• Steve H. Hanke
    05/04/2016 - 08:00
    Authored by Steve H. Hanke of The Johns Hopkins University. Follow him on Twitter @Steve_Hanke. A few weeks ago, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) sprang a surprise. It announced that a...

25th Sequential Stock Fund Outflow, $81 Billion Year To Date

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:29 | 681434 King_of_simpletons
King_of_simpletons's picture

Money going to the sidelines. LOL !

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:37 | 681458 centerline
centerline's picture

401k's getting cashed out too.  Between a rock and hard place is starting to look rather plush now.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:02 | 681538 midtowng
midtowng's picture

Inflows might go positive for a short time, but if the market dumps again watch the outflows resume.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 18:59 | 681799 DormRoom
DormRoom's picture

err that's because ppl are reallocating from US equities to commmodity &PM based foreign equities (TSX, ASX, etc)

foreign equity inflows remains very strong.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:31 | 681445 Dr. Richard Head
Dr. Richard Head's picture

So it's a good time to go into equities then right?  Sell my gold, pull out a HELOC, and buy by the fistful right?  /sarc

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:34 | 681453 HarryWanger
HarryWanger's picture

Looks like it's trending up though. Maybe next week it turns positive? 

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:35 | 681460 treemagnet
treemagnet's picture

only if you count POMO

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:38 | 681470 Bill Lumbergh
Bill Lumbergh's picture

Or maybe there is nothing left to be taken out by those people who want to exit.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:41 | 681483 Ragnarok
Ragnarok's picture

+1

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:43 | 681485 Hype Alert
Hype Alert's picture

as in who is left to sell???  May be the same issue with insider selling.  Is there such a thing as dry heaves for stock selling where there is just nothing left to come out?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:49 | 681505 Minion
Minion's picture

It seems the outflows are always greater near price bottoms and lesser at tops.  I could see it going positive (briefly) before the market trend reverses. 

"Everyone is a trader at bottoms and an investor at tops" - Prechter  :D

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 19:05 | 681808 rocker
rocker's picture

Prechter is clueless. He said go 200% short in February. How did that work out?  But hey, he's got 20 ways to take your money and prove to you that he can predict Nothing.  He does not trade either. Too busy selling you Fear.  

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:34 | 681454 treemagnet
treemagnet's picture

Its not real until you hear it on CNBC.

<Sarcasm on>

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:33 | 681455 Cyan Lite
Cyan Lite's picture

-$202m is getting really tiny.  We could see it go positive next week.

(Of course the market will then rally another 30% on this second derivative change)

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:39 | 681473 HarryWanger
HarryWanger's picture

Yes, it is. I think we could see it positive next week.

BTW: ERCI is now about 35% above it's low a few weeks ago and continues to trend higher.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:44 | 681486 MarkS
MarkS's picture

If Retail comes back in we'll know we're near the top...

It is possible that that the outflows will tail off for tax purposes - people can't take anymore 'hardship/education' money out without having to pay the 10% penalty.

 

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:48 | 681506 101 years and c...
101 years and counting's picture

do you work for the BLS?

 

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:00 | 681532 midtowng
midtowng's picture

That's sort of an exaggeration. The ECRI is still at negative 7 and has hardly budged from when it went below negative 10.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=11946133

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 18:39 | 681767 erik
erik's picture

ECRI went from -10s to -5s in mid-2008.  What a leading indicator.  At best it was coincident with what the stock market was doing.  Take a look at 2008.  It didn't lead shit.

Same goes for today.  It has improved because the market has rallied on QE2 hopes. 

The ECRI is a coincident indicator dressed in leading indicator clothing.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:33 | 681618 firstdivision
firstdivision's picture

The problem with the ECRI is how much did 'expected' QE2 pricing on stocks effect the ECRI.  If the stocks have a decent weighting on the ECRI, then the reading is quite skewed.  I am ignoring all index's like the ECRI and such, as leading indicators in that have been all have been affected by the QE hopium that has flooded the system.  Like it has been pointed out economy != markets, and markets != economy.  I am at a sit back and watch mode as I have an decent put position, but 90% cash at the moment.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:49 | 681502 President Palin
President Palin's picture

Maybe.  If next week the flow of funds into stock mutual funds goes positive by only 1 cent, the MSM (especially CNBS) will run the headline, "Massive inflow of cash into stocks!".

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:37 | 681461 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

Does it really matter as the FED has put in twice the amount of the outflow thru Pomo.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 19:08 | 681815 rocker
rocker's picture

When will the promo pomo team sell ???  On the First inflow ?    YUP.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:39 | 681472 Hype Alert
Hype Alert's picture

I hate jokes I can't laugh at and this market is a big one.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:44 | 681487 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Apple,Cat,Amzn,IBM, all down after-hours before pomo ...???

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:27 | 681603 firstdivision
firstdivision's picture

CAT is shooting to the moon right now.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:44 | 681488 Paul Bogdanich
Paul Bogdanich's picture

Regrettably 640 million last week 200 this.  SO they have a shot at breaking the streak for the last week in October.  I think we turn down again in November but the XX consecutive outflows sure makes for an engaging headline plus the trend encourages these idiots that stil believe this market to be free.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:45 | 681491 Comrade de Chaos
Comrade de Chaos's picture

"For everything else, there's Bernanke Card."

and multiple semiconductor arrays...

 

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:47 | 681495 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

Does it not seem suspicious that the FED wants to own all of Americas Debt?  Why?  If the FED owns all of Americas Debt do they in effect own America?  What is interesting is that they are using Taxpayer money to buy America.  How interesting.

Think about it for a minute.  The FED owns 80% of AIG the largest insurer in the world, C the largest Bank in the world, FRE, FNM 80% ownership, which owns 50% of the Mortgages in America, GM the largest car manufacturer in the US.  Now they want to own all of the Bonds? 

Just what is going on?  Do they want to own America in total?  Forget about a Stock Market think about the total control of the FED.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:12 | 681557 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

Are Pomo's being used to buy back debt from the Chinese? Is the FED not telling us that the Chinese want to cash out their American Bonds?  So, they do a Pomo so it will not be noticed, yet the Market rallys.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:22 | 681589 mikla
mikla's picture

You are not crazy for speculating such things.

The original Fed charter banned the Fed from purchasing securities that were not backed by the full-faith-and-credit of the US Federal Government exactly for what concerns you:  (1) The Fed should not be able to make taxpayers liable for debts without Congressional approval, and (2) The Fed should not be able to "snap fingers" (i.e., print money) and seize assets.  Today, they are doing both at an absolutely massive scale.

Unfortunately, the Fed does not follow its charter.  It doesn't care, because it should be disciplined by Congress, and the Fed knows they are toothless morons, and Congress is beholding to the Fed anyway.  Further, the Fed Charter states there is no punishment for the Fed violating the charter.  So, it wouldn't matter even if the Fed were found (by Congress) to be in violation of the Fed charter.

What you see now is literal wholesale asset seizure by the Fed.  The Fed actually doesn't care what is the value of the dollar -- that is absolutely irrelevant.  The Fed only cares that the dollar is used, because the Fed has the unilateral power to inflate and deflate the dollar, skimming and front-running every transaction.  The Fed uses this power to convert dollars to assets and profits, as well as move "friends" into positions of power.

Further, while it is true that Congress (and the Executive Branch) is subservient to the Fed, it is *also* true that the Fed (e.g., Bernanke) is actually the puppet of the Fed shareholders (about a dozen private banks/institutions).  Literally, the Fed is the physical manifestation of the international banking cartel as it manipulates the world reserve currency (which the Fed indisputably controls).

After the capital/asset "grab", the old system will be removed, and a new system will be installed -- by the ones with the capital.  You'll notice the middle class, evicted from their homes, doesn't have that capital.

Long story short:  It's big.  Too big for most humans to understand.  However, that's how the system works.

On the "bright side", it's possible the international banking cartel is actually bankrupted.  This would be a political action, based on "laws", and liabilities the banks created for themselves through indefensible leverage.  IMHO, Fed death without international banking cartel death would make things (far) worse.

Yes, we are playing with very big poker chips in a game of international brinkmanship.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:39 | 681631 optimator
optimator's picture

In Stalin's Soviet the Goverment owned everything, isn't that what we're aiming at?  This is just a little more peaceful way of taking everything.  So far!  Once the Serfs catch on...........

Thu, 10/28/2010 - 00:38 | 682455 KillerCoke
KillerCoke's picture

That is so far from true as to be delusional.  But it seems that delusion is a sound currency these days.

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:46 | 681496 TooBearish
TooBearish's picture

ICI needs to be hedonically adjusted

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:47 | 681498 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Did I see Bob Piss-on-me with a major Woodie the other day when he stood in front of the "heat-map" wall on CNBC and all he could see was green forever?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:05 | 681549 let x equal x
let x equal x's picture

Yep, Pissant-i must wear viagra patches or something.  Mr. Positive really is pathetic sometimes.  "Market's ONLY down 110, BOUNCING BACK from down 150...back to you Erin..."

Fri, 12/10/2010 - 22:40 | 797891 laosuwan
laosuwan's picture

Tutor Boy! How's your katoey?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:51 | 681509 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

With the FED owning almost all of Americas Debt could they take over America?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:35 | 681623 Qoheleth
Qoheleth's picture

My question is the converse: If the gov't nationalized (absorbed) the Fed, would all that debt that the Fed holds just go away?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 20:18 | 681974 mikla
mikla's picture

If the gov't nationalized (absorbed) the Fed, would all that debt that the Fed holds just go away?

No.

There are several categories of debt.  The "guaranteed 6% return" that the taxpayer gifts to the Fed would technically "go away", but that is (mostly) irrelevant since the value of the Fed is that it can monetize every Treasury auction.

The value of the Fed is its value in obfuscating the debasing of the US currency.  Absorbing the Fed would make that transparent (it would trigger a "sudden stop"), and absorbing the debt is independent of the *real* problem:  Fraudulent accounting to hide Federal liabilities that can never be fixed.

Current US unfunded liabilities like Social Security and Medicare are over $100T.  They are generating increasing cashflow problems, weekly, which is forcing them onto the current budget.  There is no scenario by which this is repaired.

These debts will default.  The Boomers will not get what was promised.  The Congress absorbing the Fed would merely hasten the day of reckoning (plus trigger a bunch of other interesting chain reactions).

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 22:23 | 682224 Derp2012
Derp2012's picture

I thought that the fed refunded its profits to the US Treasury, after deducting expenses and a dividend.

If that's the case, then in some sense when the Fed buys a treasury bond it cancels out most of the interest payment on that bond.

The Fed could also forgive the loans.. but it doesn't really matter anyway since none of this debt can possibly be repaid.

Thu, 10/28/2010 - 00:01 | 682409 mikla
mikla's picture

I thought that the fed refunded its profits to the US Treasury, after deducting expenses and a dividend.

This is true.  However, those "profits" are negligible/irrelevant in scale and absolute nominal value.  Rather, they are accounting "tricks".  After buying $1.4T in MBS, and the AIG black hole, and all the Maiden Lane toxic crap, any assertions that the Fed makes a "profit" are insane.

If that's the case, then in some sense when the Fed buys a treasury bond it cancels out most of the interest payment on that bond.

No.  The bond forces dividends, which triggers an increasing forward demand for future increased money supply.  These dividends are not redeemed to the Treasury.  That's why deflation is so destructive to the Fed:  The entire monetary system is built on the assumption of a perpetually *increasing* money supply.  Even a "constant" money supply would trigger system collapse.

Further, these dividends and "profits" are "in the noise".  In percentage and absolute terms, they don't matter.  The power comes in the ability to front-run public announcement of Fed actions.  Do you know how big the Nov 3 action will be?  The Fed and its friends do.  Check out the perfect Fed Front-Running Records to see who are the Fed's friends.

That's also why the Fed monetizes every Treasury auction.  It knows this money won't ever be paid back (e.g., they are merely debasing the currency), but they don't care.  It doesn't matter.  The magic is being able to use "inside information" to front-run and manipulate all market activity.

Remember, the Fed is the "head regulator" for the entire banking industry.  In addition to controlling the money supply and the price of money, they get to see *all* the numbers that nobody else gets to see.  They get to cut international currency swap deals without vote and without review.  They get to screw sovereigns anywhere on the planet whenever they want.  Now *that* is power.  The "profits" that theoretically are redeemed to the Treasury through accounting tricks mean nothing whatsoever.

The Fed could also forgive the loans...

No, the Fed cannot forgive the loans (in an overt manner).  True, the Fed can ensure certain counter-parties benefit from Fed actions, with the Fed incurring all the losses.  That's why the Fed bought the MBS market -- to transfer private losses to taxpayer (Fed) losses.  That's also the purpose of all the Maiden Lane and numerous other "alphabet soup" Fed programs since 2007.  That's also the purpose of (private/secret) Central Bank currency swaps, and the reason for the Fed to purchase foreign sovereign bonds.

However, no, the Fed cannot legally forgive any loan.  (Yes, in actuality, it does through deceit.)

...but it doesn't really matter anyway since none of this debt can possibly be repaid.

Agreed.

Thu, 12/09/2010 - 22:03 | 794588 Derp2012
Derp2012's picture

Thanks for the detailed answer (from a long time ago -- I recently discovered the "Track" function)!

Your point that the Fed has immense power to manipulate the markets, and funnel money to their patrons, is an excellent one. I would only add that in some sense, buying the bonds back is sharing a little of the benefit with the US treasury. The Fed screws the UST less than it does the other central banks... second in line on the mantrain so to speak.

However, no, the Fed cannot legally forgive any loan.  (Yes, in actuality, it does through deceit.)

I meant more that Congress could in principle revoke the Fed's charter, and nullify any bonds it held. 


Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:54 | 681512 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Something just happened with Apple just dropped over $2.50 in a few seconds ....

 

Now down 4 bucks ...

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:58 | 681527 pat53
pat53's picture

BS, AAPL is down a little over $1 !

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:09 | 681560 Vampyroteuthis ...
Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

Down $3.50 at the moment. Little panic going on from the last few human traders?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 16:53 | 681517 Something Wicke...
Something Wicked This Way Comes's picture

Bob would look good in a tinfoil hat.

The retail outflows might stop, but inflows are not going to resume. This market is the last fucking cookie jar. If they can't float this beyotch, the lid is gonna come off this whole charade. "Monetize the debt, who me? 

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:08 | 681555 Gordon Freeman
Gordon Freeman's picture

But...there's TRILLIONS on the sidelines, just waiting to rush in and save the day

Right? Right?

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:09 | 681558 carbon based unit
carbon based unit's picture

the big guys say:  its about time those retail pukes stepped up to hold the bag.  we have gains to lock in!

 

 

Wed, 10/27/2010 - 17:32 | 681613 digilante
digilante's picture

$81 billion. That's about 35% of MSFT's market cap. Hardly earth-shaking.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!