• Econophile
    09/08/2010 - 23:15
    The President's economic team doesn't seem to know how to fix the economy. Here are some immediate things he can do to turn it around, quickly. But he has to ignore his advisers.
  • Bruce Krasting
    09/08/2010 - 20:57
    This story won't quit.
  • asiablues
    09/08/2010 - 20:05
    Hewlett-Packard Co. slapped Mark Hurd, the CEO it ousted last month, with a law suit soon after rival Oracle Corp. named Hurd as Co-president and Director. HP claims that Hurd cannot perform his job at Oracle without violating a confidentiality agreement.

BLS Releases Latest Job Openings Data, Number Of Unemployed People Per Open Spot Increases In February To 5.5

Tyler Durden's picture




The number of unemployed persons per job opening has started to increase again, hitting 5.5 in February, as just disclosed by the BLS' most recent Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. In February, the total number of job openings declined from 2.85 million to 2.72 million sequentially. The job openings rate was little changed over the month at 2.1 percent. The hires rate (3.1 percent) and the separations rate (3.1 percent) were also little changed in February. Most importantly, there is no improvement in the rate of Hiring, which declined from 4.09 million to 3.96 million. Attached are the main charts of relevance along with BLS commentary.

1. Total number of unemployed persons per job opening.

  • Combining the unemployment level and job openings level produces a ratio between the 2 series that can serve as an indication of how the number of unemployed persons per job opening changes over time.
  • When the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) series began in December 2000, the ratio was just over 1 unemployed person per job opening. The ratio rose during and after the recession that began in March 2001, rising to a maximum of nearly 3 unemployed persons per open job in September 2003. After September, the ratio drifted steadily downward to 1.4 in March 2007.
  • When the recession began in December 2007, there were 1.8 unemployed persons per job opening. The ratio rose to a high of 6.2 unemployed persons per open job, twice the highest ratio seen since the JOLTS series began.
  • In February 2010, there were 5.5 unemployed persons per job opening.

2. Job opening and employment

  • The number of job openings peaked at 4.8 million in March 2007 then began falling. Employment peaked later, at 138.0 million in December 2007.
  • The number of job openings had already declined to 4.4 million when the employment downturn began at the official start of the recession in December 2007.
  • Job openings fell to a low of 2.3 million in July 2009.
  • In February 2010, there were 2.7 million job openings in the United States and employment was 129.6 million.

3. Hires, total separations and employment

  • The number of hires peaked at 5.6 million in January 2005 then remained essentially stable until November 2006 when hires began to decline. The number of hires had declined to 5.0 million by the official start of the recession in December 2007.
  • Hires fell to a low point of 3.9 million in June 2009.
  • Separations also began to decline before the recession, and in December 2007 when the recession began there were 5.0 million separations.
  • Separations have trended downward overall since the start of the recession in December 2007.
  • Employment continued to rise during the period immediately preceding the recession, because hires, although falling, were still greater than separations, which were also falling.
  • Employment peaked at 138.0 million in December 2007, the beginning of the recession.
  • In February 2010, there were 4.0 million hires and 4.0 million separations in the United States.

Quits and layoffs and discharges

  • The number of quits has exceeded the number of layoffs and discharges for most of the JOLTS series since December 2000 when the series began. The number of layoffs and discharges began to rise in February 2006 and the number of quits began to decline in December 2006. By November 2008, layoffs and discharges outnumbered quits.
  • From November 2008 onward, the number of quits continued to fall, reaching a low point of 1.7 million in September 2009. The number of layoffs and discharges rose to a peak of 2.6 million in January 2009.
  • In February 2010, with 1,848,000 quits and 1,822,000 layoffs and discharges, quits again outnumbered layoffs and discharges for the first time since November 2008.

5. Our, and everyone else's, favorite: The Beveridge Curve - Job Openings vs. Unemployment Rate

  • The above graph plots the JOLTS job openings rate against the CPS unemployment rate. This graphical representation of the relationship between the unemployment rate and the vacancy rate is known as the Beveridge Curve, named after the British economist William Henry Beveridge (1879-1963). The economy’s position on the downward sloping Beveridge Curve reflects the state of the business cycle.
  • During an expansion, the unemployment rate is low and the vacancy rate is high. During a contraction, the unemployment rate is high and the vacancy rate is low. The position of the curve is determined by the efficiency of the labor market. For example, a greater mismatch between available jobs and the unemployed in terms of skills or location would cause the curve to shift outward.
  • Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the point on the curve has moved lower and further to the right as the job openings rate declined and the unemployment rate rose.
  • In February 2010, the point on the curve moved slightly down as the job openings rate fell from 2.2 percent to 2.1 percent and the unemployment rate remained the same.
5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)



by HarryWanger
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 10:51
#288565

MarketWatch has a different take:

"Job gains exceed losses for second time in two years"

On a seasonally adjusted basis, U.S. employers hired 3.961 million workers in February, while a record-low 3.957 million left their jobs voluntarily or involuntarily, the government said in its monthly job openings and labor turnover report.

With those kind of numbers no wonder the market is green now.

 

by docj
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 10:56
#288574

Yeah, totally surprising that MarketWatch would have a more, uh, optimistic take.  Right?

The fact that the market is open removes any wonder that it's green now.

by zeroman
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:40
#288639

Please...We are living in the twilight zone. Its not reality and its not a cartoon. Its another dimension. Data does not matter. The new normal is for everyone to be insolvent.

by rubearish10
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 10:54
#288572

Everything and anything is bullish!

by Cognitive Dissonance
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 10:57
#288575

Thanks for the great info. One thing jumped out at me. Nearly every other government agency, along with the Fed and many private organizations, show the recession as having already ended sometime in 2009. But the BLS still shows the grey area right up to today and notes at the bottom that it ain't over until the fat lady (NBER) sings.

Very interesting. Is this just BLS saying we haven't completely collapsed under the political pressure and distortions, other than our char-broiled economic numbers? I'm sure they have standards but doesn't anyone else? Or is that a silly question?

by WineSorbet
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:02
#288583

I have no idea why everyone at ZH worries so much...You do know, "There's an APP/PILL/PRINTING PRESS for that!"

by Jason T
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:03
#288585

Factor in the underemployed and discouraged workers, and it's like 1 job opening in 10.    

by Cookie
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:07
#288589

Green shoots, green shoots!!

by Popo
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:13
#288590

And consider this:  Consumer spending is artificially high right now, which is keeping a far larger wave of layoffs at bay.   For every 1 house in foreclosure in the USA, there are 5.6 in strategic default.   That's almost 6x the number of current foreclosures which *should* be foreclosing.

 

Those strategic defaulters are currently spending and consuming as if they have their mortgages paid off, and it's keeping the image of the American consumer alive -- and that "false" consumption is what staves off the great wave of layoffs which is coming.  

 

Next-up, we've got tax return season, which will provide the expected boost to consumer spending... and then... and then we've got the long slow bleed out of the consumer. You can extend and pretend only so long.  The deflationary collapse is still on the horizon... and getting closer every day.

by Ripped Chunk
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:13
#288593

Interesting theories.

by Al Huxley
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:16
#288597

And yet the regional banks (and the big 4 in particular - JPM, C, BAC, WFC) continue to trade like their in the best shape they've ever been.  Everybody is ignoring the underwater first and second mortgages, taking all accounting ficions, all mark-to-imagination valuation at face value.  It appears that as long as there's free money from the FED, there'll be no end to this.

by Popo
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:42
#288644

Except for (supposedly) the free money is now done. $1.7 Trillion is (supposedly) all there is in the basket.

Granted, the basket actually has no bottom... but if you believe that the Fed is done stimulating, then we are at an interesting crossroads...

by Ripped Chunk
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:12
#288592

Green shoot!

Leo!  Leo!   Anybody?  Bueller?

by Dr Hackenbush
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 11:54
#288664

I took a job selling insurance - so please take me off your list!

by laughing_swordfish
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 12:01
#288674

We've got the Great Recession -

When do we see The Great Liquidation?

by Gimp
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 12:13
#288695

Bank stocks are on fire as usual. What f**king world are they in because I want entry.

by Headbanger
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 13:35
#288817

The (not so) funny thing is that all this la la land BS is actually killing the "recovery" by causing gasoline prices to rise to the point where employers will cut costs by laying off more people and consumers will cut back on other purchases to pay for $4/gal gas again.

by SofaPapa
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 14:17
#288890

Boy wouldn't the Treserve love to figure out how to have a commodity bubble that conveniently left oil at $70/barrel.  But no, oil rides up with the rest of them.  And because gas prices are the unsung trigger of the 2008 mess, I wouldn't be surprised to see them play that role again.  The repetitiveness of the way we are destroying ourselves is getting dull.  We should figure out new ways to find the cliff.

by MaxPower
on Tue, 04/06/2010 - 19:23
#289202

Agreed; repetitiveness is dulling:

"What experience and history teach is this: that nations and governments have never learned anything from history, or acted upon any lessons they might have drawn from it."

-Hegel

by mark456
on Fri, 04/09/2010 - 02:54
#292789

Good linux hosting package offered by ucvhost which not only provides the best in terms of hosting packages but also believes in truly being there for the customer, 24x7. cheap hosting Moreover , they offer unlimited bandwidth as well as nearly 1GB storage along with database maintenance, email facility along with storage, availability of sub domain and many other important features for a very low price. windows hosting Thanks forex vps

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.