O'Keefe Strikes Again, Catches NYT Editors On Hidden Camera: "Targeting Trump's Businesses, His Dumb F**k Of A Son"

Update:  The New York Times has just responded to the latest Project Veritas bombshell by dismissing the target of the undercover video, Nick Dudich, as a "recent hire" in a "junior position" who "misrepresented his role."  The NYT confirmed that it looked as though he had "violated our ethical standards" and said they're "reviewing the situation." 

Here is the full statement from NYT spokeswoman, Danielle Rhoades Ha:

Based on what we’ve seen in the Project Veritas video, it appears that a recent hire in a junior position violated our ethical standards and misrepresented his role. In his role at The Times, he was responsible for posting already published video on other platforms and was never involved in the creation or editing of Times videos. We are reviewing the situation now.

All of which sounds like Dudich is about to find himself without a job...maybe it's time to do another tour of duty with Antifa?

* * *

In the latest of a series of undercover operations targeting mainstream media bias, James O'Keefe has just dropped a new undercover video which takes direct aim at the New York Times' Audience Strategy Editor, Nick Dudich, who admits repeatedly to promoting content that intentionally seeks to, among other things, damage President Trump's businesses as a means towards forcing his resignation.

Here is a brief intro from Project Veritas:

While talking about being objective at the Times, Dudich replies candidly, "No I'm not, that's why I'm here."


Dudich considers himself an important player at the New York Times, telling the Project Veritas Journalist "my voice is on... my imprint is on every video we do."


Dudich goes on to explain what he might do to target President Trump:


"I'd target his businesses, his dumb fuck of a son, Donald Jr., and Eric...


"Target that. Get people to boycott going to his hotels. Boycott... So a lot of the Trump brands, if you can ruin the Trump brand and you put pressure on his business and you start investigating his business and you start shutting it down, or they're hacking or other things. He cares about his business more than he cares about being President. He would resign. Or he'd lash out and do something incredibly illegal, which he would have to."


When the undercover journalist asks Dudich if he could make sure that the anti-Trump stories make it to the front, he replied, "Oh, we always do."

To our complete 'shock', O'Keefe also learned the Dudich worked for Hillary's 2016 presidential campaign and Obama's campaign in both 2008 and 2012...

In 2016, he was recruited to work for the Clinton campaign:


"So I have that background, so when Clinton in 2016... they needed a volunteer strategist to do video... well, they needed someone to help them do video, and how to make it heartfelt, for Clinton."


He even had to quit his job in journalism in order to work for the Clinton campaign: "I had to leave my job at Fusion ABC to then take a job at Upworthy where I wasn't deemed a journalist anymore to be able to work for the Clinton campaign."


Dudich explains how his activism motivated him to re-engage in the news business: "Like, after the Clinton campaign, I'm like, no I need to get back into news and keep doing shit because, like, this isn't going to change."

Bizarrely, Dudich also claims to have joined the Antifa movement as an undercover agent for the FBI...a request which he originally said came from his godfather, James Comey, even though he subsequently retracted that statement.

Nicholas Dudich also told the undercover journalist bizarre stories about his personal connection to the FBI and his previous excitement as part of Anti-Fa.


"Yeah, I used to be an Anti-Fa punk once upon a time." he told the undercover journalist. "So, I had fun. They'd start s**t, I'm like, I get to hit you. I'm so excited."


He also claims that James Comey, former Director of the FBI, asked him to join Anti-Fa: "I joined that stuff for them [the FBI]. I was an asset... So it was intelligence gathering, seeing if they were [sic], what their agenda was, whether they're a threat or not."


"How'd you meet Comey?" asked the Project Veritas journalist. "He's my godfather," Dudich explained. "My dad and mom knew him and his wife for a really long time."


"Well the Comey hearing, I should have recused myself, but I'm not ever telling anybody there [at the Times] that I have a tie with that or else I don't know if they can keep me on."

With that intro, here is the complete video:


Why do we feel like it's Dudich whose resignation is imminent as opposed to Trump's?


JimmyJones TheDude1224 Tue, 10/10/2017 - 12:50 Permalink

So he said he was working as an informant for the FBI and joined ANTIFA, was that a lie?  What type of a small minded fool lies about being a "special agent" working for the Gov't?  Well this type.  Fox news "fair and balanced" , NY Times "Fairly Biased".  But don't worry the Liberals will still view the NY Times as the Paper of Record.  Looney

In reply to by TheDude1224

lincolnsteffens sincerely_yours Tue, 10/10/2017 - 15:49 Permalink

Since Joos are a small minority in the US and couldn't make the NY Times profitable by themselves, why do the Goyem support the NY Times?Its a rhetorical question. No need to explain why a significant majority allow themselves to be duped into buying The Paper of Record.Fool me once, shame on you, Fool me twice, shame on me. No different than the large banks fooling and stealing from account holders. People still flock to their banks and use their credit cards. Banks caught money laundering, fake accounts, using customer assets to distort the markets and everything goes on, and on, and on. A simple thing like using cash for all local purchases instead of credit cards pull the rug out from under theses criminal organizations. It is a small step with the slightest of inconvenience yet when I suggest this to people they give me the old shrug.From Wikipedia- "The world's core Jewish population was estimated at 14.41 million in 2016.[1][2][3] Demographer Sergio DellaPergola proposes an "extended" Jewish population, including people identifying as partly Jewish and non-Jews with Jewish parents, numbering 17.3 million globally, and an "enlarged" Jewish population figure that also includes non-Jewish members of Jewish households totaling 20.2 million... Jewish population figures for the United States are contested, ranging between 5.7 and 6.8 million."If Wikipedia is correct,  Jews at the max  of 7 million pull all the puppet strings in the USA. Guilt by association makes all Joos culpable in intentionally destroying and enslaving the world. This makes perfect sense to many. Of course this means almost the entire world population is too stupid to realize this. 

In reply to by sincerely_yours

jeff montanye shovelhead Tue, 10/10/2017 - 23:38 Permalink

if manny's surprised, he hasn't been paying attention for a very long time.what is probably truer is people like glenn greenwald, naomi klein, ed asner, and https://duckduckgo.com/?q=anti+zionist+jews&t=osx&ia=web are not surprised and are working to oppose the evil that israel has done, is doing and will continue to do until stopped.and off topic but damned intriguing, China’s property ­value may have surpassed the total in the rest of the world combined.  http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2114248/bubble-econ…

In reply to by shovelhead

PT NEOCON1 Wed, 10/11/2017 - 06:42 Permalink

NEOCON1:  Nup, they still would not be able to afford it.  That's what they're whinging about.  It's not so bad now.  At the peak in my city (2004), only doctors and lawyers could afford to buy the cheapest house in the cheapest suburb - and that is before taking house repairs into account ( - remember, I just said CHEAPEST).  Of course, that is not what was happening in the real world.  What we saw was the equivalent of the unemployed bum with the brand new Porsche.  House prices and wages simply do not add up.  Even now, they still don't add up.  A lot is being swept under the rug.  Me personally, I see no reason why guilty goys should go free.  Punish the guilty - whether they are Jew or Goy.  Jewish Conspiracy?  Are all of them in on it?  I haven't met many, and the ones I have met appear to work for a living just like everyone else.  But it wouldn't be the first time an ethnic division was known for a common characteristic.  And gangs and networks do have that advantage over individuals.  But punish the guilty and let the chips fall where they may.BTW, I am not a good historian, but by some accounts, to the "Jewish Conspiracists", the non-conspiratorial Jews are just as disposeable as the Goy.  Who funded both sides of the wars?  Who ended up in the concentration camps?  Why would you stand up for the guilty when you know they'd throw you under the bus just for an extra ounce of fat?If the Jews make up the bulk of the Conspiracy then there is no point denying it.  They won't be saving your head.  Likewise, Jew assistance or no Jew assistance, the Goy Conspiracists won't be changing their MO anytime soon if the spotlight ignores them.

In reply to by NEOCON1

stinkypinky Shemp 4 Victory Tue, 10/10/2017 - 18:12 Permalink

In my estimation this is a case of a kid trying to get into this chick's pants by telling lies he thinks are going to make that happen. I have no reason to believe that the Times is a good organization, and plenty of reason to believe that they are, in large part, a bad one, however this video isn't exactly damning to the Times itself. It clearly torpedoes the future of this kid though.

In reply to by Shemp 4 Victory

SybilDefense Chupacabra-322 Tue, 10/10/2017 - 15:56 Permalink

I've always wondered who voted to repeal Smith Mundt and what argument they possibly could have had to argue why it would be a good thing to use propaganda against Americans on US soil.  Must have been a bunch of hung over mf'ers voting that day, or the bill was attatched to another that guarantees free hookers (or pizza) for whoever voted "yeah".  All while Americans were asleep at the wheel, again.

In reply to by Chupacabra-322

Malleus Maleficarum SybilDefense Tue, 10/10/2017 - 17:56 Permalink

It wasn't repealed, it was "modernized" (much like the 4th Amendment, and the 1st and 2nd perhaps in the not-too-distant future.) It had to do with Voice of America, and a complete ban of their PSYOP products on US soil. Their products are now available upon request to Americans, via State Department. VOA product cannot be directed toward an American target audience, and DoS cannot broadcast VOA to the US. Anyone with a shortwave can pick it up, of course. In all honesty, it's not a big deal and it doesn't legalize VOA or DoS or the military targeting American citizens with PSYOP across any medium. I will ask: 'when has that ever stopped them?' The answer is of course, NEVER. The MSM let bias bleed through (impossible to avoid, but easy to minimize)  and lie through their teeth, often at the request of politicians. But I'd be far more concerned about PMCs and their subsidiaries feeding BS to MSM for broadcast. There are no controls on that kind of thing civilian side.In the military, their are safeguards against that kind of thing and it is definitely a career killer. 'Don't target Americans, and if anyone asks you to, it is an illegal order' is day 1 PSYOP. For example, several officers have found themselves in deep shit for studying up on a visiting dignitary, and then trying to persuade and influence him based on that research. Pretty ridiculous, IMO. People generally have little grasp of what military PSYOP does: a force multiplier, primarily. 

In reply to by SybilDefense

Socratic Dog Malleus Maleficarum Tue, 10/10/2017 - 22:31 Permalink

You're minimizing the control "they" have over the media.  Exhibit A: Ebola, last time around. Coverage went from saturation to zero, literally overnight.  Including on the Hedge, so it ain't just the MSM, it's media in general.The question I ask is "how?".  How can they have such control?  And I think it's a pretty damn important question.  It gets to the heart of how they manage these repeated false flag psyops so easily.  How is it that "they" have such complete control over all the media?

In reply to by Malleus Maleficarum

Bes hedgeless_horseman Tue, 10/10/2017 - 15:26 Permalink

I used to remember journalism was about exposing criminals, cheats, liars, etc.....but targeting only Trump is not fairespose them all, CONgress, Hillary, Wall Street, the MIC, the FED, Goldman Sachs........and if TRUMP is clean and on the up and up what does he have to fear????????------only trumptard trumpflakes overdosing on orange kool-aid would get bent out of shape over this.

In reply to by hedgeless_horseman

Bes jcaz Tue, 10/10/2017 - 19:00 Permalink

he's azionist - goldmanite - neoconwith a wall street general filled cabinetwho loves the MIC and militarizing the police stateand he's no friend of yoursFULL STOPpick a fucking lane yourselfagain only trumptards and trumpflakes would give a fuck about trump jr and trump's businessesmy allegiance is to the people, the country, the constitution, and not some oligarch and his uday and qusay sons

In reply to by jcaz