And Now For Today's Mini Silver Flash Crash: Same Time, Same Place

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:50 | 1236134 Rynak
Rynak's picture

WHAT THE FUCK!!! That this is even tolerated is a joke.... they're not even trying anymore to hide what's going on! It's almost as if they want to let you know "WE CAN!"

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:56 | 1236168 Pepe
Pepe's picture

Absolutely agree, and not just with the silver issue; on every issue the message is we do it because we can. What are you gonna do about it? Well I guess that is going to have to be our decision

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:57 | 1236177 Xibalba
Xibalba's picture

Anyone heard from Bart Chilton?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:02 | 1236205 Pepe
Pepe's picture

Last time I heard of him it was december 2010. You know, now that you mention it, if you put a beard on the man, lie him down and paint his forehead with red, he could easily look like someone I know....

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:12 | 1236231 Haywood Jablowme
Haywood Jablowme's picture

 

Shake that tree bitches.  So easy, it should probably be traded on the pinks...

 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:40 | 1236313 TooBearish
TooBearish's picture

Bang de close bitch, bang it like you're riding Blythe doggie style!

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:59 | 1236528 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

you scared her away you...big...bad...bear.  (Maybe she still likes to watch...er I mean...READ!  READ!)

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:42 | 1236311 rocker
rocker's picture

They cancel trades on a daily basis. They manipulate every day because the can. The market is broken. Nobody Cares! 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:51 | 1236331 dlmaniac
dlmaniac's picture

Did you guys notice CFTC is no where to be found? HOHO. Corruption at its deepest.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:58 | 1236534 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

the Silver Surfer cared.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:10 | 1236845 YouBetYourLife
YouBetYourLife's picture

For students of history, you're in luck!  You get to relive history, up close and personal, with a front row seat.

Today's feature:  The Fall of the Roman empire (redux).

Yes, this is what it was like when the mighty Roman empire collapsed due to its own greed, corruption and internal rot.  The rich and powerful not only were unaccountable to their fellow citizens, but were actually protected by the system that should have been prosecuting their crimes.

If I remember correctly, it didn't end well. . . eight centuries of darkness.   

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:27 | 1236899 FeralSerf
FeralSerf's picture

The tickets sure are fucking expensive lately.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 03:04 | 1237200 Hook Line and S...
Hook Line and Sphincter's picture

Eight centuries of darkness is still better than eight eons of WWIII induced radioactivity. This time around there are those who have learned to split atoms and toy with scalar energy.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 07:33 | 1237327 ArgentDawn
ArgentDawn's picture

Where do we sign up to be Visigoths?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:04 | 1236541 sleepingbeauty
sleepingbeauty's picture

Could we not fight back ala anonymous. Millions of trades for small amounts all across the world.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:28 | 1236729 angrybill
angrybill's picture

Anonymouse use a program (the LOIC) installed on the client machine that enables centralised command of those PCs to attack (flood) an interwebs target of choice.

 

What you're after is central command (of multiple trading accounts) to trade on an equivalent scale (downloads of the LOIC is in the millions)

 

Not knowing which sort of trading platforms (if any) could support this sort of account managment/coordination or trying to get this many people to hand over money to total strangers seems like a pretty tall order...

 

like an open source hedge fund or summin...?!?!

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 10:44 | 1238033 Doña K
Doña K's picture

Better yet, stay totally out of the markets and keep buying physical PM's on a small continuous fashion. Good opportunity silver at $40 or under. I am starting to buy again. 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:58 | 1236180 augie
augie's picture

Actually i think it is "yes we can" not just simply "we can."

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:01 | 1236195 Dexter Morgan
Dexter Morgan's picture

Si se puede.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:33 | 1236477 Mec-sick-o
Mec-sick-o's picture

¡Sí señor!

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:54 | 1236524 akak
akak's picture

Debe ser "Si podemos", verdad?

"Si se puede" es muy debil, y no precisamente lo equal de "Yes we can", yo creo.
Nunca lo he entendido, tengo que decir.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:38 | 1236600 Mec-sick-o
Mec-sick-o's picture

You are near.

"Si podemos" implies "nosotros" (yes we can)=Sujeto Implícito.

"Si se puede" has no subject (yes can be), but only talker & listener know about who they speak about=Sujeto Tácito

http://lengua.laguia2000.com/gramatica/sujeto-tacito

 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:10 | 1236689 msamour
msamour's picture

Aye Pedale! Vas tu ecrire en anglais ou quoi? Comment aime tu ca ne pas comprendre?

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 01:34 | 1237128 Mec-sick-o
Mec-sick-o's picture

Oui monsieur. Mea culpa, mea culpa est.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 01:45 | 1237137 akak
akak's picture

Merde!  Combien langageaux parlez vous?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:23 | 1236435 myTPisUSD
myTPisUSD's picture

Yes we (kicked the) can!

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:55 | 1236640 Mec-sick-o
Mec-sick-o's picture

+1*10qe(u$d)

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:59 | 1236182 DosZap
DosZap's picture

Rynak,

"It's almost as if they want to let you know "WE CAN!"

No they did, no almost to it.One day there will be a run on  new rope.

These fackers are almost equal to single cell protozoas.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:25 | 1236266 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

YES WE CON!

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:37 | 1236468 hpprinter000
hpprinter000's picture

calm down, read this http://thefront9.wordpress.com/2011/04/26/freak-out/ almost perfect prediction

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 20:50 | 1236508 JPDG
JPDG's picture

Anyone know any hackers in Anonymous?  We could use their help.

How about everyone sends the CFTC a flood of emails?

questions@cftc.gov

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:33 | 1236750 angrybill
angrybill's picture

Got IRC?

I believe it's AnonOps

else

4chan /b/

(good luck with that ;^)

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:04 | 1236838 mouthpiece
mouthpiece's picture

IRC is your best bet.  4chan is a joke/front page/recruitment tool to (not for or by) the [dis]organization, populated almost entirely by hangers-on and wannabes, the 1 million people who downloaded LOIC but have no idea who the real muscle of Anonymous is (which is an unknown number of hackers and hacker groups).  You used to be able to contact them almost directly on 420chan's /i/, but /i/ (stands for invasion, the forum formerly used to coordinate Anonymous' DDOS activities, long before Wikileaks and LOIC) became password-protected and located on a "secret" server about the time I stopped lurking at 420chan.

Try this link: http://search.mibbit.com/channels/AnonOps

Although, in reality, you are contacting a group of hacktivists that operate under the Anonymous umbrella.  Oldschool /i/ Anonymous people were a bunch of anarchist pranksters and troublemakers who trolled relentlessly and tried to destroy websites/people's lives in the name of "lulz".  "Anonymous" itself is an amorphous concept that anyone can use to do anything, as long as they can convince enough of the /b/ crowd to go along with it.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 09:05 | 1237599 DrunkenMonkey
DrunkenMonkey's picture

And there are more /b/tards lurking here than you think.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:00 | 1236530 NOTW777
NOTW777's picture

a chart that reflects the integrity of our markets

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:32 | 1236760 Ben Fleeced
Ben Fleeced's picture

Same Buy The F'in Dip time same buy the dip channel. I know my GenNexers. Read up on crazy azz biathc Popcorn 198---sumthin' and learn. 

A whoooaw.

And in the death,

as the last few corpses lay rotting in the slimey thoroughfare

...

 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:44 | 1236135 e_goldstein
e_goldstein's picture

This is starting to look like a dip worth buying.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:01 | 1236197 Tortfeasor
Tortfeasor's picture

Already missed it

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:02 | 1236203 InconvenientCou...
InconvenientCounterParty's picture

c'mon $35.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:18 | 1236253 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

e: give it another week or so

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:44 | 1236622 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Valued advice.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:21 | 1236715 e_goldstein
e_goldstein's picture

Thanks, Turd. No reason to try to catch a falling knife.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:55 | 1236136 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

What's this talk about two silver prices? tmosely is convinced this has happened and doesn't think anyone can get silver close to spot, in fact he dared me today to try and pick up silver close to spot...it's rare if you are retail and pick up any PM directly @ the spot, that's how the business works. Every product is in stock but the 1 OZ 9/11 commemorative coins.

$2 over @ ampex is pretty standard; 500 or more @ $1 over spot.

http://www.apmex.com/Category/1202/1_oz_Silver_Rounds.aspx

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 18:58 | 1236179 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Umm i just looked and the cheapest rounds from apmex is 2.29 over spot. Eagles, maples, and phils are still 5 dollars over spot. Nice try.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:11 | 1236188 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

Oh...sorry.

I was off .29 cents. What the fuck ever, it's normal.

Not as many phils are minted that's why they are more expensive. I can find you collectible coins going for up in the hundreds but that's irregardless of supply/demand/comex defaulting.

Here, I found 1 OZ silver bars going for $360 over spot:

http://www.apmex.com/Category/525/Australian_Silver_Lunar_Series_1___1999_2010.aspx

Comex must have defaulted!

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:21 | 1236262 legal eagle
legal eagle's picture

Sir, might I have another!  Ha ha ha, you cant hurt me, got in too low!

Please, "irregardless" is not a word.  Irrespective, yes, regardless, yes.  Well, maybe in the tweet and text generation, not for us ol' timers.

Cheers,

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:30 | 1236273 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless

Evolution.

It appears in a wide range of dictionaries including: Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged (1961, repr. 2002)

Guess it just depends what dictionary you use.

But I thought this thread was about silver. I guess we can correct our grammar/syntax as well though, that's always a hoot of a time.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:06 | 1236842 MachoMan
MachoMan's picture

All quoting a dictionary means that many people misuse the term...  it's a popularity contest more or less...  and, in this case, the popular term is incorrect.  At some point, without rules, we lose a language.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:26 | 1236894 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

Than why don't we all just speak latin?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:41 | 1236956 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Because we lack the mental horsepower to speak clearly and with the deep conviction and clarity that any classic language demands.

English is a lose lose all the way down the rabbit hole.

ORI

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!