This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
A Blinking Idiot & the Banking System
Interview with Lee Adler of Wall Street Examiner
Introduction by Ilene
Elliott, writer of PSW's Stock World Weekly, and I recently began a series of interviews with Lee Adler, chief editor and market analyst at the Wall Street Examiner. (The interview was on May 11, 2011.) The Wall Street Examiner is a unique and very comprehensive investment newsletter. Lee Adler’s work covers subjects such as the Fed’s open market operations, the impact of the Fed and the US Treasury on the markets, the housing market, and investment strategies. We often cite Lee’s analysis in Stock World Weekly and on Phil's Stock World -- his research into the Fed’s and the Treasury’s activities - the money flows - provides invaluable information for formulating an overall market outlook.
Part 1: A Blinking Idiot & the Banking System
Ilene: Lee, I've gathered from reading your material lately that you think it's time to be out of speculative trades, such as oil, now?
Lee: Yes, the Fed is serious about stopping speculation, and they are not waiting till the end of QE2. Bernanke wants to break the back of this thing. So if you want to trade the long side now, you’re playing with fire. The powers that be have put out the message that they won’t keep tolerating speculation in the oil and commodities markets.
Ilene: Because of the inflation that Bernanke denies exists?
Lee: Yes, the inflation is disastrous. They’ve known all along that inflation is real. You know it when you’ve got this situation in Libya with people getting killed. It started with food riots in Tunisia, but then it morphed into something else. People are starving all over the world because of these commodity prices, and the idea that it is not affecting Americans is crap because 80% of the people are affected by gas prices at these levels. They have to cut back on other spending, and the top 10% can’t carry the ball. If you’re spending an extra $100 - $200 to fill up your car and put groceries on the table, that affects your ability to service your debts, and that affects the banking system. This inability to pay back loans is showing up in mortgage delinquencies and credits card delinquencies.
Ilene: You also have written that the Dollar and commodities have an inverse relationship, why is that?
Lee: Because commodities, such as oil, are traded in Dollars. Commodities are basically a cash substitute at this point. The players don’t want to hold Dollars because the Fed is trashing the Dollar. If you’re a trader outside the U.S., and your native currency is the yen, for example, and you want to buy oil or gold futures, you need to sell Dollars in exchange for the gold or oil futures contracts you’re buying. So your action of buying the commodities in Dollars is in effect creating a short position in the Dollar.
So if commodities collapse and you’re forced to sell your positions, you’ll reverse that short position in the Dollar - trading the commodities back for Dollars. That creates demand for the Dollar. That’s why commodities and the Dollar definitely do have an inverse relationship.
With the margin increases that were implemented in the last month or so, the Fed is beginning to reverse the commodities price run up. This is the precursor to the end of QE2. The Fed is sending warning shots across the bow. After the Jan 26 FOMC meeting, banks’ reserves began to skyrocket. Why did bank reserves suddenly skyrocket? There’s no overt reason. Something was going on behind the scenes. I think banks and Primary Dealers (PDs) got the back channel message that it’s time to start building reserves because they’re really going to end QE in June - they really, really are. I give it six weeks to two months until the whole thing collapses and they have to start printing money again.
Ilene: Why do commodities and the Dollar have a more persistent relationship than the Dollar and the stock market, for which there is an inverse relationship now, but this is not always the case?
Lee: The Dollar/stock market inverse relationship is a correlation due to a common cause - essentially the actions of the Fed. It’s not a cause and effect relationship.
Elliott: Will the Fed defend the Dollar?
Lee: They are starting to, but not officially. They’re doing it behind the scenes. That’s my theory. I’m a tinfoil hat guy.... I didn’t start out this way. I arrived at my tinfoil hat after paying careful attention to the data for 8 or 9 years. After a while I realized it’s kabuki theater.
Elliott: As you say it is kabuki theater, and as Phil says, we don’t care if the markets are rigged, we just need to know HOW the market is rigged so we can place our bets correctly.
Lee: Exactly. All you need to know is what the Fed is doing. That’s my bread and butter. I watch what the Fed is doing every day. I’m so familiar with the data that stuff jumps out and screams at me. The margin increases were not an accident. They were completely out of character, and they followed Bernanke’s press conference where he claimed he couldn’t stop speculation. He’s so manipulative. He says one thing and does another.
Elliott: But being Chairman of the Fed, doesn't he have to lie? If he came out and said exactly what he’s planning to do, wouldn’t everyone and his dog get on the right side of the trade?
Lee: That’s what he does though - he lies, but in his backchannel way. He tells the favored groups exactly what he’s going to do. You have to read between the lines. The meeting minutes are pure propaganda. That is how they send coded messages to the market.
In the last meeting minutes, or maybe the one before, the Fed said that wage increases were to be eradicated. I went ballistic when I saw that.
Elliott: Especially because they create all this inflation, and it trickles it’s way down. This is trickle down inflation. It’s gotten to the point where the people trying to make a living and ultimately buy things are being told that although prices are going up, we can’t allow you to earn anymore money...
Lee: It’s a moral outrage and a terrible policy. But that's what they want. Their purpose is to keep the bankers in business. The Fed serves the banking system. That’s why it’s there, to make sure the banking system is profitable.
Ilene: So they are accomplishing their goal.
Lee: For the time being. In the end they cannot fulfill their purpose because the banking system is dead. This is Frankenstein’s monster. This is another one of Bernanke’s economic science experiments, Dr. Bernankenstein. And the result of his policies is bernankicide - the financial genocide of the elderly in America.
Elliott: Then if Dr. Bernanke is Dr. Frankenstein, then what exactly is his monster?
Ilene: The banking system?
Lee: Yes, it’s got these screws coming out of its head, and stitches across its forehead. It’s the walking dead. The banks don’t make any money, the only way they appear to make money is by lying about it.
Ilene: But the people running the banks make money.
Lee: It’s a criminal syndicate for god's sake.
*****
Pic credit: Jesse's Cafe Americain
Stay up to date with the machinations of the Fed, Treasury, Primary Dealers and foreign central banks in the US market, and get regular updates on the US housing market in the Wall Professional Edition, Money Liquidity, and Real Estate Package - information essential for understanding where the markets and the US economy are headed. Click this link to try WSE’s Professional Edition risk free for 30 days!
»
- ilene's blog
- 7969 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
"Their purpose is to keep the bankers in business. The Fed serves the banking system. That’s why it’s there, to make sure the banking system is profitable."
This is dead on..but people have to understand the mechanics of banking..it is complicated, but once people 'get it' there is no turning back. The banks are parasites, the 'game worked' but now there is simply too much debt. What the banks lend, "leans against future labor" and what we pay them, "completed labor" are two different things, yet they have the same value and are treated the same. The banks create one out of thin air, and the rest of us have to work for it. People need to understand this. This article explains it well
http://www.thecactusland.com/2011/05/moral-hazard-of-modern-banking-how....
perhaps i should change my name to gina trusts the gov to sell out to the banksters
Spot on, spot on. This is going to be a major hit in america when the game finally comes to a stop and there is no money for alot of things.
Ilene, you ignorant slut.
Your rant yesterday accused the Republicans of wanting to sell assets to fund government.
Look what your beloved King Obama just did: sold the SPR to fund deficit spending.
Where is your indignation now?
Politics is the distraction.
Look deeper.
+++
The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Families.....
http://seenoevilspeaknoevilhearnoevil.blogspot.com/2011/06/federal-reser...
Milton Freidman is a Keynsian? You smoking a six paper joint or something?
Interesting. Seems at one time they only 'owned' the republicans........now they sure seem to own both parties. Sad.
Frankenstein at least for Ben, but he tricks the blind guy - stealing his food and fooling around with his daughter - while the poor old man is in the outhouse.
Wall Street is filled with blood hungry ZOMBIES!
It reads well... but 'the banking system is dead' is bullshit!
is this commentary 6 weeks old?
Six weeks old and still relevant means FED and banks = SSDD
Hard nipples are always relevant, is that why you double-posted?
Who cares... Is that an avatar of Ilene?? she is SMOKING HOT!!!!!
All Ben can do is be a confidence cheerleader and print money. To defend the US dollar he needs to raise interest rates(he is no Volcker), that's never happening. High oil prices do to monetization but blaming speculators will get old and not believable after a while.
is this commentary 6 weeks old?
Wonder what they did with Saddam's gold
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNkM9o41lb4
Elliott: Will the Fed defend the Dollar?
Lee: They are starting to, but not officially
Hate to interupt, but this would be a reversal of a policy that has been in place since 1913......
I don't think Lee was speaking about the 100 Year USD chart.
I disagree. For example, the Volcker years were a good example of the Fed taking serious moves to defend the Dollar, when interest rates got cranked up to 18% back during the early 80's. Sometimes the Fed pursues a strong Dollar, sometimes it pursues a weak Dollar, and while the overall trend since 1913 is indisputable there are times when the Fed will make moves against that trend - as in the case of the Volcker era.
"Defending ther dollar" is another phrase that means reducing inflation enough to prevent riots and beheadings. But no deflation, no, can't have that.
Would love to praise Volcker (ala Ron Paul) for defending the dollar and taming inflation during his time at the FED, but when considering who he has always worked for, it must be considered that it was all in the plan to make the robbery look legit for a while, help add a few more suckers onboard.
Once again...
Paul Craig Roberts, in his book that details his time in the Reagan Admin stated that they had an "agreement" to cut the rate of increase in the $ Supply and the reductions were to be spread out over 3 years. Volcker delivered the whole package in 6 months, guaranteeing the recession and huge budget deficits as well as high interest rates.
You are on the right track Herbert.
CW
Ilene posts a lot of drivel, somebody rational, tell me is this post worth spending the time to read, is it like that worthless, "...progressiveism..." post?
Personally, I'm getting damn tired of posters coming on and slamming Illene, G.W., Leo,etc.
If you find these individuals take on subjects not worth reading just move on.
You're a bunch of pussies.
How do I know?
Not once have I seen anybody slam "Tyler".
Not once you little bitch.
It is worthwhile because it provides a rational explanation for the otherwise seemingly irrational.
The rational explanation is that the banks are an international crime syndicate and that they lie, cheat, defraud, embezzle, bribe and steal. This is not new news, but it is welcome confirmation.
I can accept that.
So I read this post unfortunately. It was as painful as watching CNBC.
It’s a criminal syndicate for god's sake.
Well, yes, and Bernanke is not the Don, he's the consigliere. The fixer.
What should really happen now is for Bernanke to resign so that a new consigliere might be empowered - one who appears to be serving the public interest while facilitating the last round of looting before the elite part-out the globe.