This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Mike Krieger On Why He Supports Ron Paul
Submitted by Mike Krieger of KAM LP
Why I Support Ron Paul
Now consider that an ideologue is not necessarily a fanatic. What he does is adjust most of his ideas to circumstances, without recognizing the opportunism latent in such ideological adjustments. The opportunism of a great statesman, on the other hand, rests on principles. What John Morley once wrote about Edmund Burke may be applied to Churchill: “He changed his stand; but he never changed his ground.” Or what the aged Metternich once wrote: that an idea is like a fixed gun in a fortress, ready to fire and to hit error in one straight direction; but a principle is like a gun mounted on a fixed but revolving base, capable of firing at error in all directions.
- John Lukacs in Churchill: Visionary, Statesman, Historian
Ron Paul
I hold a deeply held view of Ron Paul as an honorable, genuine and trustworthy American statesman. In fact, I cannot really think of anyone else in the tepid cesspool of American politics today whom I could even remotely categorize as a statesman as opposed to a run of the mill politician (or ideologue as Mr. Lucas puts it). Mr. Lucas moves on to explain that to an ideologue it is current ideas that matter, while to a statesman it is certain principles that matter. He states that an ideologue’s view of the world and its inhabitants is political, while to a statesman it is historical. These simple sentences are what I believe inherently separate Ron Paul at his very core from everyone else currently running for president. This is merely what separates the man’s character from the others. This is reason enough to consider him, but not reason enough to vote for him. His ideas about liberty, war and economics also separate him from the pack and it is his strongly held principles on these subjects that in my view make him the only one capable and with enough conviction to help heal this country’s wounds, get us back on the right and moral path and foster real change as opposed to a campaign slogan.
Why the Elite Establishment or TPTB Hate Ron Paul
In case you have been asleep under a rock for the last few months let me fill you in. The elite in this country that control all forms of mainstream communication in the United States as well as both fake political parties are having a panic attack in response to Ron Paul’s surging popularity. There is a simple reason for this. On the important issues, the issues that affect your freedom and economic future he does not tow the party line of TPTB. As I have written about endlessly for almost five years now, the Federal Reserve is the mechanism of American empire and this institution’s policies are the primary reason the middle class in America is on the verge of being completely destroyed. It is the mechanism for transferring wealth and power to a smaller and smaller faction of the population through persistent inflation. As Keynes wrote: “Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”
Remember, the Fed creates dollars out of thin air and then forces countries to accept this counterfeit, backed by nothing, and consistently devalued money for their resources. While many people now understand this concept, what most U.S. citizens still do not seem to understand or want to accept is that it is not in the national interests of other countries to accept this certain to be vaporized currency for their hard produced goods. Fortunately for us, there is a solution to that. Support (or install via coup) if necessary despotic puppet regimes around the world to accept this monetary system. Our Federal Reserve system and indeed our way of life is supported through the barrel of a gun pointed at every other “sovereign” nation on the planet. If you step out of line you will be deemed a terrorist state and we will single you out and fight for sanctions on you and then if none of that makes you fall in line we will start bombing you. We will say that you commit atrocities against your people and you probably do (although we were also probably your ally recently despite the atrocities). Make no mistake about it. Every country we every go after militarily relates to defending the Federal Reserve system. Since oil being priced in dollars is the key to the system, we are always on the verge of invading oil producing countries that we do not already have under puppet control. Israel is merely another U.S. colony. We defend it so vociferously not because of the Jewish lobby but because they are a strategic asset in the oil rich Middle East that we use to defend the Federal Reserve system and the American empire.
If you Attack the Federal Reserve you are Racist, Anti-Semitic and Possibly a Terrorist
Let me fill you in on a little pattern that I have noticed. In American politics you are allowed to criticize pretty much anything except the Federal Reserve system. This is the third rail of American politics. Why? Because this is by far and away the most important issue on planet earth. Republicans will run around yelling about cutting back on government and preserving “freedom” but they NEVER EVER attack the Federal Reserve. The only time we have ever seen this in recent memory was this political season in the Republican primary and that is only because opportunists like Rick Perry saw it was a popular issue. Ron Paul on the other hand means business when it comes to the Fed. He has been criticizing it for decades and it is not just talking points. He is the only one out there that actually understands how the monetary system works and how it is destroying this nation.
So isn’t it interesting that whenever a popular movement with anti-Fed elements comes out it is not attacked based on the ideas, but it is immediately categorized as racists or anti-Semitic. Why? Because TPTB want to be able to turn people off as quickly as possible. They know that if people actually do a little research they will see the truth. This is why the tea party was branded that way immediately by the mainstream media fake left. This is also why Ron Paul is being attacked the same way. They do not want to talk about the substance of ant-Fed arguments. They want the whole thing to disappear as quickly as possible.
What also has been very interesting to see is how the mainstream media fake right went after OWS. OWS is a huge deal in American history because it was when elements on the other side of the political spectrum really started to attack the Fed and banking system for the first time. Sure many, many of the ideals behind the tea parry and OWS are totally different, but what is far more important and dangerous to TPTB are the similarities. Both are against bank bailouts and have anti-Federal Reserve elements. Thus, the media had to attack them as well. They used the “lazy, ignorant, imbecile meme” for these guys.
Ok, so now we have their entire playbook. Any popular movement is not to be listened to. If it comes from the heartland it is to be categorized as being dominated by “racists, anti-Semites and survivalists.” If it emerges from the urban areas on the coasts it is to be deemed as being dominated by “ lazy, unemployed, morons who are probably high on drugs and want free stuff.” Most important to TPTB is that these two groups remain separated and the goal is to create as much animosity between them as possible so they never realize they agree on the key issues. Divide and conquer is being used on American citizens in America. This tells me one thing. The criminals in charge on Wall Street and Washington D.C. are afraid. Very afraid.
I am Jewish and I Support Ron Paul…There are MANY of us
When I saw this http://www.businessinsider.com/morning-joe-there-is-2011-12 the other day, where Joe Scarborough basically labeled Ron Paul supporters as anti-Semitic I became infuriated. First of all, I have been a Ron Paul supporter for years and I am well connected to many of his key supporters all over the country. I think I might have an idea as to whether they are anti-Semitic or not and they are certainly not. Meanwhile Scarborough hasn’t been in the Ron Paul circles but yet…“On Morning Joe this morning Joe Scarborough revealed that he's always heard from friend who support Paul that there is an underlying strain of anti-semitism to Paul events, which some in the past have tied to Paul's anti-Wall Street, anti-Fed views.” Huh? This is journalism? Some anonymous friend says Ron Paul rallies are anti-Semitic? Who is this friend and why doesn’t he come out publicly? This is like a middle school rumor-mill. Sadly, that is what the mainstream media has devolved to nowadays.
When I saw this clip I felt the need to respond. These sorts of tactics are going to backfire big time. It got me so riled up it inspired me to write this email as well as to make the decision to dedicate much more of my time this year to politics rather than the markets. 2012 is a year to fight these guys in that realm and I plan on being relentless. This clip was an insult to me as someone who is Jewish and to all of those Jews I know personally that support Mr. Paul. What is so ironic about this whole anti-Semitic argument is that the guy that is seen as the most influential figure in Austrian economics (the economic perspective that Ron Paul adheres to) is Lugwig Von Mises. Guess what? He was Jewish. How about Murray Rothbard, the economist that popularized Austrian economics in the last couple of decades? Also Jewish. Then during Ron’s 2008 run his economic advisor was Peter Schiff. Another Jew. For an anti-Semite this guy sure surrounds himself with a lot of Jews. To those that hear something on mainstream media or read one of the newsletters and become turned off I ask one thing. Read his books. They are short. If you still feel turned off at least it is on the actual issues and then I can live with that conclusion.
Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy Views are “Dangerous.” Dangerous to Who?
There is one issue where the RINOs (Republicans in Name Only) will actually engage Ron Paul on the issues and that is foreign policy. They try to portray him as an “isolationist” but in reality he is Anti-Empire. He believes in strong national defense he just doesn’t believe in constant preemptive war. He also points out that it is hypocritical to support one totalitarian regime while bombing another. For these rational views he is attacked vehemently by the likes of Gingrich. The dirty little secret however is that some of Ron Paul’s strongest support emanates from the U.S. military. This makes sense. At the end of the day, most of these war mongers in both the Republican and Democrat party have never fought in a war and they know their kids would never be sent overseas to die, yet are such tough guys and war mongers with OTHER PEOPLE’S KIDS.
The fact that the military is strongly supportive of Ron Paul’s foreign policy is so terrifying to the elite cowards in this nation that CNN resorted to outright censorship the other day. When this active duty soldier who has been serving his country for the last ten years in war time started to discuss his criticism of American war mongering he was immediately cut off. See this incredible clip here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TSxm2V8aVQ&feature=g-all-u&context=G2989....
Oh so you think this guy is a one off? Nope. Check this out. http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contriball.php?cycle=2012 The armed forces are Ron Paul’s three biggest supporters. Look at who is backing Romney. Wall Street has clearly made a bet on who its next puppet will be.
Why Ron Must Run Third Party
I support Ron’s attempt to get the Republican nomination even though I recognize that hell will freeze over before the Republican establishment allows him be chosen. Nevertheless, it is a smart move as he is exposing the lack of ideas amongst the Republican field and exposing them as the empty suits that they are. Other than him, they will all be puppets of TPTB just like Obama. I think that simply his running is changing the debate and converting more people to his perspective.
So the big question is what should he do after the Republicans choose their new Wall Street puppet Romney. In my opinion, he must run as a third party candidate. No matter what he will not be returning to Congress so this is really his last shot and I actually think he can win as a third party candidate. Just imagine a debate between Romney, Obama and Paul. How will they respond to Paul’s strong defense of civil liberties. Or his attacks on the Federal Reserve system. Or his anti-preemptive war stance? They can’t and it will expose Romney and Obama to be the same guy on the important issues at play today. They will be shown once and for all as the empty suits that they are. Even if he doesn’t win, turning this whole thing around will not happen overnight. It is a process and him running as a third party candidate will further expose the two party system as the sham that it is and further accelerate the demise of both parties. In fact, I already think that by 2016 the Democratic party will be essentially a shadow of its former self and the Republicans may be as well if they continue on the path they are on much longer. To paraphrase Shakespeare. The tides in the affairs of men are changing. Neither political party can comprehend it.
Finally, let’s remember that it is both bought and paid for parties that hate Ron Paul and that is because he is the only genuine threat to the establishment. As soon as this man topped the polls in Iowa the mainstream media went into total freak out mode. Watch this clip that shows how both the fake right and fake left media portrayed the Iowa caucus in 2008 and now 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soHAOVZzXtA&feature=watch_response
Finally, Jon Stewart several months ago joked about how the media systematically ignores Ron Paul. http://www.infowars.com/jon-stewart-scolds-media-for-ignoring-rep-ron-pa...
Welcome Aboard
In conclusion, I want to welcome the hundreds of new people on my email list. Those that are joining come from all over planet earth, in every field imaginable and I believe represent key players in helping to create a new and better world. So welcome all of you to the list and feel free to forward this and every other email I write to as many people as possible. We have a moment right here and right now. Let’s do some good.
Peace and wisdom,
Mike
»
- 20590 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
I like RP's moral attributes as regarding the FED and our money, but don't buy his stance on foreign policy. i.e., his isolationism. I support the existence of Israel and believe we need someone with strong convictions about her, not so much the gov't of Israel, but her people. And that means some type of (military) support. Israel is our ally. I'm not happy with the choices of GOP candidates, but know that politics is not the answer.
1) Why do you equate the advocacy of a generally peaceful, NON-INTERVENTIONISTIC foreign policy, and the repudiation of pre-emptive war, with "isolationism"? Is EVERY other country other than the USA therefore also "isolationist" for not engaging in overseas nation-building, military occupations and wars of aggression (which actually undermine our nation's financial and military security)?
There are options --- an infinite range of them, in fact ---- between being an extortionistic bully on the one hand, and a hermit living in a cave on some mountain on the other. I suspect that you have never given much thought to any alternative possibilities for US foreign policy other than the wildly simplistic, black-and-while false dichotomy with which you presented us.
2) To call somebody an "ally" is to presume a two-way relationship. In what ways is the vast financial and military support for Israel by the USA contributing to the safely and security of the USA? In other words, we all know just how much (the federal government of) the USA does for Israel --- but what does Israel do to further the interests of the USA? I see mostly negatives in this relationship for the USA (as for most of our foreign entanglements), in which to be honest the state of Israel is more reminiscent of a parasite than any putative "ally".
I equate peaceful non-interventionist foreign policy with isolationism because I believe the world is basically a battleground. And when I say "world" I mean the cosmos or the present evil world system in place controled by the Devil. (Oh my God, I cant believe you used that word, you are so... medieval! Yes, I did.)
Yes, this world containing God's wonderful creation, Man (though in a fallen state) is a battleground over the title deed between the Devil and God. The book of Revelation shows it clearly. There is no let up in that battle. This is why you can't have a peaceful foreign policy. If the US tried to do this, it would fail utterly. The US pulling out of Iraq, out of everywhere would never bring peace.
No, my friend, that PEACE of which you speak and for which all our hearts pine is for another age. THY KINGDOM COME, the Messianic Kingdom, which is another reason for supporting Israel: the remnant of Israel will be the ones who bring Christ back in the second coming, when they repent in prayer at Armageddon, when the gentile nations are trying too wipe her out.
Shalom!
I think you take an unrealistically dark, cynical, morbid view of the world than is justified by both fact and history.
To believe that the world, violent as it is and can be, is "basically a battleground" seems to assume the corollary on the smaller scale, that society itself is similarly a battleground. And yet, with all the crime and violence within our society, it is only a VERY small minority who engage in such antisocial behavior. Just think of all the daily activities and interactions in which you regularly engage: how many of them are determined through the exercise of violence? I am willing to bet that you would answer "none", as would the vast majority of people. Virtually all of your societal interactions throughout life, in fact, are guided by the opposite principle, peaceful exchange and cooperation.
So it is on the international stage, all kneejerk assumptions to the contrary. Most nations are NOT at war with most other nations at any given moment (the USA being the most guilty in that respect), and again, if you think that foreswearing Hitleresque pre-emptive war and aggressive military interventionism somehow equates to "isolationism", then I will again point out that that is precisely the foreign policy of EVERY other nation in the world today, the USA excepted --- even China, Russia, Iran, Syria, and North Korea are vastly less involved, particularly militarily, in the internal affairs of their neighbors than is the USA.
Please note that I am NOT claiming that the USA, in withdrawing its occupation forces from around the world, and renouncing its policy of aggressive, pre-emptive war, is thereby automatically in and of itself going to usher in some peaceful utopia, but that is just a strawman argument of your own creation in the first place. To turn away from our interventionistic foreign policy does NOT mean in ANY way giving up on the true defense of this nation --- it would, in fact, finally FOCUS on honest defense, and not the financial ruinous and counterproductive offense that it has for the last 65 years.
I'm sorry, but I don't think you have even begun to provide a rational defense for your baseless claim, nor for your slur against those who are not willing to automatically, gullibly and sheepishly follow their sociopathic leaders into war.
Even Krishna (arguably the Hindu God of Love), urged his disciple Arjuna, to fight (in the Mahabharata). There are some things worth fighting for, but the Zionist gobbledygook in "Revelations" is NOT one of them. You're arguing with a Zionist here, my friend.
The sign & motto of the British Colony in America became a segmented poisonoous snake with the inscriptions: JOIN or DIE, and DON'T TREAD on ME as a warning to all, step on me and you will die. This was a defensive posture, thus we still have a "Defense" dept today. But whether what we now do is actually defensive or offensive is in question. I think it is increasingly becoming offensive to Americans and much of the world, what America does in order to meet her energy needs. But other nations are desiring the goods too, so can't we just share nicely? This is not how the world works. Many of them would not share hegemony with us either. The US has been a good nation in God's sight for many years, good to His people and good to the world, indeed emblematic of the universal church (Catholic and Protestant). Other nations have terrible histories of abusing their own people and they would wipe us out, given the chance.
You can enjoy your garden because of the blood of others.
Absolutely NO ONE should be looking forward to the fulfillment of "Revelations!"
Rather, go forth and alleviate some suffering NOW: http://www.worldvision.org
"Faith without works is dead." A lot of Christians are gonna be totally surprised if "Revelations" ever comes to pass, oh clueless one!
See Hannity tonight? Posted the Iowa results and just removed Ron paul, showed Newt in third place... welcome to Fox Nazi, home of "Goebbels" Hannity... that A-Hole needs to be hung with piano wire.
I have to wonder just how truly brain-dead the sheeple have to be to not even notice this kind of egregious bullshit any more.
I mean, damn, in 2003 I did not even own a computer, nor had never surfed the internet, and yet just by watching all the mindless, unquestioned cheerleading, and rote parroting of Bush administration talking points, by the so-called "mainstream media" for the grossly unnecessary and shamefully Hitleresque invasion of Iraq, I could finally fully grasp and accept that the TV "news" was more propaganda than anything else. Are people REALLY that dumb, that they can't see through the constant drumbeat of war and distortion and suppression of the truth? REALLY?
Are people REALLY that dumb, that they can't see through the constant drumbeat of war and distortion and suppression of the truth? REALLY?
Afraid so. If they actually had to take up a rifle and do the fighting themselves, a lot of fake spines would be revealed.
I think people are less dumb than numb. . . check out the usage of pharma, particularly "pain pills" or "anti-anxiety" drugs - the stats show a heavy move upward, and some people are on multiple scrips. . .
combine that with poor quality food, and TeeVee - it's a wonder some are even able to talk. . . oh, wait. . .
Time to hit him with a few more snowballs.
Yeah I saw that pathetic so called conservative pull the Ron Paul doesn't exist magic show too. Let's get one thing straight, Ron Paul running for president has flushed out all the true wannabe conservatives and put them under the microscope. Sean Hannity you should be fucking embarassed... I'm a person that has listened to endless hours of your shows, i'm talking thousands of hours and lately i'm embarassed to even mention your fucking name. Thanks alot for hoodwinking me all these years and actually making me believe you were one of us. You are a fucking coward in every sense of the word and backed by the syndicate just like the rest of them. I see you pretty much have cut your ties with Glenn Beck since he backed Ron Paul. How can you support the likes of Newt Gingrich after all the controvesry he created during the Bush Administration? All I can say is I'm A peaceful person, never fight or downgrade anybody for any reason, however evertime I see a pic of Newt with his triple neck and those jowls, all I want to do is punch the fucking piece of shit in the jowels and watch the " chicken hawk" pout. Sorry Sean, I deleted my live feed to your show today because honestly, I finally realized your true agenda doesn't give a fuck about me or my family only you and your own teleprompter that nobody has revealed yet!
Nice!
I can hear the honest anger and betrayal in your post, and I only wish that each and every dishonest, malevolent, traitorous bastard like Hannity, Billow Wryly, Chris Wallace, Chris Matthews, Dana Bash, and indeed just about every other corporate media parrot, could read and hear it from you, and the millions of other people like you, in your own voice and to their very faces.
And please lets not forget that Ron Paul planted the seeds to the Tea Party Movement!!!
Welcome to the (fight) club.
BREAKING STORY!!
Hey, just got back from our local Ron Paul meeting and lo and behold, met this Judy lady tonight who just sprang this story on us. Yeah, this lady caught the bad fingers in Iowa and they couldn't there in Iowa? Amazing when you think of it. Here is a real game changer. Will it matter?
Iowa discrepancy that could change the Caucus outcome:
http://www.watchthevote2012.com/AffidavitTrue.htm
We will win with delegates. Please donate to Ron Paul and spread the link below. Military Vets plan a march on DC; Feb 20th.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?346856-Proposal-Veterans-and-Active-Duty-March-for-Ron-Paul&p=3965576#post3965576
Here's some raw meat from:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/01/20121475630363232.html
Tear it to pieces:
Brooklyn, NY - Ron Paul has two problems. One is his and the larger conservative movement of which he is a part. The other is ours - by which I mean a left that is committed to both economic democracy and anti-imperialism.
Ron Paul's problem is not merely the racist newsletters, the close ties with Lew Rockwell, his views on abortion, or even his stance on the 1964 Civil Rights Act - though these automatically disqualify him from my support. His real problem is his fundamentalist commitment to federalism, which would make any notion of human progress in this country impossible. [Dontcha just luv it? Stychokiller]
Federalism has a long and problematic history in this country - it lies at the core of the maintenance of slavery and white supremacy; it was consistently invoked as the basis for opposition to the welfare state; it has been, contrary to many of its defenders, one of the cornerstones of some of the most repressive moments in our nation's history - and though liberals used to be clear about its regressive tendencies, they've grown soft on it in recent years. As the liberal Yale constitutional law scholar Akhil Reed Amar put it not so long ago:
As I've argued repeatedly on this blog and elsewhere, the path forward for the left lies in the alliance between active social movements on the ground and a strong national state. [Well, without Big Brother, just WHO would take the Progressives seriously? StychoKiller] There is simply no other way, at least not that I am aware of, to break the back of the private [Private? Seriously? Stychokiller] autocracies that oppress us all.
Even people, no, especially people who focus on Paul's position on the drug war should think about the perils of his federalism. There are 2 million people in prison in this country. At most, 10 per cent of them are in federal prisons; the rest are in state and local prisons. If Paul ended the drug war, maybe 1/2 of those in federal prison would be released. Definitely a step, but it has to be weighed against his radical embrace of whatever it is that states and local governments do.
Paul is a distinctively American type of libertarian: one that doesn't have a critique of the state so much as a critique of the federal government. That's a very different kettle of fish. I think libertarianism is problematic enough - in that it ignores the whole realm of social domination (or thinks that realm is entirely dependent upon or a function of the existence of the state or thinks that it can be remedied by the persuasive and individual actions of a few good souls) - but a states-rights-based libertarianism is a social disaster.
So that's his problem.
Our problem-and again by "our" I mean a left that's social democratic (or welfare state liberal or economically progressive or whatever the hell you want to call it) and anti-imperial - is that we don't really have a vigorous national spokesperson for the issues of war and peace, an end to empire, a challenge to Israel, and so forth, that Paul has in fact been articulating. The source of Paul's positions on these issues are not the same as ours (again more reason not to give him our support). But he is talking about these issues, often in surprisingly blunt and challenging terms. Would that we had someone on our side who could make the case against an American empire, or American supremacy, in such a pungent way.
This, it's clear, is why people like Glenn Greenwald say that Paul's voice needs to be heard. Not, Greenwald makes clear, because he supports Paul, but because it is a terrible comment - a shanda for the left - that we don't have anyone on our side of comparable visibility launching an attack on American imperialism and warfare. (Recalling what I said in the context of the death of Christopher Hitchens, I suspect this has something to do with our normalisation and acceptance of war as a way of life.) In other words, we need to listen to Paul, not because he’s worthy of our support, and certainly not because the reasons that underlie his positions on foreign policy are ours, but because he reveals what’s not being said, or not being said enough, on our side.
There is a long history in this country of the left not paying too much attention to the ways in which our leaders do things that set the stage for worse things to come. J Edgar Hoover got a tremendous amount of traction under FDR and the New Deal because he was perceived to be a spit-and-polish, professional crime fighter. So trusted and hailed was he by liberals and progressives - when he worked for their leaders - that it was none other than Arthur Schlesinger, in The Vital Center (1949), who urged Americans to put their trust in Hoover rather than in the Red hunters of the far right:
In 1950, William Keller reports in his essential The Liberals and J Edgar Hoover, while Truman was still president, Hubert Humphrey took to the floor of the Senate to declare:
Yet, as Ellen Schrecker rightly argued in Many Are the Crimes, her definitive account of McCarthyism:
In the last week, liberals and progressives have been arguing about these issues; Digby has been especially cogent and worth listening to. The only thing I have to add to that debate is this: both sides are right. Not in a the-truth-lies-somewhere-in-between sort of way. Nor in a can't-we-all-get-along sort of way. No, both sides are right in the sense that I laid out above: Ron Paul is unacceptable, and it’s unacceptable that we don't have someone on the left who is raising the issues of imperialism, war and peace, and civil liberties in as visible and forceful a way.
Corey Robin teaches political science at Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center. He is the author of The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin and Fear: The History of a Political Idea. His articles have appeared in the New York Times, Harper's, the London Review of Books, and elsewhere. He received his PhD from Yale and his A.B. from Princeton. You can read Corey's blog here.
Oh ok. I get it. Ron Paul is right, but for the wrong reasons.
Waiter - another - and make it a double.
[mumbling] Mother Mary and Joseph.
But more christian louboutins store and more discount christian louboutin shoes sale challenges ahead cheap louboutins but often at waiting for christian louboutin boots me to challenge, will face in people, in the christian louboutin discount face of the thing. which one are not simple to deal cheap christian louboutin pumps with, but I have to face, and still have to deal with. http://www.cheaplouboutinsssssstores.com/
Draw water christian louboutin pumps smoke, the pen sales louboutins with ink stones, paint with all three louboutins sales thousand dreams. Clear anxious on fu, in the night, and between looking back, thin christian louboutin ankle boots film of window edge, do not see the old appearance. Ink christian louboutin boots really lock, drunk sleepless, two lines were crying. http://www.salescheaplouboutins.com/
I endure injustice, wanted moncler outlet to mean to say I just graduated comrade, competent moncler jackets 2011 soon, but with my efforts women moncler jackets have get an electrician moncler jackets for men title, I also go to a number moncler women vests of units in practice, the motor, circuit men moncler vest board, fitter, welder contact with many http://www.cheapmonclerssjackets.com/
A Zionist is not a Jew. A Zionist is a Zionist, period.
5 pts extra credit for those who cite the author of this statement.
Robert Kennedy Jr's last appearance on TV, was on Keith Olbermann's MSNBC farce, in which Robert Jr ascribed the neocon agenda as a "dominion heresy".
Xenophobic behavior, like religious or racial fears, is an intentionally conditioned response by the power structures chairing the boards of the Fractional Reserve War Usury. The intent of the conditioning is to divide us and prevent the formation of a united humanity.
Israel was not behind 911, the Houses of the War Usury are responsible for that crime. The war Usury is responsible for all crimes and War. Americans and Israelis share the same conditioned weaknesses: Exceptionalism, Consumerism, Vanity and toleration for oligarchical fascism masked as democracy.
The actors of all the characters in Cecil B Demille's Easter Eve fantasy, The Ten Commandments, if it were to have been anthropologically accurate, would have been black.
Albert Einstein, a German Jew, protested and condemned the establishment Israel in a letter to the NYT in 1948.
The Diary of Anne Frank is fiction. Called my youngest child's literature teacher after learning his class had spent 2 weeks on the holocaust and that he was being taught the content of the "Diary" was factual. The teacher knew the "Diary" was fiction and confided that the itinerary was forced on all schools in the district. Again, the War Usury does this with the intent to condition either a guilt complex and an acceptance of the genocide of millions of Muslims for no cause, or to "breed" discontent with "Jews". In both cases the goal is to divide our humanity,
In a war ravaged nation, like WWII Germany, where there was no infrastructure, the gentry will ultimately congregate at food medical and services distribution centers: ie, a refugee center is no different than a so called concentration camp.
The infamous Mr Schindler, before he became a high income Nazi hunter was a high income Nazi Arms manufacturer who used Jewish slaves, proving one can, indeed, work both sides of the fence have one's cake and eat it too.
The real history, not the War Usury's media driven revisionism, of pre WWI and pre WWII is that Americans, including American Jews, supported Germany against England in both cases.
Ron Paul adviser, Bruce Fein, is both a Jew and a constitutional scholar. When Dr Paul does become our next president, one can only hope Bruce Fine is Attorney General. Anyone who watched Mr. Fein in front of congressional panels during the Bush Era Iraqi genocide, knows Mr. Fein has been biting at the bit to prosecute neocons for those, and other, crimes.
It bears repeating, this is an excellent ZH article. Don't know if Mr Krieger, this article's author, or a guy names Mises coauthored with Dr. Paul o the subject of Austrian Economics. Either one of them would make a great economic adviser or cabinet chair. God speed to both.
And speaking of Dr. Paul, did anybody other than me and a whole bunch of Iowans think it strange that Sanitarium came out of nowhere and to within 8 points of Romney? Even Sanitarium looked surprised as shit. Did anybody except me and a bunch of Iowans think it Strange that Dr. Paul was not the top caucus vote getter? Well it is getting pretty hot and some are calling for a recount. Some strange stuff went on - like registering at caucuses without photo ID then voting at the caucus (or as many caucus sites as the buses could make before they shutdown.
It's not just establishment GOP that are worried to the bone regarding Dr. Paul's acquisition of the executive pen, a whole bunch of contractors working for the War Usury are shitting bricks.
Dr. Paul can and will win this for us. When was the last time you donated to his campaign or did some phone work or volunteered or told a complete stranger "Vote for Paul"? At any rate ..
God Speed America
God Speed Dr. Paul
And, in the tradition of ZH's very own Dog Daze, God Speed Bitches and keep a stiff upper lip!
Ron Paul - Crazy Eddie for our time. Break the cycle.
[disclosure - I have donated to his campaign.]