You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

All That Expires is Not Gold

Marla Singer's picture




It is difficult to draw comparisons between last year's market for gold futures and today's, given that gold wasn't exactly on anyone's radar in late 2008, but we'll try anyhow.  Curiously, the January contract (expiring January 5, 2010) might as well be chopped liver according to volume today.  What does it say about futures traders that none want a contract that expires 4 days after the new year?  Just that they plan on having a significant hangover?  Or that they want zero roll risk after a long market holiday?

 

It is a bit odd because crude (expiring withing a day of gold) doesn't seem to show the same effect.

 

We saw the same "gold gap" effect in 2008...

 

...but why was is this effect confined to gold futures? (Well, actually silver and palladium, but not platinum, seem to share it).  Is it NYMEX specific?  Something to do with specifics of the metals contracts in January?  Or does this suggest that the majority of gold futures traders are long chaos over the holiday season?  Implied volatilities for futures options don't seem to suggest so.  Or that, compared to investors in crude futures, most gold investors are American and thus impacted by the Thanksgiving holiday season more directly?  We actually have no idea.

Damn gold bugs.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:29 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Something smart to say, to impress Marla.....Think...think......Darn.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:37 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Nice try George. Tell her you think her shoes look great.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:44 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Her shoes look great? I did not know that.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:54 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

That's because you weren't looking at her shoes, were you?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:47 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Good one CD, I do not mind playing straight man for that.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:31 | Link to Comment 10044
10044's picture

It's all to do with tungsten and naked shorting of GS et al. Once they find out they've been naked all along, 1650 will be the next stop.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:32 | Link to Comment Prophet of Wise
Prophet of Wise's picture

There are more fingers in the gold market than drops of Idumean blood in the central bank ownership. Gold is the most heavily manipulated market in the history of mankind and yet despite all his monumental attempts to bring her to ruin she still rises with the wind. Man will never learn he shall not win his war with nature.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:39 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

But then how do you explain the Feb contract?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:10 | Link to Comment onelight
onelight's picture

mystery to me, too...

L. Edelson of Weiss (Edel-Weiss?) calling today for a USD collapse to 70 this very weekend to come, the theory being that last year the post-Turkey Day weekend saw the same downspout-and-spider thing going into the Monday following...

and with gold expiry next week, well...

But he likes to get out ahead of the curve sometimes...so who knows...I'm standing aside

Swenlin's DecisionPoint charts for USD on weekly monthly show interim t-line supp around 73.5, and then of course toward 70 after that...

If the USD-S&P inverse correlation holds tight, maybe getting into the 73's will be the thing that pulls stocks out of this angst-ridden S&P 1100 area, to 1120-1150, if only to get the move done, and then decline

anything to get us out of this will-they-or-won't-they business below 1120..

Goldman sez 1060 year-end though, and Kass estimates 1030, and if they are right then the Santa won't find its Santa hat this time

I dunno...just trading..

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:43 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Is the contract telling us the bank holiday schedule?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:28 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

Why isn't crude's?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:46 | Link to Comment BlueStreak
BlueStreak's picture

The Jan is just friggin bizarre...was it a display anomaly?  IE, is it still there right now?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:28 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

It was last year too. (See charts).

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:16 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

No, the question would be why is there January VOLUME?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 16:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:01 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

"The United States Mint has suspended sales of gold and silver yet again. 2009 has seen an unprecedented demand for the 2009 Gold American Eagles and 2009 Silver American Eagles as investors have clamored to secure their assets and protect their wealth against the rising tide of inflation. "

 

Just landed in email inbox from APMEX.  Certainly talking their book but can't be ignored.

 

 

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:04 | Link to Comment jruspini
jruspini's picture

Does anyone here actually trade???

Gold futures trade actively in every other month, but crude trades actively in every maturity.

If you traded futures, you would see that every month.

Disgraceful.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:17 | Link to Comment onelight
onelight's picture

ok, enlighten me...if gold trades actively every other month, and yet I have December and then both January and February contracts to work with (liffe) on my screen, then why would one trade so much less actively, as you state,

and how does that explain the apparent anomaly that Marla points out?

They both trade (Jan & Feb), so why would one trade so much less?

tia

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:43 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

That makes all the sense in the world. Until you see that Bloomberg is reporting January volume. So... what is that exactly?

 

 

Also, I asked this question specifically:

"Something to do with specifics of the metals contracts in January?"

So your attitude is a little misplaced there, Gordon.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:28 | Link to Comment A_MacLaren
A_MacLaren's picture

Marla - According to my records, the January 2009 contract was just recently opened.  In my TWS-IB platform, I always keep at least 2 months up, front month, and the subsequent.  When I rolled from Oct to Dec as front month, the next one that opened was Feb. 2009.  I had not thought to go check on a freshly opened Jan contract until your post.  Sure enough, it is there now, it wasn't just a short while ago.

Have a delicious Thanksgiving.

 

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:49 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

So who at Bloomberg should I call to get that volume figure yanked for 2008 and 2009?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:46 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

Indeed! This is what I was looking for.

Email me and claim your free ZH hat. marla@zh

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 20:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 11/26/2009 - 03:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 11/26/2009 - 04:31 | Link to Comment celticgold
celticgold's picture

  sounds like a CC event to me

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 05:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 11/26/2009 - 12:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 11/26/2009 - 12:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 11/26/2009 - 12:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 11/26/2009 - 13:15 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Ya you should totally do your homework before starting a story that is basically asking why the market has this behavior and then this story wouldn't have existed because it's purpose would have been void. Comex noob. :P

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!