The Death Of The Deadbeat Carriers, Part 2 - Apple Avoideth, Google Destroyeth

Google Destroyeth

I have alledged that Google is MASSIVELY undervalued and grossly misunderstood. This is actually a very good thing for Google, for management has demonstrated that they are in this for the long term and the less resistance they get to their Borg-like initiatives, the better. This is probably a good thing for investors as well, for it the market corrects (as it damn well should) astute financial types can pick up massive parts of the future of computing and data at very, very low prices. All it would take is time and realization of reality to accrue significant value appreciation. Many know of Google's Android, Google's search and ad networks, Google's YouTube and TV initatives and Google's cloud offerings, but most are not aware of Google Fiber! The following is taken directly (with my annotations) from Google's Asheville blog:

“Google fiber” is shorthand for the “Google Fiber for Communities [22]” project.

The goal of the project is... 

... to build a fiber optic network – your connection to the Internet, more or less – right to your door.  This network would be different than what you have now in that it would be a lot better and more stable.  It would be, for example, 100x faster than the maximum speeds you have now and it would be open source (think the opposite of a toll road).  It would also be capable of carrying enough stuff so that TV, phone, web would all fit in one connection.  And it would all be very fast. Google has stated that they are willing to spend up to 500 million dollars (probably split among a few spots) and then charge for Internet access at a “competitive rate.”

Like you, I thought Google was a search company. Why do they want to build an experimental network and sell me broadband services?[tweetmeme source="googleavl" only_single=false]

That's right! Google is looking to directly commoditize the broadband carriers, just as they did the news organizations, the online ad agencies, currently doing the smart phone industry... No, Google is not a search engine company, as I have said so often in the The mobile computing wars series [23]. Google is a data company, and as such, anything that has to do with the movement, storage, organization, manipulation, control and intelligence of said data, Google either has their hand prints on it or are reaching for it. May the ignorant, and the slower moving competiion, beware!!! Again, excerpted directly from the Google AVL blog [24], which is the blog that is detailing Google's buildout of the high speed fiber network to the doorstep in the city of Asheville as well as Kansas City, both of whom competed against many other cities for this privilege. That's right! This is not a pie in the sky initiative, this is something that is being built right now by a company that is not know for taking its time... I  stronly suggest interested parties visit this site [25] after persuing my thoughts on Google [14], in order to get a clearer view of the BIG PICTURE...

[25]

1. Google needs lots of data so they can organize it.

Google doesn’t want to be a broadband provider (my opinion), but they do want to manage and organize the world’s data [26].

[27]That business mandate puts them in direct conflict with anyone who limits the flow of information that Google seeks to manage. Google needs you to take full advantage of your digital connections to the world so that they have a profitable job – with room to grow – making up clever ways to organize your data. The most basic way they do this now is with search. Another is with maps. And so on.

But what if we stopped making so much data? That is exactly what is happening in the U.S. – only we didn’t stop creating data. We just stopped adding the capacity to transmit it, which, from Google’s point of view is the same thing.

2. Our slow-ish broadband network means there is less for Google to organize, potentially capping Google’s growth.

[28]In the U.S, during the last 10 years, broadband companies have been relatively content with their profits, consumers have had only one choice or two choices for service (cable vs dsl), and no outside software has been desirable enough to make everyone want anything different (in the way that the iPod made everyone ditch CDs).

How slow are we?  In 2007, the average advertised bandwidth speed in Japan was 96 Mbps. My Charter connection at home right now is supposed to be 5 Mbps but rarely exceed 3 Mbps. You can see for yourself by comparing broadband costs and bandwidth among countries [29] or examining this article [30].

Or better yet, test your current connection [31] and see what your bandwidth number really is.

It looks to me like we are somewhere between 15th and 23rd in the world (and falling) in terms of broadband.

This problem is most acute at the so-called “last mile [32],” which includes the connection from the pole to your house.  Also during the last 10 years the speed and capacity of the backbone, aka the bigger cables between cities, has increased in speed pretty dramatically.  When you read about “dark fiber [33],” you are often reading about the unused capacity that lies just beyond your yard, past the pole as you head upstream from your cable or phone jack. Not only has your current broadband provider refused to consider alternate technologies like fiber optics, they’ve gone ahead and planned some upgrades that use their existing cable technology in order to appease a part of their customer base.  Those upgrades are detailed in the just released National Broadband plan [34].  One of the problems with that plan is that it ignores the best technology – fiber optics – which the rest of the world is increasingly using [35].

3. Google enters the market with a better plan in order to spur competition among existing broadband companies.

[36]Google  wants to shake things up [37] by building something better than what you are used to.  And not just a little bit, either – they want to build an open network with 1) much better speed and service than you have now AND 2) they want to do it using better technology (that’s the fiber part of the project) AND 3)they want to use a different business model than your current provider.  It is a lot to get your head around, I know.  Those three things, taken together, are what make Google’s fiber project so exciting.

"they want to use a different business model than your current provider..." Put plainly in layman's terms, Google will cost shift, and basically provide the high speed broadband for no out of pocket expense in exchange for access to your behavioral data, advertising consumption activity or subsidize the broadband as your corportate and high use neighbors take advantage of cloud services. To make a long story short (if it ain't too late), you'll get cutting edge broadband access for what you would consider free - much like how you get YouTube HD video for free. Where does this leave the big Telcos???? 

The open network [38] is the hardest of the three ideas to grasp, since most people in the U.S. have never had one.  Normally, it would work like the street in front of your house –tax payers pay for it, anyone can use it, and some of those uses allow us to do profitable things.  The open network model is in use in other parts of the world [39] and open networks are quite successful*.  They are usually built, like roads, with at least partial taxpayer funding. In this case, Google is proposing that they pay for the road on Asheville’s behalf.

4. If they wait, they could lose a lot of money.

If they wait, they have less data to manage. This is because the U.S. just released the national Broadband plan [34], and the plan is not good enough [30].  The plan settled [40]and accommodated existing industry at the expense of innovation and competition**.  Our new broadband plan does not require or even suggest open networks, it advocates speed increases that are small in relation to what technology allows, and, generally speaking, it keeps the old way of doing business alive and well for the current broadband companies. Google, who had input into the national Broadband plan, no doubt saw this coming and intends for this experiment to help create an alternate path to a better network.

And that’s why, right now, they are running a competition to build a fiber optic network (speed and reliability fixed), to your door (last mile problem fixed), with an open network (competition problem fixed, control shifted back to the customers).  And they will build it with their own money.

-Clark Mackey

• • * Asheville is already one of the few places in the country with a functioning open fiber network – ERC Broadband [41]. Open networks are opposed by your current broadband provider, but strongly supported by some very smart people. One is Vint Cerf [42] who is widely known as father of the Internet [43]
  • ** In the National Broadband Plan, we settled for slower speeds 10 years in the future than some countries have now. Ch 1 page 2. The plan has a goal of 100 Mbps, much slower than Google’s proposed speed of 1000 Mbps.  We accommodated by obfuscating the decision to go away from open networks, allowing current companies to justify exclusive control of the wires because of the high cost of installing them (Ch 4 page 36 and 37).  Roads are expensive too, but I note that we have found ways to build them without requiring tolls at the end of our driveways.

Industry Leading, Subscription Based Google Research

All paying subscribers should download the Google Q1-2012 Valuation Summary [44], wherein we have updated the valuation numbers for Google using a variety of metrics. Click here to subscribe or upgrade [45]. 

Google still exhibits the likelihood that they will control mobile computing for the balance of the decade.

Subscription research:

[46]Google Q1-2012 Valuation Summmary [46] 04/20/2012

[47]Google Q1 2011 results [47] 04/18/2011

[48]Google Q3 2010 reveiw [48] 11/08/2010

[49]Google Final Report [49] 10/08/2010

[50]An Analysis and Valuation of Google's Android and AdMob [50] 09/27/2010 

[51]Google Valuation Model [51] 09/21/2010 

  [52]Google's VOIP and Telephony Services [52] 09/16/2010

[53]Google Cloud Based Services [53]

[54]Google TV Analysis [54]

A couple of bits from our archives...

1. Looking at the Results of Google's "Negative Cost" Business Model Employed Through Android   [55]
2. Did A Blog Best Wall Street's Best of the Best In Guaging The True Value of Google? We Have To Think More Like An Entrepreneur & Less Like A Wall Street Analyst [56]

[57]
There are currently 7 Google reports available. Select the "Google Final Report" and click the "Download" button. You will receive a 63 page analysis that looks like this on the cover... [57]

[58]

The table of contents outlines how we have broken Google down into distinct businesses and identified both the individual business models and the potential revenue streams, as well as  valuation for each business line.

[59]

Page 57 of the analysis shows a sensitivity table which outlines the various scenarios that can come into play and how it will change our outlook and valuation opinion.

[60]

Professional/institutional subscribers can actually access a subset of the model that we used to create the sensitivity analysis above to plug in their own assumptions in case they somehow disagree with our assumptions or view points. Click here for the model: Google Valuation Model (pro and institutional) [61]. Click here to subscribe or upgrade [45].

Fresh and Very Accurate Apple Research