This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Ambush in the Oil Market

madhedgefundtrader's picture




 

The most significant development in the financial markets during my recent sojourns in Europe was the International Energy Agency’s shocking release of strategic petroleum reserves. Unprecedented during peacetime, the move caught oil traders completely by surprise and prompted an immediate $6 drop in crude prices.

The howls of leaked information and insider trading were so loud that they could be heard in the distant recesses of the Swiss Alps. This is what you usually get when several leading players lose a huge chunk of money overnight.

The move was orchestrated by President Obama’s White House, and quickly found several willing coconspirators in Japan, Germany, and South Korea. Ostensibly done to address the 1.6 million barrel a day shortfall in light crude supplies caused by the Libyan civil war, there are in fact far broader implications for all of us.

This is the first real attempt by the consuming nations to eliminate the oil risk premium, which has been variously estimated at up to $50 a barrel. Take away the instability from the Middle East, the chicanery by short term traders at hedge funds, and more recently, the entry into the market of high frequency algorithms, and crude should be trading at a mere $50 a barrel.

This is the point where virtually all oil majors believe would be supported by weakening global economic fundamentals, and on which they based their own multibillion dollar long term capital spending and development budgets.

The amount of oil involved was really quite small, some 30 million barrels over 30 days, 1.3% current global consumption. That is not important. The impact at the margin where prices are made was large. Goldman Sacks said that this would cut oil prices by $10-$12 a barrel over the next three months, while JP Morgan predicted a whacking great drop from $130 to $100 for Brent crude.

The game changer is that the move reflects a new interventionist, activist approach by governments towards the commodity markets in general and the energy space specifically. Traders may bet against the national interest, but now do so at their peril. Volatility and unpredictability in the oil markets have just taken a quantum  leap up.

That leads to an automatic increase in SPAN margin, making it more expensive to maintain positions. Hedge fund risk managers will also be taking an ax to oil trading books. While the profits to be made from oil trading are quite substantial, they are now higher risk and of lower quality, justifying lesser amounts of capital. Over time this should shrink the speculative demand for oil in the market place, especially if the IEA repeat the action in the face of rising oil prices.

The impact on the global economy can be quite large. World oil consumption is at 87 million barrels a day, or 31.8 billion barrels a year. At today’s $95 a barrel, that costs consumers some $3 trillion a year out of a $60 trillion world GDP. If the IEA’s strategy works, and prices stay down 10% over time, this would inject $300 billion into the world economy. A 20% decline generates $600 billion, exactly the amount of money the financial system is losing with the expiration of Ben Bernanke’s QE2.  Call it QE3 in black?

You won’t hear any carping from me, as I have been playing oil from the short side over the last two months, all the way down from $118, as part of a generalized “RISK OFF” trade, buying puts on the oil ETF (USO), and buying the 2X inverse oil major ETF (DUG). The IEA action gets us within striking distance of my downside target of $84 a barrel, the price that prevailed before the onset of the Libyan war and a six month low. That is the neighborhood where I start to buy again.

To see the data, charts, and graphs that support this research piece, as well as more iconoclastic and out-of-consensus analysis, please visit me at www.madhedgefundtrader.com . There, you will find the conventional wisdom mercilessly flailed and tortured daily, and my last two years of research reports available for free. You can also listen to me on Hedge Fund Radio by clicking on “This Week on Hedge Fund Radio” in the upper right corner of my home page.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 14:30 | 1416340 Arrowflinger
Arrowflinger's picture

From The Hunt for Red October - "Right now Tupelov is removing the safety features on all his torpedoes.

Shortly thereafter .....

Konovalov Crewman: Torpedo, Dead Ahead!

Andrei Bonovia: [to Captain Tupolev] You arrogant ass! You've killed us!

[just moments later, the Konovalov explodes.]

Life imitating art.


 

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 14:28 | 1416324 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

It's not a "conspriracy" if governments do it.  I think the technical term is "in concert with."  If it's a total failure and prices soar as a result we also can call it "a total failure."  I think i would have taken the Cramer approach and increased margin rates instead.  Clearly it shows no confidence in the market to "set the correct (lower) price."  Needless to say either way "a good time to be an oil company."

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 12:19 | 1415816 gorillaonyourback
gorillaonyourback's picture

shit article, no talk of peak oil, inventory levels,  saudi arabia overstatement of pumping capacity by as much as 40%,  the beakdown of opec.   LMAO  this is just a chartolgist trying to predict the future lookin at the past 

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 12:03 | 1415770 bourbondave
bourbondave's picture

I don't understand this at all.

1.  It assumes our leaders actually have a plan other than playing politics which is ridiculous.

2.  Even beyond the small amount released, the other parties mentioned have all the cards.  The gov't can hardly release much more oil from the Reserve.  I doubt anyone is too concerned.

3.  The impact was so immaterial that it has largely reversed itself in the few days it took to publish this post.

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 11:57 | 1415745 BORT
BORT's picture

Community Organizers make the best oil traders

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 11:59 | 1415737 IslandMan
IslandMan's picture

World consumption is not 87 million bpd.  That figure is "all liquids", even you should know the difference by now.  Crude oil production / consumption is 74 million.  Of that, about 43 million is available for export.  So, the Libyan reduction is more like 4%.

"the oil risk premium, which has been variously estimated at up to $50 a barrel".  Variously estimated by whom exactly ?

Good luck playing the short side.  You're betting against the house, the house of declining production and increasing demand.  

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 12:02 | 1415753 Francis Dollarhyde
Francis Dollarhyde's picture

...and has been stuck at 74 since 2005...

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 11:56 | 1415730 earnulf
earnulf's picture

Some ambush, dropped prices for a weekend plus one day and prices now rebounding.   

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 11:48 | 1415712 InconvenientCou...
InconvenientCounterParty's picture

It's a try and it's a "text book" example of "price controls". Very predictable and very bullish for the "peak oil" narrative.

Thu, 06/30/2011 - 14:23 | 1416320 max2205
max2205's picture

Ambush is priority ONE for Obama and the ability for him to be reelected...high Oil = no Obama. Hey, I am willing to pay a few extra bucks a gallon to get rid of this Dick.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!