This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Barclays Quant Strategy: "Mispricings In The Market May Be Beginning To Take Root"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Barclays' head of quantitative strategy Matt Rothman provides some additional information on one of the most notable facets of the current market regime, namely the record implied correlation and thus, near record low stock dispersion, in other words, the phenomenon that all stocks trade as one, regardless of fundamental differences across different publicly traded companies. While nothing a slight dip in 1 month implied correlation from all time records near 70% hit in the past month, Rothman observes that "low levels of stock dispersion generally correspond with difficulty in picking individual stocks...This high level of cross-sectional correlation also has implications for how certain characteristics are being priced. For if stock return dispersion is low but underlying fundamental (economic) performance of factors remains relatively constant then it would appear that mispricings in the market may be beginning to take root." In other words, as we noted last time we observed the record low stock dispersion a month earlier, alpha (continues to be) dead. Yet for those who are eagerly anticipating the dispersion to finally rise, Rothman says that the market is basically back to mid-2009, when high quality stocks were largely undervalued compared to low quality: "High Quality companies are cheap right now relative to low Quality companies. We believe this is due both to a compression of returns in the market and because of the current macro-economic environment that has favored lower Quality stocks." Of course, shorting high beta names in a Fed-mediated market, has led to nothing but implosion.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 08/09/2010 - 11:21 | 510737 Manipulism
Manipulism's picture

Wow, no idiotic "bitchezzz" comment so far.

Whats wrong.

Go ahead, make this blog better.

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 11:29 | 510755 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

Id say yours is the first.

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 11:37 | 510762 King_of_simpletons
King_of_simpletons's picture

Define 'high quality company'

Define 'low quality company'

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 11:38 | 510764 Gimp
Gimp's picture

Another sales pitch. Let's all run out and buy, buy, buy.

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 11:45 | 510777 DrDre
Mon, 08/09/2010 - 12:00 | 510813 gringo28
gringo28's picture

just buy cash generating monsters, who operate in growth economies/segments.

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 12:06 | 510822 I am more equal...
I am more equal than others's picture

With the suspension of mark to market hasnt this stuff been mispriced for some time and we're all living on Fantansy Island.  Da plane da plane Robert Reich screams....

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 12:10 | 510827 Bankster T Cubed
Bankster T Cubed's picture

a currency-linked program controlls all prices

nothing else matters

insiders make zillions, everyone else says wtf

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 12:16 | 510839 nevadan
nevadan's picture

"...higher Quality companies appear to be attractively valued on a relative basis"

Or, put another way, lower quality companies are simply overpriced.

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 12:37 | 510877 Bartanist
Bartanist's picture

Doesn't game theory indicate that the computer models will gravitate to one and squeeze all of the alpha out of the quant trade?

What we really need is two separate markets; one independently computer bid ask matched free market for private investors only (not guaranteeing any level of liquidity) and a completely different market run by the Investment banks for their casino gambling games and guaranteeing instant liquidity.

 Investment banks would be prohibited from participating in the free market, no leverage and no shorting of any kind would be allowed. It would be solely for companies to raise capital and to allow private investors to participate in the future of the companies that need capital.

Mon, 08/09/2010 - 13:01 | 510905 mudduck
mudduck's picture

After reading this I realize, I shoulda stayed in school, I could've been a plumber.

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 02:46 | 514662 susiesss
susiesss's picture

HI?would you please send me the original report?

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 02:47 | 514663 susiesss
susiesss's picture

my email is susiesss910@gmail.com

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!