You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Absent Inventory "Bounce" Is Reason For Japanese GDP Miss

Tyler Durden's picture




The world's second biggest economy just posted a dramatic miss in GDP expectations, and demonstrated how tendentious "developed" governments can be when fudging numbers in volatile economic times. And the biggest reason for the divergence: the mythical inventory bounce, which based on preliminary estimates was supposed to generate a 4.8% GDP. Alas, inventories never "bounced" leading to a disappointing 1.3% reading. Is the US next in line for major GDP disappointment? Or do we have mid-term elections to thank for continued GDP fudging for at least the next 12 months?

Goldman highlights the divergence:

The sharp cut to inventories (contribution cut to +0.4 pp from +1.4 pp) was a factor behind the divergence versus the market consensus. Private capital expenditures were also revised down markedly, going from +6.6? growth in the preliminary estimate to a double-digit negative of -10.6%. Large cuts were also made to the public sector, with government consumption swinging into negative territory at  0.5% from +1.5%, and the decline in public investment widening to -6.3% from -4.9%.

A breakdown of the revised Jul.-Sep. GDP components shows that private residential investment (-28.1%; contribution of -1.0 pp) and capex (-10.6%; -1.5 pp) continue to be drags on private-sector demand but exports (+28.6%; +3.5 pp) and firm individual consumption (+3.8%; +2.3 ppt), driven mainly by purchases of consumer durables, underpinned the economy. The contribution from public demand moved into negative territory at -0.4 pp.

 

And the firm concludes with a very gloomy outlook on the land of the rising sun:

We expect GDP growth to approach zero from Oct.-Dec.: We think GDP growth from the Oct.- Dec. quarter through mid-2010 is likely to slow to nearly zero due to a fallback in consumption, which government stimulus revved up through the Jul.-Sep. quarter, and the partial suspension of the FY2009 supplementary budget. We expect this span through June 2010 when the DPJ-led administration is to begin distributing childcare allowances to be a soft patch without public policy support. If the yen stays at the current level of strength over this span, that would squeeze profits at exporters in manufacturing industries and create further substantial downside risks to the economy in terms of employment and wage reductions.

Certainly not good news to an economy which is gripped in deflation for a second decade running (and is a advance look of the troubles facing the US itself). And is this the first case of major downward revisions by economists and analysts? Will this optimism killer spill over into all corporate sectors? It is unlikely, as Wall Street's very survival (read bonuses) depends on perpetuating the hope myth for as long as possible. Even if numbers continue missing, analysts will merely extend and pretend, saying that once Amazon stops selling 2 kindles to every high school drop out in 2010, the company has an exponential and practically guaranteed growth pattern well into 2039.

h/t Hedged In

 




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 01:10 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

Futures are not reacting at all to the news. Some minor blips, but nothing out of the ordinary. Kind of disappointing. I guess the interns at GS don't sleep.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 01:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 01:50 | Link to Comment pbmatthews
pbmatthews's picture

US GDP numbers too are overstated.  And Chinese GDP figures are 100% nonesense.

Has anyone been seeing all of the central planned construction going on in that country?

Check out this video from our friend's at Al-Jazeera (from November 9th).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h7V3Twb-Qk&feature=PlayList&p=06BD91A0CE5916D1&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=30

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:46 | Link to Comment mannfm11
mannfm11's picture

Amen to all of that.  Outfits like the IMF don't give away their gold. 

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 02:21 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

As a small business owner in high tech manufacturing, I can tell you that there will be a big uptick in US high tech exports in Q4 (i.e. semiconductor equipment/automation etc.).  This is largely due to a dry spell that goes all the way back to around March/April of 2008 and the recent weakness in the dollar.  These are among the most productive and competitive industries (unlike healthcare for example) so I wouldn't expect much job creation.  My company continues to see bookings through January/Feb but if I were to guess the main thrust of orders is already past.

That said I remain uber bearish on the overall US consumer led economy particulary financials and real estate.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 02:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 05:02 | Link to Comment Reductio ad Absurdum
Reductio ad Absurdum's picture

Perhaps the Japanese fudged the numbers down to further weaken the yen?

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 06:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 07:17 | Link to Comment Eduardo
Eduardo's picture

The news section is not updating anymore ?

 

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 07:53 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

And despite this and far east markets falling, europe falling early on, the dogged US futures get pushed up by some unknown keen buyer and so lead the european follow the leader traders back up from the lows

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 08:07 | Link to Comment Edna R. Rider
Edna R. Rider's picture

Um, the latter: we have mid-term elections to thank for continued GDP fudging.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 08:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 08:48 | Link to Comment SDRII
SDRII's picture

United annoucnes jobs program in form of plane builds yesterday. Today WSJ says over 25% of Boeing airline deals will be funded by the Ex-Im Bank

The U.S. Export-Import Bank mainly provides U.S. Treasury guarantees to banks to make them comfortable lending to buyers of American exports. No company has deeper relations with the bank than Boeing but some critics say the bank may be warping the market that is oversupplied with planes. Article is about the influence and practices of the bank as part of the WSJ's USA Inc. series.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 09:22 | Link to Comment Edna R. Rider
Edna R. Rider's picture

Thanks for the insight.  It's a smart move for United:  retire older, less fuel efficient planes and borrow the money from the government at an historically low rate.  Who cares if United goes under.  The US taxpayer will cover it.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:12 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

It's ok. It'll follow the farming route. Build a bunch of planes park them on the ground collect carbon credits for not flying them. You didn't think they would bother making new scams? Variations on a theme. Variations on a theme.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 09:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!