You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

$1.9 Trillion In Renovations To The GSE-Bloated US Debt Ceiling On Deck

Tyler Durden's picture




You didn't think all those massive stock market gains would come free of charge? The cost: about $1.9 trillion in new debt allowance according to Steny Hoyer, almost $500 billion higher than previous estimates by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad. It took a mere 4 days for Conrad's optimistic estimate of the future cost of today's carefree living to go up by 30%. And who will bear the brunt of this ludicrous leverage: the U.S. soldier. Dow Jones reports that the debt ceiling increase provision will be added to legislation setting forth the Pentagon's budget for 2010. "It is unconscionable for the Democratic majority to pile the debt limit increase on the backs of the American soldier." In ironic retrospect, it will not be so "unconscionable" when the same soldier is sent for some preliminary diligence work west of the Pacific, just in case America's partner in the most crucial prisoners' dilemma game of all time, China, decides to finally defect, and tell the Fed it can monetize its own debt without Beijing's cooption. But that's a topic for late 2010/early 2011.

More from Dow Jones:

According to Treasury estimates, the current debt ceiling is expected to be reached soon. The federal budget deficit in fiscal 2009 was $1.4 trillion and, through the first two months of this year, is on course to be even higher.

According to the figure made public by Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D., Md.) Friday, the move would hike the government's ability to borrow to between $13.9 trillion to $14 trillion.

Increasing the debt ceiling itself is largely symbolic as the public debt is the accumulation of past deficits, or money already spent.

 

But were the U.S. to breach its debt limit, it would default on its obligations, potentially lose its prized top-shelf credit rating and have to pay significantly higher interest to its creditors. Such a scenario, albeit an extremely unlikely one, would have tremendous ramifications for the wider financial markets.

And just to make it very clear who is betting the house that China will forever keep buying US Bills at 0% in perpertuity (good luck with the 30 Years), "Reps. Steve Scalise (R., La.) and Kevin Brady (R., Texas) introduced legislation Friday that would require a stand-alone vote on any incrase in the debt ceiling."

The bill would require a House vote of a two-thirds majority in to hike the debt ceiling. While it is almost certain not to become law given the size of the Democratic majority in the House, it is the latest salvo from Republicans who are hoping to tap into growing public angst about the state of the country's finances.

As of last count, the total debt outstanding was at $12.08 trillion (with a marginal cushion as Marla had disclosed previously). Yet with the two most recent Treasury auctions still to close, keep a close eye on this number. The Treasury Secretary and the Senate are both playing far too close to the vest with something which, even if a pure technicality, will force the rating agencies to find the US in default, as much as they would hate to do so.

 




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 14:52 | Link to Comment HelluvaEngineer
HelluvaEngineer's picture

...and gold continues to get pounded

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 14:58 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Never underestimate the sneakiness of CongressCritters. Only this time they've miscalculated. Their thinking is that tucking this away in the Pentagon budget will jam it right through . And the timing is perfect.....when the sheeple have sugar plums dancing in their heads.

Now if they can get the 2010 Bond market to ignore this little piece of statutory window dressing, they'll be home free come next November.

NOT !!  

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 14:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 15:00 | Link to Comment 10044
10044's picture

Does anybody with half a brain think that the US can repay all that money?? I mean seriously, how dumb can they be? Get your money out before they devalue the dollar to repay the debt with 1/3 less dollars. What a bunch fking bozos

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 20:05 | Link to Comment David449420
David449420's picture

Good Luck with that.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 17:04 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Does anybody with half a brain think that the US can repay all that money??

No.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 17:10 | Link to Comment MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Never underestimate the stupidity of those dollarbugs. Seriously, the dollar has been losing buying power on such a long-term scale that it only has the value of about 4 cents since the Federal Reserve Note (dollar) came into being during the early 1900s. In 2009 alone it has lost approximately 10%, yet still those dollarbugs keep buying bonds and other garbage.

Meanwhile goldbugs went from $35/oz to $1110/oz.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 17:14 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

This isn't about repaying the money. It's all about shifting the blame to the next administration.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 19:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 15:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 15:49 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Yes, it's thoroughly disgusting.

http://www.iamsorryivotedforobama.com/

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 15:10 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Yes I agree, largely symbolic AT THIS POINT.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 15:35 | Link to Comment Overpowered By Funk
Overpowered By Funk's picture

FWIW I'm learning how to reload my used brass.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:57 | Link to Comment Shameful
Shameful's picture

Dillon press my friend! And reloading is a must if you plan on shooting much, though be warned it's hard to get primers now.  My old man just bought a bunch but had to pay a premium for them.

Though it's also hard to buy ammo still as well.  Go figure in the middle of an economic crisis and they can't keep ammo on the shelves.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 15:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:00 | Link to Comment Sancho Ponzi
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 18:36 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

"Russian Military Analysts are reporting to Prime Minister Putin that US President Barack Obama has issued orders ..."

First sentence. You can stop right there.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 20:31 | Link to Comment David449420
David449420's picture

I'm wondering if this EUTimes is the National Enquirer equivalent in Europe?

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:21 | Link to Comment Hammer59
Hammer59's picture

   When Bush came into office, the National Debt stood at 5 trillion USD. He promptly doubled that amount in eight years. Where was Republican's indignation during that time? Besides incurring insurmountable debt, he bloated the size of Government, involved us in 2 unending expensive wars, increased entitlements, and cut taxes primarily for the wealthy---leaving behind a ruined economy. Now everyone is concerned about debt ceilings?  Now we are questioning the cost of war?  Where was your voice when it really mattered? Your hypocrisy is shameful.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:30 | Link to Comment Overpowered By Funk
Overpowered By Funk's picture

Most of here are well aware of the failings of the Bush years, and you'd be hard pressed to find many that would defend that record. Obama and his change crowd are dancing to the same song, however, and it's getting old. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 12/12/2009 - 00:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 18:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 12/11/2009 - 21:25 | Link to Comment docj
docj's picture

Spare us the lecture, sport - there's plenty of hypocrisy to go around.  After all, the same people who called George Bush's FY 2003 budget deficit (inflated by the collapse of dot-com and 9/11) of about 465B "reckless" among other things are now in charge and claiming that deficits 3-times that size - and growing - might not be "big enough".

Bush, Hastert and Frist (etc.), for all their legion faults, were spending pikers in comparison with the current crowd.

So yeah, like I said, plenty of hypocrisy to go around.

Fri, 12/11/2009 - 16:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 12/12/2009 - 03:13 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

People don't get elected by telling the truth.

Sun, 12/13/2009 - 01:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 12/13/2009 - 04:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!