This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Capital One Has Not Counted Chapter 7 Filers As Charge-Offs Previously; Auto Charge-Offs Surge By 50%+ Sequentially

Tyler Durden's picture




 

A humorous observation emerges from reading the fine print of Capital One's Monthly Charge Off And Delinquency Statistics. While the overall net charge off rate increased to 10.14% in December from 9.60% previously, a rather substantial jump, what jumps out of the page is the surge in Auto Finance net charge-offs which surged from 3.67% to 5.68%, a 50%+ move in one month.

November...

...And December

What is the reason for the sudden surge? Let's read the fine print:

December Auto Finance charge-offs reflect an accounting change in the recognition of charge-offs related to certain customers who have filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy, have not specifically reaffirmed the loan, but have chosen to remain current on their auto loan. Previously, the Company did not recognize these loans as charge-offs if customers remained current on the loan. Following the change, the Company now charges off these loans to the estimated net realizable value within approximately 30 days of receipt of bankruptcy information, unless customers specifically re-affirm the loan. This change resulted in a one-time increase to charge-offs of approximately $24 million, or approximately 153 basis points.

So let's get this straight: you are a CapitalOne borrower, and you have filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection. In other words, you are dunzo with paying off credit cards, revolving loans, non-revolving loans, yacht and country club payments, fired the butler, got rid of the underage nanny, cut up the Centurion, and are waiting for the repo men to come and take your outhouse and two donkeys, even as the third wife and kids are garnishing your wages, and the IRS is doing a full-blown tax audit. Yet because of some fluke the check to COF was in the mail, and while the bank was fully aware your FICO score was essentially 0, they still would not count you as a "charge off"...WTF!!!???

Can anyone please advise if this is standard practice? How much leeway do banks get by counting Chapter 7 cases as "current payors." Is this an auto-finance quirk specifically, or is the bottom about to fall out of the entire market as comparable such "adjustments" hite the global domestic card metric vertical? Does this mean charge offs are really about 50% higher than presented by the likes of Capital One, Discover, AXP, JPM, etc? Or is this merely yet another GAAP gimmick designed to obfuscate and extend-and-pretend the total mockery that lender balance sheets have become?

We would truly appreciate readers' feedback on this one cause we really are stumped by this lunacy.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 11:54 | 194869 justrichard
justrichard's picture

Even deadbeats need transportation.  Many if not most will probably find a way to stay current on their auto payments.  They get current utility.  It's not the same as an old debt.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:45 | 194933 Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Yes, exactly.  I'm not sure there's any smoke here, much less fire.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:12 | 195188 ATG
ATG's picture

Gotta love the fine tooth ZH comb...

http://www.jubileeprosperity.com/

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:02 | 194877 glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

Time to invest in Repo Depot?

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:34 | 194924 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

haha your fucking NUTS !!!

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:03 | 194878 pbmatthews
pbmatthews's picture

I am a CPA.  GAAP requires that once a receivable is deemed to be uncollectible, it must be written off to a net realizable value immediately.  How that process is to occur is up to discretion of management. 

That said, any respectable accountant or auditor should not allow for a receivable to be valued at par if the receivable is from a customer who has filed for bankruptcy.

The company has now adopted a correct posture:  "the Company now charges off these loans to the estimated net realizable value within approximately 30 days of receipt of bankruptcy information, unless customers specifically re-affirm the loan."

The key here is the phrase net realizable value.  That might be zero if the customer walks 100% away from the loan and the car has no value other than scrap or it could be anything in between (up to par) if the customer decides they will continue to make all payments so as to keep their access to transportation.

 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:00 | 194956 deadhead
deadhead's picture

thank you pbmatthews!

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 14:13 | 195045 OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

The banks continue to cooking the books, by delaying the write offs they can make their balance sheet look better, and help with the bonus checks.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 23:32 | 195641 RoastingBankers
RoastingBankers's picture

fried? baked? grilled? roasted? or broiled?

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 14:13 | 195046 OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

The banks continue to cooking the books, by delaying the write offs they can make their balance sheet look better, and help with the bonus checks.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:25 | 195211 dnarby
dnarby's picture

Thanks.  On a humorous note, I think you should sign all your comments with:

"I am a CPA." to balance out Chumbawumba signatures.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:38 | 195239 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

+1 PB.... The auditors should have applied the "substance over form" principle and written down the loans in question to net realizable value

Sun, 01/17/2010 - 14:47 | 196675 John McClane
John McClane's picture

Management has a tremendous amount of discretion to determine the appropriate time to mark the assets down to net realizable value. Some banks mark the loans upon the initial notice of bankruptcy while others wait until the bankrupt borrower stops paying. The Ks have some info about critical accounting policies, but the banks are careful to leave the 10-K wording up for interpretation in order to avoid future lawsuits when the banks decide to switch accounting policies during the year. We still have years until the banks fess up to their bad, non-performing loans.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:04 | 194879 perpetual-runner-up
perpetual-runner-up's picture

Call crazy, but COF is not a TBTF in my opinion, and I could see, in an effort to gather more populus support, the gov jerking the rug out from under COF...

The world would not miss this company, and everyone hates them, so the politicians could gain some serious brownie points and deflect some eyes away from what is really going on by sacrificing this company....

Not to mention the executive compensations plans and heavy reliance on stock earnings could be played to look really bad and "greedy" in the press...

It has all the makings (in appearence only) of an enron or worldcom type thing that the press and public could latch on to to channel some anger...just an opinion and I am not insinuating anything specific about their books or anything like that...

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:37 | 194926 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

I happen to like Capital One.  The upped my rate from 9.9% to 18.9% so I paid the Card off.  They then gave me Zero percent interest for a year with the 3% up front fee.

What a great deal.  I was paying 9.9% they raised the interest I paid it off and they relent it to me for 0% (except for the 3% up front fee).

I think they are a great company.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:41 | 194929 just.a.guy
just.a.guy's picture

This line of thinking is exactly what led me to buy a decent sized pile of Capital One puts almost a year ago.  Instead of "too big to fail", they are "too small to save and too easy to hate."

I still agree with the logic, even though today is actually the day those puts are going to expire worthless.  Oh well... being early is functionally equivalent to being wrong!

 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:10 | 194892 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Stop paying on your mortgage, you can still live in your house for 18 months (minimum).

Stop paying on your car and it probably gets taken pretty quickly.

Easy choice.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:03 | 194962 deadhead
deadhead's picture

i agree with ghost and note that this is certainly a change in the paradigm.

previously, one always paid the mortgage first, then car.

now, not the case due to bank balance sheet matters.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:22 | 194986 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Comment on PBS a few months ago by a car repo guy "We like to see our job as getting people back on their feet."

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:14 | 194898 bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Whats in....um....our wallet?

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:19 | 194907 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

start of the mass default for cash for clunkers? getting in front of that next wave...

Surf's Up man!

MS

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:28 | 194917 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

A very high percentage of borrowers continue to make car payments even when defaulting on everything else as they need their car to go to their job, visit their girlfriend whatever.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:33 | 194922 Transor Z
Transor Z's picture

Most debtors will reaffirm at least one auto loan. Technically, equity in a vehicle is an asset in the Chapter 7 estate but you can usually shield much or all of that -- and prevent forced liquidation -- by applying exemptions.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:28 | 195221 dnarby
dnarby's picture

Equity in a used car?  HA HA HA.

They let you keep it if you pay on it because it's a usually a PITA and a loss to run it through the car auction.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:33 | 194923 Assetman
Assetman's picture

I think the recognition varies widely in the credit card sector.  I do know that many banks with significant credit card portfolios have remained quite conservative, and have eaten the losses appropriately.

With COF, I'm sure they were doing whatever they could to remain viable so the executives could get paid.  I'm not sure to what extent COF has been playing catch-up in building excess reserves-- but they've had their opportunity.

COF should have been recognizing Chapter 7's all along, and the change implies to me that they are more "ready" to absorb portfolio losses.  The question is a good one to being up-- and I wonder to what extent larger credit operations within bank holding companies are doing.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:41 | 194928 Stoploss
Stoploss's picture

When filing chapter 7 ( liquidation bankruptcy ), your credit file is pulled and automatically scanned for student loans and auto loans. If you have student loan or loans, they will have to be paid, and are not subject to liquidation. The reason for that is those loans are backed by the govt, so if you default on the student loans, the govt will show up at your door one day and seize any and all property they deem fit to satisfy the loan requirements. Most of the student loans are placed in forebearance, and when you make your 12 monthly payments, on time and in the proper amount, then they are taken out of forebearance and re-established as a good loan, but they will not report you are paying as agreed on your credit report.

 

Auto loans are a toss up, you can have a voluntary repo done, or, reaffirm the loan, or simply just keep paying until it is paid off. Again this will not be reported on the credit file that you made any payments on time. They have to report the vehicle is paid for, but give no payment history.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:42 | 194931 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Repo the crapper with two donkeys....sooooo damn funny!!!! Lots of revelations coming after the bonus checks are cashed and invested in gold?

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:58 | 194951 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

In prior years, I think many banks would not classify an auto loan if the borrower is current on payments but has filed a Chapter 7. Their auditors would allow it given the bank could show how many of these borrowers reaffirm the loan in the bankruptcy, plus the loan was secured by the vehicle. My guess is that the auditors have gotten more conservative and told them they need to charge it off unless the debtor reaffirmed the loan in the bankruptcy - with all the job losses, my guess is that more borrowers will not reaffirm the loans, so the auditors figured the risk was greater.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:13 | 194975 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

and CapitalOne ads are displayed on you website...LMAO

What a nice way to mint money Tyler, I'm supporting you...

300+ Clicks in 2 days..Everyone click on gold and bank ads and support pay the homage.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:33 | 195001 Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

One perk of being "behind the scenes" at Zero Hedge is the knowledge that your scathing article will not only take several layers of skin off of your target and leave them with one of the better steel-wool exfoliations of their lives, but that Google's use of highly targeted key-word context algorithms is nearly certain to mean that the target will be paying for the privilege. I just chuckle when people accuse us of selling out.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:52 | 195018 Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Devious.  Extremely devious.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 14:38 | 195074 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Anon 194975 you need to listen to "Hooker With a Penis" by Tool

Selling out?  That's almost funny.  Point that finger up your ass.

 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:13 | 195190 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

The irony is unbelievable!

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:20 | 194981 Dburn
Dburn's picture

I was under the impression that banks had to charge off credit card receivables that are 6 months past due. That doesn't mean they do. In related bankers are scumbags" news, There is a real healthy and growing business in selling credit card receivables that have been discharged in bankruptcy to third party collectors.

Initially 7 Million would get you 7 Billion in Discharged receivables. I think the banks got smart and started holding extensive auctions as more companies crowded into the lucrative field. One example I read was a 5% collection rate on the 7 Billion for a 350 Million gross profit with a 7 million investment. The company's name is Sherman Financial.

That was in 2002. The company then started doing that quarterly by 2008. There is one company that was taken public who does that but the name eludes me right now. The now billion dollar firm and growing chose smartly to keep a low profile as it is somewhat illegal to collect on on discharged bankruptcy debt. One judge remarked that the auction of the receivables should be illegal but it isn't. That's the loophole the banks use to get some bonus money for the C-Suite.

Sherman Financial bought a tiny bank in 2005. Their collectors would call people who had filed bankruptcy and ask them if they wanted a credit card. "sure" they would reply. Then the collectors would talk the target into putting 50% of their discharged debt on the credit card to "get his credit back". The amount was now a new debt, at a nosebleed interest rate and no credit line.

They make huge money. They have 15-20 operating subsidiaries and even use law firms to threaten former debtors. Where they are real successful is the snake in the grass approach. They put the debt on a persons credit card as past due. They apply for a mortgage a few years past their discharge date and find everything is ok but this one debt. Rather than fight it,  as they are time compressed, they just pay it.This should be a simple matter for law enforcement, but like most things now-a-days, law enforcement is really a local matter with expensive take downs of marijuana dealers and 7-11 thieves who steal chocolate bars. The big stuff , the multimillion, multitrillion stuff is just a little to be strenuous for our erstwhile civil servants to undertake. Besides they never have the budget. So maybe congress is in on it too.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:22 | 194984 Plainview
Plainview's picture

Could be a nice double top on the chart - a retest of $36 looks very likely to me.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:22 | 194985 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The beauty of private business. You can criticize Capital One while you generate revenue from their ads. But what will happen if you become a public cor,and you have to treate your evenue generators with kids gloves?

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:27 | 194992 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

TD, I think it is some fluke as far as what the debtor will pay on and what debts they accept through the bk process.

And 5 stars for the Battlestar reference.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:33 | 195002 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Why would anyone reaffirm the auto loan? I know I wouldn't. I can walk away from that car at anytime after filing BK and the lender has no recourse but to repo the car. Does the lender sometimes force the filer to reaffirm? My guess is that it depends on if the automobile is the primary mode of transportation or if it is a second vehicle for play or maybe work assignments. Anyways, I could understand not writing off the loan if it's the primary and the payments are current. Most people will keep their transportaion if they can. Same goes for the mortgage. You do not have to reaffirm the mortgage to keep your house. You simply keep paying. They don't write off that mortgage do they? If later you want to walk you just stop paying and wait to be evicted. They have no recourse aside from the eviction. The truth is that due to the current economic situation lenders should probably write off a percentage off all loans that do not have equity in the collateral.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:41 | 195007 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

They haven't written me off yet because I haven't bothered to contact them to let them know that they can take my account balance and go fuck themselves with it.

Like all credit card companies, Capitol One deserves to die a horrid death, but especially so.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 14:46 | 195093 Stoploss
Stoploss's picture

Be aware that the banks sell your delinquent accounts to collection agencies, who then file suit against you to collect the debt. They will notify you 1 time by mail, that they intend to sue. The next correspondence you will recieve after that will be from the constables office, delivering to you in person, the court documents showing that you have been sued, and found responsible for the debt, with out you even being there. You then have 30 days to make good on the debt, or be hauled into court. Once in court, all bets are off and you will quickly find out that had you settled within the 30 day period, (likely for far less than the account balance) would have been the thing to do.

 

I say this because it happened to me, i chose to settle the debt out of court.

Had i gone to court, i would have lost, and then ben responsible for the entire balance plus fee's, court costs, attorney fee's and anything else they decided to shove up my ass.  After that, it was bk time..

Debt is not that easy to walk away from, good luck, and dont answer the door after lunchtime.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 15:35 | 195152 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

OK, just because you are a sissy doesn't mean everybody else is. If you are bankrupt, it doesn't matter how many "fees" they slap on you. BTW, there is nothing wrong with filing for bankruptcy. In fact, considering the circumstances today, I would say it is a matter of pride. Just make sure you hide all your assets properly. This is war - the war of repudiating the bankers' debt. If we are going down, we'll take them down with us. 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 15:47 | 195169 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

The only risk with hiding assets is the judge deciding to charge you with fraud - which is a nasty turn - so either choose Chapter 13 (which I don't recommend) or be very wise about which assets will be "undisclosed". I doubt many readers here would pass the means test anyway:

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/article-29907.html

GG, no doubt you are aware of all this, so I'm just sayin' to readers in general to be wise. And I do consider bankruptcy an honorable act at this point in the game. Who cares about FICO now with no recovery of fundamentals in sight - that's how they keep you under control in this debt game.

CHAPTER 7 BITCHES!!!

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 18:18 | 195379 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Ask old Bob Brennan about hiding assets in a Ch 7 filing as he sits in jail. Fucking punk.

"1st Jersey Securities - Come Sink Grow With Us"

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:37 | 195237 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Or, they do a check on you and find out you have no real assets, try and collect the debt by phoning you, writing you etc., pass a judgment against you, fail to intercept any income, and after a few months write it off and send you a 1099 for the amount, at which point you deal with the IRS.

You can't get blood from a turnip.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:48 | 195268 dnarby
dnarby's picture

Do you work for a bank?  If not, why are you spreading this FUD?

From http://ezinearticles.com/?When-Can-A-Credit-Card-Try-To-Go-To-Court-For-...

"Yes, it is true that a creditor can take you to court to try and collect on a debt.

However when you look at the sheer volume of people who go behind on their credit cards, proportionately very few accounts actually go to court. Anyone who is behind with their creditors can receive papers to go to court as long as it is within the statute of limitations of their state, which is on average between 3 and 6 years.

You see, it costs a creditor a good amount of time and money to take you to court for credit card debt. They have to find a law firm in your state to serve the papers, and of course they will pay legal fees to be represented in court as well as filing fees etc. Even if the creditor does try to take you to court, that doesn't guarantee that the creditor will get paid. First they have to get a judgment.

The first step in getting a judgment is to get a lawyer to serve you papers at a local court. You then have the option of responding, OR showing up in court, OR doing nothing.

THE WORST THING YOU CAN DO IF YOU ARE SERVED PAPERS, IS TO IGNORE THEM AND NOT RESPOND.

If you do not respond, the creditor gets a default judgment. Basically, because you don't show up, you're guilty. The creditor receives the judgment and then has one of two options.

Option #1- In most states the creditor can try to place a lien on your house. This does not mean you have sell your house, or that you will lose it. It simply means their is now an I OWE YOU attached to the house, and IF you decide to refinance the home or sell it, the lien must be satisfied first. It is still possible to negotiate the amount of debt even if a lien has been placed.

Option #2- In some states the creditor could try to garnish your wages. While this is a possibility, the creditor still has to find out where you work, and can only take a portion of your paycheck. It is not pursued that often, unless your place of employment is easily found or already known. This is not the preferred method of collection as it takes quite a bit of time to get paid, and only one creditor may garnish at a time.

A side effect of only one creditor at a time being allowed to garnish your wages is that if you receive one judgment from a creditor in court, you will most likely not receive another.

If you are served court papers, the worst thing you can do is not respond. If you are in a settlement program at the time you are served, the good settlement companies (there are about 5 in the whole country in my opinion) should have a way to handle this. If not, you should follow the steps included in the summons to respond to the matter as soon as possible."

Sat, 01/16/2010 - 03:48 | 195735 theadr
theadr's picture

If you have a bank account, their attorney will put a hold on your account at 3x the debt.  Of course if all you have is physical gold and silver in your home safe like Chumba, not a problem.

Sat, 01/16/2010 - 14:19 | 195941 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

You are right NEVER ANSWER THE DOOR.  Do not let anyone in the House answer the door. Put a For Rent sign outside your house and a Key Box on your front door knob (available at most locksmiths, possibly at Home Depot).  Have the number on the sign go to a Reative that will say the house has been rented.  Draw the blinds so no one can see in from the front or the back of the House.  You may even want to put one of thoes X10 video cameras so you can see on your tv who is at the door.  Have friends or Relatives call when they are comming. Otherwise NEVER ANSWER THE DOOR.

Make sure no one is sitting outside your House when you leave or come home.  Make sure to drive past your home before parking to check out anyone sitting in a car.  Especially if they have papers in their hands.  If someone is sitting outside your home leave and go to the Store or someting for an hour.  You might want to exit your home from the back entrance and park your car down the street.  Reverse when you come home, park down the street and walk behind Neighbors homes before entering from the rear.

Drop your land line and get a Cell Phone.

Have the address on all of your Bills changed to a P.O. Box in a County outside where your House is located.  Even if they get a Judgement it may be recorded outside the County where your House is located and would not affect the Title of your Home.

If they happen to get a Judgement Appeal, the Judgement.  Credit Reporting Agencys will not pick up a Judgement if it is Appealed.  The Appeal shows you as the Plaintiff and not the Defendent.

I am not an Attorney and the above information is a suggestion and not legal advise.  If they think that you are evading service they can get service in Absentia. So, be careful.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 13:53 | 195017 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Capital One are the biggest whores in a business that is nothing but slimy crack whores.

Who cares what the fuck they do?????  The change in the bankruptcy laws a couple of years ago no longer allows discharge of credit card debt. (What a lobbying victory!!!)) So that is what they are hanging their hat on here. Accounting rules????? Doubtful collectibility?????? What the hell is that about??????? Reflect these realities on your financial statements!!!??????? That's just crazy talk!!!!!!!

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 15:36 | 195155 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Capital One are the biggest whores in a business that is nothing but slimy crack whores.

+100000

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 14:15 | 195048 OutLookingIn
OutLookingIn's picture

Lets face it. You lose everything. But you gotta have wheels man!

Besides, you can even live in it. Lots of car people out here. Gonna be alot more!

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:36 | 195070 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

In all but the largest cities with decent mass transit.

If you are walking down the road (to work or the market) not in a car, people (driving by) think you forgot your Thorazine or something.

 

The car culture country who's car companies could not a profit make. (Shall I cut and paste the defenition of imbecile here)

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 15:28 | 195142 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture


I say buy the car using a credit card and then stop paying the damn card. Easy, ain't it? No headache of continuing to pay for the car when you are not paying anything else. BTW, the US Govt. already gave your money to the auto companies, so why pay them twice?

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:38 | 195240 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Remember the GM Mastercard? That was a real winner!

 

 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 16:54 | 195277 Lndmvr
Lndmvr's picture

Called to close a 25k card...........  woman said all the words to keep me in it. I said " Just close it or I'll take all the cash out of my direct banking I have with you". Got done in a flash, but, she didn't know I took it out weeks earlier. Capone....never again.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 17:07 | 195292 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Filing a bankruptcy is differnt than getting a debt discharged in bankruptcy. It's the difference between a temporary stay against collection, and permanent injunction against collection. Many bankruptcy cases that get filed do not get discharged (for many reasons) and the temporary stay against collection gets lifted, so the creditor can continue to collect.

So, upon filing of a BK, a large creditor will do some black box analysis to determine the probablity and amount that debt will be collected (something less than whole). It would then increase its reserve for loan losses for that amount (something less than the entire balance).

If the bk goes through and the debt is discharged, the remaining debt would be written off. If the case gets dismissed without discharge, the lender may (using the black box once again) reduce its loan loss reserve by some amount up to the full loan amount.

To summarize nothing wrong going on here. it's just a misunderstanding of what it means to write-off a debt vs take a larger reserve against a loan receivable.

Oh yeah, and I'm a CPA too.

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 20:10 | 195477 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Yee Haaaa.  Capital One are still the biggest whores in the industry.

They can eat that black box with a cup of cat piss.

 

Fri, 01/15/2010 - 21:23 | 195546 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Yeah, Capital One must hold the prize for being one of the most vicious sub-prime lenders. My feeling
is that if you weren't sub-prime before getting a Capital One card, you'll be one soon after. The Company actively creates mistakes and
uncertainties which push individuals over the edge.

Think of Capital One as a sociopathic Vampire.

I counsel college students and many have fallen into the trap of getting one of these cards. The most common complaints are not receiving statements and changes to terms
and credit limits almost always at a critical time which result in a "trip-wire fee" and rate increase. And when you try to close a card,
they'll tell you the account is being closed, when they really just want you to ignore it so they can hit you with one of their
yearly card fees. I've noted they are quick to send disputed accounts off to collections. My guess is that will change now that you can sue them
without binding arbitration.

So Capital One - Just say no...

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 13:44 | 235622 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Why do so many people refer to individuals who file bankruptcy "deadbeats"? If you can't pay your bills, can't get a decent job after layoff, termination, what are you supposed to do? If a business uses this protection they aren't scorned by society.

At 40, I had to file chapter 7. I never thought I would have to do it, especially after having a stellar credit history for 20 years. But after having to go on SSDI - a lengthy process, I racked up over $25,000 in bills.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!