China Adds Troops To India Border, Will Defend Sovereignty At "Whatever Cost"

With attention focused on geopolitical tensions involving North Korea, the world may have missed that another, potentially more troubling conflict is brewing on the border between India and China, where as we reported over the weekend, China threatened with military action after a "blatant sovereignty infringement." Since then tensions have grown, and on Monday China warned on Monday that it will step up its troop deployment in a border dispute with India, vowing to defend its sovereignty at "whatever cost".

The latest standoff started more than a month ago after Chinese troops started building a road on a remote plateau, which is disputed by China and Bhutan.  Indian troops countered by moving to the flashpoint zone to halt the work, with China accusing them of violating its territorial sovereignty and calling for their immediate withdrawal.

"The crossing of the mutually recognised national borders on the part of India... is a serious violation of China's territory and runs against the international law," Chinese defence ministry spokesman Wu Qian told a press conference quoted by AFP, adding that "the determination and the willingness and the resolve of China to defend its sovereignty is indomitable, and it will safeguard its sovereignty and security interests at whatever cost."

He also said that "border troops have taken emergency response measures in the area and will further step up deployment and trainings in response to the situation," without giving any details about the deployment.

Meanwhile, showing no signs that either nation is willing to relent, India and China both said they have foreign support for their positions on the conflict. As AFP adds, India-ally Bhutan has said construction of the road is "a direct violation" of agreements with China. Bhutan and China do not have diplomatic relations.

India, which fought a war with China in 1962 over a separate part of the disputed Himalayan border, supports Bhutan's claim, although India should "not have any illusions" that its position will prevail, Wu said.

 

"The history of the PLA (People's Liberation Army) over the past 90 years has proven that our resolve to safeguard (China's) sovereignty and territory... are indomitable," he said.  "It is difficult to shake the PLA, even more difficult than to shake a mountain."

India and China have vied for strategic influence in South Asia, a key component of China's "One Belt One Road" initiative, with Beijing ploughing large sums into infrastructure projects in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Bhutan has remained closely allied to India.

* * *

Finally, courtesy of Bloomberg here is a primer on the ongoing conflict between the world's 2 most populous nations:

China and India, two nuclear-armed powers with a combined population of 2.7 billion, have been in an “eyeball-to-eyeball” military stand-off over territory in Bhutan, a kingdom in a remote area of the Himalayas, since mid-June. The flare-up, one of the most serious since China won a border war in 1962, comes as the two rising powers jostle for regional influence. The current dispute is near a three-way junction between Bhutan, China’s Tibet and India’s Sikkim.

1. Why is the area important?

All land-based military and commercial traffic between India’s northeastern provinces and the rest of the country travels through the narrow strip of land known as the Siliguri Corridor -- also sometimes referred to as the Chicken’s neck. The Doklam Plateau -- where troops are currently facing off -- overlooks the corridor, which India defense strategists fear could be vulnerable to Chinese attack in case of a conflict.

2. How far back does this dispute go?

An 1890 convention between Britain and China is supposed to determine the location of the border near the Siliguri Corridor. However it contains a contradiction that allows each country to claim support for its position, said Taylor Fravel, who studies border disputes at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. India contends the border is at Batang La, while China argues it is at Mount Gimpochi, three miles to the south. If China is correct, it would gain access to the Doklam Plateau.

3. What’s the status of ties between the three countries?

Bhutan has had close relations with India since 1949 when it agreed to a Friendship Treaty under which India would “guide” Bhutan’s foreign policy. This was updated in 2007 to remove the guidance provision. Both agreed that neither government would allow its territory to be used for activities harmful to the national security of the other. Bhutan doesn’t have diplomatic ties with China, though the two sides routinely holds talks aimed at resolving seven disputed border areas.

4. What is behind the latest flare-up?

All three sides agree that a People’s Liberation Army road-building team entered the Doklam Plateau and started construction. India said that its troops entered Bhutan’s territory “in coordination” with Bhutanese authorities to stop the Chinese road builders. There are now about 3,000 troops on each side on the plateau, according to the Times of India. It is the first time that Indian troops have confronted China from a third country.

5. Is it all about a road?

Bhutan’s foreign ministry says the road is being constructed on territory subject to a border dispute, and that the two sides in 1988 and 1998 agreed to refrain from changing the status quo of the boundary. China contends that it is operating in its own territory and cites the 1890 convention. The removal of Indian troops from the area is a prerequisite for “meaningful dialogue” to resolve the issue, China’s foreign ministry says. India cites a 2012 agreement that indicates the boundary points are yet to be finalized and says China’s actions could have serious implications for India’s security.

6. Is this stand-off more sensitive than others?

All this is taking place during a period of tense relations between two rivals competing for influence in the broader South Asia region. Bilateral relations were frosty even before the current border dispute began because New Delhi objects to President Xi Jinping’s “Belt and Road” trade-and-infrastructure initiative. Part of it traverses the Pakistan-administered part of disputed Kashmir, which India claims as its sovereign territory. China’s Global Times, raising Kashmir, said “under India’s logic, if the Pakistani government requests, a third country’s army can enter the area disputed by India and Pakistan.”

7. Will it lead to war as we saw in 1962?

Most observers think not. Conflict wouldn’t serve either country’s interest. India, with an election in 2019, would risk losing an economically debilitating conflict with a much more powerful foe. China would risk its efforts to present itself as an international leader, filling the shoes of an isolationist U.S.

8. Without war, what other solution is possible?

With nationalists in both countries stoking tensions, neither side can afford to be seen standing down. Most analysts predict a protracted stand-off before the two countries figure out a diplomatic solution. But it won’t be easy. Neither side wants to be the first to withdraw troops.

Comments

OverTheHedge abyssinian (not verified) Tue, 07/25/2017 - 11:38 Permalink

Or pressure from US via India? India isn't necessarily a lapdog, but I'm sure can be bought for the relevant freshly minted dollars. Do we have any reports of cargo aircraft making surreptitious deliveries? Being paranoid, my uninformed opinion is to lean toward China being in the right, just because of the history of western pressure tactics. I haven't seen a map, and have no idea what the realities are here - just pontificating, because it's fun.

In reply to by abyssinian (not verified)

Buck Johnson Creepy_Azz_Crackaah (not verified) Tue, 07/25/2017 - 10:59 Permalink

China needs land for food and excess population.  They don't dare go via Russia (already had a war with them over 50 years ago on that border).  They really don't want India (they are in just as bad a shape as china and more of a population).  I think China is going to invade Australia and take it for themselves in the near future.

In reply to by Creepy_Azz_Crackaah (not verified)

froze25 (not verified) Déjà view Tue, 07/25/2017 - 09:39 Permalink

India doesn't have the ability to beat China yet, they need time to catch up. China is in decline, their one child policy is starting to catch up to them and effect their growth rate and this will hurt them soon enough. India needs to bide its time and allow their baby boom generation that is currently in their early 20's to start forming families and move up the totem poll. The next 20 years belong to India as the Growth power house of Asia.

In reply to by Déjà view

JamesBond OCnStiggs Tue, 07/25/2017 - 09:37 Permalink

Whoa Tiger.  Two chinese may sound like twelve, but...A Chinese fighter just shadowed a US military plane in international waters coming within meters and we did nothing.  The rules of engagement were changed under Obama.  China will let Trump take the lead in any NK action.  Better all the NK missles head south instead of north due to an action by China.  China is ready to seize land and military assets in NK once the shooting with SK and the US begins. Cheers.

In reply to by OCnStiggs

TheObsoleteMan JamesBond Tue, 07/25/2017 - 09:47 Permalink

They are communist internally, but are quasi-capitalist externally. That is the devil's deal they made when they agreed to join the WTO. No one forced them too. Now they are no longer a closed loop system, they are inter-dependent { globalist love that word} just like the rest of us are, maybe a little more so. This is part of the framework for the global government they are creating. In the not too distant future, national leaders will be no more than state governors. The real power will reside with the illuminated few.

In reply to by JamesBond

Haus-Targaryen JamesBond Tue, 07/25/2017 - 09:47 Permalink

I have no doubt ther .gov and MIC would love to send a few million kids overthere to die and would likely try to -- the question is would anyone show up?  "Here, show up to this draft station to report for duty.  We invade Manchuria next year!" I imagine the white male populations of Argentia, Austria, Ireland, Sweden and Finland and Switzerland explode in all directions if someone tries this. 

In reply to by JamesBond