- advertisements -
holy bacon francis!
is by and far the best performing asset class of 2010
is by and far the best performing asset class of 2010
Other than BHH, cotton,coffee, GDXJ, tin, Peru, .... full ETF list link
If you liked silver in '10, you're gonna love it in '11!
It takes squiggly lines to detail currencie manipulation? The Site does it one better, 'Race to the bottom, bitchez!' When did ZH coin that term anyway? '09? I have been surprised all year that MSM uses the term now, and I am not usually surprised when the MSM copies ZH, but 'Race to the bottom' is such a righteous phrase. I wonder how often Bernanke says it?
Bernanke lies? He and Gethner say, 'Its All About the Benjamins, baby'. You know what happened to all the bills right? They used them to light their cigars.
Monetary Trends - Velocity
Monetary Trends - CPI
Gross Saving Rates and Balance on Current Account (NIPA)
Alan Grayson: Is Anyone Minding the Store at the Federal Reserve? -2009
The bacon-o-meter never lies.
So where's the meatheads that claim there's no money printing?
I've been watching the DJI's value decline based on Gold. I didn't think about the DJI's value decline based on bacon. Smells Good.
Took a lot of bright minds and good dose of humor to make these charts. I hope to see the whole series together, in paper. Definite hat-tip.
What I'd like to know is how come Timmay never got raked over the coals for his no-taxpaying gimmickry. The guy should be mime, not a tres Sec, given his range of expressions. Looks terribly constipated to me.
Maybe it's a side effect of using Benucks for toilet paper? It's probably a rough sub.
The Bernank problem: Baconomics indicates Baconflation.
New JPM shorts: Naked Bacon
This article is as useful as elephantiasis of the scrotum on prom night. You can't present a chart about money printing without also showing money taken OUT of circulation, especially if you want to talk about inflation - and you know that!
In 2010, currency in circulation is little changed, while the monetary base has been less than 2009 for most of this year.
Currency in circulation at the end of 2009: $925 Billion
Currency in circulation at the end of 2010: $980 Billion
If you compare the rise in GDP for 2010 verses the currency change in circulation in the past year, you will find the numbers are commensurate with each other - nothing alarming, whatsoever.
Shadow banking liabilities bitchez!
Good article. The winner at race-to-the bottom is about ready to cross the finish line, Europe as the EU. The situation there is just so dire there is no going back. Helicopter Ben and the ECB wanted a Merry Christmas before chaos. Just a few more months and it will blow wide.
we need total monetary reform.
Eliminate debt-backed money and move to production backed money. Banks serve as utilities to discount real bills and serve as market makers for the futures to set ratios between commodities. Producers and consumers participate only in futures markets, banks only serve to match counterparties.
Money as the "oil" in the economy's engine, is like electricity or water, and should be utilitized.
The public doesn't so much have an issue with the spending or printing, but that the fatcats who created the mess are being bailed out and continuing their lavish lifestyles while the rest of the economy crumbles.
Really, the Fed's policies help ONLY the banks and bankers and punish all others. To the extent other corporations have real production or political cover, their *executives* benefit, with no pass-through to the wider labor base.
Mainstream articles like these will push Joe SixPack into Gold and Silver. Joe knows it costs more for a 6 pack of Coors than it did just 2 weeks ago.
To what, trav777? What exactly are you looking for? Those in power will always find a way to convert production based money into debt based money. The transformation was really quite clever if you think about it.
All you guys that dream about ending the Fed fail to consider the alternative: the exact same thing.
If true unfettered, unabated capitalism were allowed to exist without the influence of a central bank, the exact same system that we have now would be created in due time. In pure capitalism, all assets eventually move to the smartest and richest and most adapted - those individuals will, in turn, create a system to ensure and preserve their power and success, at the expense of anything and anyone. The most efficient way to accomplish that is to control the money, and the most efficient way for the wealthy to control the money is to create a central bank that exists outside the control of the voters.
And when I refer to the smartest or most adapted, I'm not talking about some genius hunched over a desk trying to understand Fermat's Last Theorem, or someone training for a triathlon. I'm referring to those who - when the fabric of society nearly unravels - has access to all the life boats. As we all know, in September 2008, the structure of society as we know it nearly collapsed. And what happened over the next two years? The richest, smartest and most well adapted won, while everyone else searches for the remaining bread crumbs. In modern society, the Darwinian trophy holders are the rich banking elite; they have figured out a way to control all money and all politics - they are the smartest, most well adapted and the shrewdest in our society that we have had created for us - by them.
If you take a small group of people with no food, no farms, no shelter and no monetary system, and put them on a new continent with nothing but a Constitution and a Bill of Rights, you will - given enough time - end up with a central bank and a totally perverse form of government that has twisted the laws of the land to serve the wealthy. In a game of Monopoly, everyone starts at the same point; three hours later, all assets belong to one person. Pure capitalism is no different. Don't confuse textbook capitalism with real world capitalism. In the real world, textbook definitions don't matter
In short, pure unfettered unabated capitalism will always lead to a plutocracy given enough time, and those at the top of society will twist and pervert the system to ensure their power and success. Debt based money was a fantastic discovery for the plutocrats, and when/if we ever have a restart, they will create it all over again. They will always throw out enough pieces of cheese to provide you with enough energy to return to the hamster wheel tomorrow. They control the wheel, the cage and all the pieces of cheese that you keep running for. In one form or another and given enough time, pure capitalism will always lead to what we have today.
So what you're saying is that you might as well give up because the corrupt will always rule? You might as well not even try because they are going to win anyways?
Are you a spineless coward, or one of the so called "smartest and richest". Bobbie Fisher was the smartest, but was he the richest? He who dies with the most toys wins right? Can't beat em, might as well join em? You may be intelligent, but wisdom eludes you.
I do believe the point of my post flew over your head with such velocity that it created a massive low pressure center above your face, disrupting the blood-oxygen equilibrium in your brain and prompting you to write this inconceivably ignorant post.
If you want to continue posting here, I would suggest you go to fighter-pilot school and learn proper breathing techniques to deal with extremely adverse blood-brain conditions.
"they have figured out a way to control all money and all politics - they are the smartest, most well adapted and the shrewdest in our society that we have had created for us - by them."
Yea, it's called conspiracy and treason! Will you still be calling them smart when they are hanging from the end of a rope? "For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his soul?"
I believe I captured the spirit of your post exactly. Give up, don't try, evil always wins. Don't hold anyone responsible for what has happened, because it was bound to happen. It would have happened no matter what. I'm glad Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin didn't think like you. They didn't prescribe to your defeatist ideology. Would you have preferred that they chose communism instead of capitalism. Capitalism is not the problem. The problem is the crimes of your so called "smartest", and the torries who are calling them smart instead of calling them tyrants.
Yeah, right. Central banks are as fundamental as hydrogen. Give us a break.
What human kind desparately need is the ability to migrate into outer space. Then let's see the predator class try to hunt them down and make them play their totally bogus fiat, fake, fraud, fiction, fantasy, fractional-reserve perversions. Fact is, outer space is the answer for humanity, because the energy required to even begin to attempt to find and hunt down the producers is vastly more expensive than any bounty they could steal. Or put more simply, space is BIG --- so astronomically much bigger than almost any human can grasp, that nobody can practically "rule".
The only answer to liberty lovers seems to be "another frontier", and the only truly viable frontier is outer space. Oh, and remember, those two asteroids over there are mine. Choose your own from the umpteen billion others covering the vast expanse of the solar system (or even just the asteroid belt).
Central banks are as fundamental as hydrogen
I implied that central banks were the inevitable consequence of capitalism. Over time, capitalism gradually shifts all assets to the wealthy like a neutron star. Capitalism inevitably leads to a plutocracy, and a plutocracy will inevitably create a central bank (controlled by them) to preserve their power.
Even in a total collapse and an opportunity to "restart" the system, you will find that all capitalistic societies will look remarkably similar to what we have today.
It's like Monopoly - America's most famous game.
The analogy to Monopoly is insightful and I have never thought of it that way before. Now the question for me is why I always win at Monopoly but still have to work for a living.
Bacon Dollars. Store of Fat.
The rise in oil prices is a great way to force people to spend money. This raises government revenue. Basically its a stealth tax that they will use to provide more stimulus. Rising oil prices are also a great way to control the amount of dollars in circulation. High oil prices act as a sponge.
The rise in oil prices is the whole objective of the game. Greater oil earnings leads to more expenditure on US military hardware by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
This used to be called the "Nixon Doctrine" - you put your money in US banks and treasury bills and then spend it on our military hardware and we will make sure that your cleptocratic elite is protected against external enemies.
I forgot about that part of the money flow. It is explained in Confessions Of An Economic Hitman. Good thing I have some LMT. Might as well pick up some RTN and NOC also.
We may have hope for a return to the American System. Money issued debt free...though what the effects would be on the price of gold and silver is left for those more knowledgeable to explain.
Great charts, loved the Geitner alert levels - LOL!
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.