America's Addictions - Opioids, Donald Trump, And War

Authored by Tom Engelhardt via TomDispatch.com,

When you think of addiction in America today, one thing comes to mind: the opioid epidemic. And it should. It’s serious. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, almost 64,000 Americans died of opioid overdoses in 2016 (more than died in the Vietnam War), an average of 175 people a day. In that year, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration estimated that 11.5 million Americans “misused” pain medication. (Note that such figures are still on the rise.) Only recently, the surgeon general issued a rare national advisory “urging more Americans to carry naloxone, a drug used to revive people overdosing on opioids.” This crisis of addiction has already cost the country an estimated $1 trillion since 2001 and might, in the next three years alone, cost more than half that much again.

The United States, however, has two other crises that, in the long run, will cost Americans far more. Yet they get remarkably little attention as addiction phenomena. The first is so obvious that no one should have to comment on it. Here’s the strange thing, though: it’s a rare moment when there’s any serious analysis of it or real attention given to it as an addiction.

This country (and above all its media) is addicted to Donald J. Trump in a way that no population, no media, possibly not even the Communist Chinese press in the days of Mao Zedong, ever was to any figure. Since he rode that Trump Tower escalator into the presidential race in June 2015 to the tune of Neil Young’s “Rockin’ in the Free World” and took out after Mexican "rapists” and future Great Walls, no one -- nothing -- has ever been covered or attended to this way, online or off, in daily life or in our increasingly shared, increasingly addictive media life. (Yes, the Internet and social media are undoubtedly addictions of some sort, too, but let’s not head down that road or I’ll never stop writing!)

Not Donald Trump’s 2016 electoral victory, nor his tax “reform” gift to the 1%, nor his chance to appoint a second Supreme Court justice (with more openings likely to come) -- none of these or anything else he’s done or is likely to do will qualify as the truest, deepest, most far-reaching of his triumphs. That can only be the unprecedented way he continues to draw attention. It represents a victory of the first order for him of a unique, almost incomprehensible sort, made more so by the inability of those who report on him to take in what’s happened to them or analyze their situation in any serious way.

Addicted to Trump

Donald J. Trump, as candidate and president, has trumped the attention span of this country, possibly of the planet. Eyes have been focused on him, his insults, his tweets, his passing thoughts, his every comment, his acts, major and minor, and the associated acts and reactions of those who circle around him, as never before in history -- not for a king, an emperor, or a dictator, and certainly not for a president. His truest triumph has been to make himself into the voluntary drug of choice for most of a country and all of the media in a way we’ve never imagined possible, and for which, it seems, there is no naloxone.

He has, in the deepest sense, turned the media he loves to loathe, thrives on hating, into a genuine mechanism for producing “fake news” -- about him. It’s only real news if you think that The Donald should be the focus of essentially everything, if you believe that nothing else on this planet should take place except refracted through him.

When it comes to the media in particular, Donald Trump is the opioid crisis. He’s their drug of choice. He gets them high. They can’t help themselves, nor can they stop. As head of CBS Leslie Moonves put it during election campaign 2016: “It may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS.” And then he added, “The money’s rolling in and this is fun. I’ve never seen anything like this, and this [is] going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It’s a terrible thing to say. But bring it on, Donald. Keep going.”

And it’s never ended. The president glues eyeballs to papers, to the endlessly talking heads on the cable news networks, to Twitter, to anything that now passes for media, at a time when so many news outfits are in so many other ways coming unglued. More reporters have undoubtedly been assigned to cover him and his acolytes than ever covered anything or anyone else on a day-by-day, week-by-week basis. Every day of Donald Trump’s life is, in coverage terms, something like the equivalent of the Kennedy assassination, which might be thought of as the first 24/7 TV event, or perhaps the 1994 O.J. Simpson white Ford Bronco car chase that was, in some strange way, a preview of this Trumpian media moment.

It really doesn’t matter much what the “story” is when it comes to his presidency. Whatever it is, it’s promptly swarmed by that media without the slightest sense of proportion or any feeling for what actually matters on this planet of ours. In almost every sense, in fact, Donald Trump now regularly blots out the sun.

Take a small incident just over two weeks ago. With a party of family members, Trump Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stopped off at the Red Hen, a tiny farm-to-table restaurant in Lexington, Virginia. Mid-meal, she was asked to leave by the owner after staff members raised “concerns.” I’m only reminding you of this -- a couple of weeks ago you undoubtedly could have told me every detail -- because it’s already been consigned to the dust bin of history as other Trump-infused tales -- from the resignation of Supreme Court justice Kennedy to prank-calling the president -- have swept it aside. Of course, Sanders's half-eaten dinner also helped sweep aside previous stories of our time like that message on the back of Melania Trump’s coat on her first trip to the U.S.-Mexico border (“I really don’t care. Do U?”).

When Sanders left that restaurant and then tweeted about it, a storm of coverage, as well as a firestorm of tweets, Facebook posts, insults, and praise about the judgment of the restaurant’s owner, arguments over the ideological polarization of the country, and so much else, including the “weaponization” of the restaurant-review website Yelp, flooded over us. Unrelated restaurants with “Red Hen” in their name elsewhere in the country (or even the world) received threats of all sorts and were inundated with insulting messages as were shops and restaurants that happened to be located near the actual Red Hen.

The story became front-page news nationwide and, for instance, led NBC Nightly News(which I happened to watch) on the evening that the stock market swooned over trade-war fears. In my own hometown paper, the New York Times, it was a front-page story and not one but two reporters were assigned to a crucial sideline piece about why President Trump’s Twitter finger was so slow; why, that is, he waited 48 hours -- two full days! -- before tweeting his support for his press secretary by attacking the Red Hen for having a “filthy” exterior and undoubtedly being “dirty” inside. The Times journalists focused on “the president’s uncharacteristically tepid, delayed response,” wondering whether it was a sign that Sanders was on her way out. (The Washington Post, on the other hand, dissected the president’s response in terms of, as the headline on one of its articles put it, “everything Trump got wrong about Red Hen, in one tweet.”) And so it went.

Tell me, then, if this isn’t an addiction, what is it? And what’s the one thing you know about addictions? Whatever high they give you -- and let’s not deny that Donald Trump offers us a constant set of highs (whether as rushes of agreement and pleasure or horror and dismay) -- if you can’t stop yourself from taking the drug, day after day, night after night, there will be a price to pay. Somebody better have the equivalent of naloxone on hand.

Addicted to War

And then there’s that other twenty-first-century all-American addiction, in some ways far stranger than the Trumpian one and likely to be no less costly in the long run: addiction to war. Almost 17 years after the Global War on Terror was launched, the highs -- the invasion of Afghanistan! The taking of Kabul! The smashing of Iraq! The capture of Saddam Hussein! -- are long gone. Now exhausted and discouraged, those hooked nonetheless remain unable to stop.

In some ways, addiction may seem like a strange category when applied to this country’s war-making, as for most Americans the very opposite seems to be true. Since a series of historic global antiwar protests faded out with the invasion of Iraq in the spring of 2003, it’s as if most Americans had gone cold turkey on this country’s credit-card wars. Willfully demobilized by the top officials of the Bush administration, who preferred to conduct their military operations without citizen or congressional oversight, they simply turned away and went about their business. Meanwhile, America’s all-volunteer military, increasingly a kind of foreign legion for much of the population, has continued to fight never-endingly and remarkably fruitlessly across a vast swath of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa.

The divorce of most Americans from Washington's wars and those fighting them may be less than apparent because, according to the polls, the public has a kind of blind trust and soaring “confidence” in the U.S. military, unlike any other part of the government or, for that matter, the society, and because the urge to “thank” the “warriors” is now such a basic part of American life. But all of that is, I suspect, little more than a massive compensation reaction from a public that otherwise could not care less.

When it comes to Washington’s still-spreading war on terror, the media has, if anything, followed suit. Recently, for instance, Reuters correspondent Indrees Ali posted a photo on Twitter of a large, almost empty room filled with chairs, with the caption:

“There are exactly four journalists at the Pentagon briefing on Afghanistan.”

That single image sums up the present situation vividly. Almost 17 years after the invasion of Afghanistan by a military repeatedly hailed as “the finest fighting force the world has ever known,” at a moment when Taliban insurgents are again gaining ground, a Pentagon briefing on developments there is of no interest. Yes, events in such wars are still dutifully reported from time to time, but those reports, often tucked away on the inside pages of papers or deep in the nightly news, don’t hold a candle to Melania’s jacket, the president’s latest tweet, or a Red Hen rebuff.

And yet the photo of that Pentagon briefing is deceptive. It leaves out a key group still in the room: those addicted to an American style of war-making through which, year after year, the still-theoretically dominant power on the planet only seems to induce the spread of terror movements, disorder, destruction, and the displacement of increasingly large populations (contributing to a global refugee crisis that is, in its own way, helping to remake the planet).

Missing from that photo are the characters who have OD’d on U.S. military power and yet can’t stop mainlining it in ways that have become all-too-familiar since 2001. I’m thinking of the generals of the U.S. military, the men who have led an endless set of campaigns as part of what those inside the Pentagon are now grimly referring to as an “infinite war” leading nowhere. And they’re strung out. As Mark Perry reported recently in Foreign Policy, Secretary of Defense James “Mad Dog” Mattis and other American generals, unlike the president’s new civilian counselors, National Security Advisor John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, are not eager for the next potential war, the one with Iran that already looms on the horizon. They understand that they could launch such a conflict successfully, destroying much of Iran’s military (and its nuclear facilities), and still, as with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and so on, somehow not get out.

And yet, much as they don’t want a bright, shiny new war (and who could blame them under the circumstances), they can’t imagine leaving the old ones behind either. And that’s America’s war addiction in a nutshell, one that has long had in its grip most of elite Washington and the rest of a national security state set up around a style of infinite-war-making that must always be fed with ever increasing numbers of taxpayer dollars. Thanks to those dollars, we, the taxpayers, could be thought of as so many street-level drug peddlers in this country’s war equivalent of the opioid epidemic.  The politicians who feed those dollars into the military maw would be the doctors who prescribe opioids, understanding full-well their ability to hook patients.  And the Military-Industrial Complex -- the giant weapons companies and the warrior corporations that now go into action in lock-step with that military -- would be the drug companies that have profited so off the opioid crisis even as they stoked it.

Returning momentarily to Donald Trump, you can feel the power of that war addiction in his inability to fulfill his promise to fight those conflicts in a winning style and, if necessary, quickly extricate the country from what he termed its "$7 trillion" Greater Middle Eastern disaster. In his own fashion, he, too, has been hooked. And when the increasingly tired and distraught generals he chose to surround himself with proved unpalatable to him, Trump notably picked as replacements civilians guaranteed to keep the ball rolling when it came to America’s wars from hell.

So, addiction? If you don’t think this country has an addiction crisis (other than opioids), think again.

Comments

Dutti powow Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:06 Permalink

"America's Addictions - Opioids, Donald Trump, And War"

Yes, but Opioids and War Addiction have been around long before Trump.

Why was there never an article,  just as true for example:

America's Addictions - Opioids, Barack Obama, And War

Oh, I get it: the author wants to  get the name of Donald Trump into the same sentence as some other negatively afflicted words.

I guess this author would not want to write for example:

America's Success - Low Unemployment, Donald Trump And No New Wars.

 

In reply to by powow

Rapunzal Dutti Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:10 Permalink

The opioid addiction is no coincidence. It’s coinciding with the invasion of Afghanistan and the rollout of big Pharma with opioid painkillers. Kind of an irony that the soldiers coming home with PTSD, from guarding the poppy fields in Afghanistan. Are getting opioids prescribed by the VA. Don’t forget the CIA did this to black communities in the inner cities during The Vietnam war. Now it’s sold to everyone, maybe one of the signs of an end of an empire.

In reply to by Dutti

roddy6667 Dutti Fri, 07/13/2018 - 03:44 Permalink

You are a puppet if you believe the "low unemployment" numbers. The per capita income and the median household income have not gone up. The median household debt outside mortgages has gone up. If more people are working, why aren't they getting paid?

The purchasing power of the American middle class has backslid to the 1967 levels, yet some people are cheering about MAGA.

In reply to by Dutti

Scipio Africanuz ted41776 Fri, 07/13/2018 - 03:10 Permalink

At the rate things are going, America may not even survive at all. Russia did, China did, even the UK did albeit as a tiny island but the USA? It's almost a zombie nation save for some brave holdouts, screaming from the rafters that the Republic is in peril!! The others just go on like zombies, unaware and unconcerned.

Something is going on here, and I'm still trying to tease it out because it boggles the mind that the military is fighting directly, and indirectly, in so many wars without success, its budget increasing ever steadily, and the country delving ever deeper into financial ruin, and economic catastrophe, and still, folks continue unconcerned.

They say it can't happen here, and you ask, what can't happen here? My answer? The unmentionable, which can't even be whispered...

In reply to by ted41776

zebra Thu, 07/12/2018 - 22:48 Permalink

Just wondering, Tyler, who pays you to scan and collect gloom and doom articles everyday? And why don't you use a real name?

MsCreant zebra Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:11 Permalink

Check out suggested readings on the right hand side of the website under contact information. You may find the answers you seek. I think it works well this way.

Mostly this is aggregated news. Every now and then they do their own investigative finance journalism. They have blown some minds with their work on HFT and bonds. Don't see so much any more. I guess it is about resources. 

I like the freedom here. The bad part of freedom is that there is a lot of crap here too. But that is the cost of freedom of speech, sifting through crap to find the particles of gold that show up from time to time. 

I couldn't be here if I had to use my own name. Tyler(s) might have the same issue. 

In reply to by zebra

Meat Bunny MsCreant Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:04 Permalink

Trump is the symbol.

To those who 'love' him, he represents the mobs bringing down statues of Stalin.

To those who hate him, he's the anti-christ who created all the evils that we have brought down on ourselves as a society.

 

Those who have a Trump hating fixation need to be honest with themselves. Those who 'love' Trump need to find better heroes in a field of charlatans and fools.

In reply to by MsCreant

Cabreado Thu, 07/12/2018 - 22:55 Permalink

Until the focus of the citizenry is on a thoroughly corrupt and defunct Congress, the trajectory will stay its course.

Oops...

the People have Already Failed.

besnook Thu, 07/12/2018 - 22:58 Permalink

someone could probably refresh my memory with the author of " the business of america is business". i think it was hoover. anyway, war is business and the most lucrative of all businesses, the usa taxpayer.

Chief Joesph Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:08 Permalink

"....almost 64,000 Americans died of opioid overdoses in 2016".  What a great way to weed out the ones with lower IQs. That should help improve the international PISA score rankings for the U.S.,.  Besides, with a population of more than 324 million, we need population control in this country anyway.  Not enough dying from auto accidents, police shootings, school shootings, or from the other addictions to gore and warfare. 

Balance-Sheet Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:22 Permalink

Worthless journalist complains about Trump Addiction then goes on and on about Trump. Throttle this poor confused person and keep him off ZH. We are currently experimenting with a permissive policy on Opioids. people are making their own choices, taking their own risks, and paying the price. I do not like it but people are demanding to use the stuff - no one jams a needle into their arm.

Don't want to risk addiction and an OD death do not start on Dope.

Balance-Sheet Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:28 Permalink

War is not rare in History but a continuous, chronic, commonplace so we can expect War to continue indefinitely. This is the case all the way back to the earliest days before any sort of Civilization. There never was a Garden of Eden nor a moment when Humanity sinned and released all the bad things into Life.

Naturally we may not want War but this has nothing to do with whether we get War or not. Another great war - WW3- may simply be inevitable and it certainly seems so for those with an historical perspective. Certainly massive civil strife/civil war is at low intensity in Europe the one place where you might expect they would have had enough but apparently not so.

 

San Pedro Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:39 Permalink

Liberal alphabet news media can hardly be considered "news organizations". It's obvious to the most casual observer the alphabet news org's are pom pom dancers for the DNC. Everybody knows this. They are also owned by massive corporate interests that are entrenched in the very fabric of "progressivism"..proving yet again liberals have to lie to other liberals to forward the ruinous liberal agenda.   

JibjeResearch Thu, 07/12/2018 - 23:49 Permalink

Fact: The UK destroyed China using opium.

Fact: Opioid is killing Americans, and it's legal.

 

Who is supplying the Opioid?  They are the one killing Americans and America!

peippe Fri, 07/13/2018 - 00:02 Permalink

Tom E. let me explain it to you.

64,000 dead in a country of 330 million+ is a slight statistical deviation.

Trump Administration had oh, just about zero to do with the incubation period of the 'crisis'.

Like all statistical anomalies, this one solves itself. I know it's brutal, but it's like the character

Rick Grimes said in the walking dead:  'the thing is, they're not all gonna make it'.

Relax, quit blaming today's boss for nonsense come to fruition from 20 years ago.

monad Fri, 07/13/2018 - 00:11 Permalink

The reason the whole swamp hates the Trump presidency is because he's an outsider to their political class. He crashed their orgy of crime and now he's rocking as the CEOTUS. What they fear is if he, an outsider, a shnook even their Kenyan puppet could mock, could run the circus better than them, other outsiders will see this and kick their sorry asses off the island. What comes after the President Donald John Trump? More pain. The swamp is getting squeezed real good.

I hear Bill Maher doesn't like very much the government we deserve. Poetic justice is headed his way.

SuzerainGreyMole Fri, 07/13/2018 - 00:31 Permalink

The pointless wars and also the terrible opioid crisis helped bring Trump into power, yet he is so often seen to a part of the addiction called the deep state.  However, I believe this is actually a false understanding, although it is not always easy to prove if you look superficially.

Trump is actually an antidote to the other addictions, but appears to the casual observer to be yet another dimension to them.  He has to play their game before he can start to dismantle it from inside.  His outer behavior is often his way of covering his own tracks. 

ZIRPdiggler Fri, 07/13/2018 - 01:56 Permalink

Oh Tyler. morons. MSM coverage of Trump doesnt count. All they are out to do is assassinate his character on a daily basis. Maybe Americans are addicted to freedom and liberty and our socialist hellhole country is anathema to what Trump represents. Ever think of that? prolly not.

Cockoo Fri, 07/13/2018 - 02:44 Permalink

Deaths by Western Countries Pharma:
Chemothherapy  18,545.009
Latrogenic deaths 14,538,106
Hospital errors 8.159.807

Western Countries since Jan 2000: Psychiatric drugs include suicides 9,272.502

Worldwide deaths since Jan 2000: Opioids + presc drugs & herion:  2,058, 498

 SuperBugs: 12,981,563

WW I: 9,722,620  /  WW II: 50 - 80 Million

Ink Pusher Fri, 07/13/2018 - 02:49 Permalink

In the 60's it was Weed , Acid, Shooms and MDA.

In the 70's it was Hash Coke,Junk and Meth.

In the 80's everything went Beer or Big Pharma and Synthetic.

In the 90's Production + Profit as usual Surpassed quality.

Here we are in the 21st Century and the soldiers are guarding poppy fields for Big Pharma and the governments have muscled into the weed markets...

I've watched it all from ringside and even got some blood on my face.

Nothing changes except the players,the game remains the same.

If you think all of those body-bags that come home from the war zones are loaded with anything except opium or heroin, think again eh......

 

janus Fri, 07/13/2018 - 02:58 Permalink

Tom Engelhardt suffers from TDS.  this much is clear.

Tom should also understand that things have only just begun.  Where was your pity and magnanimity a few years ago?  Did you think it coy or clever that certain critical thinkers were persecuted for sport?  Is your charity only reserved for those sharing your political bias?  hmmmmmm.  I don't think you've near learned your lesson.  

the show must go on, tom...and it's yet to crescendo...not even through with the first stanza 

Not only has the Red Hen not disappeared down any memory hole, the fun has only just begun.  That professor husband of hers absolutely must lose his tenure and employment.  VMI will be receiving letters and pressure from the alum.

>Conduct unbecoming an officer is even more unseemly in professors what train them. 

yes oh yes, they must both be ruined and immolated.

fair is fair, thomas...do you doubt me?

janus

StinkyLebinowitz Fri, 07/13/2018 - 04:14 Permalink

I see ZH is publishing another dumb fuck who doesn't know shit about what he is talking about.

Killer opioids are all connected to illegal drug abuse. But in order to find that out, it would take some actual investigation into the data related to the actual causes of death. More people die every day from choking on food than those who die from correctly taking an opioid pain medication that was prescribed to them. 

The addiction rate for people who are using their prescribed pain medications also is no more than 0.5%. That is approx 1/20th the rate of alcohol addiction in this country.