Switzerland

• Jobs Gauge Carries Election Clout (WSJ)
• Draghi Lured by Fractious EU Leaders to Build Euro 2.0 (Blooomberg)
• Rajoy stance sets stage for EU stand-off (FT)
• China Approves Plan to Build New Roads to Boost Economy (Bloomberg)
• Hollande faces questions on tax pledge (FT)
• Putin Looks East for Growth as Debt-Ridden Europe Loses Sheen (Bloomberg)
• Strike Grounds Half of Lufthansa's Flights (Spiegel)
• The weakest will win in the euro battle (FT)
• Hilsenrath: Fed Economic, Interest Rate Forecasts Will Include 2015 Outlook (WSJ) - because he just figured that out
• Obama Presses Plan for U.S. Resurgence (WSJ)
• Hong Kong to Restrict Sales of Homes at Two Sites to Locals (Bloomberg)
• Drought Curbs Midwest Farm-Income Outlook, St. Louis Fed Says (Bloomberg)

There are three key factors to modeling trade flows - or relevance - in a post-globalization world. While competitiveness is important, countries gain from being generally 'Technology-rich', 'Labor-rich', and/or 'Resource-rich'. The following chart, from Deutsche Bank, shows where the world's countries fit into the Venn diagram of give-and-take in a post-globalization market. The red oval highlights where Italy, Greece, Portugal, and Spain (and Argentina sadly enough) do not fit into this picture. Two words - Euro-sustainability?

• The bankers are coming: Banker Plan Would Fund Super-PACs to Sway U.S. Senate Elections (Bloomberg)
• Risk Increases of Prolonged World Slowdown, BOJ’s Miyao Says (Bloomberg)
• Spain Seeks to Stem Its Banking Crisis (WSJ)
• Deadly shooting mars new Quebec premier's victory rally (NBC)
• Democrats Keep Tax-Raising Focus On Top 2% Of Households (Bloomberg)
• Merkel Swings Into 2013 Election Mode Evoking Crisis, China (Bloomberg)
• Europe’s money market funds future in focus (FT)
• Pressure Mounts on ECB to Bring Down Bond Yields (Reuters)
• Swiss bank vows to hold franc down (FT)
• Australia economy still solid in Q2 despite GDP miss, but threats mount (Reuters)
• Clinton Brings to Beijing Plea for Maritime Solution (Bloomberg)
• The End of a 1,400-Year-Old Business (BusinessWeek)

We recently discussed Guggenheim's 'awe-full' charts of the level of central bank intervention from which they noted that the Fed could lose 200 billion US$, when inflation comes back again. Interest rates would increase by 100 basis points and the US central bank would be bankrupt according to US-GAAP. We explain in this post the differences between money printing as for the Swiss National Bank (SNB), the ECB and  the Fed. We show the risks the central banks run when they increase money supply, when they “print”. As opposed to the ECB, the SNB only buys high-quality assets, mostly German and French government bonds. However, for the SNB the assets are in foreign currencies, for the big part they are denominated in euros. Further Fed quantitative easing drives the demand for gold and the correlated Swiss francs upwards.  Sooner or later this will pump more American money into the Swiss economy and will raise Swiss inflation. For the SNB these two are the Mephistos: Bernanke and Draghi, the ones who promise easy life based on printed money.

Yesterday, when the market was plunging (by less than a whopping 1%, yet magically defending the 13K "retirement off" threshold in the DJIA), we wondered: where is the Fed's favorite messageboard: WSJ "journalist" Jon Hilsenrath. We found out at 3 am, when instead of releasing another soon to be refuted rumor of more easing, we discovered that the scribe was busy doing something very different: discussing the pros and cons of the Chairsatan's legacy.

A few weeks ago, western governments' war on productive people took an interesting twist when US immigration authorities detained two teenage children of an asset manager based here in Switzerland. The kids were traveling through the United States by themselves to visit extended family, and they were interrogated for six hours about their father's business and whereabouts. During the six-hour ordeal, the children were not allowed to contact family members who were waiting for them, nor any sort of attorney or advisor. This 'guilty until proven innocent' approach is the same sort of special treatment reserved for suspected terrorists. The only difference is that you don't end up in Guantanamo. Free societies do not treat people this way. Hell, most criminal networks don't even treat people this way. And while it may raise a few bucks in the short run, in the long run it's counterproductive. People adapt. They create underground, cash-based economies. They leave. Foreign investors stay away.

Even in the unlikely case of a fiscal union, the conflict “Draghi against Weidmann”, between the ECB and the Bundesbank will continue for years. The ECB mandate and many european inflation figures do not allow for excessive ECB rate cuts or for state financing via the printing press, but Draghi wants to help his struggling home country.

A couple of weeks ago we wrote about how the Portuguese citizenry was being forced to sell its gold in order to eat.  It seems that the Italians have now joined this illustrious club.  What do you expect when you allow Goldman Sachs to impose technocrat dictator Mario “Three Card” Monti as your political leader?

The pawnbrokers, ...can hardly keep up with business. They normally have the gold quickly melted down and sent abroad, making it one of Italy’s fastest growing exports. Official gold sales to Switzerland leaped 65 per cent last year to 120 tonnes, up from 73 tonnes in 2010 and 64 tonnes in 2009.

That’s not just gold being exported, that is wealth being exported.  China says thanks.  At least you protected your bankster class from taking a hit on their bond portfolios.

• Hurricane Isaac Whips Storm Surge on Path to New Orleans (Bloomberg)
• Republicans Vow to Transform Obama’s U.S. With Low Tax, Freedom (Bloomberg)
• Little-known Ryan to take center-stage at Republican convention (Reuters)
• An $800 billion stimulus tempest in a teapot: China State Researcher: Local Govt Investment Plans Largely Symbolic (WSJ)
• China Says Payment Delays, Defaults May Worsen (Dow Jones)
• G-7 Countries Call for Increased Oil Output to Meet Demand (Bloomberg)
• Creeping Socialism: Clegg calls for emergency tax on rich (FT)
• United Airlines computer problem delays 200 flights (Chicago Sun Times)
• Paulson, Investors Avoid Fireworks Despite Brutal Run (Bloomberg)
• Occupy Sets Wall Street Tie-Up as Protesters Face Burnout (Bloomberg)
• The nostalgic grass is always greener: Serbia Joblessness Swells as Milosevic-Era Leaders Return (Bloomberg)

It ain't safe no more???

Forget Merriam-Webster. The Mario-Webber dictionary is where it's at these days...

“The extent of tax fraud by the Swiss has no numbers”

Silver is going to blow SKY HIGH!!

"It is rather amazing that a 2.8% yield on the long bond couldn't do the trick. By hook or by nook, it looks like the Fed is going to make an attempt to drive the rate down even further — but if that was the answer, wouldn't Switzerland, Japan and Germany be in major economic booms right now seeing as how low their 30-year bond yields are? Monetary policy in the U.S.A. is not the problem, so it is doubtful that it will be the solution. It all boils down to fiscal and regulatory policy and how the government can part the clouds of uncertainty — the Fed may be able at the margin to cushion the blow, but that's about it."

Under widespread NIRP, pensions, annuities, insurers, banks and ultimately all savers will suffer a slow but steady decline in real wealth over time. Just as ZIRP has stuck around since the early 2000’s, NIRP may be here to stay for many years to come. Looking back at how much widespread damage ZIRP has caused since its introduction back in 2002, it’s hard not to expect that negative interest rates will cause even more harm, and at a faster clip. In our view, NIRP represents the death knell for the financial system as we know it today. There are simply too many working parts of the financial industry that are directly impacted by negative rates, and as long as NIRP persists, they will be helplessly stuck suffering from its ill-effects.