You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Both S&P and DJIA Return 14.98% In Q3. To The Dot.

Tyler Durden's picture




Correlation algorithms were working overtime in Q3, when both the S&P and the DJIA returned exactly 14.98% each.

As a reminder, here are the 30 companies that make up the DJIA and here are the 500 companies that constitute the S&P.

We will leave the statistical analysis of the probability of identitical returns over a 3 month period for two completely different stock universes to the experts, suffice it to add that in Q3 fundamentals obviously played a major, decisive role in overall market movements.

h/t Joel




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:36 | Link to Comment nope-1004
nope-1004's picture

Courtesy "Big bald Brother".

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:40 | Link to Comment contrabandista13
contrabandista13's picture

Kinda like a grading valuation curve....  We wouldn't want anyone to whine about revenue discrimination, would we....?

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:43 | Link to Comment BlueStreak
BlueStreak's picture

Somebody bet somebody a dollar that they could make this happen and nobody would notice or care...unbelievable

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:56 | Link to Comment koaj
koaj's picture

Turn those machines back on damnit!!!!

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Do you think it was pumped to 14.98% instead of, say, 15% to increase believability that it could really happen "naturally"?

Does it still match if you bring it out to three decimal places? :>)

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:10 | Link to Comment Art Vandelay
Art Vandelay's picture

Not quite:

Dow = 14.979046%

S&P = 14.984589%

So you see, they don't really match at all!

 

Edit: for further comic relief: NASDAQ Q3 return = 15.66%

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 15:31 | Link to Comment mitack
mitack's picture

Yeah, numbers... my portfolio is @ -14.98 for the same period. Gee, what a coincidence. Must be from my Rosie glasses...

 

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:54 | Link to Comment Whizbang
Whizbang's picture

nope, the error rate between the two amounts to .00036 or roughly 4 in 10,000. This is statistically insignificant, and most likely a gap in the algorithm.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 19:23 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Check it against Benford's Law.

I am Chumbawamba.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:50 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:10 | Link to Comment Comrade de Chaos
Comrade de Chaos's picture

The weak dollar is killing Europeans as well. Just they other day they claimed their allegiance to the $... trashing (criticising) us in the last 9 years, why would they suddenly do so?

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 12:55 | Link to Comment ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

Well there you go. With such diversity from both indices, how in hell does this happen? I'd accept it if all you had to trade was DIA and SPY, but......well there you go

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:01 | Link to Comment MyKillK
MyKillK's picture

I've noticed this for some time because I go to finance.google.com to check out my charts. Right on the front page, it shows the DJIA, S&P500, and NASDAQ all on one graph.

I've been noticing for months on end, that day after day, all three indices are basically carbon copies of each other. I can't remember a single day that any of the three had any significantly different pattern than the other two. They go up at the same time, down at the same time. The only minor differences are the amount that each go up and down.

It's totally obvious that robo-traders are in control and they're just buying index futures in huge amounts.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:00 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Looks like that gain is on its way to being erased today. Am I the only one who thought that it made sense to keep the market pumped through 9/30 Q3, enough time to get out if you wanted to, and then let er rip?  

 

 

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:00 | Link to Comment Steak
Steak's picture

I, for one, think Nargles are to blame here

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:07 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

For those like me who are over 50, could you please flag your Harry Potter references so I don't wear out Google?

They have enough problems on their hands spying for the NSA without me using up all their resources.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 15:35 | Link to Comment mitack
mitack's picture

Hey, anyone know how much it is to colo a 1U at the NYSE ?

With 1Gb connection to the flash order network of course...

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

The coincidence algo caused that.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 13:08 | Link to Comment Oso
Oso's picture

GS just revised down their payroll number for tomorrow to -250k from -200, funny how they make revisions the night before the number comes out. odds they get it spot on?

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 14:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 17:34 | Link to Comment TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

I hate statistics.

Thu, 10/01/2009 - 18:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!