You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

10,000 Wells Fargo October $26 Put Block Trades At 10.23 AM

Tyler Durden's picture




Someone just traded 10,000 Oct $26 Puts on the ISE. At first blush it appears it was a bid-side trade, and not a roll.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 12:54 | Link to Comment Mos
Mos's picture

Warren you sly devil you, are you hedging your WFC position?

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:40 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

or M.Whitney/clients buying...i have yet to see her ever retract her opinion of wfc, which is not very good.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:45 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

Not much of a hedge if they expire in October. Seems more like a trade.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:04 | Link to Comment Big Al
Big Al's picture

Hey somebody had to stay in the home to protect it from vandals.

Also, this could be another chance for the Big O to weigh in on the evils of racial profiling.   I'm bet my next paycheck that Charonda (the Wells executive in question) was black and the neighbors were white.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:19 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

executive perq?

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:38 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

According to the article, Wells Fargo said in a written statement that the former owner required Wells Fargo to keep the house off the market for a period of time. 

Oh really.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:07 | Link to Comment primus
primus's picture

Seems like more trickery from the banks to me. Even with all the hocus-pocus accounting gambits running full tilt, none of these banks can actually afford to go through foreclosure (price discovery) and take a loss.

http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/1-1-trillion-in-toxic-loans-908-billion-in-interest-only-and-198-billion-in-option-arms-the-zombie-loans-that-simply-dont-die/

The issue of shadow inventory is important because many of these banks are simply not moving on homes and ignoring the foreclosure process completely.  Not true?  Well look at some examples across the country:

 

“(Cleveland) Renetta Atterberry thought she had lost her East 102nd Street house. So she was shocked to learn in January — five years after her mortgage company filed for foreclosure — that it was still in her name.

Worse, the long-vacant rental home had been vandalized and she faced a raft of housing code violations. Since then, she has been saddled with debts of about $12,000 to pay for demolition and back taxes.

“I thought I had nothing else to do with that home,” said Atterberry. “I was so embarrassed and humiliated by this.”

Her mortgage company didn’t buy the house and never took it to sheriff’s sale to see if somebody else would, leaving Atterberry the legal owner, responsible for upkeep and taxes.

These so-called “bank walkaways” are another troubling development in the foreclosure crisis, particularly in cities like Cleveland with weaker housing markets, say housing advocates and government officials.”

In many other areas, banks are simply walking away from homes.  In fact, it is a cold and calculating move.  If they take possession of a property, they are responsible for taxes and maintaining the property according to city ordinances.  Instead, they do nothing.  In their calculus, they figure legal fees and handling the foreclosure process correctly outweigh doing absolutely nothing.  You would think with trillions in bailouts banks would have a structured system in place after two long years into the crisis but they are as incompetent as they ever were.

 

 

 

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:18 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

trust me, in the mortgage industry, this is a no-no.  regulators are VERY picky about this sort of thing, especially the OCC, who would regulate the bank entity that Wells uses for mortgage.

the head honchos are not even allowed to get a mortgage from their own company.  generally employees are not allowed to buy REOs, even if they are willing to pay full price.

this is why the FDIC has been so reluctant to allow private equity firms to buy banks - self-dealing with bank assets is not kosher.

if wells is using REOs as executive perks, the FDIC and OCC will be all over them like white on rice.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 20:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:04 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

That is probably what this bet is about -  the political fallout from that story should be enormous.  Here is how I see it playing out - this really pisses off a lot of large depositors, who start pulling out their money.  This cascades into a bank run, which takes them down.

People are fed up enough about these banks, and this could be a catalyst to get people to pull deposits.  With the amount of leverage at a bank, it doesn't take much to start the avalanche - a 10% deposit loss is huge for a bank.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 12:57 | Link to Comment zarrmax
zarrmax's picture

52.321% impl vol. I have to believe the trader is selling the vol. I'd look for WFC to trade higher before leveling off and the vol drops.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:38 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Citicrap Oct $4 put options are trading with IV of 62%. Much deeper out of the money in terms of %--WFC cheaper, relatively speaking. Don't believe it was a seller on WFC...

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 12:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

I posted this under the Carry Trade thread:

More big put buying in WFC today. 10000+ at 26 strike in OCT. Spurious activity in BAC--nearly 10000 puts at 16 and 17 in Oct but 10000+ in 17 and 18 calls. Not matching up like yesterdays WFC January simultaneous trade of selling 100,000 puts struck at 20 and buying 50,000 struck at 25. Given who owned 25% of BAC at the end of Q2, I would be wary of any BAC activity. Furthmore, over 27000 puts of C struck at 4 in Oct.  today. Fun fun fun...

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:40 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Who would be stupid enough to buy these?

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:17 | Link to Comment omi
omi's picture

WFC backratio is not too bad. you earn some +theta. and if the stock drops, you profit too.

 

I made some screenies for you.. we all like screenies. http://finpic.blogspot.com/2009/09/caught-large-wfc-trade-yesterday.html

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:46 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Sorry but I don't believe that HFT and Flash can define the delta and the dmz any better than the american military did it in vietnam. 

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:05 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Not a bad play, holding it on a distressed bank over a weekend in Sept & Oct... if that was a buyer (regardless of IV%, that price is not terribly expensive - even for WFC, which trades with a considerably higher premium on puts compared to the other big banks).

 

Maybe waiting until 3:58 to run the buy might be more favorable, but you'd have to have it arranged already.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:09 | Link to Comment zarrmax
zarrmax's picture

agreed.... 90cents is not enough for me to write against a crap bank like WFC.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:16 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

I think we're talking about buying puts--option market makers lay off the risk by trading delta neutral and selling the stock. The put seller is not taking the risk on a block trade because they are hedging it at the time the trade is done.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:43 | Link to Comment zarrmax
zarrmax's picture

This is why I'm a muni trader....:) Thanks for the clarification....

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:26 | Link to Comment sondog
sondog's picture

Bodes

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:07 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

I might add watching the AIG Sep put option chain is like watching flickering Christmas tree lights.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:29 | Link to Comment sondog
sondog's picture

Are we back to this? Don't be an idiot.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:10 | Link to Comment SDRII
SDRII's picture

Any merit to speculating on the continued dollar down - obama schedules a speech on crisis. any way to track if the major banks are hedgeing dollar in anticipation of an event which would be of course pre arranged with the banks to prevent against losses per an fdr like event? Why is the us intel community coming out now saying iran has crossed a threshold when the Mossad has been saying such for 2 months. is the US presence in Afghan about pincer on iran rather than any care about Tali? Russia say no sanction on Iran. If Israeli goes would the US accomidate its planes in the Afghan desert? Would dollar rally on such an event or would it be perceived as long ball?

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:30 | Link to Comment What_Me_Worry
What_Me_Worry's picture

I would think a decent world event would spark gold most and USD second.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:50 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

Gold seems to be sparking just fine today without any world events... can you imagine what it would do with an actual event... I think Citi's prediction of $2000 would become relevant very quickly...

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:45 | Link to Comment Sardonicus
Sardonicus's picture

Netanyahoo cannot wait to poke Iran in the eye.

I think it happens soon.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:54 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

I agree 100%... it will happen... he will not want history to attribute his inaction as the reason Iran joins the Nuclear Power Club.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:56 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

any guess on the conversation between Netanyahu and Putin the other day?

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:59 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

All I can say is it must have been interesting... don't think they have a lot in common... what do you think?

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:19 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Ben: Nice tie Vlad
Vlad: What the fuck is that supposed to mean? Are you implying you are even with us?
Ben: Is that a Hermes?
Vlad: Did you just say I have Herpes? I don't have Herpes and if I did I wouldn't tell you.
Ben: I just thought...
Vlad: Yeah, you just thought that you are the equivalent to my great nation and that I have Herpes.
Ben: How's that negative GDP working for you?
Vlad: Eat me, you little terrorist.

 

 

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:25 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

LOL... the next Jon Stewart...

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:44 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Ha...

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 15:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 15:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:31 | Link to Comment chunkylover42
chunkylover42's picture

how is this helpful?  anonymous poster cites some "story" (read:rumor) going around about a false flag operation.  where did you hear this?  from whom?  when?  do you have any details?  why should we listen to this?

provide a source or some credible information or don't bother.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 15:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 17:52 | Link to Comment chunkylover42
chunkylover42's picture

There were massive amounts of sell orders for American and United Airlines in the run up to 911. There is a currently a need to have a reason for a financial collapse.

 

In case your head has been in the sand, there have been numerous national guard units moving into the DC over the last several months to guard the Capitol from "terrorist." Those reports are easy to find.

 

none of this addresses my point.  You are correct that there was selling of UAL and AA in the runup to 911, but I did not see any evidence or claims that this is occurring today.  You simply said something vague about a "false flag" operation.  Connect the dots for me on this.  Also explain your contention that "there is currently a need to have a reason for a financial collapse".  This sounds like opinion, which is fine, but I'd be interested to know how you got there.  You saying it does not make it a fact.

My head is generally not in the sand (but thanks for the condescending remark), but your point about "numerous national guard movements into DC" proves absolutely nothing.  The implication you have made is that such movements are unusual.  I am far from a military expert, so enlighten me as to the relevence of this event. 

I see no facts or evidence to support anything that was said.  That's all I'm looking for.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 18:03 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

The voice of reason... thanks...

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 18:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:35 | Link to Comment You Cant Handle...
You Cant Handle the Truth's picture

This really isn't that much $ is it, in the big picture??

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:57 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Read up on trading delta neutral. Market makers hedge when they sell puts by selling the proportionate amount of shares relative to the strike. They then manage this in real time by buying and selling shares to stay hedged. The market maker buys volatility low and sells vol high. They typically do not take a stand on the direction of the market.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:03 | Link to Comment You Cant Handle...
You Cant Handle the Truth's picture

Thank you for the explanation.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:42 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

I'm guess it was put buying due to WFC showing their gross incompetence today by actually have the nerve and stupidity to downgrade AIG.

 

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:51 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Another Whopper today....Huntington Bank bet on 5 trading days til expiry. 28000 puts struck at $4 for 10-20 cents. With it nearly at the money, the IV is .81 on an average price of .15 cents. Also, Key Sep ATM put volume over 23000. Yeehaw!

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 13:59 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Have to love the bets on FDIC Fridays as events start to play out (even though FDIC has to be on 'holiday' until Congress gets around to it).

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:06 | Link to Comment avatar
avatar's picture

I will be closing my accounts with WFC within the next few weeks. Long overdue.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Crazy. You better do it sooner.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:12 | Link to Comment avatar
avatar's picture

no doubt, unforunately too many hooks via auto pay and the such to coordinate it all at once.

 

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 16:14 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Yeah, took me several weeks (had to unhook Paypal, etc) but it sure felt good when I did it.

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:10 | Link to Comment Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

And the HAL 9000 casino traders are heatmapping casinos.

Heh

Sym:MTM

Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 14:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 21:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/11/2009 - 23:58 | Link to Comment long-shorty
long-shorty's picture

you can always feel good about yourself for not being Lenny :-)

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!