This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
California Marijuana Dreams May Go Up In Smoke.
One issue to be decided on November 2 will be proposition 19, the latest effort to legalize marijuana in California. This is another one of those “Be careful what you wish for” stories. Advocates claim that passage of such a measure would solve the state’s budget crisis, as it would bring in tens of billions of dollars of tax revenue while cutting the cost of our prison budget by billions more. Up to a third of the state’s 170,000 prison population are there for possession of small quantities of drugs.
Proponents are right on the second point, but miss on the first one by a mile. In 1933, the 21st amendment to the constitution repealed the 18th amendment, rendering the Volstead Act unconstitutional, ending prohibition. Tens of thousands of small time backyard distillers, basement breweries, and bathtub gin makers rejoiced at the prospects of a larger market. Instead, legalization caused the price of their products to collapse, driving them out of business. Today, the industry for alcoholic spirits is dominated by a handful of globally integrated marketing giants running volume driven businesses on razor thin margins, like Anheuser Bush (BUD) and Diageo (DEO).
The same would happen to the pot industry. An Internet search reveals that potent Mary Jane today sells for $200 an ounce wholesale, or $400 retail. Legalize it, and that price might drop to the $20 that I heard prevailed during my college days. Your typical Mendocino underground farm or Oakland grow house with its $3,000 monthly electricity bill, doesn’t fit anywhere in this picture.
The same would happen to anticipated state tax revenues. Right now, California smokers pay $1.05 in federal taxes per pack, and 87 cents in state taxes, bringing the average retail cost of cigarettes to $5.05 a pack. I doubt actual marijuana tax revenues would exceed what it currently earns from cigarette taxes, or $839 million a year.
There is another matter proponents aren’t focusing on. US Attorney General Eric Holder last week said that his Justice Department would continue to prosecute pot dealers, even if the proposition passes, as federal law trumps state law. Federal prisons are already full of former growers who were deluded into thinking they were growing pot legally because they had licenses from the state.
My guess is that the state’s pot industry lobbyists have been smoking too much of their own product when preparing their budget forecasts.
To see the data, charts, and graphs that support this research piece, as well as more iconoclastic and out-of-consensus analysis, please visit me at www.madhedgefundtrader.com . There, you will find the conventional wisdom mercilessly flailed and tortured daily, and my last two years of research reports available for free. You can also listen to me on Hedge Fund Radio by clicking on “This Week on Hedge Fund Radio” in the upper right corner of my home page.
- advertisements -
certain "law enforcement" and the make profits from prisons gang are opposed to 19 because decriminalization would require them to actually pursue and incarcerate real criminals--
As far as investments go, legalize pot and get long pizza delivery companies.
Wouldn't it be a great excuse for individual states to reconsider their relationship with the federal government?
Yes indeed Malachi. If Mr. Holder tries to stretch California's already hyperattenuated resources in busting dispensaries, he will have a shitstorm on his hands. The tide is turning.
Wow, someone going mad with the junks on this thread; here, here's another one :0
I would just bet that the tax on mj would be quite a bit more than that of a pack of cigs, in fact it should be a HUGE tax. Im sure pot smokers would not mind paying $20 a pack for the luxury of actually being able to relax.
medicine shouldn't be taxed.
ever.
I was just trying to make a funny about paranoia (and thats why I drink alcohol instead of smoke, because its illegal and I would never try something illegal). However, unless you are a card carrying member of the legal med unlucky, you can bet they will pose some sort of recreational tax on retail mj. However, I cant imagine mj smokers paying any tax on something they can grow in their yard. I would like to see them tax private growth (hah!), much like trying to tax my tomatoes in the back yard. However, Im sure thats next.
Uuuuh.. whah? Hey man... uhhh... dude, that's not cool, man....
Like -1 for dumping on my buzz dude.
MHFT, how do you equate the business' expected profit margins with the tax? It's not a tax on the profits of whatever industry pops up, it's a tax on pot sold.
And to the point that stoners won't pay a tax, they'll just grow it? Uh, I grow tomatoes. I suck at it. I buy tomaotes except for the three tomatoes I get off my plants every year, which are crappy anyway. A tax of $5 an eighth would be inconsequential. I'd gladly pay it to get quality product I can't grow myself without great effort.
Dumb article, but I'm glad you wrote it, because it keeps people talking about it.
This post is somehow, amazingly, dumber than all previous posts to this site, period. MHFT, you have outdone yourself.
Just to add a bit of content here, has he considered that collapsing a criminal black market is a public good?
Whoa...
Don't taze me bro...
I had a license...