You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Albert Edwards On The Upcoming Economic "Abyss"

Tyler Durden's picture




As always, Albert Edwards provides a solid dose of economic observations based on facts, not hope. And, as always, he is one of the few in his attempts at deductive logic: why bother with causal relationships when there is a scent of "change you can (almost) believe in" permeating the airwaves. Never mind that the next administration will have to deal with the massive fallout of this "change" once it realizes America is bankrupt: we hope they have their catchy slogan writers already on damage control. After all "debt repudiation you can really believe in" just lacks that certain pizzazz that may prevent the next president from being on TV 24/7.

Back to Albert, who shares his thoughts on the liquidity driven asset bubble:

Many clients believe it is inevitable that "excess" liquidity will continue to drive risk assets higher. The broken nature of the banking intermediation means that surplus reserves are not being funnelled into the real economy and therefore must, it is believed, inevitably cascade foaming and invigorating over risk assets. And all the while interest rates remain close to zero this process is expected by many to continue apace, driving risk assets higher.

This is wrong. It is the cyclical upturn that is sucking money into risk assets. This is exactly what happened in Japan in the 1990's. Japan enjoyed many decent economic and profit recoveries which regularly pushed equities and other risk assets substantially higher. But the underlying fragility of any cyclical recovery amid a secular balance sheet recession meant there were frequent lapses back into recession. This eventually drained hope away from zombie investors who then became sellers-on-rallies, rather than buyers-on-dips.

Additionally, Edwards presents the case for balance sheet-based deflation. In essence, even as the government tries to inflate its way out of all its problems, it is, even by printing trillion in new treasuries, unable to catch up with the non-governmental balance sheet collapse.

The US Federal Reserve recently published their comprehensive flow of funds data for the US. This showed that the household sector continued to pay down debt for the fourth consecutive quarter. Corporates also started to pay down debt sharply in Q2 at a similar $200bn pace. The non-financial private sector paid down debt at a $435bn pace in Q2. This compares to a $2,116bn pace of expansion in 2007 (see chart below). Add to that the financial sector unwind and the total private sector is unwinding debt faster than the government is able to pile it up (hence the red line is still negative)! The lesson from the balance sheet recession in Japan is that the massive private sector headwind to growth has a long, long way to run.

If that is the case, we can expect, just like Japan, frequent relapses back into recession. The market now understands how an end of inventory de-stocking can boost GDP, i.e. it is the change in the change that matters. Similarly as Dylan Grice points out - link, it is the change in the fiscal deficit that is a net stimulus or drag to GDP. A massive 6pp stimulus last year is likely to turn into a 2pp drag on growth next year (see chart below). With continued private sector de-leveraging likely next year and beyond, how can one seriously not expect the global economy to relapse back into recession next year taking nominal GDP deep into an abyss?

Most notably, Edwards discusses the red herrings of systematically focusing on the wrong economic indicators, whose recurring spin by the media exaggerates the scope of any nascent recovery:

Amid the excitement of this cyclical recovery, equity investors continue to focus on entirely the wrong thing. It is cash revenue growth that is relevant for profits, not volumes. Hence when we see that Japanese core CPI inflation suffered a record 2.4% decline in August, it emphasizes that we should forget volumes and look at values. Volumes are a red herring that are misleading investors into a frenzy of excess optimism. One of the reddest of red herrings was the recent Australian GDP data. Real GDP rose a surprisingly robust 0.6% QoQ in Q2 after a rise of 0.4% in Q1 and a single quarter decline of 0.7% in Q4 2008. Unsurprisingly equity investors liked this data. Yet less attention was paid to the fact that nominal GDP declined 1.5% in Q2 after a decline of 0.6% in Q1 and a decline of 0.1% in Q4 2008 (see chart below)!

 

 

In cash terms, Australian GDP is getting worse sequentially, not getting better. One last comparison worth considering: in Q3 2008 Australian nominal GDP peaked out at a 11% yoy rate and on the most recent data that had slowed to 0.9% yoy - a heady slide indeed (by way of comparison real GDP slowed from 2.4% yoy in Q3 2008 to 0.6% in Q2 this year). Investors should not be reassured by the minor 1.8 percentage point (pp) slowdown in yoy volume growth over this period. Instead, they should panic at the 10pp loss in cash GDP growth.

At this point it is passe to discuss green shoots. An early term coined to fantasize about a quick V-shaped recovery, has since been eradicated due to the ongoing concurrent data presentations that highlight on one hand an employment picture that keeps getting worse (over and above expectations, see today's number) and on the other hand stimulus funding trickling down into the economy. In a sense, Obama has bet the house, farm, and generations of unmanageable interest payments, that the second will overtake the first eventually, and that consumers will look beyond the fact that tomorrow they may be out of a job and get back to using their credit cards as the only real driver of the U.S. economy.

Yet all factual signs point to a continued divergence between cash in (government) and cash out (everyone else) in the US, and by implication, global economy. Layer on top the fact that global trade has been decimated and that currency imbalances will make it prohibitive for natural flows to resume (US core importer, everyone else exporters), courtesy of a worthless dollar, and if you were to remove your rose-colored glasses for a second, you will see why even in the face of a 55% rally in the stock market, strategists and economists (not David Bianco mind you, we mean objective, unconflicted ones) continue their bearish stance on the economy. Because unless you truly believe that the stock market is its own isolated bubble, which many do, at some point cash from assets will have to support equity and debt valuations. And once the government cash funding vacuum pops, the market-economy divergence will also collapse. At that point, every dollar used by the government via stimulus and Federal Reserve pumps will have an equal and opposite effect on stocks, thereby throwing America not just into a debt funding crisis, but a complete economic and capital market tailspin. Alas, it appears impossible to prevent this, as the administration and the Federal Reserve Chairman are dead set on executing their inherently flawed experiment...and the American middle class.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:33 | Link to Comment monkeyshine
monkeyshine's picture

Don't worry. Unemployment is a lagging indicator, doncha know?

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:31 | Link to Comment Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

You see, this is the thing.  In discussions over at Naked Capitalism it gradually became clear that the bond market would be preserved at all costs, to protect the insurance companies and pension funds as well as (by total happenstance) the uberrich and furriners.  So no bankruptcy (private failure) or true takeover (public failure) strategy would be forthcoming, other than occassional accidents and other exceptions.  Nothing....systemic would be done.

Ergo, we are doing a Japanese zombie dance, most likely a Lost Generation rather than a Lost Decade.  The investor psychology and sectoral returns in Japan, then, aren't a perfect guide but a critical datapoint (see also Cassandra Does Tokyo for sporadic but profound glimpses under the kimono).

The main points are, expect no real return across all traditional asset classes.  What you save is what you get to keep--if you can keep it.  Bond funds are as dangerous as equity funds.  401(k)s are killing fields.  We will mostly still participate in 401(k)s because of the honey trap of the corporate match.  But the money market funds are the only safe place there relatively speaking.

Savings will increase to make up for the carnage and the slow drip of bailouts and taxation.  Combined, increased savings and taxes will strip double digit percentages off of consumer spending.  For ever. 

Naturally, we are far worse off than Japan ever was, but that's a start.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:44 | Link to Comment Mos
Mos's picture

Deflation is not such a bad thing for an economy with ample private savings, see http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2009/09/japan-on-ground-view.html .  Unfortunately, the US is driven by credit expansion and thus deflation is roadrunner to our Wiley E Coyote economy.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:55 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Sorry, can't resist.

CNBC - Breaking news from Bernanke. There's no such things as a bad economy, it's just (severely) misunderstood.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:08 | Link to Comment Ben Graham Redux
Ben Graham Redux's picture

Jesse's piece was good but people will draw the wrong conclusions by focusing on Japan for two reasons:

1.  Japan experienced its "lost years" during a magnificent global economic expansion that lifted all boats - even the ones with holes in them.

2.  Japan has domestic savings.  The US is reliant on outside savings which can be both a blessing and a curse, depending on how our Economic Masters play it.

 

If we go into a deflationary fall, the world is going back to the dark ages.  Too bad Yankee Candle is private!

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 15:17 | Link to Comment Ben Graham Redux
Ben Graham Redux's picture

Good point - but the Japanese were able to devalue their own savings - all we can do is devalue someone elses.  The more the world uses the buck to pay for the carry trade, the more the world sees the value of its collective savings go down the drain.  The Japanese have savers, we have borrowers.  This difference is critical.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 15:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:09 | Link to Comment TeresaE
TeresaE's picture

"Deflation is not such a bad thing ... with ample savings..."

Only if daddy gubmint doesn't confiscate it because they have to.

They have done it before and look to be planning to do it again.

Savers and people with paid for assets will be the next to be slaughtered.  They are the only people with anything left of value for the gubmint to sell to China.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:16 | Link to Comment contrabandista13
contrabandista13's picture

Being slightly less insolvent does not make you a saver.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 15:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 16:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 15:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:39 | Link to Comment True Constant
True Constant's picture

Excellent points in this piece.

Is there a link to the full doc?

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:46 | Link to Comment rhinotrader
rhinotrader's picture

Watch what happens when China wants there money back. I am sure most people know who made this absolutely correct statement.

 

 

 

Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship. ...voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.[40]

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:56 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Sounds like your friendly neighborhood (US Government) Nazi to me.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:49 | Link to Comment Philologus TaXitus
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 10:54 | Link to Comment Jim B
Jim B's picture

Unfortunately, I must agree completely.  The rampant goverment spending will end eventually and it will be ugly.  

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:42 | Link to Comment monkeyshine
monkeyshine's picture

Unless, and I'm just thinking aloud here, government spending replaces the entire tax code.  That will drive up savings in the short term (but unlikely in the long term) and create inflation simultaneously. In essence government spending and the concurrent inflation replace taxation.  We pay tax in the form of inflation.  That forces us to spend our dollars faster (to avoid them losing value) and gets us out of this liquidity trap.

A side benefit for the people is, it gets the government out of our hair. But government won't like it since it eliminates the best lever of control over our lives.  In fact it turns the tables, since all government spending has a direct effect on all people (by devaluing their currency in the form of inflation) the government will be much more sensitive to debt and spending and the people (both foreign and domestic) would be much more vocal about government largess. 

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:03 | Link to Comment economicmorphine
economicmorphine's picture

I like the comment about executing the American middle class, although I imagine it feels more like rape than execution at this point.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:11 | Link to Comment TeresaE
TeresaE's picture

Ask a few former small business owners if they feel the same.

It changed from just a friendly brutal rape to outright execution sniper in the past year or so.

Blackened buildings everywhere prove this point.

 

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 17:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 11:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 16:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 16:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 19:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!