On the three month bankruptcy anniversary of the company whose rehypothecation gimmicks will one day be seen as a harbinger of everything that is broken with the multi-trillion ponzi system, but not just yet despite loud warnings otherwise, we are getting close to a final verdict of where the $1.2 billion (and possibly more as originally predicted by Zero Hedge - see below) in commingled client money may have gone. Note the use of the passive voice because using the active, as in money that MF Global executives stole from clients, is prohibited in a legal system in which nobody goes to jail for something as modest as $1.2 billion in theft. That verdict? "Vaporized." No really (and yes, in the passive voice of course). From the WSJ: "As the sprawling probe that includes regulators, criminal and congressional investigators, and court-appointed trustees grinds on, the findings so far suggest that a "significant amount" of the money could have "vaporized" as a result of chaotic trading at MF Global during the week before the company's Oct. 31 bankruptcy filing, said a person close to the investigation." Uh huh... Because money simply vaporizes. Which means one of two things: i) the "vaporization" is merely the phrase that so called investigators use to avoid the far more troubling sounding "stolen" as it would imply guilt, something which the former NJ governor and Goldman CEO (and not to mention JP Morgan which most likely was on the receiving end of the $1.2 billion + transaction) will, under guidance from counsel, sternly disagree with, or ii) the capital markets are such an unprecedented and manipulated fraud, that nobody has any clue at any moment, where any client money is, and that any residual capital still "invested" in mythical representations of "assets", which are likely rehypothecated so many times, that not even Bank of America's robosigning division would have a clue where to start unraveling, will promptly be converted into tangible manifestations of capital. So when someone asks what happened to stock market volume, and to investor confidence in the "stock market" feel free to use just that phrase: "it vaporized."
WSJ "explains [7]" how $1.2 billion "vaporized"
Many officials now believe certain employees at MF Global dipped into the "customer segregated account" that the New York company was supposed to keep separate from its own assets—and then used the money to meet demands for more collateral or to unfreeze assets at banks and other counterparties as they grew more concerned about their financial exposure to MF Global.
Investigators also are examining other scenarios that have gained traction in recent weeks, such as the possibility that MF Global suffered steep losses on investments made using customer money. Officials investigating the case have looked into whether such investments were appropriate under rules at the time.
As money poured out of MF Global, much of it likely passed through J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and other banks where the securities firm had accounts, as well as trade-clearing partners such as Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. and LCH.Clearnet Group Ltd., people familiar with the matter said.
Those companies have denied being knowingly in possession of any missing MF Global money, and any efforts to make them fill the hole would face daunting hurdles. And because the firms usually were middlemen between MF Global and other counterparties, the funds they touched were then scattered widely, complicating the search.
So one hand, nobody at MF Global was responsible because every member of lower, to middle to upper management was responsible (and certainly not Jon Corzine), secondly, not one regulator was responsible, because every regulator was equally oblivious of the grand theft occurring right under their noses. Finally nobody on the receiving end of this fund flow was responsible, as the money could have ratably gone to one of an infinite number of destinations. And here we were thinking that dilution is only applicable to what the central banks do to their currency. Little did we know that it is the de facto global modus operandi for the systemic fraud endemic in modern finance, whereby not one person is held accountable, as otherwise everyone would be held accountable.
Brilliant.
Finally, it is becoming once again apparent that the final tally will be at least $1.2 billion. To wit:
But hundreds of millions of customer dollars are potentially snarled in litigation with other parts of MF Global, including its U.K. arm, and U.S. officials might never be able to recover those funds. As a result, Mr. Giddens believes the shortfall is at least $1.2 billion, though regulators at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and CME Group Inc., parent of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and New York Mercantile Exchange, have estimated the total is smaller than that.
Visually:
[8]
And from Zero Hedge November 1 [9]:
Doing some quick inverse addition and we get a (w)hole of $5.45 less $2.5 less $1.5 or $1.45 billion. In other words, the theft by MF Global was not stealing hunderds of millions form its customers: it has stolen a whopping $1.5 billion! For those confused, this is not a rogue loss of $1.5 billion, something which was enough to send UBS' Kweku to prison. This is outright theft resulting from illegally commingled accounts. Our only question is will $1.5 billion in theft be enough for the first real perp walk of an Obama-friendly Wall Street executive?
It is becoming increasingly difficult to even care anymore; it is also becoming increasingly certain that any client capital in the "markets" will sooner or later disappear in one of many comparable bankruptcies, and there just like here, nobody will be held accountable, as holding someone accountable will actually expose to everyone the whole scam that is modern ponzinomics, in which binary representations of money in the forms of ones and zeros, not only don't exist in the real world, but is in effect collateralized by the same ever smaller pool of dwindling hard assets. Not only that, but someone may actually, gasp, go to jail.
And that is not allowed under a legal system which is in bed with the very financial system that preserves it and funds it.
Ironically, it is the conspiracy theory movie, "The International [10]" that captures precisely the interplay between the terminally broken and beyond corrupt legal system and modern financial markets:
WEXLER
Justice is not possible.
SALINGER
Why not?
WEXLER
Because, Agent Salinger, your idea of justice is an illusion. Understand the very system that you serve and protect will never allow anything to happen to Skarssen [i.e., Jon Corzine] or the bank [i.e., insert any current bank]. On the contrary. The system guarantees the IBBC's [i.e., insert any current bank] safety because everyone is involved.
And that should answer all questions about how $1.2 billion can simply "vaporize."