This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

AXA Rosenberg's Attempt To Conceal Its Quant Glitch Costs $242 Million

Tyler Durden's picture





 

So much for quant trading being an innocent program that can never do any harm. After a year ago AXA Rosenberg disclosed that it had kept its clients in the dark about a massive error in the computer code of its "quantitative investment model", today the SEC fined the  one time asset manager of over $70 billion with a record for its kind fine of $242 million. As a reminder the immediate effect of the error when first reported was the major underperformance of the fund compared to its peers: "A number of the funds managed wholly or partly by AXA Rosenberg performed poorly last year." Yet what supposedly did not alert the firm that anything was wrong was that the system was performing in line with other comparable models: ""It wasn't obvious if there were any problems or
any impact from this error on our fund because it followed a similar
trend to other quant managers
," Vanguard spokeswoman Rebecca Katz told
Reuters on Saturday." In other words, it is safe to assume that other AXA peers have or had been operating with comparable system flaws, yet due to the SEC's preoccupation with porn, had never been caught, and as a result investors in such funds may have well been fleeced of millions due to comparable uncaught computer glitches. So much for robotic efficiency, especially when coupled with a human's eagerness to engage in willful securities fraud...

From today's SEC announcement charging AXA Rosenberg with Securities Fraud, and imposing a $242 million fine:

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged three AXA Rosenberg entities with securities fraud for concealing a significant error in the computer code of the quantitative investment model that they use to manage client assets. The error caused $217 million in investor losses.

AXA Rosenberg Group LLC (ARG), AXA Rosenberg Investment Management LLC (ARIM), and Barr Rosenberg Research Center LLC (BRRC) have agreed to settle the SEC's charges by paying $217 million to harmed clients plus a $25 million penalty, and hiring an independent consultant with expertise in quantitative investment techniques who will review disclosures and enhance the role of compliance personnel.

The SEC's order instituting administrative proceedings against the firms found that senior management at BRRC and ARG learned in June 2009 of a material error in the model's code that disabled one of the key components for managing risk. Instead of disclosing and fixing the error immediately, a senior ARG and BRRC official directed others to keep quiet about the error and declined to fix the error at that time.

"To protect trade secrets, quantitative investment managers often isolate their complex computer models from the firm's compliance and risk management functions and leave oversight to a few sophisticated programmers," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "The secretive structure and lack of oversight of quantitative investment models, as this case demonstrates, cannot be used to conceal errors and betray investors."

The SEC additionally charged BRRC with failing to adopt and implement compliance policies and procedures to ensure that the model would work as intended.

Rosalind R. Tyson, Director of the SEC's Los Angeles Regional Office, added, "Quant managers need to ensure that their compliance policies and procedures are tailored to the risks of their model's strategies, and that compliance personnel are integrated into the development and maintenance of their investment models."

What happened with AXA will soon enough happen with all other HFT firms, that today are still all the rage, but following the next major market meltdown that not even all the talent of Sack Frost will be able to recover from, the ensuing scapegoating will immediately focus on blaming those most defenseless and most silicon endowed: the various collocation boxes that do nothing but "provide liquidity." And as a reminder, scalping and frontrunning HFT algos collect rebates in up markets... as well as down.



 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 02/03/2011 - 22:58 | Link to Comment Double down
Double down's picture

Preoccupation with porn

You are killing me!!!

 

Bitches!

Thu, 02/03/2011 - 23:09 | Link to Comment gwar5
gwar5's picture

Too funny!

Thu, 02/03/2011 - 23:30 | Link to Comment Ima anal sphincter
Ima anal sphincter's picture

I'm a total financial idiot, but it seems to me if money is missing, it was a planned glitch.

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 00:24 | Link to Comment Money Squid
Money Squid's picture

Agreed. Companies keep multiple sets of books, they keep multiple sets of computer programs, ones that trade for profit from offshore companies and ones that trade for losses for the sucker investors onshore.

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 06:44 | Link to Comment benburnyanki
benburnyanki's picture

yea u rite matey! every trade has a winner and a loser. I a programmer and I know that their software is designed to be hooked up to their Jew Mafia customization that makes winning trades work for the Jew Mafia families and more of the losing trades handed out to locals who the Mossad/CIA have targeted for 'Stasi Secret Disintegration' to financially destroy them. The Mossad secretly financially/emotionally destroys 'smart folks' who are not in the Jew Mafia as nobody even knows there is a Jew Mafia. Biggest most secret fookin' Mob around folks!

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 14:32 | Link to Comment h3m1ngw4y
h3m1ngw4y's picture

you are so full of shit and/or losses that your mental health is turned into a disaster

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 00:00 | Link to Comment Comrade de Chaos
Comrade de Chaos's picture

O Common. Ignoring your job duties and failing to oversee your former or future friends, is a very nerve breaking job. How else can one hanle it but a nice long afternoon porn session? 

this case is a clear indication that if one wants to do business in here related to anything somewhat substantial in  "investments" or "banking", one just hasto hire former SEC employees.. or ELSE. (or else no one will warn you when the bad boys come & what they will look for... sarc / sick)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjpvpQ9c8IE&feature=related

 

 

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 00:14 | Link to Comment RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

The money must have been "skimmed off" by the managers.

Nothing new, move along please.....

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 01:07 | Link to Comment Attitude_Check
Attitude_Check's picture

Making errors faster by computer is never a good thing .... unless you are the recipient of the errors.

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 01:21 | Link to Comment snowball777
snowball777's picture

Zero sympathy for the 'fleeced'...fuck em if they're too lazy to manage their own money.

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 01:50 | Link to Comment Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Thank you robot trader for filtering the recents chart requests through Tyler. You're both good men. The 10 cross over was on the 21 sma buy the way. Best wishes. To you both.

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 06:39 | Link to Comment benburnyanki
benburnyanki's picture

Holy Flyin Fink Farts Fatman,

Who the hell let these SEC flak flickers on The Street? Don't ju all got bodygardz to keep the sticky fingered fatties off your necks?

I know how to count in Japanese and not no Hero or nada but can keep a few SEC pinstripped porn pinkos off ur ass fer a few quid.

Call +44 800 tonyblair

Oh and numbnutz investors, when your fund manager says their software is a Quant (pronounced Kunt) that is your first hint that your in for a fuckin' and then they pull the ole switcheroo and make you the femaile end of the equation.

 

Fri, 02/04/2011 - 08:55 | Link to Comment sarnuk
sarnuk's picture

AXA doesnt have the lobbying nd bribing paower of the major investment banks. That's why they get fined this obscene amount for a coding error that they already paid for by losing half their assets.

 

Now major bulge brackets get fined $10 million, or maybe one employee's salary, for years of frontrunning, now that's special. Oh, and how are the big banks doing? did they lose half? NOT.

 

What a joke.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!