You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

BATS Exchange Releases Short Volume As Part Of Increasing Disclosure, Suprising Results

Tyler Durden's picture




As part of the recent initiatives by Exchanges, ECNs and ATS to provide much needed transparency into daily trading practices, BATS recently started disclosed not only daily volume breakouts of total daily and short volume, but also detail into every single transaction occuring during the trading day. The complete data can be found here: the transaction level detail is staggering.

Yet the daily volume information provides a useful summary snapshot of individual and combined stock volume and the short volume disclosure is quite suprising. Based on available trading data, Short Volume on BATS accounts for over 46% of total volume. This is quite surprising in light of the fact that over the past month Short Interest as disclosed by the NYSE and Nasdaq has plunged materially. The question is how does BATS define a short transaction, and who out there actually has the guts at this moment to initiate short positions. Also, are the shorters moving aggressively from traditional exchanges such as the NYSE to fringe mediums such as BATS, ITG, etc.

Below is the chart summarizing the recent volume disclosure by BATS.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:41 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

OK...

I'm hardly one to analyze such data.  But that looks like a huge amount of shorting activity.

Progam trading?  J'accuse!

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:43 | Link to Comment Veteran
Veteran's picture

Zola, nice

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:54 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Another possibility - Since this is only a couple of weeks of data, it could be showing large short positions being taken.

Futures this AM went up big, then dropped.  That smells of a stop sweep to me.

Given what else I'm looking at, we could be FINALLY looking at the correction many have been expecting.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:38 | Link to Comment mgarrett84
mgarrett84's picture

MY guess is that its likely intraday short positions likely tied to index arbing.  I doubt much of this is held over night. 

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:30 | Link to Comment lettuce
lettuce's picture

exactly

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:45 | Link to Comment demsco
demsco's picture

My guess is they count a sell order as a short order, perhaps if the security is not in the account and it needs to be DTC'd in. Other than that, program trading.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:50 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Demsco, with respect, that really doesn't make sense.  A short sale has a clear definition, and I really, really doubt they would call all sales short sales (also, if that was the case, using BATS as a proxy for the market as a whole, we would have seen a 0.6% rise in the markets over that time period).

That's shorting activity.  Whoa!

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:52 | Link to Comment slore
slore's picture

a 'will deliver' trade would not be marked short--

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:10 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Hell yes.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:17 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

i would rather have full disclosure and transparency than what we have now. and what we have now is that the goddamn worthless SEC doesn't want to disclose who has a short position on which stock. that my friend is a black box of all black boxes that lay around. And with the Madoff exemption still in force, you don't need to have much coordination to bring down the company of your wish: Let me point you to SAC and the fact that 75% of their positions were unknown in q3 and 4 of 08 and 1 of 09 

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:04 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

...And me.  Actually, been trying to short this f*cker for a month now.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:06 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

It should be, but who knows.  It wouldn't be hard for the boyz to avoid BATS and do their trades in a less transparant market.  Dark poolz rool!

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:15 | Link to Comment yy
yy's picture

It is a great move for BATS and hopefully others will follow.

The more info out the less insider's edge and better off society is.

Maybe markets will go back to being about investment and not casino.

I am for one heavily short these days and will remain.

 

 

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:16 | Link to Comment yy
yy's picture

d

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 09:59 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

articles like this is what separates ZH from everybody else. great job TD and thank you.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:09 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

TY Anon 35170.

I really hope you pick a suitable handle and give us updates on this data - I don't think many of us have access to that type of DB software.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 12:44 | Link to Comment channel_zero
channel_zero's picture

You need a DB?  You got it.

http://www.postgresql.org/

I know it runs great on mac/win/linux/bsd.  The more memory and CPU the better, but if you can set jobs up before going to bed, any old PC will do.

Now you need mad SQL skillz to do some aggregating/summing. 

Dump the results into openoffice.org to make your graphs and Bob's yer Uncle!

http://www.openoffice.org/

Seriously, it's there for the taking.  Free.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:01 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Interesting.  Have you used PostgreSQL?

I've never had to deal with 100mb+ datasets before...

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:10 | Link to Comment channel_zero
channel_zero's picture

I work with 10's of gigabytes-size datasets in postgesql and I'm on the laughably small end of the dataset bragging rights.

Mysql could be used easily too.  I prefer postgresql though.

If you know what the interesting data looks like, I'm happy to host the data, do the queries, return small result sets.

 

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:13 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Here ya go http://www.batstrading.com/market_data/shortsales/

Same data was used to make the graph up top.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 12:53 | Link to Comment channel_zero
channel_zero's picture

Excel is a poor man's database.  I mean that in the friendliest way because I get that spreadsheet jockeys want to use what they know and there is nothing wrong with that.

With datasets like this, you need a legitimate database.  No, Access isn't a legitimate DB backend.  Access is useful for putting forms up as frontends for data, but it's query language is very weak.  So, the way to do it is to dump the data into a legitimate DB.

http://www.postgresql.org/

If you are stuck on Access as a DB frontend, (yikes) use the postgresql ODBC connector.

 

 

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:29 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Ah...  That clears up a lot, thanks.

It seems large...  But since this data just became available, there's no history to compare it against (unless BATS releases it).

Still, a good step in the right direction.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 10:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:13 | Link to Comment Milton
Milton's picture

How are they able to borrow the shares?

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 14:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 11:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment channel_zero
channel_zero's picture

I don't know what to look for, but if there is some interest from people that know what to look for, I'd be happy to host the data, write/run queries, generate smaller result sets every month the data becomes available.

It would be a good way of contributing.

 

Post a reply to this comment with an email address to reach you to get started.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 15:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 16:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 20:08 | Link to Comment wheaties
wheaties's picture

If anyone ever wanted a large dataset with real value to run/test their supervised or even unsupervised learning algorithms this is it.  Now if only I had other people's money to wager like a bank... Heads I win, tails they lose.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 21:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!