This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

$12 Billion 30 Year Auction Closes At 4.009% High Yield, 2.37 Bid To Cover

Tyler Durden's picture




 
  • Yields 4.009% vs. Exp. 3.994%
  • Bid To Cover 2.37 vs. Avg. 2.59 (Prev. 2.92)
  • Indirects 34.5% vs. Avg. 48.03% (Prev. 46.7%)
  • Indirect Bid To Cover: 1.51
  • Allotted at high 27.53%
  • 8.5% of accepted to directs

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:12 | 93017 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The Fed has run out of cash? Interns slept at GS? Is the sky is starting to fall? >4% yield is a big change from the summer theme

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:37 | 93050 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

No from what I can tell. The higher the long term bonds ramp up relative to the short term bonds the more likely it is that interest rates on a number of things will have to rise in the future. It has been ramping hard till they took the super short bonds up just a bit in interest.

The bond market always seems to know where the economy is heading. It's like it has access to our bank account information and tax returns. Oh wait. It TOTALLY does.

http://fixedincome.fidelity.com/fi/FIHistoricalYield

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:11 | 93129 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

excellent link, thank you.

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:20 | 93026 Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

Evidently the market (bonds) doesn't like these results.

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:25 | 93032 sleestak
sleestak's picture

Has someone kept trace of the last driblets of above-board QE? What remains that can be used to relieve the dealers of this cusip?

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:47 | 93067 Icarus
Icarus's picture

$5.6B

It's one of the many, much appreciated things that Tyler does.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/tiny-13-billion-pomo-done-enough-push-m...

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:57 | 93222 Rama V
Rama V's picture

Yes, the QE data is much appreciated, and the $5.6B could be completely gone anyday.

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 15:34 | 93286 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Yeah, only 20B a week of MBS POMO to go, every week until the end of time.

http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/mbs/

 

 

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 16:10 | 93351 Rama V
Rama V's picture

What did the lady say,"During the S&L crisis there were 1000 Federal indictments with only 3000 Savings and Loans."  When will someone indict the writers of the MBS?  Can a democracy do otherwise than reflect the values of its People?

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:40 | 93041 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

What are the lyrics from that old tune?

Slip sliding away.

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:40 | 93053 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

the nearer your destination...

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:37 | 93049 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Fucking thank god. I was bleeding cash on TBT calls.

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 13:49 | 93072 Don Smith
Don Smith's picture

I don't understand the slip sliding reference or the "bond market doesn't like these results" analysis.  30-yr. is trading in secondary at 3.98, the yield came in at essentially 4.01 versus an expected 4.00, and is trading way above par at 108. 

What part of the results indicates the bond markets portend a dim future?  I'm not being rhetorical, I simply can't read the tea leaves clearly, as I see no particluar doom in this report. 

(BTW, thanks for keepin' 'em coming, TD)

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:01 | 93094 tradeking13
tradeking13's picture

30-Year

CURRENT PRICE/YIELD:  107-20 / 4.06

PRICE/YIELD CHANGE:  -1-00 / .055

TIME:  13:53

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:14 | 93137 tradeking13
tradeking13's picture

Actually,

30-Year

CURRENT PRICE/YIELD:  107-04 / 4.08

PRICE/YIELD CHANGE:  -1-16 / .082

TIME:  14:08

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:22 | 93158 Don Smith
Don Smith's picture

Uh, *gulp*, OIC.  I started writing that post before the parabolic move. 

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:24 | 93160 Don Smith
Don Smith's picture

OK, but wait, isn't this just an example of the Fed failing to tlak down the market enough in advance of this auction?  Stocks are up, so wouldn't we expect treasuries to be down? 

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:26 | 93164 sleestak
sleestak's picture

Am I being foolish to think that this drubbing of long bonds could be the moment the shorts have been waiting for?

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:32 | 93177 tradeking13
tradeking13's picture

Yes

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 14:34 | 93180 sleestak
sleestak's picture

why?  negative real rates are what fuels all. remember the blowout in 5/07 when china stopped buying?

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 15:04 | 93233 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Dude, you DO know you're talking to a dog, don't you?

:>)

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 17:42 | 93502 cocoablini
cocoablini's picture

2.37 ratio? Were we not in the 3's last couple of months? Sounds like a weakening market

Thu, 10/08/2009 - 17:51 | 93516 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

More meaningful than the bid to cover is the yield range as you may have a lot of PDs bidding that don't actually want to buy, a 184bp range seems like quite a lot.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!