williambanzai7's picture


Earlier in the week, I was looking for materials written by Hirose Takashi, a well known Japanese anti-nuclear activist. A found portions of a recent interview on Japanese television that had been translated by C. Douglas Lummis.

Takashi has been warning from the beginning that the Fukushima site would have to be entombed and that there was folly in delaying the inevitable decision. As we now see, Takashi was right, four of the six Fukushima Daichi reactors are unrepairable and a decision has been made to scrap the all six reactors at the Fukushima plant. In the interim we have witnessed an incredible spectacle revealing just how unprepared TEPCO was not only for the tsunami, but the epic follow on damage control struggle. 

Doug Lummis is a political scientist who lives on the Island of Okinawa. He has recently published a book on democracy titled "Radical Democracy" which I must confess I have not yet read, but has been critically well received. I noticed that he had been in recent communication with Takashi and thought it would be interesting to solicit his thoughts on what is happening. I received the following last night, just as I was reading of the decision to scrap the reactors.

For ZH readers, I am also posting the Hirose Takashi interview which was originally posted on the counterpunch website.

Power Corrupts; Nuclear Power Corrupts Absolutely

C. Douglas Lummis

In the early 1970s I helped organize a tour of students from Japan to the Hanford Nuclear Facility in central Washington State. We timed it so that our guided tour of the site would be on the anniversary of the nuclear bombing of Nagasaki. This knocked the official guide a bit off balance; when we came to the big photograph of the Hanford workers cheering when they learned that it was the plutonium they had made that went into the Nagasaki bomb, his words got a little mumbly and hard to hear.

But he was very energetic when it came to explaining how safe the Hanford Facility was. Waste plutonium, he said, was buried in pits dug deep into the ground, and then carefully monitored to make sure there was no leakage. I asked him, “But didn’t you tell us just now that plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years? Who is going to monitor it for that long?” “The US Government, of course.” “In all of human history, has there ever been a government that lasted for 24,000 years?” He did not answer, but only looked at me with contempt. Evidently he thought I was lacking in patriotism.

This was the moment I realized that a very intelligent, highly trained nuclear engineer can be a fool.

My field, political science, has produced probably only one scientific law: Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. But few political scientists have noticed that the closest thing we have to absolute power is nuclear power. Nuclear power corrupts the thinking of its believers in a peculiar way. It seems to tempt them to imagine that they have been raised to a higher level, where common sense judgments don’t apply. Common sense judgments like, it’s very dumb to produce a substance that will continue to radiate death, and will therefore require “monitoring”, for tens of thousands of years.

And then there’s the problem of accidents. As my common-sense grandmother used to say, “Accidents do happen”. An “accident” means something unexpected, something you hadn’t planned for. In the case of some dangerous activities, we seem to be willing to take the risk. We (we who are not the direct victims, that is) are satisfied if the probability of auto accidents or airplane crashes is kept fairly low. But in the case of nuclear reactors, a low accident rate is not enough. The consequences of a full-scale meltdown are so horrifying that, to justify building a nuclear reactor, the promoters must guarantee that there will be no accidents at all. The problem with this is not just that it is impossible, but that it carries the nuclear engineers and nuke-promoting politicians away from the real world and off into a fantasy world that exists only in their heads, and on charts and graphs. A world where the trite, common-sense saying, ” Accidents do happen” doesn’t apply.

The trouble is, they happen. The engineers in charge of the Fukushima Power Plants said that for a tsunami to climb all the way up from the sea and engulf their reactors was “beyond their imagination.” Yes, that is what is meant by an “accident”. It was probably beyond their imagination that no one would remember to put gasoline in the emergency pump, which apparently was one of the big factors in the meltdown. It was probably beyond their imagination that someone would “accidentally” cut the telephone wire between the plant and company headquarters. When they started squirting seawater over their delicate machinery – a measure which it seems they thought of on the spot – it apparently didn’t occur to them what effect the salt would have on all those gauges and valves and pumps and switches. And it seems that it’s only in the last few days that they are beginning to notice that the sea water that they pump in comes flowing back out again, carrying radiation with it.

This is not to blame the workers. They are only human, and there is no such thing as a human being who makes no mistakes – especially when frantic. And there is no such thing as a machine that never breaks. And there is no such thing as a world without accidents. Common sense people have been saying these things for decades, until everyone got bored hearing it. But boring or not, it was true.

I used to have a kind of black humor joke that I thought was pretty clever. People would say to me, The anti-nuclear movement seems to be dwindling. Do you think it can last? I would say, Oh, you don’t have to worry about that. A big accident is sure to happen some day, and the movement will rise again.

It isn’t funny after all.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
williambanzai7's picture

It takes six hours to play a round, at that's without the teleprompters.

Scubacuba's picture

I have taken measurements here in Seattle when the inital plume hit the west coast.

 I think this stuff could be around a while.

Like 3000 years......

DollarMenu's picture

Your Governor yesterday reported that elevated, but not as yet threatening levels of radiation have been detected in Washington milk, and that monitoring will continue.

I do not know it these results are anywhere accessible by the public.

Andre's picture

I moved to Spokane a year ago. Didn't think to get a Geiger counter at the time.

How bad?


Quixote2's picture

If you live in Spokane, don't take the counter down to the basement and measure the radon.  You might be suprised. 

ilene's picture

Did you have one for now?  If so, are you detecting differences from the previous normal background levels?