Unemployment

The Spanish banks rallied after the (faux) stress tests, just to have reality spank them the following week. This time around, will the revolution be televised, or covered through a blog?

In keeping with the tradition of digging America into a debt hole so ridiculously large any conversation over whether the US will be able to ever pay this debt off is immediately moot, the Senate has just ended debate over the latest micro fiscal stimulus, specifically the legislation extending unemployment insurance benefits. It appears the latest iteration of the "you never have to work again as long as you vote for Obama" bill is about to pass. Next up: free government jobs for everyone as the census becomes a monthly affair. And when that fails, free Bernanke Bux for all who still remember how to breathe after all the daily Desperate Housewives of Liberty 33 drama. As for the cost of this latest freebie: $25, $50 billion.. who cares - at the eventual hyperinflationary discount rate, the NPV is about a penny or three. As for current funding, two Fed Assured 2 Year glitchless auctions at record low rates will take care of it.

In June, 20 states posted a (seasonally adjusted) unemployment rate greater than the US average. At 14.2% Nevada was once again the state with most idle hands (excluding Puerto Rico, which since the earthquake nobody cares about anyway). Michigan is second at 13.2% as those unemployed for 20 years or longer (the vast majority of the population) are now presumed to be dead, thus causing a downward inflection point and a major improvement in the state's economic perspectives. California, Rhode Island and Florida rounded out the top 5 states. Yet the gimmickry at the Federal level is making the state picture better as well: in reality the main reason for the improvement on a state by state level is the decline in the labor force, so even as the unemployed in California declined by 30k, the labor force contracted as well, by 23k, and, carry the four, the net result was a loss of 27.6k workers. In other words, more data that is gradually becoming completely irrelevant.

Broke US states are probing new lows with each passing day, as money continues to stubbornly refuse to grow on trees (unless you have discount window access of course). The latest funding fiasco comes from Texas, which Reuters reports is planning on selling $2 billion in debt just to refill its empty unemployment trust fund. We are confident that bondholders will be ecstatic to put their money into a extremely rapidly amortizing "asset" that will begin depleting from day one and will likely have no collateral recourse in under a year. But after all, it is other people's money, so we are confident this particular Citi/BofA led bond offering will close and price and sub Treasury rates.

The traditional hot bed of haute couture and fashion retail is experiencing an unprecedented plunge in end demand as Italy, absent trillions in fiscal and monetary stimulus boosts, has become a prime example of what US retail would look like absent the generosity of the government and the Fed. According to this Bloomberg TV report, "sales are worse than last year and business is getting worse and worse. The situation is not good." Summer sales revenues are expected to be down 5% across the board. Another factor blamed for poor sales: the weak performance by the Italian football team, and the resultant glut of jerseys. And when Prada and Gucci are seen offering extra discounts just to get shoppers into the stores, the whole concept of ultrapremium retail goes out of the window, putting the "aspirational shopper" paradigm on hold.

The IMF has issued a less than stellar outlook of the US economy after consultations with US government authorities, in which it cautions that even as the outlook has generally improved, major downside risks remain: "On the downside, the backlog of foreclosures and high levels of negative equity, combined with elevated unemployment, pose risks of a double dip in housing; the continued deterioration in commercial real estate poses risks for smaller banks; and financing conditions remain tight, especially for smaller firms reliant on bank finance. Most recently, and tipping the balance of risks to the downside, sovereign strains in Europe have become an increasing concern, potentially impacting the United States through financial market and, in a tail risk scenario, trade links." Also notable is the fund's warning on the state of the US consumer and the perceived overvaluation of the dollar: "It follows, as also emphasized in last year’s Article IV, that the United States can no longer play the role of global consumer of last resort, underscoring the importance of measures to boost growth and demand in current account surplus countries. With the U.S. dollar now moderately overvalued from a medium term perspective, this will need to be accompanied by greater exchange rate flexibility/appreciation elsewhere."

A few months ago we disclosed that based on its campaign contributions in Q1, Goldman Sachs had turned from Democrat to Republican, as "its campaign spending favored Republicans over Democrats by a margin of 58 percent to 42 percent both for March and the first three months of the year." Furthermore the animosity between the firm and the president is not exactly top secret. So, being the smartest guys in the room, would it not behoove Goldman to endorse precisely those policies which while unlikely to have much economic impact (for the growing futility of Keynesianism see here), are most at odds with prevailing popular opinion of what next steps for the economy should be? We pointed out first two days ago that Goldman is now openly rooting for QE 2.0 and another round of unbridled fiscal stimulus: precisely the kind of behavior that increasingly more people realize is the primary reason why this country is in its current sad place. Today, Goldman economist Alec Phillips continues the shadow attack on the administration, pointing out in excruciating detail what will happen if unemployment benefits are not extended (a topic also discussed previously here), and that some form of passage of the bill is critical, in essence putting the high hurdle strawman before the administration, and boxing it in a lose-lose corner. Regardless of the political sideshow, and we will keep an eye on it, with this week's Initial Claims out due later today, and a likely collapse in Extended Unemployment Compensation and Extended Benefits now that there is, at least for now, no extension, here is how Goldman envisions the over 4 million plunge in those eligible to receive benefits, and the implication of this to the economy.

Yesterday, NY's pension fund sued BP for having the temerity to see its shares drop. Today, the Democratic candidate for Texas  AG has filed a Legal Complaint and Legal Brief against Goldman Sachs et literally al for "causing financial crisis and physical harms; recession; unemployment;
home and wealth loss; forced cutbacks in a wide variety of critical
areas, including medical care, social services, and environmental
protection" and pretty much everything that is bad in the world. Tomorrow, one million Americans file a class action lawsuit against E-Trade for experiencing a downday.

Ho hum. What's another $34 billion. Chump change.....

The only reason for the decline in the unemployment rate to 9.5% was yet another decline in the labor force participation rate, which according to the BLS dropped another 652k people in the month of June. This resulted in a labor force to the civilian non-institutional population ratio of 64.7%: the second lowest number in decades of data, and only better than December 2009, when this number was 64.6%. The problem with this is that it badly underestimates the split between those who are marginally attached and those 14,623 who were formally unemployed in June. As the chart below shows, the double dip in the labor force participation is now very much pronounced. What this chart implies is that if there was a mean reversion to the last 10 year labor force participation average rate of 66.2%, there should be another 3.5 million jobless added to the 14.6 million tally. And as this differential is the easiest thing in the world for the BLS to fudge, adding the two and dividing by the labor force of 153,74, we get an unemployment rate of 11.8%, leaving aside all other such fudge factors are government hiring, temporary workers, birth death, etc. 9.5% or 11.8% - which one is more realistic for an economy finally realizing it never left the second great depression, you decide.

Private payrolls were a disappointment at just +83k, versus consensus of 112k. Birth-death added 147k. Census removed 225k, in line with consensus. Temporary help was another terrific "green shoot" increasing by +21k. And the Unemployment rate dropped to 9.5% because 652k people walked out of the labor force, which dropped from 154.393 million to 153.741 million. Another big miss for the recovery story and another confirmation of the data point. The only improvement was the percentage of those unemployed 26 weeks and longer dropped from 46% to 45.5%, or from 6.763 million to 6.751 million. Yet the most troubling indicator was the downward inflection in the average workweek, which once again dropped by 0.1 hours to 34.1 hours, while in manufacturing the drop was a severe 0.5 hours, following a rise of 0.4 hours in May. The slack in the laborforce is once again building up. Also, average hourly earnings declined by 0.1%, after an increase of 0.2% in May.

As we reported on Friday, a critical bill that was unable to pass this past week was the extension of unemployment benefits to millions of Americans currently collecting a $1,200 average monthly stipend from the US government for sitting on their couch and not paying their mortgage. As a result of this huge hit to endless governmental spending of future unearned money, the WSJ reports that "a total of 1.3 million unemployed Americans will have lost their assistance by the end of this week." Furthermore, the cumulative number of people whose extended benefits are set to run out absent this extension, will reach 2 million in two weeks, and continue rising: as a reminder the DOL reported over 5.2 million Americans currently on Extended Benefits and EUC (Tier 1-4). The net result is yet another hit to the US ledger, as soon 2 million Americans will no longer recycle $1,200 per month into the economy. In other words, beginning in July, there will be $2.4 billion less spent each month by America's jobless on such necessities as LCD TVs (that critical 4th one for the shoe closet), iPads and cool looking iPhones that have cool gizmos but refuse to hold a conversation the second the phone is touched the "wrong" way. As the number of jobless whose benefits expire grows, the full impact of lost money will progressively increase, and absent some last minute compromise, the monthly loss will promptly hit $5 billion per month. Annualized this is a hit of $60 billion to "consumption", and represents roughly 120 million iPads not purchased, and about half a percentage point of GDP (ignoring various downstream multiplier effects). Worst of all, as these people surge back into the labor force, the unemployment rate is about to spike by nearly 1%, up to 10.5%.

The BLS has released May unemployment data by state: nothing too notable - a slight decline in the overall unemployment rate: "Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia recorded unemployment rate decreases over the month, 6 states had increases, and 7 states had no change." Nevada hit a new all time high rate of 14%, and surpassed Michigan at 13.6% as worst state in the continental US.Aside from that, the MoM change was not very material for other states. Where there is also no surprise is who the biggest source of state jobs was in May: out of 394 thousand jobs created in May (total at 130,197,600), 86% was courtesy of government hiring. This is not surprising as the bulk of the hiring was due to census, as was already reported. Losses were reported in Construction, Trade, Transportation, Financial Services, and Education and Health Services. Pick ups were seen in manufacturing, professional and leisure and hospitality services.

It was only a matter of time before the administration converted the Gulf spill tragedy into the latest unemployment stimulus program. The Unified Command in Mobile, Alabama announced today the first deployment of the Qualified Community Responder (QCR) program that will put unemployed individuals to work in the counties that may be affected by the oil spill. Working closely with the Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida unemployment offices, unemployed workers have been hired to help with the cleanup effort. There is no conformation yet whether any of these "unemployed" will be quintuple BLS-counted census workers, or just what death (birth, not so much) adjustment to crustacean wildlife the Department of Labor will apply in order to avoid a comparable overpromise/underdeliver gaffe as this Friday's NFP. And since the oilspill will likely reach Maine relatively soon, we expect the entire Eastern seabord to see at least half a million monthly pick up in temporary workers by the time there is no water left in the Oiltlantic Ocean, some time in September.

In light of today's [abysmal|terrific] NFP report, it is probably not a bad idea to take on unemployment propaganda, but from a slightly different angle. Below, courtesy of madatoms, is a chart summarizing the truth and myth about unemployment.Of course if you are Obama, unemployment is really employment, which brings this chart to a whole new level of David Lynch appreciation.