You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

The Dumping Begins: Chinese Reserve Managers Notified That Any Non-USG Guaranteed Securities Must Be Divested

Tyler Durden's picture




It appears that this time China's posturing is for real. Following up on our earlier post that Chinese military officials want to "punish" America by selling Treasuries, Asia Times Online is reporting that an explicit directive by the Chinese government has notified reserve managers to sell all risky US assets, including asset backed and corporates, and just hold on to explicitly guaranteed Treasuries and Agency debt. And from following TIC data we know that China's enthusiasm for MBS/Agencies over the past year has been matched solely by that of one Bill Gross.

From Asia Times:

Dollar-denominated risk assets, including asset-backed securities
and corporates, are no longer wanted at the State Administration of
Foreign Exchange (SAFE), nor at China’s large commercial banks.
The
Chinese government has ordered its reserve managers to divest itself of
riskier securities and hold only Treasuries and US agency debt with an
implicit or explicit government guarantee. This already has been
communicated to American securities dealers, according to market
participants with direct knowledge of the events.

It is not clear whether China’s motive is simple risk aversion in
the wake of a sharp widening of corporate and mortgage spreads during
the past two weeks, or whether there also is a political dimension.
With the expected termination of the Federal Reserve’s special facility
to purchase mortgage-backed securities next month, some asset-backed
spreads already have blown out, and the Chinese institutions may simply
be trying to get out of the way of a widening. There is some
speculation that China’s action has to do with the recent deterioration
of US-Chinese relations over arm sales to Taiwan and other issues. That
would be an unusual action for the Chinese to take–Beijing does not mix
investment and strategic policy–and would be hard to substantiate in
any event.

Furthermore, demonstrating just how seriously China is approaching a populist-driven adversarial stance with the US, was earlier speculation that instead of unpegging its currency (a move much desired by the US administration in its goal to further weaken the dollar and make China less competitive in the export market), China would reduce its trade balance not by the traditional way of currency inflation, but by the economic textbook footnote approach of raising salaries.

Higher labor costs would cut Chinese export competitiveness
while boosting domestic spending power and sustaining economic
growth, according to the bank. Premier Wen Jiabao’s government
has been pressed by U.S. and European officials to end a 19-
month yuan peg to the dollar to help diminish trade and
investment imbalances that contributed to the credit crisis.

“Wage increases are a better option because they largely
benefit Chinese workers,” Tao Dong, a Credit Suisse economist
in Hong Kong who has covered the Chinese and Asian economies for
more than 15 years, said in an interview yesterday. “Currency
appreciation will only result in Chinese exporters losing out to
competitors in countries such as Malaysia and Mexico.”

The strategy may limit gains in the yuan to 3 percent this
year, according to Tao. This month’s 13 percent increase in
minimum wage in eastern China’s Jiangsu province indicates that
higher pay will play an important role in officials’ efforts to
rebalance growth in the fastest-growing major economy, Tao said.

The wage decision “argues against a large one-off yuan
revaluation,” Ben Simpfendorfer, an economist with Royal Bank
of Scotland in Hong Kong, wrote in a note this week.

One thing is certain - China will now focus on doing precisely the opposite of what America would urge Chinese authorities to do, in order to establish itself as the focal point of negotiating leverage and increasingly humiliate the Obama regime. If this involves selling USTs or corporates (both fixed income and equities) so be it. This is further confirmed by carefully worded disclosure in today's copy of China Securities Journal:

The China Securities Journal, a government-backed daily, accused the U.S. in a tough-worded front page editorial of playing the "exchange rate card."

It said that, just as China didn't interfere with Federal Reserve purchases of U.S. Treasuries, "the U.S. has no right to interfere in China's exchange rate policy."

"Whether or not to appreciate is our own business," the newspaper said.

"Whether it will appreciate, when and by how much is an integral part of China's monetary policy."

It is not clear when the asset divestiture directive takes place or if it is already being enforced. Juding by the afterhours action in futures and the currency markets, some dumping may already be taking place. Alternatively, we now know just who it is that sell into every rally (yes, even in this market, every buyer is matched with a seller).




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:05 | Link to Comment Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Must be the big sell-off.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:06 | Link to Comment Stu
Stu's picture

And so it begins.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:42 | Link to Comment Stevm30
Stevm30's picture

Historians writing about this in the future HAVE to include the two feet of snow on the ground in Washington DC.  It makes for a perfect setting for a world crisis.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 02/15/2010 - 02:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:09 | Link to Comment Number 156
Number 156's picture

We may now witnessing the opening salvos of economic warefare.

This can only end in tears.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:06 | Link to Comment Gold...Bitches
Gold...Bitches's picture

This can only end in tears.

thats why gold is attractive.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 17:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 20:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 02/11/2010 - 13:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 02/11/2010 - 13:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:08 | Link to Comment JackES
JackES's picture

Glad to see they act finally

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 05:11 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

On the edge of oblivion

A ship of fools sailing on

Rip it up... move down

Rip it up... move it down to the ground

Across the nation, around the world

Everybody WANG CHUNG TONIGHT!!

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:16 | Link to Comment Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Is Goldilox/Cramer going to redefine BRIC out of spite?

I mean de-acronymize or whatever.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:16 | Link to Comment docj
docj's picture

So, how much cashola are we talking about here?  Eh?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:18 | Link to Comment docj
docj's picture

BTW, looks like insiders are back to selling as fast as they can.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:19 | Link to Comment Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

They are up to their eyeballs in Freddie/Fannie/Farmer-ie.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:22 | Link to Comment docj
docj's picture

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Hey, doesn't Da Fed have a metric crapton of that on their balance sheet too?

What could possibly go wrong?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:25 | Link to Comment Number 156
Number 156's picture

We will start finding out tomorrow morning. when the markets open.

They're going to start a stampede in asset backed securities.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:16 | Link to Comment putbuyer
putbuyer's picture

It's funny. I still often try to educate the drones on yahoo message boards that not all shit goes up, even with good cooked books. They never listen.

The movie "The Road" was interesting. I suspect these same idiots will be killing humans for food.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:22 | Link to Comment Missing_Link
Missing_Link's picture

Why even bother posting there?  They can't be educated.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 10:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:19 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Whaaaaaa!  I want to go back in time to 1997!

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 13:58 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

YEAH! GO US GOV! WOOHOO ALL THE WAY TO THE TOP!

idiot.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:17 | Link to Comment ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

Easy fix. Offset dump by an FR monetization pump followed by sales of F18's to the Dalai Lama.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:26 | Link to Comment Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

I'm sure the Lama is getting his F-18's from the Chinese. It's 14% off all flying objects for Valentines day week.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:26 | Link to Comment Number 156
Number 156's picture

HAHAHA!!!

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 11:37 | Link to Comment Trifecta Man
Trifecta Man's picture

The Dalai Lama.  I never saw that painting.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:18 | Link to Comment Tahoe
Tahoe's picture

bounced at 1063.00 @21:41EST.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:34 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

A lot of ZH regulars think the dollar is shit.  Well, gold sinks and shit floats.  That's life.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:37 | Link to Comment KevinB
KevinB's picture

I often hear this, but whenever I'm done and I look, it's at the bottom of the bowl. It never floats.

I must have some heavy shit, man.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:48 | Link to Comment Quantum Noise
Quantum Noise's picture

I'm sure the Chinese had something to do with it... who knows how much Pb is in the Chinese version of Yellow No.5....

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:21 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Better get on that puffed wheat diet..........................................or sink

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 08:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:34 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

China trade balance +$14.2B vs fcast +19,2

let's see about that bounce...

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:35 | Link to Comment Going Down
Going Down's picture

'Nuf Said

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

--Sun Tsu

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:35 | Link to Comment Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

meanwhile S&P futures say, "Pthh.. whatever.. China doesn't have the balls.. " they are off 7..

 

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 05:10 | Link to Comment 1984
1984's picture

The Chinese don't bluff - hard to save face...

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:36 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

I hope they stick it to the usa banks good with a boycott of crap securities.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:37 | Link to Comment moneymutt
moneymutt's picture

the thing that really irritates me is the Dalai Lama thing...Taiwan should be free, but I can see any country having concerns about someone selling arms to a nearby neighbor that is a concern to them..but Dalai Lama simply advocates that Tibet be treated in accordance to Chinese constitution, DL has not fomented violent rebellion. That like us retaliating if Chinese visited with someone advocating not for Hawaii independence but Hawaii to be treated as more independent than a state per some such pre-existing status in our constitution....so we would cut off China if they met with peaceful radical advocating a legal method of changing our relationship with Hawaii...what evah, I'm tired of US, everyone being scared of China in this regard.

And wasn't Reagan credited with taking out USSR by talking tough to them? 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 04:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 15:55 | Link to Comment moneymutt
moneymutt's picture

Seriously, if China or Venezuela invited an indigenous US leader that was advocating for more mineral rights, more independence via legal, constitutional methods for his tribe, say he/she had a case winding its way to SCOTUS, do you think US would start making big economic threats about someone else meeting with said leader..say Hawaiin leader was asking Hawaii have a more independent status like psuedo sovereign nation status of Indian reservations but was doing it in legal, civil political manner, making a constitutional argument, or if it was a Puerto Rican leader or Guam leader, really you see US going China/DL on this?...While a US admin might talk against this movement, resist the change in status, I have a hard time seeing how even more hardline US admins like Reagan or W's starting financial trade wars over the China meeting with such a person.

Don't get me wrong, I have huge critiques about bad things US does, and no doubt we politically and economically mess with people who have done small things...shoot look at the horrors of our actions in Nicaragua, Guatemala, and what, are there even 5 million people in either those countries? What real threat were they to us other than diminishing profits for some multi-national?

But just as US is wrong in many things, just as we are oversensitive, too protective about many things, (see Israel), so is China...

tyranny and imperialism abound...

not trying to say or even figure out which is country/regimes are worse, but DL is no where near as radical as, say, Arafat was, as he was willing to be violent, call for Israel to be wiped out...not quite DL talking points, and yet China bristles...get over it...

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 16:45 | Link to Comment velobabe
velobabe's picture

the utter chaos created in developing the panama canal.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 09:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 17:05 | Link to Comment velobabe
velobabe's picture

man i would love to play golf with his holiness. i even have a pre 1990 ping eye 2 wedge.

Thu, 02/11/2010 - 03:17 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

Zero Hedge theme night...I'll take "Bill Murray movies" for 200, Alex.

 

You're a lot of woman, you know that? Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:46 | Link to Comment Double down
Double down's picture

Sounds like the Chinese are administrating the medicine the Greeks could use a mouthful of.

This is good news in disguise

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 05:35 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Without researching it, there has been chatter here and elsewhere that the "arms sales" to the Taiwanese are no surprise to the Chinese, and that they were already well underway in the prior (what was that guy's name) Administration. Meaning, not sure you can cast stones on Obama for this one, and the Chinese are simply being the Chinese.  Why hang on to these soon to be underwater Fannies etc.? They are reacting to the end of the QE road, as announced, and agree with Bill Gross, apparently. Sure, implementing this now helps them vent some steam from some anti-US factions but it is the right move anyway. Why take a bigger loss? Time to get out of everything but dollars and USTs.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 15:51 | Link to Comment ThreeTrees
ThreeTrees's picture

My thoughts exactly.  Arms sales is an excuse.  There's no way the Chinese would telegraph a move like this if it hinted that they actually see the growing cracks in this growth facade.  They're gonna get out while the getting's good and they're gonna save all the face they can doing it.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:38 | Link to Comment Tahoe
Tahoe's picture

and bounced again at 1062.75 @ 22:30EST

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:45 | Link to Comment Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Brilliant! So then what will become of the ZeroHedge 'Store'?

http://www.cafepress.com/zerohedge

No more cups and stuff?

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:48 | Link to Comment David449420
David449420's picture

Oh, they'll still be available. You'll have to pay for them in Gold, though.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 10:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:40 | Link to Comment Miramanee
Miramanee's picture

Resistance is futile. We are the Borg.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:43 | Link to Comment Yossarian
Yossarian's picture

hahaha, China is so powerless yet they masquerade is being so powerful.  As Chanos said, they send us stuff and we send them paper- the situation is clearly not ideal for either party but if they want to stop buying our paper assets we will stop buying their stuff.  We can easily cut back 20% on their stuff but they can't take a 20% reduction in demand for their exports.  Such a situation would mean a painful but manageable recession/depression for us and probably a revolution for them as their urban centers will be full of angry, unemployed former rural farmworkers.     

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:53 | Link to Comment strike for retu...
strike for return to reality's picture

>they send us stuff and we send them paper<

If it were that simple, the Chinese govt could simply have one half of China dig a hole and the other half fill it in.  (Which would have the added benefit of making the Keynesians here happy.  At least the ones making Goldman Sachs type wages who can afford stuff not made in China.)

 

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:38 | Link to Comment Cyan Lite
Cyan Lite's picture

Cutting back on buying their stuff would probably be good for the USA.  That means (gasp) we'd actually have to produce something here in the States...

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 08:44 | Link to Comment MarkD
MarkD's picture

Not sure if Americans are ready to fill their shopping cart only part way, or buy something they actually need and not due to their wants. Workers over here complain if they don't get 5 weeks paid vacation, sick days, health care, dental, club memberships.....etc. All that combined with gov intervention in our business operations, how can we make stuff over here and keep costs at a level where American's will be able to "Save Money.....Live Better". Unless a company is defense related or is deeply in debt, I don't see how they will survive by producing products for our QVC shoppers. I am a small busness owner and am amazed how many sick days, vacation days and holidays friends have off that work at regular jobs. We are fat and lazy and don't want to give up our shopping desires.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 09:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 04:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 06:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:31 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

I repeat myself when under stress

Sat, 02/13/2010 - 06:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:45 | Link to Comment plocequ1
plocequ1's picture

Do you blame them? Who the fuck would want to hold on to these cheezy, Foul, Shit smelling, Stanky, Corrupt, low grade timebombs anyway? These are time bombs ready to go BOOM!!

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:45 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

When do we get to stop being the bitch in this relationship?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:10 | Link to Comment Gold...Bitches
Gold...Bitches's picture

depends on what you mean.  so long as were the reserve currency we get to send paper to countries for commodities and finished goods.  those holding ever more worthless bits of paper that the US 'guaranteed' to pay, but not its value, are the ones who are the bitch.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:49 | Link to Comment SayTabserb
SayTabserb's picture

It seems to me the Obamanauts were talking to their Commie financiers about this very thing for some time before this announcement. Doesn't the explanation for the sudden "explicit guarantee" of all things Fan&Fred on Xmas Eve suddenly snap into place? And the commission to reduce the deficit, by Exec Order if necessary? A whole new kind of bipartisanship.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 03:13 | Link to Comment scaleindependent
scaleindependent's picture

Hmm

 

 1 +

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 08:29 | Link to Comment CONners
CONners's picture

We have probably already seen the implementation of this policy for some time. Why show your cards until you must?

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 08:45 | Link to Comment perchprism
perchprism's picture

 

And yet Fannie and Freddie remain off-balance sheet, despite the xmas eve pronouncement. 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:51 | Link to Comment Greenbacks
Greenbacks's picture

The Chinese advantage in a trade war; their population is much more able to withstand the turmoil. America is a nation of soft, spoiled whiners.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:56 | Link to Comment SayTabserb
SayTabserb's picture

No doubt they're tough. But as far as population is concerned, our very softness probably means that in terms of total mass, we're probably pretty close, even if they have 4 times as many (normal sized) people. Thus, we can get through it through liposuction, using the blubber to light the street lamps.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:03 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

screw them. screw the usa maggots too.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:36 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

And your nationality (oh mighty hard one) would be???

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 20:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:00 | Link to Comment Quantum Noise
Quantum Noise's picture

WTF are you talking about? How much do they have... $2T? Pffft! Ben can print these in an afternoon...not to mention that the rich guys in the middle east will be pretty pissed off if their USD denominated assets go down just because some Chinese general felt insecure about his underinflated undies.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 13:43 | Link to Comment Anton LaVey
Anton LaVey's picture

US$2 trillion printed in an afternoon? More like 45 seconds. You need to update a lot of databases, but these computer thingie are pretty freaking fast these days.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 23:56 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

I was guessing it would be 2011, looks like 2010 is gonna be the beginning of the end now. =\  Im ready, bring it on. Much thanx to ZH and originally Chris Martenson for the wakeup call.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:01 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

zh gets the scoop, again.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:02 | Link to Comment Great Depressio...
Great Depression Trader's picture

Interesting how things could unravel just because of a arms sale. Obviously there are other factors involved that have created tension between the two nations. This could be the spark that begins to deteriorate relations between the two nations.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:07 | Link to Comment johngaltfla
johngaltfla's picture

They're just a bunch of retarded backasswards rice farmers. Denninger said so.

No big deal.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:08 | Link to Comment Bear
Bear's picture

Wow ... leave it to the unscrewable Chinese to be the first one out

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:21 | Link to Comment economessed
economessed's picture

I demand a new 10 minute youtube video from walstreetpro2!!!!

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:24 | Link to Comment moneymutt
moneymutt's picture

where's Leo, there has to be somethign bullish about this...

and where's combustible assets, that burning bag head always seem so appropriate for posts like this

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:29 | Link to Comment Double down
Double down's picture

Did they not just confess to owning a crapload of US equities, something like $9 billion?  It seems ALL Chinese economic decisions are political.

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 12:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:35 | Link to Comment Going Down
Going Down's picture

 

Asia Times Online may not be correct in its reporting. Why would the Chinese--or any seller--let its intent be known? And if ATol "knows" that these sales are on the horizon, why aren't investors in Shanghai or in Hong Kong bailing out of dollars right now?

 

There's a wonderful expression in Shanghainese which basically translates into "stir the pot." It's used just in such circumstances to confuse your negotiating party. China may sell but not today.

 

 

 

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:57 | Link to Comment Double down
Double down's picture

Shit is always-already-fully valued.  Who is going to buy this stuff, thought it was toxic?  No buyer no sale only huff and puff. 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:14 | Link to Comment Bear
Bear's picture

Why now ... GS will surely take it up another 10 SPY pts

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:48 | Link to Comment jmc8888
jmc8888's picture

You mean raising wages can work? Who knew?

 

Obama sure got some bad advice, like just about everything since at least june 2008. 

 

These are interesting times my friends, watch and learn, I know I will. 

 

Well the Chinese hoped in Obama as much as we did.  You could say the left is hating him, the right obviously does, the independents have abandoned him, the Chinese have lost hope, along with most of the rest of the world, and the bankers ran circles around him. Gee I wonder if any of those are linked? Effects meet the cause.

Yeah Obama, to the Chinese you were our last hope (I suspect).  Once you re-started the Bush tactics of American Bullschmidt all over again, that hope faded (I suspect).  Now they will protect their interests the best way they can as they now know a real solution will not appear from Obama, and I suspect the Chinese reaction to that fact will be very bad for us. 

It seems soon will be the time to choose, the right way of placing the blame where it lies, the system, and those who run it and change to something better.......or......blame each other, the poor, the sick and lazy who had nothing to do with causing this crisis.

Because that my dear friends was the difference between the American Revolution, and the French Revolution.

In our version, cooler heads prevailed

In theirs, heads were cooler because they rolled detached from bodies

I'm optimistic to how we turn out, but we must admit to ourselves we're far closer due to ignorance to the latter (french revolution) than to our more desirable American Revolution. 

Imperialist Monetarism MUST end

Good luck

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 08:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 10:20 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

There was nothing subliminal about the consumerist media bombardment.  The lumpen were a necessary part of the bubble.  Lifestyles of the Rich and Shameless and all.

As for "we all wanted more", be careful about the "we".  Some small percentage of us never believed it was real in the first place.  Maybe it's my background in math.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 16:10 | Link to Comment moneymutt
moneymutt's picture

I think our biggest sin was staying conveniently ignorant of what horrors weere being done in our name, with our tax dollars, we didn't mind while we were fat and happy..and of course, we messed up by not minding our own store,...so now getting less fat, and less happy and have enemies galore...

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:47 | Link to Comment Double down
Double down's picture

Here is your mark to market

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:48 | Link to Comment monopoly
monopoly's picture

moneymutt, wheres Leo. LMAO

 

And let the Races begin.

Just the timing all.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:50 | Link to Comment Get_to_the_choppa
Get_to_the_choppa's picture

So where can I get my Cold War 2.0 hat?

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:08 | Link to Comment Double down
Double down's picture

Iceland

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 10:08 | Link to Comment John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

We are still waiting for China to make them for us. 30 million hats is a tall order. You did not think an apparel company here would actually hire Americans to do the job? How else would the three people at the top of the company save money while everyone else is underpaid. Send all the jobs to China I say..great plan. 

Great for stocks..Right Cramer?

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 00:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:41 | Link to Comment fedusw (not verified)
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 03:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 08:53 | Link to Comment colorfulbliss
colorfulbliss's picture

SPAM alert

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:57 | Link to Comment BlackBeard
BlackBeard's picture

Bring it on bitches.  Let's crush their exports.

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:01 | Link to Comment chindit13
chindit13's picture

Here's one of the few instances where taking a conspiratorial bent might be prudent.  I read this as an indication that China's domestic problems are more serious than we suspect.  China traditionally puts up some bogeyman against which popular frustration can be directed (rather than at the Party).  Usually they use Japan, but the "white devil" works better at a time when China has illusions of being Papa Asia, and a new and weak Japanese PM is making nice to them.  To do this right before Lunar New Year (Kung Hei Fat Choy to all) is highly unusual, as happy happy is the preferred societal mood.

There is no way China can consume its own production in any near term time frame, so at this time they need the US (and Western markets) more than the West needs them (the US can always default by CUSIP number on UST's as a last resort).  China also needs the technology which they have been absent in producing for nigh on 2500 years.  At present they get this technology from either joint ventures (a bit) or theft (most). Cut off the tech flow and China's economy stagnates at closer to the t-shirt and carnival prize stage of development than high margin computer chips and cutting edge bio-science.

If Obama doesn't send Timmy or Hillary over there this afternoon, then the US feels pretty secure with the hand it holds.

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:21 | Link to Comment Altan311
Altan311's picture

they are sitting on a huge basket of technology, including workable nuclear fusion assuming they can find the fusionable material to run some reactors. Lots of it on the moon, not so much here, but that explains their space programs goals nicely doesn't it? They have jumped the shark so to say and are perfectly capable of innovating. Don't let backward ass American opinions cloud your judgment. I am Mongolian, and my people beat the Chinese by starving them out, and then stealing their siege engineers. Wouldn't surprise me to see some weather warfare in the near future...

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:30 | Link to Comment chindit13
chindit13's picture

Appreciate your comments, but I don't have too much access to "backward ass American opinions", as I have resided in various Asian countries for the last 30 years, speak a number of the languages, and have had a front row seat to the various and sundry "miracles".  Not saying I am right, just that I have "informed ignorance".

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!