You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

6 Theories On Why the Stock Market Has Rallied

George Washington's picture




There are at least 6 theories about why the stock market has rallied some 70% off its lows a year ago, even though nothing has been done to actually address the root causes of the financial crisis.

What The Dumb Money Believes

The dumb money believes what CNBC and their trusty stock churner ...
er, broker ... says: that the government has fixed the economy but it
just has to "kick in" (and that unemployment is just a lagging
indicator, nothing important.  See this, this, this and this).

Therefore,
these folks believe that stocks are hugely undervalued, and that if
they buy while most people are still afraid, they'll make a killing
when the market goes to the moon.

Temporary Juice

Others believe that it is the
quantitative easing, low rates, bank bailouts, stimulus spending, and
other portions of the "wall of money" which the feds have thrown at the
economy are creating a temporary pump to the stock market.

But they think that - when the spigot is turned off - the market will tank.

The Situation is Inflation

Others believe that - regardless of continued loose monetary and fiscal
policy or real stock valuations, we're in for some serious inflation.

Stocks tend to preform well during inflationary periods.

For more on inflation versus deflation, see this.

Machines Run Amok

Tyler Durden
explains that all of the stock market gains have occurred after hours
when mystery buyers purchase stock futures in low volume environments
(and see this).

Vincent Deluard - a strategist for TrimTabs Investment Research (25% of the top 50 hedge funds in the world use TrimTabs' research for market timing) - said last month:

We've never seen this before – such a huge rally, and the little guy is out.

Some argue that it is high-frequency trading or momentum-chasing
trading algorithms doing the buying, and that the market will tank when
they change their game.

Fed Futures

Others argue that the government is itself buying stock futures.

Some believe that the Feds aren't buying, but that they have intentionally showered the big banks with money, and encouraged the banks to buy. In other words, they argue that the Feds are indirectly promoting a stock market rally.

Fraud Central

Karl Denninger believes that the market has rallied due to the systemic, fraudulent overvaluation of assets.

As Denninger wrote yesterday:

[A reader wrote] The FDIC to ask about [allegations of fraudulent valuations]. This was their response:

That’s the value the bank had them on their books on their year-end financials, but the true value is much less.
It is similar to someone in Las Vegas saying that their house is worth
$300,000 because that’s what they paid for it three years ago, but the
reality is, if they had to sell it in today’s market, they’d only get
$250,000 for it. The FDIC has to sell assets in today’s market...

Or tomorrow's market.

 

The simple fact of the matter is that there it is, right in front of you.

A raw admission that the banks are carrying these loans at dramatically above their actual value.

 

Yes, this means that essentially all balance sheets must now be considered fraudulent, and thus the valuations assigned by the market to them are also fraudulent.

 

Extending
this to the stock market as a whole you now have a market that is
intentionally overvalued as a direct and proximate consequence of
fraud, permitted and endorsed by the government, of somewhere between
25-40%.

 

Now you know why the market rallied off the SPX 666 lows to where it is now. 1139 (where we are now) * .60 (a 40% haircut) = 683.40, or awfully close to that 666 bottom.

 

Of
course this "valuation" expressed in the market can only be maintained
for as long as the fraud is. If the ability to maintain that fraud is
lost for any reason then values will instantly collapse back to reflect
reality.

Note: Obviously, I believe this is a bear market rally which will eventually fizzle out.

If the bulls are instead right, then that will make me the dumb money.

(Look at the guy on the right, as well).

But I think it much more likely that the rally will lose all steam in the not-too-distant future.


Leave a comment about why you think the stock market has rallied, and how long you think the rally will continue.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 10:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 10:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 08:16 | Link to Comment Instant Karma
Instant Karma's picture

Manipulation by the Vampire Squids (yes, there are more)--

I believe the stock market bottomed a year ago yesterday, and has been steadily walked up by market participants at the behest of the US Government (think Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan or even some account at the FED or Treasury), it doesn't matter.

The fact that once the market fell, and stopped falling, outfits like Goldman were able to mint billions of dollars per quarter tells you not that they have the best computer programs in the world, or the smartest most logical or intuitive traders, but rather that they took out positions that they knew would be profitable. In short, they knew as did others that the market would be higher tomorrow than it was today.

How did they know? Because they were part of a program to walk the stock market back up! It's just common sense. With banks collapsing under the weight of bad debt, much of which is bad mortgage debt, and consumer's wealth taking the triple hit of unemployment, falling stock market valuations, and falling housing prices, the easiest and quickest asset to "fix" was stock market valuations.

One year later the game goes on, and I suspect it will go on for some time. At this point returns will be much more muted, but downside is limited because as much stock is sold by investors or speculators, people with infinitely deeper pockets will be there to buy it. That is why the stock market refuses to go down in spite of heavy volume sell offs and light volume rallies. The market has been and continues to be "walked up" and kept up.

It's nothing new in Wall Street history, it's just a bit much to get one's mind around in that all stock markets world wide have nearly identical charts for the past year, with nearly identical returns off the bottom. Commodities too. Welcome to the world of the controlled market where everyone who invests makes money. The world of guaranteed outcomes. A world without risk.

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 05:55 | Link to Comment Bear
Bear's picture

Based on my previous post what are some opinions of what we should be watching as a foreshadow of a major market sell-off ... a prior assumption that fundamentals point down

Dollar, Bonds, Volume, technicals, black swan, gray swan (Iran, No. Korea, Israel), sovereigns, municipals, swaps , etc.

or do I just have to wait until mid November?

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 05:56 | Link to Comment Bear
Bear's picture

Thanks for your insights.

Over the past 5 years the market has become so speculative and so closely correlated to the indexes that manipulation has become increasing easy. Pump the indexes and everything else follows like sheep.

Speculation overlooks fundamentals and is fueled by greed and fear so propaganda (GS, US Gov, CNBC, your broker, etc.) pushes the speculator's fear of 'missing out' and all the manipulators have to do is bid up the indexes (SPY by day and ES by night) and then only at strategic points. Low volume insures a 'low cost' pump, so it's affordable. Who's going to sell? A thousand guys on their computers sitting around saying 'this can't be happening! I'm selling 5 now' ... No, they cannot overcome a concerted and well orchestrated push north. But alas, it can only go on for a season. There are probably too many people who know about this for it to go on indefinitely.

I have followed ES for ten years now and have seen when a major push occurs (5 minutes), it takes a long time for the market to subside (20-40 minutes) and if another push comes in it is another ratchet up ... every small decline is followed by a pump. This happened 2003-2007 with regularity ... but ... it was never supported by such huge bid blocks that we are seeing today at night. TD's analysis of the differential profit of night vs daytime is right on.

But having figured all this out does nothing for us if we can't find clues for when it ends.

This is mashup musical chairs and we may all die before the music stops.

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 04:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 04:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 04:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 02:10 | Link to Comment BlackBeard
BlackBeard's picture

that was awesome possum.

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 02:00 | Link to Comment SNAFU
SNAFU's picture

A thought from Dr Gloom, Doom and Shroom.  I heard Marc Faber say the DOW could go to 20,000.  But if that did happen, gold would be at 3,000.  Meaning that if all the QE overcame deflation, the funny money would find its way into equities, as an inflation hedge.  Gold would also benefit but even more than equities.

In my reading of the Von Mises site, i found a link describing Weimar inflation in detail. 100 pages worth!   Equities went blazing upwards and traders made a killing.  The public that had a stake to play with were also doing well trading too.  As I recall, near the end, the corps that had too much debt went bust.  So those shares went to zero.  The corps that were conservative bought the bankrupt assets of their gambling competitors for "pennies on the dollar."  Then they made warbucks from Hitler.  But the war scenario comes after the inflation scenario of 2012-2016.  [war in 2020?]

So the insolvent Fedsters have nothin to lose.  They will keep pumping up the Dow for the sake of drugging the potential pitchforkers.

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:52 | Link to Comment time123
time123's picture

After such a massacre, bouncing with a high % is not as hard to accomplish. We are still well below the numbers of two years ago though.

Remember I said back in November the U.S. dollar will rally relative to the Euro? It turns out it did! Meanwhile the market yoyo continues. Some of the ETFs are up double digits in just the last couple of weeks. Therefore, it is still the case that market timing is the only way to make money in this market.

time123

Called the bottom in March 2009: http://invetrics.com/?p=973

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:12 | Link to Comment Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 First, I would like to say how much I enjoy your posts, and to thank you for them.Now, on to the question.I think the stock market is so high because of magic.I am talking about the kind that experts at sleight of hand or good stage magicians practice.In this case, it is used to defraud and control the public.For some insane reason, typical Americans think that high stock prices are good and also equal a good economy.Unfortunately, the economy currently sucks out loud.People are losing their jobs, homes and forced onto the streets.If only a fraction of them really ran amok, the entire house of cards would come crashing down.The people in control are desperate to continue the illusion that things will get better and that everything will be fine.

 

 At precisely the time in our nations history that we need good leadership, at that crucial moment when all hangs in the balance, we get illusions instead of vision, venal self serving frauds instead of public servants, craven fawning enablers instead of reformist enforcement.

 So they lie.And they manipulate.And they steal.In their insanity, they do not perceive the doom that awaits them, they are certain that they will escape it and that they are untouchable.Certainly nothing in recent time would disabuse them of this notion...they are the rulers...and not subject to the laws their lobbyists have twisted out of any semblance of justice or prudence.

 In other words, Mr President, There is absolutely no connection between fundamentals or reality with current equity valuations.It is a magic show, a lie, a false reality.I agree with Tylers view of the low volume ramp as one mechanism.Doubtless there are many other ways they exert their control over the prices.

 The disconnect now is so obvious I wonder how much longer they can keep it up.

 But when they FAIL, it should be obvious....even to the most dulled of sense.

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:11 | Link to Comment Grand Supercycle
Grand Supercycle's picture

 

EURO daily signals suggest a big move soon.

http://www.zerohedge.com/forum/market-outlook-0

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 00:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:49 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

The Plunge Protection Team, cooked numbers (GDPs, "sentiment", CPI, inflation, unemployment, etc), oligarchs who had pulled out at DJ 14,000 and then reinvested at S&P 666, and inflation up until now.  Then next month the Hollywood Futures index pumps fresh cash into the market.  More inflation.  China unpegs.  More inflation.  Stocks go to 15,000 by next March '11, and Gold at $2200 an O Z.  The Doelarr is at DXY 66.  Then after a nice run through '10 and into '11 for the CAD, AUD, NZD, those countries tank on housing bubbles, and their currentseas begin to devalue.  Stocks push higher still.  Dow Jones at 20,000 by Dec '11.  That is when it all ends.  I can only see so far out, but once people get scared, which should happen about then, the market could "crash" (what is stock if you get paid in worthless FIAT?).  Worthless doelarrs are revalued by a new global currentsea held by the IMF and World Bank; let us call it the "Phoenix".  The banks issue the currentsea based on the Central Bank's gold holdings.  People might be stupid enough to keep accepting JPM food stamps and keep going along for the ride the whole time.  Time will tell.

Bob marley "time will tell":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7kSjZ9LoIs

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:09 | Link to Comment doublethink
doublethink's picture

 

Propaganda

 

This campaign has been far too consistent and calculated to brand it with the traditional label, “spin”. This manipulation of public perception can only be called propaganda. Only when we, the public, are able to call the underlying realities by their proper names—extortion, capture, looting, propaganda—can we begin to root them out." Yves Smith, ECONned

 

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com


Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:31 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Not to mention there was a lot of "profit" from the one-time tax lookback change.  Almost the entire homebuilder segment earned a "profit" from that one-time tax benefit.

Of course, all their earnings were trumpeted in the MSM including the one-time benefit.  If it had been a one-time writeoff, you can be sure it would be ignored.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 22:57 | Link to Comment RetiredVet
RetiredVet's picture

When a market goes up on lame volume for as long as it has, you have to ask who is the "buyer" ? In all my years, bull markets are up on big volume, down on small volume...this has been anything but that......When the selling starts in earnest, who will buy then? There is just too much bullshit going on at the FED, and with the FASB rule change last year to "fabricate earnings" for the banks, you know that valuations are bullshit.

A "No Confidence" market is just that. 

 

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 22:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 22:16 | Link to Comment economessed
economessed's picture

George, I always admire your posts.  This is a tidy collection of the "conventional wisdom" in the bear market universe.

But to answer your question:  I DON'T KNOW.  I could be some or any of the things you've cited, or perhaps it's something else that hasn't been identified.  There is no transparency, no cause and effect, no relationship to core fundamentals.  This is a much different market than I feel comfortable "investing" in.  Trades lasting more than a few hours bring substantial risk, and I don't want to work so hard to scalp basis points.  So I wait confident that we are not on a sustainable trajectory.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:20 | Link to Comment milbank
milbank's picture

I expect Joe and Jane Sixpack feel the same way.  It's not surprising that they did not participate in this rally.  The dishonesty and outright fraud is something even the most casually interested of them can sense and don't want to be involved in.  As long as they continue to sense this, the equity markets will never be again for them the investment vehicle it became after the creation of the IRA and 401K in the eighties.   It is this sense that Americans have about their markets and their government that will eventually assure the downfall of the propped up facade that has been executed by Washington and Wall St. over the last year and a half. I expect the inevitable collapse of this facade will happen at some time between this fall and 2013.

I also agree with the poster who said it started with Reagan, peaked out with "W" and it will be Obama who will end up the patsy.  Someone with a extraordinarily convincing persona who emerged from virtual obscurity into the White House during a period of just a few years, who will take the fall.  That is not a political statement, it's just the way it went and will go.  I think both parties are the same and a sham. We live in an Oliarchy, not some Democratic Republic Americans have always thought they lived in.  This didn't just happen.  It's really been this way since the beginning of the "Republic."  It has was always been "About the Benjamins" even when the actual Benjamin was still alive.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:33 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Here is 1 theory:

$1.25T of MBS.  That is all I needed to know to get the hell out of USD and into oil, gold, copper, CAD, AUD, etc. on March 18th of last year.

Now that the MBS program is coming to an end, at least temporarily (and yes, I will know if they try to buy surreptisiously in that market, it ain't like the stock market), I am a bit concerned about my anti-dollar positions.  The failed fiatco might stage a rebound against real assets at least temporarily before Bernanke start buying again.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 10:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 03/10/2010 - 07:58 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

That is correct. The bad assets have been firewalled within the Fed.  The trouble is, the Fed could not absorb the derivatives, only the paper/assets that are the "real" assets upon which the CDS bets are placed.  But for now, the Fed is Yucca Mountain, the bad paper sealed up where it is thought it can do no harm.  Even better, as the radioactive material was traded for FRNs that could be used to buy other assets to reflate the economy.  And the Fed is not only the Lender of last resort, but the Eternal Holder of Last Resort.  It is the Event Horizon, a phenomenon that simply is one of its properties as the American Empire's Central Bank issuing a peerless reserve currency. The examples from physics are numerous: space and time appear "normal," until you approach light speed. The rules change at its periphery, because they can change. For instance, what does a "loss" mean to the Federal Reserve.  Nothing.  Just print it away.  As long as King Dollar rules, there is nothing that prevents that. To the extent the paper held to maturity works out, great. But any loss can be backfilled by printing, as long as King Dollar rules.

The one remaining vulnerability: QE and the Empire's debt. All other issues are subordinate to that one.  QE allows for some flexibility in managing this very big problem, but whether infinite printing can occur seems the big question mark.  I think not. 

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:10 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

I completely agree with Karl on the zoom-zoom in equities and its timing. Earnings in the financials are signifigantly puffed due to overvaluation of impaired assets.

I also agree with his assessment of the degree to which the  SPX is overvalued as a consequence.

I DON'T agree with his premise of fraud in the criminal sense. In fact, the MTM suspension does have earlier precedents, which is exactly what the boyz and girlz cited to justify last April's adoption of the suspension. All the emergency powers bullshit kicked in from the RTC and LTCM banking / S & L fiascos ( which eventually worked through relatively mild asset impairment via the easy credit and low interest rate schemes....emphasize " relatively " ) . Suspension a year ago was goaded through the petrified Congress by the UST, FED, the SEC and waterboarded onto FASB and the IASB. F/F got grandfathered into the game as a big bonus, too.

But of course these 20th century remedies didn't require figuring through the derivatives dilemma.... the most complicated dimension of this Great whatever it is now.  

Now we are at the one year anniversary of this ill-fated scheme and the asset values are signifigantly disfigured and unable to reflate without the credit pump, which will be busted out for the duration of true asset pricing discovery. Meanwhile, banks trade inside for earnings and resume the bonus taking....knowing full well this baby's gonna' blow when some day King Kash Flow pops in to stink up the party.

There's tons of underlying frauds, for sure, but the plan to deceive on balance sheet fitness was 100% USDA government approved. And it is international in scope. Sorry....Banksters get a pass on criminal fraud. Moral fraud is another matter.

The true crime is the incompetence and corruption associated with improperly assessing the depth and duration of asset impairment. The true crime is committing trillions from the taxpayer into a black hole without any definition or demands regarding deliverables.

So this deceit is not private sector fraud at all. It's an international conspiracy to reflate value that has gone horribly wrong for 1 1/2 years. Governments backtracking through wreckage by their own hand to display truth NEVER happens. So it all must go on to failure. That's the way it is. I don't like it any more than the next guy.

I love reading Karl, but he needs to redefine what this misrepresentation truly is. Fraud is too convenient to describe the current situation with balance sheets....public or private. He acts like we still have a Constitution, for Crissakes !!

 

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 20:58 | Link to Comment doggis
doggis's picture

wrong, wrong.....wrong! Each and everytime abbey joseph cohen gets cnbc airtime sporting a new 'man'do - "poof" - market ralley.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 20:46 | Link to Comment no cnbc cretin
no cnbc cretin's picture

The market should be around 4000 by now, and it will be. The reason it's up, is because of cheap money, so the TBTF banksters can keep their proprietary desks going. Which means, so they can try and write down their CDS, etc., aka bad paper. Plus, make a profit at the same time. Next, the Fed., is jacking up the market, anyway it can. Once the mid-term elections are over, once the Presidential elections are over, goodbye the smoke and mirrors. As a liberal, this all started with Reagan, it peaked with W., and O is caught, watching the house burn. He could have done more, but since this country is controlled by the DOD* aka Pentagon, and by corporations, O is screwed, so is the American public. Plus, O can't do much anyway, when the money is gone.

*BTW, the DOD, for those who dislike Socialism, is just that.

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 01:39 | Link to Comment I am a Man I am...
I am a Man I am Forty's picture

lol, the fascist oligarchy cares not if the person in office is a democrat or a republican, now go back to arguing over abortion and gay marriage while rome burns

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 21:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 20:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 20:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 20:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 22:37 | Link to Comment Overpowered By Funk
Overpowered By Funk's picture

on massive volume as well...

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 19:18 | Link to Comment primus
primus's picture

Legalized, government accounting fraud, massive government intervention and HFT / computer gambits.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 19:11 | Link to Comment ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

Dumb money by definition must lose so reason 1 is wrong.

Temporary juice would have had the same effect on all dollar denominated assets like houses, food and gas so that's wrong.

Inflation? see point 2

Evidence of robot and HFT is there especially on low volume rally days but why have all global indices rallied simultaneously? Is this an international conspiracy? No prop desk has that much liquidity.

Fed funding the front running of futures sounds plausible but again why was it so wide spread? Did every CB do the same?

Fraud? Absolutely.

No easy way to determine exactly what each index is worth especially when it comes to DTCC cleared counterfeit trades. (Opposite to failed trades with naked shorts where the supply/demand of certain stocks is artificially manipulated). With this scheme, you don't need investors or even liquidity. So long as there's no major run on stocks by those actually investing, this will last for ever. 

 

Wed, 03/10/2010 - 06:58 | Link to Comment Gunther
Gunther's picture

ozziindaus,
I have a hard time to picture the reverse of a naked short sale; does that work like a real share is traded for non-existent money?

Another way to reduce the amount of outstanding shares is to call in loaned-out shares that someone sold short. That trader has to borrow other shares or to buy back.
If I remember correctly it got hard to borrow shares during the financial crisis and that is still the case.

Another part of the market gains is probably inflation; stocks and gold move up in tandem.
Since may 2009 dow/ gold is almost flat between 8.6 and 10.2

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!