This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

BP Rumormill Update: Sunday Times Reports Exxon And Chevron Receive Green Light From Obama To Plot Takeover

Tyler Durden's picture




 

You know someone is losing (a lot of) money when the heavy artillery of the rumormill department goes into overdrive. According to the Sunday Times, the Obama administration has given its blessing to Exxon and Chevron to consider takeover bids of the troubled major unimpeded. Because obviously any deal in the current environment must first and foremost get the Obama stamp of approval or else the Steve Rattners of the world will be sic-ed on your sorry derriere, and before you know it your equity will be trading above your vendor payables in right of guarantee. It is refreshing to know that the other majors can somehow handicap the outcome of the tens if not hundreds of billions in liabilities that will tie down BP in random lawsuits for decades, and that will make WR Grace et al seem like a PG-13 dress rehearsal for Scores when Lindsay Lohan is in town.

More from Dow Jones/WSJ, this time presumably without the Fed's preclearance:

U.S. oil major Exxon has sought clearance from Washington DC to examine a takeover bid for BP PLC (BP.LN), according to the Sunday Times.

According to oil industry sources, the Obama administration had told Exxon and one other U.S. oil company, thought to be Chevron, that it would not stand in the way of a deal that could value BP at up to GBP100 billion, the newspaper said.

The sources said there was no certainty that Exxon would make a move, but said talks with Washington indicated a renewed interest as BP came closer to plugging their oil well in the Gulf of Mexico.

"There have been talks at a high level, and Exxon has expressed a serious interest. It is too early to talk about a bid yet, but they are clearing the way," a senior oil industry source told the newspaper.

A spokesman for Exxon declined to comment, the paper said.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:16 | 463478 LeBalance
LeBalance's picture

So BP gets acquired in a move of good citizenship by others and its liabilities for its deeds go poof?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:21 | 463483 AssFire
AssFire's picture

The sheriff of rock ridge would love to take over the entire industry...he could quickly unionize it and never turn a profit again.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:43 | 463509 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

 

Hugo Chávez?

 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:59 | 463522 AssFire
AssFire's picture

No, much worse than Hugo... The one I speak of is a claims to be a Keynesian Democrat (which is dangerous enough), but is actually a bitter child who blames everyone for everything while using our credit card to buy things for morally defunct "victims" without knowledge of a reward system, only a devotion to their unalienable entitlements.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:00 | 463530 Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Netanyahoo?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:08 | 463533 Monkey Craig
Monkey Craig's picture

AssFire -- you used the term Democrat so I guess you mean Obama, but this could also apply to Bush and Dennis Hastert too.....great call either way

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 20:06 | 463593 AssFire
AssFire's picture

Except for Ron Paul they are all assholes in DC... Our nation's founders would have us all shot between the eyes if they saw what we did to their country.

They freaked out over a tea tax.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:36 | 463718 Monkey Craig
Monkey Craig's picture

Dr. Paul is the best, especially when on the Alex Jones show.

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/108055-obama-hits-golf-course

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:26 | 463488 Horatio Beanblower
Horatio Beanblower's picture

Oh yeah, Obama?

 

"...We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, 
we shall fight on the seas and oceans, 
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be,
we shall fight on the beaches, 
we shall fight on the landing grounds, 
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, 
we shall fight in the hills; 
we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."

 

- Winston Churchill

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:31 | 463491 George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

You've lost me, but I'm sure it's really relevant. 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:43 | 463508 Horatio Beanblower
Horatio Beanblower's picture

I don't think you will be alone.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:46 | 463512 papaswamp
papaswamp's picture

I believe he was suggesting that the british would fight the takeover attempy of BP.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 05:15 | 464013 George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Gotcha.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:07 | 463677 Biff Malibu
Biff Malibu's picture

Ah yes, Iron Maiden, from the beginning of Aces High on the live album.  Very nice

http://listen.grooveshark.com/#/search/songs/?query=Aces%20High

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:18 | 463696 palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do to rationalize my bullshit." - Barack Obama

 

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 07:13 | 464022 Mentaliusanything
Mentaliusanything's picture

Correction

The one I love most is 'You can always trust the Americans. In the end they will do the right thing, after they have eliminated all the other possibilities.'

 

 

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, 
we shall fight on the seas and oceans, 
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be,
we shall fight on the beaches, 
we shall fight on the landing grounds, 
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, 
we shall fight in the hills; 
we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."

and another Because I love the drug infected Fat fuck (Winston took some heavy drugs)

The very first thing the President did was to show me the new Presidential Seal, which he had just redesigned. He explained, 'The seal has to go everywhere the President goes. It must be displayed upon the lectern when he speaks. The eagle used to face the arrows but I have re-designed it so that it now faces the olive branches… what do you think?' I said, 'Mr. President, with the greatest respect, I would prefer the American eagle's neck to be on a swivel so that it could face the olive branches or the arrows, as the occasion might demand.' To FDR (as it ever was as it will ever be)

and yes It was very very pertinent ( smaller minds take a while to catch on) Yes you have your 'Uncle Remus' or should I remind you of the Tar Baby/ In one tale, Br'er Fox constructs a lump of tar and puts clothing on it. When Br'er Rabbit comes along he addresses the "tar baby" amiably, but receives no response. Br'er Rabbit becomes offended by what he perceives as Tar Baby's lack of manners, punches it, and becomes stuck.[2] Using the phrase "tar baby" to refer to the idea of "a problem that gets worse the more one struggles against it"  Now that remind's me of the gulf oil spill

but then again I thought him (your president) real. Your President needs to shake off the Cotton field persona and act like a statesman instead of a puppet 

 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:37 | 463501 Neo
Neo's picture

Help me out here, why would anyone want to purchase a company that will be wrapped up in litigation forever? Not everyone on the GOM is going to agree to take the payoff from the $20B?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:27 | 463558 FrankIvy
FrankIvy's picture

Neo Wrote - Help me out here, why would anyone want to purchase a company that will be wrapped up in litigation forever?

Help on the way.  Answer - because, theoretically, BP won't have to be in litigation forever.  One example would be - Exxon buys, govt. passes bill that sets a maximum cap on GOM liability, forces a class action, Exxon picks up 1. Market share in a shrinking market, 2. Assets that are likely worth at least as much as maximum liability at the time of settlement, and/or

And sit down for this one, because it's important - we've just passed peak oil, and oil production is now declining.  In my opinion, production will fall off a cliff in the next few years.  When Exxon acquires BP, it gets all of BP's proven reserves for the remarkably low price of about 76 bucks a barrel.

One of two things happen soon.

1.  The US hits Iran, or

2.  Supply crunch becomes publicly known.

Either event, and one of the two is almost sure to happen, sends oil to 200 in a matter of months.  Eventually, you can't buy oil on the open market at any price, and it becomes a national security issue for the govt to control all phases of distribution.

Oh, and Exxon makes a killing.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:38 | 463721 Neo
Neo's picture

This would all be alot easier if the US Gov't simply revoked the leases due to negligence and sold them to Soros and got this charade over with.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 20:05 | 463590 knukles
knukles's picture

Or deal is structured that excludes US operating subsidiary or any number of permutations and combinations thereof, leaving liabilities for GoM separate from production and exploration assets elsewhere.

Forget not, in the brave new frontier of boundless financial engineering All becomes possible with aide of the judicial, legislative and administrative functionaries so handily pre-purchased on the layaway plan.  

The most interesting facets are that;
1.) BP is a UK domiciled entity, not US
2.) Is not entirely clear that further concentration of off shore energy production assets in US nationals is optimal (threats of nationalization, expropriation of US parent assets as opposed to "less offensive" foreign held by third parties)
3.) Clear political hand in lack of anti-trust activity benefitting US entities further disincentivizes foreign investment in and capital flows to US at time of record budgetary needs of foreign funds (populism at the expense of biting the hands that feed, so to speak)

In essence, this while may sound good from a populist news media standpoint, it further follows upon other previous actions (abrogation of senior secured debt holders rights with GM and Chrysler) incentivizing foreign capital to seek residence in more friendly climes.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:09 | 463679 FrankIvy
FrankIvy's picture

Maybe this is the start of the corporate wars alluded to in Rollerball.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 02:31 | 463982 Willzyx
Willzyx's picture

RobotTrader's Rollerball post was one of my favorites.  Here is a repost

http://www.philstockworld.com/2009/10/14/rollerball-1975/

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:39 | 463506 Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Did anyone buy those Jan11 50 calls that were prescribed by 'someone' 2 weeks ago?

Surprised to see Tyler back so early from The Hamptons. Maybe he took the helicopter home instead of the Jitney....

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 00:18 | 463895 Eric Cartman
Eric Cartman's picture

Calls on what exactly?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:49 | 463510 AssFire
AssFire's picture

Reminds me of when Timmy and the boys hustled Bank of America to buy out Merrill Lynch.

Look for regulations and unions to ruin the entire oil sector- that is the end game for socialist in charge. There is some deal in place for any company to have interest in BP given the unlimited exposure it is locked into with the extortionist, shakedown, bananna republic..formerlly known as the USA.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:59 | 463527 Monkey Craig
Monkey Craig's picture

The parallels are striking. It is interesting that the banking and energy sectors are not as unionized as say the auto manufacturers.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:48 | 463515 papaswamp
papaswamp's picture

BP is wounded but not down yet....I would think the wolves would wait a bit longer.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:23 | 463702 E pluribus unum
E pluribus unum's picture

Unless of course there's always the possibility that BP started the rumors in the hopes of ramping up the stock price so the old monet can get out before the BK. Never underestimate the stupidity of the money managers chasing a stupid stock to ridiculous heights a la Tesla

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:55 | 463520 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

I've always been suspicious of the oil spill but this was not it. I originally thought;

  • Protect USD by sending a message to the rest of the world that the US will not drill domestically and,
  • Create a distraction from the economy and Iran

What will happen to share and bond holders? Isn't BP better off threatening bankruptcy instead (Bear Sterns style) and set up a fire sale at the expense of the share holders?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 18:57 | 463523 Monkey Craig
Monkey Craig's picture

yo Tyler

BP may sell a stake in Prudhoe Bay to Apache

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Report-BP-ponders-12B-asset-apf-899475634.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=

 

It will be interesting to see which Sovereign Wealth Funds, chinese 'majors' and integrated oil companies start sniffing around over the juicy assets in the Caspian region, Russia, Alaska and Africa.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:01 | 463532 AssFire
AssFire's picture

BP only owns fractions of most these "assets" like the pipeline.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:07 | 463540 Monkey Craig
Monkey Craig's picture

- even 1% of the BTC pipeline is a lot of money....BP has 30% of it

-I'm not sure that the majors would be as interested in the Russian assets, due to the Kleptocracy

- BP was a major producer in the offshore gulf of mexico.....any moratorium hurts those values

 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:48 | 463569 AssFire
AssFire's picture

"BP's" Alaska Pipeline?

Ownership, entire system, by area:

  • Federal government-6.27 sq. mi. approx.
  • State government-7.79 sq. mi. approx.
  • Private-1.33 sq. mi.
  • Owner companies-2.9 sq. mi.
  • Total area-19.29 sq. mi.

Ownership, pipeline only, length

  • Federal government- 376 mi. approx.
  • State government-344 mi. approx.
  • Private-80 mi. approx. (including 51 mi., Alaska Native Corp. land)
  • Total –800 mi.

30% of 80 miles isn't shit... It is old, leaking and is in need of repairs.

No, BP " Assets" smell just as shitly as Fannie and Freddies "Assets"

(And it ain't the methane from the well)

 

Also, BP lost the permits to do anything offshore in the bay so what are those leases worth??  Still idiots buy this and other insolvent companies on the pretend exchanges.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 20:00 | 463588 Monkey Craig
Monkey Craig's picture

I wasn't referring to the Alaskan pipeline (i don't know it's real name, or who owns it - i believe it transports crude oil)...I was talking about the below pipeline (it's very valuable politically and economically)

 

Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan pipeline

The BTC pipeline is supplied by oil from Azerbaijan's Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli oil field in the Caspian Sea via the Sangachal Terminal. This pipeline may also transport oil from Kazakhstan's Kashagan oil field as well as from other oil fields in Central Asia. The government of Kazakhstan announced that it would build a trans-Caspian oil pipeline from the Kazakhstani port of Aktau to Baku, but because of the opposition from both Russia and Iran, it started to transport oil to the BTC pipeline by tankers across the Caspian Sea.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:05 | 463673 AssFire
AssFire's picture

Yes, I see..The BTC really pissed off Russia.

I was focusing on the assets in the US that BP put up to finance the 20 billion USD marker put up by the cockroach in chief.. BP should just forfeit its US assets and never return to the USA. It is not like anyone will want to start offshore projects here for the next 20 years or so.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:00 | 463529 no life
no life's picture

It seems like BP would need to pay Exxon to take them over at this point.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:02 | 463534 FrankIvy
FrankIvy's picture

1. Makes the whole think reek of sabotage.

2. In times of contracting market (peak oil), mergers are expected.

3. They'll find some way to beat the liability.  Have zero doubt.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:21 | 463557 Kali
Kali's picture

#3 is exactly right.  Then, when the full force of the economic/environmental devastation from this hits, there will be no money or very inadequate funds to deal with it.   Like Chevron and Exxon have any better record of being responsible for their actions anyway.  What a farce.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:49 | 463575 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

You only need the first five seconds of this, the rest is suffering.

Mark it Zero

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJMpiCxmtuY

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 20:20 | 463609 Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

oh Ms, I love that vid -- all of it --watched it twice. As for exxon taking over bp, haha... those Bilderbergers at bp will be running exxon when the "dust" settles.

Maybe we can agree on this vid;

"they will not control us! we will be victorious!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8KQmps-Sog

 

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 07:35 | 464036 LeBalance
LeBalance's picture

But who produced that sheeple go to sleeple music?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:06 | 463538 Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

I smell Pemex everywhere!  a black hole...unless your the Union master!

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:14 | 463549 doublethink
doublethink's picture

 

Beyond Prosecution

 

"Neither the sure prevention of war, nor the continuous rise of world organization will be gained without what I have called the fraternal association of the English-speaking peoples ...a special relationship between the British Commonwealth and Empire and the United States."  --Churchill

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Relationship

 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 20:08 | 463594 knukles
knukles's picture

As in reference to the Anglo-American Power Elite?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:16 | 463551 Reese Bobby
Reese Bobby's picture

Guest Post: Sultans Of Swap: BP Potentially More Devastating than Lehman 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 19:31 | 463564 TJ00
TJ00's picture

This smells as bad as those 9/11 Puts, and we have a common factor too, Halliburton and Dick Cheney, I'm guessing if BPs board don't approve the takeover they will die in a 'terrorist' attack, right?

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 20:16 | 463602 Hustler Elite
Hustler Elite's picture

What do Chevron and Exxon Mobil both have in common? Certain large shareholders, hint: Rockefeller family trusts.

This goes to show the informed just who most elected government officials are beholden to.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:31 | 463713 palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

Sounds like the Family Feud - Gangster addition

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji-lz3uNKSw

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 07:24 | 464035 Mentaliusanything
Mentaliusanything's picture

Hey the Queen of England objects to your association with Criminals. She is not amused. 

But the big Australian is (BHP) in the Gulf and cashed up (hey I drop you a hint -ya listening)

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:23 | 463701 grunk
grunk's picture

BP is already shedding assets to pay for cleanup. At some point we'll have a shell (pardon the pun) corporation that holds only liabilities and no offsetting assets. Surprising that lawyers aren't filing injunctions to prevent the shedding of assets while litigation is pending.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 21:30 | 463710 banksterhater
banksterhater's picture

This is all bullshit. XOM isn't taking over BP. They can easily sell separate assets. Apache is known for squeezing out old fields, maybe they take some. My .02.

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 22:24 | 463786 Yardfarmer
Yardfarmer's picture

Oh no, Exxon Mobil, soon to be EMOBP, is not just taking over the flagship UK national enterprise, which we must remember was itself merged with AMOCO to set foot in the US under the chairmanship of the ubiquitously connected Peter Sutherland, it is taking over the world. The megalithic corporation, consistently one of the top five publicly traded companies in the world and usually ranked #1, with a market capitalization approaching $400 billion and stratospheric and record profits of $48 billion in 2008 alone, is not only poised but well placed to absorb its main and mortally wounded competitor. Let's not be so naive to suppose that XOM is humbly proffering its $155 billion to the puppet Obama. He takes his orders from the elitist oil barons much like his predecessors did from J.D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil which XOM is the direct descendant and heir to. 

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 22:11 | 463774 Astute Investor
Astute Investor's picture

XOM and CVX will probably come back and say they are only interested in an asset purchase (no desire to purchase the stock of BP and assume unquantifiable environmental liabilities).

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 00:32 | 463794 palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

GBP100 billion?

Seriously? Their value has to be in the trillions, just in the oil they're potentially sitting on in Alaska alone...preventing it from coming on to the market to prop the price of oil through artificial scarcity.

Interesting recent article about them selling assets to Apache here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/business/global/12bp.html?partner=rss&...

Historically, the Rockefellers were the pioneers of compartmentalization and distribution of assets and equity through wholly owned trusts.  Makes you wonder how many shell corporations are out there ultimately controlled by BP and awaiting instructions to acquire assets (that are as transparent as the gold in Ft. Knox).  With the only bourses for oil trading denominated in the GBP and the USD it would seem to be in the best interests of the shareholders of the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve to hedge their bets....

Interesting interview with F. William Engdahl, financial analyst, proponent of abiotic oil generation and debunker of peak oil here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvp-kIOSXXA&feature=related

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Peak_Oil___R...

Sun, 07/11/2010 - 23:04 | 463836 Attitude_Check
Attitude_Check's picture

VERRRY INTERESTING.  I wonder if their is any correlation between this,and the fact that Chevron has closed most all of it's gas stations in NM, and Mobil (part of Exxon-Mobil) stations are all closing in upstate NY in the last few months.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 08:12 | 464061 francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

For all we know, they'll all re-open as CITGO's pretty soon...

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 00:10 | 463885 Quantum Nucleonics
Quantum Nucleonics's picture

Wouldn't these sorts of transactions require EU anti-trust review too?  Maybe Obama would let Exxon snatch BP for a song, but our friends across the pond are likely to have a different view.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 11:30 | 464277 OldTrooper
OldTrooper's picture

I suspect that there would be some 'crisis' that would convince the Europeans that it would be best to go along.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 00:24 | 463902 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

Obama and pals gun another junker..woo hoo. Now might be a good time to buy BP...Thanks Rahm and Obammy.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 02:49 | 463987 Tense INDIAN
Tense INDIAN's picture

obama thinks the GOLF holes needs to be plugged ::

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/108055-obama-hits-golf-...

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 08:03 | 464054 francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

He's sending FLOTUS down there... So I guess the "junk in the trunk" solution is next on the agenda...

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 06:44 | 464023 theprofromdover
theprofromdover's picture

If Exxon/BP combined isn't the perfect definition of TBTF, then I don't know what is.

As a previous poster said, Exxon's friends would cap the liability for GofM and carve up the proceeds of BP's fat carcass amongst themselves. 

Oh for the good old days of the Foster-Dulles brothers, when they used to at least have some semblance of disguising the greed.

 

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 08:53 | 464055 Paper CRUSHer
Paper CRUSHer's picture

In the end what do you rather prefer,

Strategic western assets coming under control of Arabs via SWFUNDS?

Or,being sliced n diced by western Big -OIL corporates (Chevron,Exxon etc)?

BP's Tony Hayward took a trip to UAE to meet with the Crown Prince a week ago and begged the Arab Sheikhs for a cash infusion by displaying his skills by getting on all fours and rolling around like a dawg.

The Crown Prince who was at the time relaxing in his HAREM chewing on a chicken leg surrounded by his mistressess was unmoved and unimpressed by Tony's antics and instead went on to throw a peice of this meat as a token of good gesture.Soon after poor Hayward left for the US feeling dejected for acting like a complete moron.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 11:36 | 464287 OldTrooper
OldTrooper's picture

These are our choices?  Is there really that much difference?

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 07:51 | 464047 barkingbill
barkingbill's picture

close to plugging the well? what are they talking about? what meds are they taking?

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 08:00 | 464052 francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

BP (Beyond Petroleum)...

 

Time for a makeover...

- Busted Pipelines

- Beyond Plankton

- Bribe Politicians 

Thu, 08/19/2010 - 10:54 | 530303 herry
herry's picture

Really this is a great post from an expert and thank you very much for sharing this valuable information with us................. windows vps | cheap vps | forex vps | cheap hosting

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!