You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Cause For Claims Miss: California, Where Initial Claims Spike To An All Time High

Tyler Durden's picture




Initial claims for the week ended January 23 were second consensus miss in a row, coming in at 470,000 (SA), a decline of 8,000 from the prior week's downward revised 482,000 (to 478,000), however 20,000 higher than the consensus of 450,000. The comparison of SA and NSA initial claims can be seen on the chart below.

A dig through the data indicates that probably the entire spike in claims can be attributed to some strange moves in Initial Claims coming out of California, where initial claims surged to an all time high of 115,462. Is there more than meets to eye to the "rosy" picture in the Sunshine Golden State.

One explanation for this could be a previously noted administrative problem by the DOL where a backlog of filings had accumulated at processing centers due to, gasp, a shortage of staff. Note however, that the state data lags national data by one week, so the California reporting period was for January 16. Of course this simply means that Initial Claims at the National level had been under-reported in prior periods, as many of these California claims had not been counted. The question of how great of lag there is in other states' data processing must also be asked - readers indicate that many states still have massive wait times for phone processed applications, and result in callers being asked to simply call be at a later date, again and again, concluding with an inability to file an initial claim for any given week.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:01 | Link to Comment IBelieveInMagic
IBelieveInMagic's picture

Sounds like more green shoots :)

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:07 | Link to Comment Screwball
Screwball's picture

I noticed the EUC number fell by 300,000 +.  Would I be correct in assuming people dropped off because they ran out of all emergency and extended benefits?

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:12 | Link to Comment pbmatthews
pbmatthews's picture

I was wondering the same thing.  This number has been extremely volatile over the past couple of weeks.  It fell by over 300,000 two weeks ago and surged (if I recall) by like 600,000 last week.

Its all over the chart---which makes one wonder if there is any validity to it.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:27 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

"Its all over the chart---which makes one wonder if there is any validity to it."

Agreed.

Let's be careful with these numbers. Why would we assume they're being manipulated when they're better than expected but we don't consider them manipulated when they're worse than expected? There seems to be a natural tendency to assume that bad numbers are real, or at least closer to reality. A cheater always cheats, often to support or substantiate prior cheats.

While I've always taken any government calculated (and many private) figures with a grain a salt, now a days a truck load of road salt during a winter snow storm isn't enough to help me swallow the swill.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:43 | Link to Comment SmalleyD
SmalleyD's picture

One reason, why I'd assume "bad" numbers more clearly reflect reality is because the policitians have a vested interest in presenting a rosy situation.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:53 | Link to Comment Spiro
Spiro's picture

+1

 

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:44 | Link to Comment Onehunglow
Onehunglow's picture

I was wondering the same thing. Does anybody know if they track the numbers of people who are no longer counted due to extended and emergency benefits running out? I am sure many people are running out of benefits. Just wonder if those numbers are released. 

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:08 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Confuseus say : California jobless numbers just simmer now. Come to boil soon as local gubmints move to fire mode.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:09 | Link to Comment SDRII
SDRII's picture

is there any correlation to nonfarms; in previous months of similiar number of claims we lost 300-600K jobs. However the correlation is weak across the data set

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:16 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Si it has hit the wall.  Perhaps still more cheap

labor will make California economy EXPLODE.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:19 | Link to Comment slovester
slovester's picture

On this DOL site:

http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp

change the beginning year to 2006 and hit submit.  On the report page generated, check the column to the far right (Covered Employment) and compare the last figure shown versus the figure for any week of Jan 2009 and you will see they dropped it by over 3.75 million.  You have to go back to 9/2006 to find covered unemployment as a lesser number.  Lies, damned lies, statistics...

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:20 | Link to Comment B9K9
B9K9's picture

Sunshine state? Um, that would be Florida. According to my license plate, and recalling decades of indoctrination as a born & bred native, California is the Golden state, bitches!

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:21 | Link to Comment Dixie Normous
Dixie Normous's picture

With such good news the NYSE decided to give everyone on the exchange a 17 minute coffee break.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:22 | Link to Comment Gimp
Gimp's picture

Recession is officially over! Unemploymet dropping, housing market correcting and the markets up, up and away. At least that is what I hear day in and day out on the legacy media outlets. I love the optimism but.....

And of course corporate profits are up they have slashed expenses = jobs.

 

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 12:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 11:42 | Link to Comment glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

It's like the housing shadow inventory, out there but hidden from view. These types of tricks only work so long...then it all blows up.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 12:07 | Link to Comment Cheshire.Cat
Cheshire.Cat's picture

Is there more than meets to eye to the "rosy" picture in the Sunshine Golden State? That's a good one Tyler. As a Californian, I am even more discouraged by our state leadership than by the US...this place is one humongous ongoing clusterf***!

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 12:34 | Link to Comment Rainman
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 13:54 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

thanx, 04. Think I had an xtra "d" on update.

Thu, 01/28/2010 - 13:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/28/2010 - 14:39 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

I live in California and I'm biased. Does that count?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!