSider's picture

Naive, trade surplus countries without an over valued, reserve currency on steroids think they must actually produce something to be productive. Au contraire. Soon, the U.S. will have no domestically owned production at all, and we'll be the most productive country in the world. Then, we can just sit back and let the money roll in.

Moving and Grooving's picture

I'm betting on the 'ends with a bang' theory.

small axe's picture

The Fed's goal has always been a plantation state. Looks like we're doing fine, Janet!

Kenny Drebson's picture

i wonder where the robots are gonna be made.............. CHINA?!?  then china will move their citizens to the US to buy US real estate and gradually start electing poticians favourable to chinese policy/ambition.  now THAT is how you meddle and ultimately dominate a foreign democracy.

Cassandra.Hermes's picture

Yeah we all watch the presidential campaign!

Reading the article I won't put the biased title. Ok productivity didn't grow, but technically productivity is not measurable anymore, most of the products are not physically or fiscally countable anymore

NuYawkFrankie's picture

re ...Worst Year For US Productivity Since 1982

Are we sure that wasn't 1782 ?

I seem to recall - I was about 3 days old at the time - great-great-great-grandpappy tellin me that '82 was a horrendous year for beaver-pelts...  nuttin' t' trade, so had to go the whole winter without so much as a whale-oil lamp to keep warm... no liquor either, with GW's goons smashing up the all the whiskey stills....  not to mention those darn injuns raiding the hutch for a free feed of Rabbit McNuggets (no food-stamps in those days- no siree!)... still having flash-backs at the horror of it all...

You fckers don't know how lucky you are!

A. Boaty's picture

More pain killers will improve productivity. Pop some pills and get back to work!

Jtrillian's picture

Looks like a recovery to me!

Grandad Grumps's picture

If I have said it once, I have said it a billion times, the way they measure productivity is completely meaningless.

Angry White Guy's picture

The American worker has been squeezed like a dry turnip.  Businesses can only extract so much.  We're TIRED, and have no motivation to 'give more'...give more for what?  So the CEO can buy another fucking vacation home?

FUCK off!

moorewasthebestbond's picture

Lying with statistics is an art form.

 

Exhibit A.

insanelysane's picture

But the DNC told us everything was fine during 2016 and that we should elect Hillary to keep everything going in the right direction???

JBPeebles's picture

"Weaker output per hour has its roots in less corporate investment in equipment and a slower pace of innovation"

Doesn't mention stock buybacks. Money is borrowed in order to buy company stock. This shrinks supply. It ups per share price performance. Now of course that means executive pay increases as these packages are tied to short term performance.

The trade off is more  long-term debt. That restricts the ability of companies to borrow in the future. That's important because the higher the cost of future borrowing, the less likely that the company will invest into projects, train workers, and improve future performance. The benefit is narrow--to the very few who see their wage grow even higher relative to the line worker--and the cost is broad--to all long-term investors who will face a declining future ROI due to the malinvestment of capital into stock buybacks.

To understand corporate finance, you have to look at the tradeoff between the cost of borrowing and the projected ROI under a variety of economic scenarios. Should growth remain slow, higher interest rates don't justify taking the risk unless a project can beat the cost of borrowing.. Now low rate do encourage corporate borrowing but that doesn't translate into economic growth--G-- if I--corporate investment--doesn't rise. The other main components of GDP, C--consumer growth--and G--government spending/Keynesianism, have to make up for the lack of I. Otherwise the direction of growth is slow or negative.

The lack of I has a compounding effect. It will slow the general economy absent a rapid rise in G. Trump's budget has an expansion of G in some areas but it's not a broad-based government spending like a New Deal or infrastructure rebuild.

Productivity is due to gross output divided by cost of labor. If productivity rises, then people can make more and the cost of living needn't go up. If people make more money but produce less per hour of labor, then prices will rise.

The shortage of labor appears to be making it harder to get new workers to produce as much as before. Clearly a lack of business hiring and investment in new projects also slows the economy. And unsaid is the huge impact of record low business formation. Having started a retail business, I know well how hard it is to get sales going and the costs of marketing, hiring, tax compliance etc. are simply too much, especially in this lowering of the tide from the demographic trend of aging. How much easier it was to launch a business when the tide lifted all boats--at least there was demand during the Boomer years that is no more.

It's a self-fulfilling doom loop therefore when productivity is sinking. Inflation is imminent. The slow growth prophecy is self-assured when business leaders recognize the trend, restrict investment, and fatten their executive pay in exchange for balance sheet problem.