Pat Buchanan Asks "Did The FBI Conspire To Stop Trump?"

Authored by Patrick Buchanan via,

The original question the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign was to answer was a simple one: Did he do it?

Did Trump, or officials with his knowledge, collude with Vladimir Putin’s Russia to hack the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and leak the contents to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump?

A year and a half into the investigation, and, still, no “collusion” has been found. Yet the investigation goes on, at the demand of the never-Trump media and Beltway establishment.

Hence, and understandably, suspicions have arisen.

Are the investigators after the truth, or are they after Trump?

Set aside the Trump-Putin conspiracy theory momentarily, and consider a rival explanation for what is going down here:

That, from the outset, Director James Comey and an FBI camarilla were determined to stop Trump and elect Hillary Clinton.


Having failed, they conspired to break Trump’s presidency, overturn his mandate and bring him down.

Essential to any such project was first to block any indictment of Hillary for transmitting national security secrets over her private email server. That first objective was achieved 18 months ago.

On July 5, 2016, Comey stepped before a stunned press corps to declare that, given the evidence gathered by the FBI, “no reasonable prosecutor” would indict Clinton. Therefore, that was the course he, Comey, was recommending.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch, compromised by her infamous 35-minute tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton — to discuss golf and grandkids — seconded Comey’s decision.

And so Hillary walked. Why is this suspicious?

First, whether or not to indict was a decision that belonged to the Department of Justice, not Jim Comey or the FBI. His preemption of Justice Department authority was astonishing.


Second, while Comey said in his statement that Hillary had been “extremely careless” with security secrets, in his first draft, Clinton was declared guilty of “gross negligence” — the precise language in the statute to justify indictment.

Who talked Comey into softening the language to look less than criminal? One man was FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife, Jill, a Virginia state senate candidate, received a munificent PAC contribution of $474,000 from Clinton family friend and big bundler Terry McAuliffe.

Also urging Comey to soften the fatal phrase “gross negligence” was key FBI agent Peter Strzok. In text messages to his FBI lover Lisa Page, Strzok repeatedly vented his detestation of the “idiot” Trump.

After one meeting with “Andy” (McCabe), Strzok told Page an “insurance policy” was needed to keep Trump out of the White House.

Also, it appears Comey began drafting his exoneration statement of Hillary before the FBI had even interviewed her. And when the FBI did, Hillary was permitted to have her lawyers present.

One need not be a conspiracy nut to conclude the fix was in, and a pass for Hillary wired from the get-go. Comey, McCabe, Strzok were not going to recommend an indictment that would blow Hillary out of the water and let the Trump Tower crowd waltz into the White House.

Yet, if Special Counsel Robert Mueller cannot find any Trump collusion with the Kremlin to tilt the outcome of the 2016 election, his investigators might have another look at the Clinton campaign.

For there a Russian connection has been established.

Kremlin agents fabricated, faked, forged, or found the dirt on Trump that was passed to ex-British MI6 spy Christopher Steele, and wound up in his “dirty dossier” that was distributed to the mainstream media and the FBI to torpedo Trump.

And who hired Steele to tie Trump to Russia?

Fusion GPS, the oppo research outfit into which the DNC and Clinton campaign pumped millions through law firm Perkins Coie.

Let’s review the bidding.

The “dirty dossier,” a mixture of fabrications, falsehoods and half-truths, created to destroy Trump and make Hillary president, was the product of a British spy’s collusion with Kremlin agents.

In Dec. 26’s Washington Times, Rowan Scarborough writes that the FBI relied on this Kremlin-Steele dossier of allegations and lies to base their decision “to open a counterintelligence investigation (of Trump).” And press reports “cite the document’s disinformation in requests for court-approved wiretaps.”

If this is true, a critical questions arises:

Has the Mueller probe been so contaminated by anti-Trump bias and reliance on Kremlin fabrications that any indictment it brings will be suspect in the eyes of the American people?

Director Comey has been fired. FBI No. 2 McCabe is now being retired under a cloud. Mueller’s top FBI investigator, Peter Strzok, and lover Lisa, have been discharged. And Mueller is left to rely upon a passel of prosecutors whose common denominator appears to be that they loathe Trump and made contributions to Hillary.

Attorney General Bobby Kennedy had his “Get Hoffa Squad” to take down Teamsters boss Jimmy Hoffa. J. Edgar Hoover had his vendetta against Dr. Martin Luther King.

Is history repeating itself — with the designated target of an elite FBI cabal being the President of the United States?


Escrava Isaura y3maxx Wed, 12/27/2017 - 12:17 Permalink

Pat Buchanan Asks "Did The FBI Conspire To Stop Trump?" NO. Not the FBI. The conservatives are the one that conspired to stop Trump. FBI is just catching up. FBI is probably embarrassed by not seeing it coming.   In October 2015, during the Republican primary campaign, The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer, hired the American research firm Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates.   
/* Style Definitions */
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";

In reply to by y3maxx

Moe Howard Escrava Isaura Wed, 12/27/2017 - 12:23 Permalink

You fail to understand that establishment Republicans aka "conservatives" and the establishment Democrats aka "liberals" or "progressives" are members of one and the same Political Movement. I say they are both members of the STATIST PARTY, which has the ultimate goal of surrendering the Sovereignty of the United States to a Globalist Cabal.The ultimate goal is Global rule by unelected bureaucrats, controlled by the behind the scenes puppet-masters. The Hidden Hand.

In reply to by Escrava Isaura

Cloud9.5 bobcatz Wed, 12/27/2017 - 12:36 Permalink

The legal labyrinth is a web of arcane laws deigned to entrap everybody.  All of us have broken the law without even knowing it.  Professor James Duane of Regent Law School has warned all of us not to talk to the police for that very reason. is why Mueller has cast a net large enough to ensnare everyone living or dead who ever came in contact with Trump.   If he cannot trip up those people closest to Trump for one of their own missteps, he will go after their kids.  What father would not confess to some crime to keep his son out of federal prison?   Mueller is on a crusade to vindicate himself and his fellow Hillary enablers.  He will make every effort to destroy the POTUS.   The fact that he and his team are sullied by extreme partisanship is becoming more evident every day.  Most witch hunts burn themselves out when the general public comes to view the chief witch hunter as a fanatical lunatic.   That is starting to happen.  

In reply to by bobcatz

SoDamnMad jcaz Wed, 12/27/2017 - 10:47 Permalink

I see that Mueller is going after Monafort AGAIN, this time for offshore bank account activity.  That wasn't his mandate. It was Russian collusion to sway the election.  Does Mueller realize there is a life after this or is this his lifetime mission at $36,000. a day.  People with tar and feathers are getting ornery.

In reply to by jcaz

GUS100CORRINA SoDamnMad Wed, 12/27/2017 - 10:57 Permalink

Pat Buchanan Asks "Did The FBI Conspire To Stop Trump?"My response: Do we really have to ask this question?? The answer is obvious from the facts (evidence): YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SEDITION and TREASON are words that describe the corrupt actions of the DOJ, FBI and IC in general.The penalty: Life in Prison or DEATH!!!!======================================================Definition of seditionconduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch

In reply to by SoDamnMad

woody188 Bulgars Wed, 12/27/2017 - 13:20 Permalink

She had already lost at that point. Two falls brought her health into question. They absolutely had to bring charges because most of the country was freaking out about how they charged General David Petraeus for less but HRC was walking around free. Then it hits that WJC met with AG Lynch on the tarmac. No way HRC could win at that point, so they brought the charges to fake the investigation and try to save their own faces. Too late for that too.

In reply to by Bulgars

ShrimpinAin'tEasy Moe Howard Wed, 12/27/2017 - 12:50 Permalink

He gets into his gas guzzling limo... Rides it to the airfield... Then boards his private Lear jet to an airstrip next to the farthest, most remote woods on the planet, which has a specially designed porcelain God made out of the finest grades of natural elements, blasted in coal fired furnaces, then shipped by way of container ships and excavated by smoke billowing diesel units. Whereby ~ he proceeds to regally assume the posture & blow a popcorn fart. Then ~ flys back home again (while being served a delicacy based on prunes, by scantily clad flight attendants, with a refeuling stop on Epstein Island ~ hoping for better success on his next trip).

In reply to by Moe Howard

bonin006 CheapBastard Wed, 12/27/2017 - 12:04 Permalink

I am starting to wonder if Sessions might be like the televangelists from some years back, preaching against adultery and such when they were neck deep in it themselves. Could Sessions be a pot head? It could explain why he isn't doing anything. If he knows he shouldn't be doing it, because it keeps him unable to do his job because he is personally unable to use it responsibly, that could be the reason he wants the government to control (eliminate) it.

In reply to by CheapBastard

FreeNewEnergy nunyabidnez Wed, 12/27/2017 - 11:45 Permalink

Uh, yeah. Ive been saying it for months. Seesion got himself out of the limelight so he could work behind the scenes.Anybody who doesn't see that should be buying bitcoin at $18k.It never ceases to amaze me how people who are supposed to be smart can be so stupid.Sessions has been filing indictments for months, kicking ass and taking names.All you Sessions bashers can now go home.

In reply to by nunyabidnez

loves the truth rejected Wed, 12/27/2017 - 11:07 Permalink

Dan 2:44 “In the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdomj that will never be destroyed.k And this kingdom will not be passed on to any other people.l It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms,m and it alone will stand forever, Dan 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, someone like a son of manx was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days,y and they brought him up close before that One. 14  And to him there were given rulership,zhonor,a and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him.b His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.cMatt 24:14 And this good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations,q and then the end will come. psalms 37: 9 For evil men will be done away with,j But those hoping in Jehovah will possess the earth.k ? [Waw]10  Just a little while longer, and the wicked will be no more;lYou will look at where they were,And they will not be there.m11  But the meek will possess the earth,nAnd they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace.Psalms 37:29 The righteous will possess the earth,iAnd they will live forever on itIn 930 languages

In reply to by rejected