• George Washington
    09/05/2010 - 22:40
    When did it start? When will it end?
  • Cognitive Dissonance
    09/05/2010 - 15:45
    We should not adopt positions or beliefs that oppose the Ponzi simply because it’s contrary to the Ponzi. Doing so just shifts the illusion of control to us, but still leaves us dancing to the Ponzi beat. Our views should be adopted only after rigorous examination and vetting. This is the only way to a truly peaceful, free and sovereign life.
  • asiablues
    09/05/2010 - 18:06
    The back-to-back super-sized traffic jams near Beijing has landed China on the top spot among the cities with the world's worst traffic. While the world seems quite fixated on the length--miles and number of days--of these mega jams near Beijing, there's also a serious message--the under-capacity of China’s infrastructure.

Absent Inventory "Bounce" Is Reason For Japanese GDP Miss

Tyler Durden's picture




The world's second biggest economy just posted a dramatic miss in GDP expectations, and demonstrated how tendentious "developed" governments can be when fudging numbers in volatile economic times. And the biggest reason for the divergence: the mythical inventory bounce, which based on preliminary estimates was supposed to generate a 4.8% GDP. Alas, inventories never "bounced" leading to a disappointing 1.3% reading. Is the US next in line for major GDP disappointment? Or do we have mid-term elections to thank for continued GDP fudging for at least the next 12 months?

Goldman highlights the divergence:

The sharp cut to inventories (contribution cut to +0.4 pp from +1.4 pp) was a factor behind the divergence versus the market consensus. Private capital expenditures were also revised down markedly, going from +6.6? growth in the preliminary estimate to a double-digit negative of -10.6%. Large cuts were also made to the public sector, with government consumption swinging into negative territory at  0.5% from +1.5%, and the decline in public investment widening to -6.3% from -4.9%.


A breakdown of the revised Jul.-Sep. GDP components shows that private residential investment (-28.1%; contribution of -1.0 pp) and capex (-10.6%; -1.5 pp) continue to be drags on private-sector demand but exports (+28.6%; +3.5 pp) and firm individual consumption (+3.8%; +2.3 ppt), driven mainly by purchases of consumer durables, underpinned the economy. The contribution from public demand moved into negative territory at -0.4 pp.

 

And the firm concludes with a very gloomy outlook on the land of the rising sun:

We expect GDP growth to approach zero from Oct.-Dec.: We think GDP growth from the Oct.- Dec. quarter through mid-2010 is likely to slow to nearly zero due to a fallback in consumption, which government stimulus revved up through the Jul.-Sep. quarter, and the partial suspension of the FY2009 supplementary budget. We expect this span through June 2010 when the DPJ-led administration is to begin distributing childcare allowances to be a soft patch without public policy support. If the yen stays at the current level of strength over this span, that would squeeze profits at exporters in manufacturing industries and create further substantial downside risks to the economy in terms of employment and wage reductions.

Certainly not good news to an economy which is gripped in deflation for a second decade running (and is a advance look of the troubles facing the US itself). And is this the first case of major downward revisions by economists and analysts? Will this optimism killer spill over into all corporate sectors? It is unlikely, as Wall Street's very survival (read bonuses) depends on perpetuating the hope myth for as long as possible. Even if numbers continue missing, analysts will merely extend and pretend, saying that once Amazon stops selling 2 kindles to every high school drop out in 2010, the company has an exponential and practically guaranteed growth pattern well into 2039.

h/t Hedged In

 

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (4 votes)



by ShankyS
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 00:10
#157570

Futures are not reacting at all to the news. Some minor blips, but nothing out of the ordinary. Kind of disappointing. I guess the interns at GS don't sleep.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 00:41
#157587

Phil Gramm needs to tell them it's a mental depression.

by pbmatthews
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 00:50
#157592

US GDP numbers too are overstated.  And Chinese GDP figures are 100% nonesense.

Has anyone been seeing all of the central planned construction going on in that country?

Check out this video from our friend's at Al-Jazeera (from November 9th).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h7V3Twb-Qk&feature=PlayList&p=06BD91A0CE5916D1&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=30

by mannfm11
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 09:46
#157775

Amen to all of that.  Outfits like the IMF don't give away their gold. 

by msorense
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 01:21
#157604

As a small business owner in high tech manufacturing, I can tell you that there will be a big uptick in US high tech exports in Q4 (i.e. semiconductor equipment/automation etc.).  This is largely due to a dry spell that goes all the way back to around March/April of 2008 and the recent weakness in the dollar.  These are among the most productive and competitive industries (unlike healthcare for example) so I wouldn't expect much job creation.  My company continues to see bookings through January/Feb but if I were to guess the main thrust of orders is already past.

That said I remain uber bearish on the overall US consumer led economy particulary financials and real estate.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 01:44
#157612

The US will be last. First we have some major whiffs coming in Asia and Europe..

by Reductio ad Absurdum
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 04:02
#157638

Perhaps the Japanese fudged the numbers down to further weaken the yen?

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 05:54
#157648

The entire global recovery is essentially a bunch of BS.
Nothing but a liquidity-fueled asset bubble (AGAIN!)
courtesy of your friendly central bankers.

by Eduardo
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 06:17
#157650

The news section is not updating anymore ?

 

by Racer
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 06:53
#157662

And despite this and far east markets falling, europe falling early on, the dogged US futures get pushed up by some unknown keen buyer and so lead the european follow the leader traders back up from the lows

by Edna R. Rider
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 07:07
#157670

Um, the latter: we have mid-term elections to thank for continued GDP fudging.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 07:29
#157675

Off by only 369.2%. I don't see a problem with that. And I also believe one day the FED should drop interest rate to -5%. What a day that would be!

by SDRII
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 07:48
#157680

United annoucnes jobs program in form of plane builds yesterday. Today WSJ says over 25% of Boeing airline deals will be funded by the Ex-Im Bank

The U.S. Export-Import Bank mainly provides U.S. Treasury guarantees to banks to make them comfortable lending to buyers of American exports. No company has deeper relations with the bank than Boeing but some critics say the bank may be warping the market that is oversupplied with planes. Article is about the influence and practices of the bank as part of the WSJ's USA Inc. series.

by Edna R. Rider
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 08:22
#157690

Thanks for the insight.  It's a smart move for United:  retire older, less fuel efficient planes and borrow the money from the government at an historically low rate.  Who cares if United goes under.  The US taxpayer will cover it.

by Hephasteus
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:12
#157815

It's ok. It'll follow the farming route. Build a bunch of planes park them on the ground collect carbon credits for not flying them. You didn't think they would bother making new scams? Variations on a theme. Variations on a theme.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 08:39
#157701

reverse repo purchase agreement cant hide the decline..
bls gdp numbers are criminal math made easy. I would love to take a nice short position with the data before us.. But its kinda hard to trade against the whopper our Joshua. Can we Just get the vix back up to 70. So I can put every option trade on for free.(vertical condors etc..) such bull shit

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 09:19
#157722

Thanks for forcing me to learn what tendentious means first thing in the morning.

Somehow I shall worm it into ordinary conversation several times a day for the next few weeks.

-MobBarley

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:02
#157802

Well,they can fudge the number all they want. But I thought this is the job of real economist;to extrapolite the real GDP from stats like payroll taxes,tax reciepts and the likes. Or we don't have anymore real economist?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.