reason Bernanke claims to be engaging in QE at all is to keep interest rates
low to sustain the housing market (and allegedly help the economy).
a cursory look at the situation shows he is either lying or somehow manages to
monitor the US monetary system WITHOUT actually ever look at price levels.
Either one of those options is enough to give you a chill… and illustrate
beyond doubt that he is unqualified for the position he holds.
Bailout Ben to bother opening a stockcharts account or looking at Yahoo!
Finance occasionally, he’d see that Treasuries actually have FALLEN (pushing
interest rates higher) whenever he announced a QE program.
As you can
see, back in March 2009, when the first QE program was announced, long-term US
debt traded at 130. When QE 1 was announced, long-term US debt levels FELL (pushing
interest rates higher), they then traded in a range from 115-122 until April
2010 when QE 1 ended.
thing happened with the announced of QE lite and QE 2. Indeed, the only time
that Treasuries actually RALLIED (lowering long-term interest rates) was from April-August 2010: the ONLY time that the
Fed hasn’t maintained a public QE program in the last 18 months.
on earth does no one in Congress or elsewhere call Bernanke on this? It’s
obvious to ANYONE who bothers looking at US Treasuries that QE fall whenever
Bernanke implements QE. Is it really possible that NO ONE in a position of
power actually bothers checking on this stuff? I mean, if we’re going to allow
the guy to throw TRILLIONS of Dollars around, surely someone should bother
engaging in minor fact checking like… or I don’t know, seeing if his claims are
actually even VALID.
goes for his and president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York William
Dudley claims that QE will help the US unemployment situation. Even according
to the BLS’s ridiculous numbers, the unemployment rate when QE 1 started was
8.5% with 13.2 million unemployment, compared to today’s rate of 9.6% with 14.8
How on earth
can anyone with a working brain claim that the $1.25+ trillion we’ve already
spent on QE was helpful to employment when both the RATE and the actual NUMBER
of unemployed Americans have risen dramatically since QE was first implemented?
terms, the only way Bernanke’s claims regarding QE’s success are valid is if
you present the argument that both interest rates and unemployment would have
been a whole lot worse without QE. That’s a pretty piss poor argument for
spending nearly $2 trillion.
if you’re going to resort to abstractions when it comes to justifying spending
INSANE amounts of money, there’s literally no end to the craziness you can come
up with. According to this logic, the Fed could literally print $2 trillion and
give it to Wall Street and claim that it helped the economy when it fact it did
nothing but return Wall Street bonuses to 2007 levels.
Oh wait… it
already did that.
you’re worried about the future of the stock market and have yet to take steps
to prepare for the Second Round of the Financial Crisis… I highly suggest you
download my FREE Special Report specifying exactly how to prepare for what’s to
I call it The Financial Crisis “Round Two” Survival
Kit. And its 17 pages contain a wealth of information about portfolio
protection, which investments to own and how to take out Catastrophe Insurance
on the stock market (this “insurance” paid out triple digit gains in the Autumn
is all 100% FREE. To pick up your copy today, got to http://www.gainspainscapital.com
and click on FREE REPORTS.