You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

$37 Billion 3 Year Auction Results

Tyler Durden's picture




From TreasuryDirect:

- Yield 1.780% vs. Exp. 1.791%
- SOMA $5.7 billion
- Bid/Cover 2.89 vs. Avg. 2.7 (Prev. 2.62)
- Indirect bids 62.5% vs. Avg. 45.11% (Prev. 54.15%); Direct at 37.5%
- Alloted at high 13.08% (BBG)

No major reaction in prices:




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:27 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

how much of that was the fed buying?

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:45 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

You have to wait a few days to find out how much the Fed buys back from primary dealers. The important thing is some CNBC talking heads are giving the auction an "A minus". Whatever the hell that may mean. Green shoot I guess.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 17:35 | Link to Comment steve from virginia
steve from virginia's picture

You are watching masturbation in action!

 

Fun, no?

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 18:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:45 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

why is the TLT at the longer duration getting buying too. yes i imagine in

expectation on the longer duration auction coming down the pipe, but any 

other reason anyone can think of? and keeping mortgage low does not count

as a reason. 

 

 

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 04:06 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 03:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:32 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

Hey TD, just as a thought, you might want to compare the Fed ownership percentage to the Indirect Bidders instead... the reasoning for this is the currency effect might have justified the lower price on the part of the broker as well as the $625 Billion issued by the ECB several months ago right before the July auctions. Anyways, just a thought.... thanks for all the great work!

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:45 | Link to Comment Stuart
Stuart's picture

With the secrecy of the Fed's interventions as well as PD flipping based on Fed assured buybacks, the initial auction figures are almost rendered meaningless.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:47 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

Because we don't know how to correctly interpret the data does not mean it's useless. And no, I don't mean that we're not capable, I mean that the real information is hidden.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:46 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

Dont think China has a problem takin on some more 3year, bring on the 30s!

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 13:57 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

lol... Am I really the only person who believes the 5 & 7 year treasuries are the best asset you could be accumulating at the moment? Funny how so many people believe that we're in a deflationary environment and yet don't want the only security that provides protection :P

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:57 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

3 years gets you into your presidential puppet range. Though it's been generally disclosed that Obama has an 8 year shelf life.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 15:00 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

Front part of the curve is just as volatile as the back part of the curve, the only difference is in price effect. Sticking to the 5-7 durations decreases overall volatility while providing some protection from a rise in rates (That's the front part) or a rise in inflation (back end risk). I like the 10, but there will obviously be a recovery by then, so I'll stave off that risk for the moment. Look back in history on rates, you'll see that the curve pivots on the 5 for the most part and they experience the least amount of reinvestment risk compared to alternate securities. Anyways, that's what I think... and what do I know? I'm just a trader like y'all.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:09 | Link to Comment Oso
Oso's picture

or being short equities ;)

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 20:49 | Link to Comment e1even1
e1even1's picture

the treasury rates are artificially low and there's obviously a bailout safety net under pretty much everything now. why not get a better rate with a low fee well diversified intermediate term corporate bond fund. get yourself a little bailout rebate.

if ben wants treasuries, i say let him have 'em.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:00 | Link to Comment J.P
J.P's picture

indirect bidding will be questionable over time

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:04 | Link to Comment THE MOGUL
THE MOGUL's picture

PROTECT YOUR SELF FROM INFLATION:

 

http://etfdailynews.com/blog/?p=5357

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:08 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

well if inflation is an expectation then why is there buying of the longer duration?

why are 10 year bonds not getting dumped?

why is the fed's balance sheet so fortified to combat possible deflation?

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:44 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

agreed that inflation can and most likely is being manufactured using the least expensive means first. 

as of now, it is the increase of domestic deflation and increase in global inflation that is the concern. the more the fed tries to fill the hole, the more it would tell me the problem has not been stopped. deflation is like pushing on a string. 

i imagine the tape has priced in "the recession is over trade" and now corrects itself for the stance of Q3 earnings that will beat comps that are underwater. 

perhaps some of this still needs to cook until the reality reveals itself. 

china wants a stronger dollar with liquidity which makes an inverted curve

a win win. china gets its higher short rates and we get our lower long rates

to keep the mortgage rates low. which at this point not sure how 

an unemployed consumer and risk tacked onto the cost of money will really 

do anymore. 

 

 

 

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:05 | Link to Comment Hondo
Hondo's picture

You mean how much of the indirects was the street who will quickly resale back to the Fed (before September) at a nice little assured profit.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 14:47 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

good $.01

see my posts above on deflation

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 15:29 | Link to Comment masbay (not verified)
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 15:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 17:32 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

I only put money in the bank long enough to pay bills. If you take the blood out of the dragon he's less inclined to pump it through its evil little heart and hurt ya.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 19:00 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

why would the fed extend QE tomorrow? if they are going to auction 10's and 30's, an extension would scare buyers of longer duration and only increase their cost of borrowing. 

i would expect that they state a continuation of accomadation until economic policy and price stability is more stable. not sure they are ready to take the training wheels off this ride. 

i am just an equity manager that read way too many fixed income books. 

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 23:31 | Link to Comment texpat
texpat's picture

The UK surprised us with an extension to QE.

We might expect the same here, maybe another $300 billion through March, to support the med - long end.

All in the name of keeping rates low. The Fed can't afford to drop the ball now.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 15:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/11/2009 - 15:56 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

The real question is what happens to the front part of the curve if they do. That's what I'm waiting for at least... will the flight from short term move into equities causing a "melt up" or another way to think of it is "The dummys who were sitting there now pile in at the end of the move just to lose their cash after being so frugal for so long"

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 17:24 | Link to Comment tahoebumsmith
tahoebumsmith's picture

Alright already. Enough of the Magic shows and the re runs of " Masters of Disguise". Just print up the damm cash and give it to them. Simple, leaves no room for speculation.

Tue, 08/11/2009 - 17:29 | Link to Comment mkkby
mkkby's picture

"In Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08), the U. S. Government spent $412 Billion of your money on interest payments to the holders of the National Debt"

So 6 months of QE almost monetizes the interest payments.  Tomorrow we'll see if they plan on continuing that.  Either way it's a ponzi.  The treasury will borrow to pay earlier borrower.

 

 


Wed, 08/12/2009 - 00:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!