Hannity Reacts To Mueller Probe Charges: "When Will Hillary Clinton Be Indicted?"

Last night, shortly after reports leaked to CNN that Special Counsel Mueller had filed his first charges in the Russia investigation, Fox News host Sean Hannity responded via Twitter asking simply: "When will Hillary Clinton be indicted?"

Of course, as we noted last night (see: Mueller Reportedly Ready To File First Charges In Russia Probe), CNN was the first to report that charges had been filed by Mueller and that arrests could be made in the coming days, a report that was subsequently 'confirmed' by Reuters.  That said, the subject of the charges was not revealed and details of the court documents were sealed under orders from a federal judge.

A federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Friday approved the first charges in the investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller, according to sources briefed on the matter.

 

The charges are still sealed under orders from a federal judge. Plans were prepared Friday for anyone charged to be taken into custody as soon as Monday, the sources said. It is unclear what the charges are.

 

A spokesman for the special counsel's office declined to comment.

Hannity, a vocal supporter of President Trump, went on to accuse Mueller of working in conjunction with the mainstream media to "change the narrative" after new details emerged last week regarding the "Uranium One" scandal, which is now being investigated by the House Intelligence Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and the revelation that Hillary's campaign and the DNC funded the infamous "Trump Dossier".

Carefully orchestrated attempt to shift the media narrative or just a logical progression in an ongoing investigation, the answer should be unveiled on Monday.

Comments

YUNOSELL D.T.Barnum Sat, 10/28/2017 - 10:29 Permalink

Maybe not the best word, but there would be to some extent a sense of justice finally being served in a world of corruption for far too long.The sad part s the US used to be so great, with a constitution and declaration of independence, that created a system with the checks and balances to safeguard against this type of corruption soaking in, but over the 200 years it has soaked in and eroded all those checks and balances except in name only.

In reply to by D.T.Barnum

Teja YUNOSELL Sat, 10/28/2017 - 10:42 Permalink

Well, to change that, to save the US, you elected the wrong President, it seems. Trump following the Obama line to expand wars in countries you might have never heard of...  did you know the US Army was active in Niger and actually in many other African countries?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/27/niger-perfect-exa…, this reminds me of the Soviet Union, drained by wars it could not win, with the Coup de grace in Afghanistan.

In reply to by YUNOSELL

CuttingEdge justin423 Sat, 10/28/2017 - 12:28 Permalink

If Mueller goes after Manafort he implicates his (Manafort's) former employer Tony Pedosta (whose brother is connected to absolutely everything, and is probably the real brains behind most of it - twisted cunt that he is). Probably a no no - PedoBros'll end up with an airborne Arkancide event - it's the only way for Hillary to be sure with those two. If Mueller is making an arrest it could be Elias doing the bus suspension testing. He lied under oath to Congress about funding the dossier, when flanked by Pedosta and DWS and is nailed bang to rights. The other seniors involved are frantically plausably denying like a raid on a pizza convention, and he looks like being the fall guy. Everyone else has dintnonuttinitis. He is fucked, and will probably take the hit for his adorable Swamp Queen while everyone else plays dumber than a box of rocks.You have to appreciate the comedy of the wider situation. Mueller takes the job to nail Trump, probably in all likelihood ignorant that his own cadre (Hillary, Comey and even Obambam) initiated, facilitated and executed the witch hunt core to the truth of his findings. A big oops when he realised although the $30k a day probably eased his pain. And smack bang in the middle of this he himself is implicated in the U-1 deal as the FBI Director who failed to inform Congress (along with Holder) about nefarious goings on at a staggering level back during his tenure. Right now, Mr Mueller's faith in whatever satanic god he worships is being sorely tested. Especially when, as FBI Director at the time (and probably instrumental in his gag order), there is no way he cannot know what the FBI informant is coming forward with in a couple of weeks. If money changed hands between Fusion and the FBI, and if the FBI used the dossier for FISA unmasking requests (major shit), his mate Comey is beyond his protection over the dossier shite, and his time from hereon in may be more profitably spent preparing his own defence.I would expect Mueller to quit (while he is behind) before the informant testimony. And any Trump associate he throws a rabbit turd at in the interim? Charges will be dismissed the second Mueller himself comes under the microscope for enabling a Russian operation back in the day.Tick tock motherfuckers. 

In reply to by justin423

booboo IH8OBAMA Sat, 10/28/2017 - 13:52 Permalink

Hannity knows who will be indicted which is why it elicited the reaction it did from him. Obviously it is NOT Hillary or any of her minions. Mueller is tasked with "the russian connection wrt election" and he can say it was not in his scope of work to look at "Uranium One" or "Clinton Crime Family" (by the way Chelsea Hubble has been awful quiet lately).So around around we go, Mueller will resign after he skins his prey and another special prosecutor will be appointed by the one party system and by the time this is all over it will be 2020 and another major distraction will be in play..blah...blah...blah look squirrel. As long as both fake wings can be played off each other with balance and know one important gets taken down, no military industry fake war shit gets revealed and no pedo shit gets revealed it will be a win for the Deep State. 

In reply to by IH8OBAMA

bchbum CuttingEdge Sat, 10/28/2017 - 17:28 Permalink

I heard Louis Gohmert say that Mueller is sealing documents related to Hillary (and probably himself) having to do with UraniumOne.  People were calling for Donald Jr. to go to jail for 10 years for just holding a meeting with a Russian Lawyer.  If that is the standard, can you imagine all the lifetime prison terms this scandal could yield?  Dozens.

In reply to by CuttingEdge

bchbum CuttingEdge Sat, 10/28/2017 - 17:28 Permalink

I heard Louis Gohmert say that Mueller is sealing documents related to Hillary (and probably himself) having to do with UraniumOne.  People were calling for Donald Jr. to go to jail for 10 years for just holding a meeting with a Russian Lawyer.  If that is the standard, can you imagine all the lifetime prison terms this scandal could yield?  Dozens.

In reply to by CuttingEdge

eatthebanksters El Oregonian Sat, 10/28/2017 - 12:47 Permalink

Mueller is playing a dirty psycho warfare game with the Trump adminstration.  He does a pre-dawn raid at Manafort's house just to intimidate the guy and now leaks news of a pending indictment on a Friday night on the Clinton News Network becasue he thinks that Trumps people will squirm and make calls on tapped lines that will reveal something before he arrests someone on Monday.  This is fucking Gestapo tactics and its bullshit.  I hope this shit blows up in his face whtn they investigate Unranium One...I wanna see how this chump feels when he's sitting in a chair in front of the inquisitor without any fucking answers.  This is all a fucking joke.  Let's just start the civil war and be done with it.

In reply to by El Oregonian

two hoots Teja Sat, 10/28/2017 - 11:35 Permalink

Leaked?  To CNN?  Bias?  Any of those  three is enough to know this is not for the good or security of the American people.  This is a political Washington operation.  Washington is not about right or wrong, good or bad, the right thing to do, it  is past such simple attributes focusing on winning and voter emotions and voter navity. 

In reply to by Teja

two hoots Teja Sat, 10/28/2017 - 11:40 Permalink

With a king or queen  you know what you are dealing with.   With 465 Reps, 100 Senators, Pres/VP, Supreme Court and Fed Judges, appointed ones, and the agency wannabees, lobbyist, black ops, etc. the truth or accountability is nebulous and we have no idea of what or who represents us or if it any of it even does.Might be time to consider representing ourselves with todays technology and eliminating much of the confusion in Washington. 

In reply to by Teja

SWRichmond Scuba Steve Sat, 10/28/2017 - 14:23 Permalink

After so much evidence of HRC's innumerable illegal acts, if she is not indicted, tried and imprisoned it will be obvious to all there is no such thing as rule of law here in FUSA.  That will lead to many more Bundy Ranch events, with a twist: "got a tip that the feds are headed your way to arrest you.  Will be there with 20 armed men in 30 minutes."  That in turn will lead to even more overuse of no-knock SWAT raids and warrant services, and the resultant murders of innocents, children being blown up by flash bangs, etc, and that will lead directly to cops at the door = start shooting. If you can't see that, I can't help you.We don't have to go there, but it sure seems we are headed there.  A cop will rob me if I have the wrong piece of paper stuck to my car, and the judge will tell me to pound sand if I protest (been there, done that).  But HRC can sell uranium to the Russians for $145 Million bribe, and that is OK, can run an insecure email server in a private home to conduct Top Secret government business, destroy all the emails (government property) to cover her tracks, while the FBI director pretends to investigate (only after being prodded to) and prepares her public exoneration before even looking at the evidence.  We KNOW these things to be true.So, BFYTW.  Local and state officials and LE: add your voices to those demanding justice here.

In reply to by Scuba Steve

GUS100CORRINA Ahmeexnal Sat, 10/28/2017 - 12:14 Permalink

Hannity Reacts To Mueller Probe Charges: "When Will Hillary Clinton Be Indicted?"My response: As Mueller is set to file charges on Monday in the Russian probe, I want to reemphasize that this entire investigation is BULLSHIT!! Hanity is absolutely correct in both his assessment of the situation and to be outraged! I too am outraged.Mueller needs to forget about charging anybody and just resign because this S.O.B. is DIRTY to the CORE and a TREASONOUS DESPOT.And we spent TAX PAYER MONEY for this crap. AG Jeff Sessions should resign as well for letting that crap get started in the first place.As an American, this whole situation with MUELLER makes me sick and angry.Maybe MUELLER will charge himself and Comey with TREASON.DRAIN THE "DAMN" SWAMP!!!

In reply to by Ahmeexnal

Giant Meteor Ajax-1 Sat, 10/28/2017 - 11:09 Permalink

Tell me, which admistration over the last 50 plus years hasn't been loaded with criminals? The issue of lack of indictments, and prosecutions aside. The last few are just the latest in a long procession, if you're counting as they pass on by. The confusion I'm talking about is all these "who struck John" narratives. The confusion is pre meditated, self perpetuating, and purposeful. Apparently, up to this point, it has worked fairly well. I expect it's still got some  legs ..

In reply to by Ajax-1

JRobby nancysjet Sat, 10/28/2017 - 10:28 Permalink

If it's Podesta, he is DFG (designated fall guy) but that investigation, if it was ongoing, was not covered much by MSM. Big surprise. Assume a no.Manafort and or Mook seems more likely along with others within the Trump circle to keep the narrative alive in the face of all the other "news" that is leaking in. It doesn't seem likely that much connected to "The Foundation" will ever come up in a Mueller led investigation. Half of DC is involved.Kabuki. The US has a nationwide history of over charging, then going for the plea deal and testimony against others on all levels. Just stop by any courthouse in a populated area and watch the circus of defendants charged with a laundry list of crimes that get fined, then tossed into fee based probation (often run by private entities) and fee based "corrective education" that rely 100% on court directed revenues.Same as it ever was. Real cartel members never talk. 

In reply to by nancysjet