This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

China Halts Rare Mineral Exports To US And Europe, Prices Set To Surge

Tyler Durden's picture




 

The latest escalation in the binary version of modern warfare (i.e., that fought with a Bloomberg instead a stealth fighter), comes from China, which the NYT reports has just halted shipment of rare minerals to the US: "China, which has been blocking shipments of crucial minerals to Japan
for the last month, has now quietly halted shipments of some of those
same materials to the United States and Europe, three industry
officials said on Tuesday." As we disclosed a few weeks ago, prepare for an explosion in various rare metal prices...

More from the NYT:

The Chinese action, involving rare earth minerals that are crucial to manufacturing many advanced products, seems certain to further ratchet up already rising trade and currency tensions with the West. Until recently, China typically sought quick and quiet accommodations on trade issues. But the interruption in rare earth supplies is the latest sign from Beijing that Chinese officials are willing to use their growing economic muscle.

“The embargo is expanding” beyond Japan, said one of the three rare earth industry officials, all of whom insisted on anonymity for fear of business retaliation by Chinese authorities. They said Chinese customs officials imposed the broader shipment restrictions Monday morning, hours after a top Chinese official had summoned international news media Sunday night to denounceUnited States trade actions.

China mines 95 percent of the world’s rare earth elements, which have broad commercial and military applications, and are vital to the manufacture of diverse products including large wind turbines and guided missiles. Any curtailment of Chinese supplies of rare earths is likely to be greeted with alarm in Western capitals, particularly because Western companies are believed to keep much smaller stockpiles of rare earths than Japanese companies do.

Dudley Kingsnorth, a rare earth market analyst at the Industrial Minerals  Company of Australia in Perth, said that if China adopted a further reduction in export quotas of 30 percent for next year, manufacturers elsewhere could face difficulties.

“That will create some problems,” he said. “It’ll force some people to look very carefully at the use of rare earths, and we might be reverting to some older technologies until alternative sources of rare earths are developed.”

Actually, no. All it means is that a little of all the record liquidity sloshing around is about to make its way to the latest bubble. And for those wondering just what the rare mineral bubble will look like, here is a reminder:

And the narrative we presented in early October:

Ever heard of the oxides of Lanthanum, Cerium, Neodymium, Praseodymium and/or Samarium? With price surges between 250% and 600% in one quarter,
you may wish you have. The recent pissing contest between Japan and
China, which culminated with a temporary export ban in rare earth metals
such as those named above, translated in ridiculous price jumps in some
compounds most have never even heard of, let alone traded, yet which
would have made not only the year, but the decade for hedge funds
invested in them. And with China producing more than 90% of the world's
supply of rare earth minerals, coupled with increasing probability of
escalating global (and regional) trade wars, it is distinctly possible
that the gains recorded recently in gold will be dwarfed by the imminent
Samarium Oxide bubble, which 3 months ago was trading at $4/kg and is
now over $30.

Again, we were correct. The next move will be higher. Much higher.

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:00 | 662405 Husk-Erzulie
Husk-Erzulie's picture

Preseodymium Bitchez :-)

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:15 | 662888 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

oxide bitchez†

your a real rare earth, tyler.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:46 | 663119 Instant Karma
Instant Karma's picture

As I understand it there's plenty of rare earths around outside of China, but, its an ecological nightmare to process the stuff. So China took over by default. Oops.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:47 | 663121 Instant Karma
Instant Karma's picture

As I understand it there's plenty of rare earths around outside of China, but, its an ecological nightmare to process the stuff. So China took over by default. Oops.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 01:25 | 663586 LowProfile
LowProfile's picture

But you can't eat Samarium Oxide...  Waitaminute...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:00 | 662407 chet
chet's picture

Black swans seen circling over the Pacific.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:45 | 663040 George Orwell
George Orwell's picture

War between China and the US is inevitable.  It will happen in the next 10-20 years.  And the war will be nuclear.

It will be a war over resources.  Oil and Rare Earth Metals.

In order to save the village, we must destroy it.  In order to save the United States, we must destroy China.

As the only country that has used nuclear weapons against another country, we will have to nuke China.

"The American Way of Life is NOT negotiable."

 

George Orwell

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 21:21 | 663164 Oracle of Kypseli
Oracle of Kypseli's picture

We don't need to do a thing. China is running the country like the Amway corporation. It's a pyramid scheme which works great as you keep growing. Once you reach critical mass and you saturate the market, any minor downturn and you are toast.

My guess 2014 kaboom. no one would have any money to buy anything more than food.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 01:46 | 663607 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Unlike a pyramid scheme, Amway actually moved goods and services.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 23:28 | 663392 SofaPapa
SofaPapa's picture

This story should be front-page news.  It's huge.  But of course, as with so many world-changing events, 99% of the population has zero idea what's going on, and of course that is by design.  It's sort of sad to see the same patterns that have played out so many times in history play out again, and have "the little guy" as clueless as ever.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 23:32 | 663400 Triggernometry
Triggernometry's picture

Indeed, China knocking out their own satellite not too long ago was the opening salvo, signaling their capability to precisely move ordnance at that altitude. Simulations show a detonation of a megaton device at such altitude will result in an electromagnetic pulse whose 3rd resonance can knock out all unhardened ground-based electronics in most of north america, not to mention most satellites within the same radius. Thus China essentially displayed its ability to shut our lights off.

Needless to say(but pardon the redundancy herein), most military systems are hardened and or redundant. "Hardening" a satellite typically involves shielding with aluminum of thickness in proportion to the strength of shielding. At a cost of roughly $10000/kg for orbital lift, there is clearly an upper bound on how tough satellites are made. Fielding their own satellites, China will no doubt aim big with the yield of a device designed for such purpose.

China is well aware of our technological achilles heel: if our communications go down, our strike capability(first or second) will be impaired. This method is preferred over the second strike out-flanking first strike type footsie we played with the USSR.

Just pray the word neutron isn't on the menu...

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 01:39 | 663598 Hunch Trader
Hunch Trader's picture

There are no real gains to be had in a China-USA war, only losses.

Now China-Russia, there we are talking about real potential gains, about half Siberia's worth.

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:01 | 662408 TheGreatPonzi
TheGreatPonzi's picture

And the official reason is?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:02 | 662415 Apostate
Apostate's picture

Who cares?

The real message is "Hey Congress, never try to fuck 1 billion Chinese in the ass. Who the boss now?"

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:07 | 662431 DonnieD
DonnieD's picture

How do you think the Chinese comply with the 1 child rule?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:27 | 662500 knukles
knukles's picture

Export them as rare earth.  

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:14 | 662695 DosZap
DosZap's picture

*

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:16 | 662469 curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

We are your boss.  Give us the crap or all those select treasury bonds you are holding....simply will NOT be delivered on...That's right bitches!  Selective default up your ass.....

 

WHO'S THE BOSS NOW.??

 

OH BY THE WAY.....TRY SHIPPING ALL THOSE FINISHED GOODS IN HERE....  I see a buyers strike coming.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:51 | 662815 Rodent Freikorps
Rodent Freikorps's picture

The sea is a very dangerous place. Ships go missing. Who can say why?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:11 | 663070 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

There are two types of vessels at sea: submarines, and targets.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 23:31 | 663399 Steaming_Wookie_Doo
Steaming_Wookie_Doo's picture

Like the Song class submarine that popped up in the middle of US war games in the Pacific? Nice radar defeating coating on those babies. A hot war will not result in a US victory. They can muster more soldiers than we have people.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 01:48 | 663610 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

M-2 machine guns have a way of evening the odds.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 07:33 | 663731 ArgentDawn
ArgentDawn's picture

Ma Deuce! Getting it done since 1918! We could use another John Browning right now.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 23:16 | 663368 Bartanist
Bartanist's picture

Sure, no more iPADS or iPODs or iPHONEs, all 100% made in China.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:48 | 662583 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

"Are you going to kiss me BEFORE MAKING SEX TO ME!!!"

 

http://www.hulu.com/watch/110317/saturday-night-live-china-cold-open

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:19 | 663078 OldTrooper
OldTrooper's picture

An appropriate video if the subject is China, USA and money.  What kind of wretch could junk that?  Thanks for the reset goldsaver!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:06 | 662861 Mongo
Mongo's picture

Wow... Imagin Timmay having 1 billion angry chinese up his...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:27 | 663013 A_MacLaren
A_MacLaren's picture

Guess Obama should have kissed the Chinese Premiere

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/33878/SNL_Truth_/

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:52 | 662611 duo
duo's picture

You need rare earths to make glass (especially now that you can't use lead).  You need rare earths to polish just about anything used in missle optics, NVG's, HUD's, rifle sights, all that neat stuff.

China already makes the glass for everything else, digital cameras, SLR lenses, etc, except for a few rare cases.  This is a military move.

We just need to retaliate by slowing down soybean and corn shipments.

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:56 | 662633 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Best glass is still made in Germany and then Japan.  So it's not a China only show, I know they do some but the best is still elsewhere.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:14 | 662710 snowball777
snowball777's picture

And Germany and Japan get their rare earths to do same from...

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 06:53 | 663445 i-dog
i-dog's picture

... China.

Germany and Japan are not going to threaten to nuke / attack / boycott / default-on / shout-at / insult China. They actually have diplomats rather than an aggressive school ma'am in their foreign services.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:15 | 662714 DosZap
DosZap's picture

Great(far better Optical glass) comes from Japan, and Germany...no issues there.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:19 | 662902 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

are rare earths used in blowing glass. or glass to blow. or blowing your own glass vessels. you know what i mean. i sure used a lot of oxides for color in my glazes for ceramics. probably rare earther's.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:25 | 662746 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

I guess the US exported bad soja beans to China, and because of those, there are millions chinese have constipation problems.

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:01 | 662409 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Fuck China. Its time to spank this little bitch.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:07 | 662433 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

+1

(spank me too!! Pleeeease!)

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:23 | 663082 OldTrooper
Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:10 | 662445 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Bwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa hahahahahahah. Good luck with that.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:25 | 662496 Bob
Bob's picture

So few get it . . . but then we're Americans, bitchez! 

Karma is the real bitch and she never runs out of patience.  Kinda like the Chinese. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:51 | 662605 SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

This is very true. I was laughed at a month ago on ZH for stating that the Chinese are "very, very patient". They almost created "patience" for f*cks sake!

Anyone who has studied ancient Chinese writings on topics as broad as War, Buddhism, the nature of reality etc. will get it.

Don't get me wrong, China is heading for a nice crash. But I believe the populace there can return to the rice paddies much easier than we could ever wean ourselves off of I-Shit, fast food, and consumer-gratifying material garbage.

It's going to be a fascinating decade.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:59 | 662649 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Sorry farm land is trashed.

http://www.chinahush.com/2009/10/21/amazing-pictures-pollution-in-china/

 

NetEase: They want to tell you things?

Lu Guang: Yes, including “Hong River flows through here, 20 years ago the river was very nice, there were fishes, we all bathed in the river, and used water to irrigate wheat, but now we cannot do that anymore. And for so many years we have talked about it many times. We reported to the government, but nothing was ever resolved. Therefore we are now numb and don’t want to complain it anymore.” They were very miserable.

NetEase: The places you shot at where you think the pollution was very serious, how did the villagers see the pollution in their lives? Did they feel the pollution was very serious and threatening their lives or (that the polluting industries) driving the local economic development was more important?

Lu Guang: In fact, there is no economic development for them, it only brought them destructions. Back then they had fertile fields. There were many water conservancy facilities built in the 70’s, all were every good, used to irrigate the fields. But now, pollution came and the water could not be used to irrigate the fields anymore. After a long time, now all the water conservancy facilities are wastes. The polluted water has led to contamination of the underground water. All their drinking water is underground water, water in the wells or from the water tower. Water from water tower flows straight to their homes, unlike us, the tap water we drink is already processed. Drinking this kind of water for long time, many people got very ill. I interviewed a village 3-5 kilo-meters away from Hong River village and asked them if there were people with cancer there. They said yes, but only 1-2 in couple years, and very few. However (in Hong River Village), they have a dozen in each year. The difference is obvious from the same district.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:21 | 662733 DosZap
DosZap's picture

But I believe the populace there can return to the rice paddies much easier than we could ever wean ourselves off of I-Shit, fast food, and consumer-gratifying material garbage.

Yeah, sure they can,after living in big cities,making big bucks,more and more cars, middle to upper middle class.

I just know they will adapt back to an  Agrarian life............THEY got a taste of SUGAR, if you never had it you do not miss it.

Too bad,their hooked.

Of course there, they may only get a choice between that and a 7.62 Tok Rd.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 21:27 | 663175 zaknick
zaknick's picture

Actually, the same thing happened during the 1930s in th US; people went back to the farm.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:22 | 662906 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

patience  OH b one.......patience.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 10:50 | 664102 -273
-273's picture

Exactly, like the original i, the 2000 year old (at least, since some of it was set down 4000 years ago) i Ching, the book of changes. It is based on the ideas of the dynamic balance of opposites, the evolution of events as a process, and acceptance of the inevitability of change.

I have been reading it on and off for about 4 years now and there is a lot to be learnt from that book.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 16:05 | 665109 SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

Good points. When you go even deeper, see how the existence of "opposites" is refuted, that evolution nor time even exist, and while "change" is constant, the Ultimate does not change.

Fascinating stuff.....

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:23 | 662736 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Bob, agree so few really get it as many here are Americans. China has a multi-faceted plan and they do not care about the US debt money in and of itself. It is in the holding of said US debt that allows for the influence and leveredge it can 'create'.

The same can be said about China's currency being tied to the US dollar. China raises rates and look at what happens to the dollar.

Wake the f*&% up Americans, China is a smart, shrewd and patient player... who also just so happens to have an immense armed force of both 'feet on the ground' and advanced weapontry.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:30 | 662758 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

I'm awake ...

Take the most obvious example, the PBoC itself.  The central bank officially has about $2.5 trillion in reserves.  This by the way almost certainly understates its true position but let’s ignore that for a moment.  The PBoC has funded this position with an equivalent amount of RMB liabilities, which makes it very vulnerable to changes in the value of the currency.

Rate addiction

In fact there were strong rumors last year that the PBoC was technically insolvent as a consequence of the 20% increase in the value of the RMB against the dollar during the 2005-08 period of currency appreciation.  Weirdly enough, although the numbers are huge, it has proven difficult to convince anyone that the PBoC is not the richest institution in the world, and that it is actually very vulnerable to big losses (although I notice that Sovereign Trends’ Terrence Keeley, in an OpEd in the Financial Times Tuesday, seems also to have done the numbers).

The problem for the PBoC occurs not just because of the currency mismatch but also because it needs repressed funding costs to keep it profitable.  How much do the PBoC foreign currency assets earn?  I would guess probably between 3% and 4%, maybe less.  The RMB funding cost, on the other hand, is roughly between 1.5% and 2.5%.  This leaves the PBoC with a net positive carry of between 1% and 2%.

If the RMB appreciates by as little as 2% a year, in other words, the PBoC runs a negative carry on its assets.  Every further 1% increase in interest rates, or additional 1% rise in the value of the RMB, then, erodes its capital by at least $25 billion (annually, if it happens through an increase in interest rates).

Let’s assume, for example, that over the next two years we see a combined appreciation and interest rate increase of 10% (let’s say a 2% increase in interest rates and a 4% annual appreciation), which is, in my opinion, the absolute minimum that China must do to slow down the worsening domestic imbalances.  Assuming no change in the rate earned on reserve assets, which in fact may decline, this means that the PBoC’s net indebtedness would rise by over $250 billion, or roughly 5% of the country’s GDP.

These kinds of number quickly add up.

http://mpettis.com/2010/07/the-pboc-can%E2%80%99t-easily-raise-interest-...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:58 | 662828 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Imagine this: China ties thier currency valuation to a basket of items such as rare Earth metals, gold reserves, oil, etc.

Agree China is no Saint, yet they have been busy over the years investing in things of inherent value. What has the USA been 'buying' with all these newly printed dollars?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:19 | 662868 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

 

Imagine this: China ties thier currency valuation to a basket of items such as rare Earth metals, gold reserves, oil, etc.

 

rare earth is not rare just toxic to the land to extract it. We have a shit load in the usa, we have a shit load of natural gas, the great lakes are 20% of the global fresh water. We are also in the process of selling the house of saud' 60 billion in high tech weapons and another 100 billion to all her friends. That dollar/oil thingy is not going anywhere.

We have more gold than China per our books no other cb has called our bluff on our gold claims, most of the dev. world stores their gold in the usa for safety. We control the world reserve currency, U.N., BIS, WB ect ...

We have the strongest military, how will china protect her shipping lanes with hundreds of drones flying around.

China is in no position to tell us what to do. If things really got bad how many unemployed would china have on her hands.

China can not dictate a new bretton woods without a lot of pain.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:26 | 662913 Bob
Bob's picture

I think this illustrates the problem with discussions of China-US relations very well.  Generally any move by China whatsoever is instantly responded to with some version of nuke 'em!  Who do those mutha fucka think they are?!  Etc. 

This is not about war, this is just jockeying that is part of a very complex chess game.  The Chinese are not declaring war and, imo, will not overplay their hand.  They are just patiently adding to their positions, developing the material they have on the board. 

China will not attempt to dictate a new reserve currency system.  But they are getting alot of other countries interested and would appear to have already gotten a few substantial parties on board. 

We'll see how this turns out. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:44 | 662942 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

We are in total control on Oct 19 2010. Thats my only point really. China's population is no ready to take the place of the U.S.A consumer. Thats why they are spending cash on roads and cities to nowhere. They must keep everyone working. They cant have a slowdown.

If you read history all this shit happened in the 30's and what happened after this? History says things could get ugly.

Look at Blackrock,Met,going after BoA a primary dealer ..... Crazy shit.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 00:00 | 663459 i-dog
i-dog's picture

You really are as blind as a bat!! Stop drinking the KoolAid!

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 00:17 | 663484 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Oct. 18 2010

BEIJING (Dow Jones)--China's gross domestic product per capita will exceed US$5,000 by the end of the 12th five-year period, covering 2011-2015, Xinhua News Agency reported Sunday, citing a government meeting.

The country's GDP per capita in 2009 was around US$3,600, an earlier Xinhua report said.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 00:20 | 663489 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

In fact, on a per-capita basis in 2009, China ranked behind Namibia, Jamaica, Belize, Thailand, El Salvador, and Albania.  And the last time the U.S. had per-capita GDP of $6,567 was back in 1932.

 

BBBBBBBWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaBWWEaaaaaaa haaa ...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:18 | 663005 rocker
rocker's picture

Many are so naïve to believe we can nuke any and everyone. A simple observation a few years back when China blew one of their satellites out of space. U.S. reaction: China, you need to get permission first. “NO”  O.K. at least tell us before you do it. We, the U.S. has all those mighty battleships all over the world. How do we protect them. Maybe that’s why the pentagon ordered cases of Depends.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:09 | 663054 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture
Problem solved ...

HAS the US Air Force landed its secret space plane?

However, despite the extra public surveillance, no one's been able to pick it up on a new flight path, leading to speculation that maybe this time around, the US Air Force is preparing to land its experiment.

The X-37B has been orbiting the Earth for 173 days since its launch on April 22.

An unmanned vehicle with unknown intent, it's captured the imagination of skywatchers, military experts and conspiracy theorists worldwide.

It has the payload of a medium-sized truck, so maybe its purpose is to ferry spy satellites into orbit.

It can return to Earth after a single orbit, so perhaps it can pick said satellites up again after they've done their work and before they've been spotted by the enemy.

Some say it may signal the start of the weaponisation of space.

Whatever it is, it's an impressive piece of technology that at the very least has unparallelled capacity to generate headlines.

Now, for the second time since it launched, it's disappeared and the race is on once again to a) find it, then b) offer a plausible theory about what it's up to this time.

Back in late July, the X-37B went AWOL for nearly two weeks off its regular flight path.

When it was found, by amateur skywatcher Greg Roberts of Cape Town, South Africa, its new trajectory proved the shuttle was much more versatile than previously thought, with a "cross-range" wing set-up that may allow it to compensate for the slight turn in the Earth after a single orbit and land back on its original launch pad.

Now it's gone missing again, failing to pass over its regular flight path on the nights of October 7 and 9, according to UniverseToday.

This time around, the alarm bells have started ringing much earlier, thanks to the extra scrutiny offered by how-to video guides and apps such as the Simple Satellite Tracker which popped up after its first disappearance.

“This is a technology which very well could be used offensively, and other countries like Russia and China could see that as a threat”

Track satellites with this link if you're not in the US or Canada

Use this link if you're in the US or Canada

 

Also ...

The ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP) effect [1] was first observed during the early testing of high altitude airburst nuclear weapons [GLASSTONE64]. The effect is characterised by the production of a very short (hundreds of nanoseconds) but intense electromagnetic pulse, which propagates away from its source with ever diminishing intensity, governed by the theory of electromagnetism. The ElectroMagnetic Pulse is in effect an electromagnetic shock wave.

This pulse of energy produces a powerful electromagnetic field, particularly within the vicinity of the weapon burst. The field can be sufficiently strong to produce short lived transient voltages of thousands of Volts (ie kiloVolts) on exposed electrical conductors, such as wires, or conductive tracks on printed circuit boards, where exposed.

It is this aspect of the EMP effect which is of military significance, as it can result in irreversible damage to a wide range of electrical and electronic equipment, particularly computers and radio or radar receivers. Subject to the electromagnetic hardness of the electronics, a measure of the equipment's resilience to this effect, and the intensity of the field produced by the weapon, the equipment can be irreversibly damaged or in effect electrically destroyed. The damage inflicted is not unlike that experienced through exposure to close proximity lightning strikes, and may require complete replacement of the equipment, or at least substantial portions thereof.

Commercial computer equipment is particularly vulnerable to EMP effects, as it is largely built up of high density Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) devices, which are very sensitive to exposure to high voltage transients. What is significant about MOS devices is that very little energy is required to permanently wound or destroy them, any voltage in typically in excess of tens of Volts can produce an effect termed gate breakdown which effectively destroys the device. Even if the pulse is not powerful enough to produce thermal damage, the power supply in the equipment will readily supply enough energy to complete the destructive process. Wounded devices may still function, but their reliability will be seriously impaired. Shielding electronics by equipment chassis provides only limited protection, as any cables running in and out of the equipment will behave very much like antennae, in effect guiding the high voltage transients into the equipment.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 03:30 | 663667 66Sexy
66Sexy's picture

china has immense social and economic vulnerabilities.

they must represent AA when they are holding A-K offsuit.

they simply cannot afford the direction a stronger RMB takes them; they dont want to be the next consumer and domestically weak country like the US today, especially with the dollar as the world reserve currency.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:25 | 662910 sterling effort
sterling effort's picture

Time.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:27 | 662915 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

i like to see your sign or avatar. i can paint that character.

truth is dead though. i know so.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 01:47 | 663609 Moonrajah
Moonrajah's picture

Kathy, you've been inhaling too much of those rare earth minerals. Please, leave the stratosphere and come back home.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 06:45 | 663712 saulysw
saulysw's picture

Ground control to Major Kathy

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:22 | 662738 tmosley
tmosley's picture

With what?  We don't make paddles anymore, and our hands have atrophied from decades of not producing anything.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:02 | 662412 firstdivision
firstdivision's picture

This should be good for an up %10 tomorrow for the markets. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:02 | 662414 NoLongerABagHolder
NoLongerABagHolder's picture

At least the 3:30 ram that market higher bot is still working with its old rare earth inner parts.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:03 | 662420 Rick64
Rick64's picture

Rare mineral manipulators . Attack Attack.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:06 | 662426 RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

WTF??

China has nothing on the U.S.

Wanna play hardball?

We can simply OUTRIGHT HALT INTEREST PAYMENTS on any Treasuries held in China.

And if that doesn't work, then OUTRIGHT DEFAULT.

Of course, we keep payments going for the rest of the world.

Who is in bigger trouble then?

China?

or the U.S.?

LOL.....

 

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:07 | 662432 Cleanclog
Cleanclog's picture

Excellent tactic!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:09 | 662437 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

inevitable er, tactic....

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:13 | 662454 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

True.

But if it is inevitable, then it has no surprise element so it's not a tactic.

It's just a move on the board.

One does get the sense that so much of this is just going through certain motions.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:10 | 662443 b_thunder
b_thunder's picture

exactly. 

you owe bank 100 dollars - it's your problem.

you owe china 2 trillion dollars - it's china's problem.

 

the best solution is, IMHO, start selling military hardware to Taiwan.  nothing drives Commies mad more than some modern weaponry on the other side of the Taiwan straight

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:14 | 662463 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Maybe 10 stealth bombers, a few old subs, a few thousand short range missles .... Black hawks ect...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:14 | 662464 schoolsout
schoolsout's picture

LMAO

 

ridiculous

 

So, then, how do we get our money then?  Keep printing it up in a much faster way?  How do we get our goods when we just outright default on our debt?  Who will accept our BS for their goods?

Seriously?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:21 | 662482 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Announce we are starting on a ten year plan to bring manufacturing home. Dow up 2,000 on the news, work for all ...

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:26 | 662498 Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

We don't have the required labor skills anymore. Even today, employment ads going unfilled due to lack of qualifications. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:37 | 662531 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Perfect more jobs. Trade schools are now needed ...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:52 | 662612 spartan117
spartan117's picture

And it'll be the $40 an hour jobs right?  And buying a plunger will cost $250.  Want a hammer?  That will $400, please.  Get real.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:03 | 662669 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Who said it would be a $40.00 job to make a shoe ect..... A job beats no job.

Maybe we could use a subsidy ? like China has always done ? We have done it before ...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:54 | 662965 spartan117
spartan117's picture

Tell that to the Unions.  Perhaps you can lobby for a floating minimum wage, instead of a manipulated labor rate.  Oh, did I just call the US a labor cost manipulator?  I sure did.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:08 | 662992 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

The unions, you mean that shell of its former self...

They big dogs are building plants in non-union states ...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:26 | 662911 Jendrzejczyk
Jendrzejczyk's picture

Best hammers EVER!!

Use one every day.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 01:53 | 663614 Moonrajah
Moonrajah's picture

I heard bankers and hammers go very well together.

Just sayin'.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 06:39 | 663710 SheHunter
SheHunter's picture

  + 100  !

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 08:49 | 663808 RKDS
RKDS's picture

You don't supposed the mooks who whine about the price of American labor and products have ::gasp:: never bought either do you?  Day traders think they're so smart and above the sheeple, but they're just a different brand of useless.  Dollar for dollar, American workers have been and can be the most productive on the planet, but you have to overcome your crippling case of tunnel vision before you can reap any of the benefits.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:55 | 663048 FDR
FDR's picture

The USA has had the highest paid labor in the world for a long time; during the big industrial build-up after the Civil War we had wages twice as high as Englishmen.  High wages in no way hampered our ability to produce goods the domestic market could afford; on top of that we had a killer export trade, especially in machinery, which is the top of the production food chain.  Jobs weren't outsourced during the 19th/early 20th century build-up, nor during period of the 1930's and after when labor unions got real power; the outsourcing occurred over the last 30 years when tariffs were taken down. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:06 | 662681 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

We'd better hurry up, then. There's not one neodymium magnet production facility in the USA, and no US mine will be producing rare earth materials until at least 2012. Those magnets have countless uses (hard drives, motors, etc,) and we'd be f@##ed should China ban exports. Japan is the other producer of the neodymium magnets, but they have no rare earth mines. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:03 | 662850 Bob
Bob's picture

Yup, nobody seems to fully understand how essential and ubiquitous these Chinese produced materials are in modern life.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:38 | 662775 DosZap
DosZap's picture

THis is not as insane as it sounds.

I mean, if we are using 6000 Tons of Germanys GOLD, as a reserve, without their saying ok,making us the global GOLD masters of the planet..............w/ close to 13-14,000 tons in hand.....that finances a lot of shit.

Bernie can print as much FRNS as he pleases, NO LIMIT also......

So, what we have here is a DI Lema.

YOUR MOVE , HO!.

 

 

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 22:34 | 663284 zero intelligence
zero intelligence's picture

Har! You gotta love the tough guys around here. One wants to default on Treasurys (rendering the US government instantly disfuctional, because they have to sell about $2.5 trillion of rollovers and new issuance every year just to make payroll), and the other guy wants to crank up the printing presses to show the Chinaman who is the big boss of self-destruction.

 

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 03:33 | 663668 66Sexy
66Sexy's picture

militarize JAPAN more.. much more. chinese hate japanese, and for good reason. chinese are testing boundaries and getting cocky. but unless they confront the USA they will always be #2.

never, EVER trust the chinese.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:11 | 662450 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Bingo,

 

Oil, trade is still denominated in dollars..?

The average Li' six pack only makes 6 grand a year & the over capacity in manufacturing would be exposed in real time.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:15 | 662466 jmac2013
jmac2013's picture

Halt interest payments would make Treasuries worthless, and probably send the dollar into hyperinflation.  Cut off your nose to spite your face?

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:56 | 662641 spartan117
spartan117's picture

Yup.  There's no such thing as selective default.  China sells their Ts through intermediaries, and crashes the US bond market.  Or simply sell at a discount and have Germany/France/Russia dump them in the open market.  Watch the Dollar crash and burn and force the Fed to monetize everything as the entire world stops buying Ts.  These guys will never get it.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:20 | 662477 Shameful
Shameful's picture

And surly such a tactic would be good for capital flows.  Though with the Fed at the helm they still would have no problem hitting record low yields in UST paper I would expect.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:00 | 662653 Cecil Rhodes
Cecil Rhodes's picture

... and don't call me surly.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:32 | 662925 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

i mean, do you guyz know how really hysterical hilarious you are, from my perspective?

snortin' funny.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:24 | 662495 Hansel
Hansel's picture

Oh no, what will China do without some 1's and 0's on a hard drive somewhere.  China has a manufacturing base and all the intellectual property we sent over to allow them to produce our crap.  Meanwhile, our manufacturing base has been stripped and will take years to rebuild out.  People who think the world needs the U.S. because we print dollars are nuts.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:35 | 662524 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Who is going to buy? Li' six pack averages 6 grand a year.China is building bridges to nowhere this would destroy the job market in China ....

http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1975397_2094492,00.html

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:51 | 662600 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

Who is going to buy

 

Europe, India, Pakistan, Australia....

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:06 | 662676 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Europe = Austerity

The rest are a drop in the bucket to the american consumer.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:40 | 662941 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

Not if China announces a deal with the EU to Brenton-Woods III - The Euro edition.

Easy to do. China announces that it will exchange all US dollar denominated debt for EU denominated debt. The Europeans, seeing their fiefdoms disintegrate (have you seen the protests in France and Greece), agree to sell a trillion Euros in debt to the Chinese and make the RMB the next reserve currency. The Chinese publically disclose their gold holdings (both in the vaults and in the ground) and promise to back the RMB with gold, oil and Euros. Bye bye dollar!

BTW, the Europeans can use the new and improved Euro (now backed by Chinese paper!!) to buy themselves a few more years of welfare and would become the next hyper-consumers of Chinese slave labor crap. Wilkommen to Wal-Mart, do you need ze buggy?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:01 | 662976 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

The USA will sell 60 billion dollars worth of military hardware to Saudia Arabia. Another 100 billion to her friends the oil/dollar peg is not changing, the deal is already agreed upon. ....

We had to leave the gold standard because it could not back world trade, how much gold is of the derivative variety ????? All the miners are in debt to the banks/central banks.

The e.u. is totally bankrupt, what military will back all those shipping lanes, how many military bases do we have worldwide it looks like a spider web.

We control the printing press the eu banking system would be vaporized without our swap lines.

We control the U.N., World Bank, B.I.S., the european most thirld world countries in deap to this complex.

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 22:23 | 663268 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

No, actually we had to leave the gold standard because we were spending so much money that the Europeans panicked and sent battleships to NY to pick up gold from the FRNY. We were running out of gold, so Nixon defaulted on our debt by removing the security to that debt, namely gold.

World trade happened just fine for 5000 years under the gold standard. The seller would obtain a script from the ship captain, who would exchange it at the destination for gold from the buyer. The ship captain would return with gold and retrieve the script from the seller. The scripts were written for 90 days at no interest and done not only thru banks but also thru private parties. System worked quite well actually.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:51 | 662603 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Uh duh, the Chinese can consume their own goods retard. Where you dropped as a kid or what?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:12 | 662689 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Uh duh ....

 

Adjusting for GDP (Purchasing Power Parity) on a per-capita basis, China (at $6,567) has a long way to go before it achieves "superpower" status, considering that it ranks #102 according to the CIA, #99 according to the IMF, and #92 according to the World Bank. 

In fact, on a per-capita basis in 2009, China ranked behind Namibia, Jamaica, Belize, Thailand, El Salvador, and Albania.  And the last time the U.S. had per-capita GDP of $6,567 was back in 1932.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:27 | 662752 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

You are with out a doubt full retard status. It's like you're arguing that you wouldn't be able to sit in a chair that you had built yourself. 

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:34 | 662765 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Explain how I'm wrong .... *****crickets**** ....

 

Your the one who thinks the China consumer can just turn the switch on, so who is the moron?

You should throw your t.v. in the dumpster and start reading ...

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:51 | 662959 spartan117
spartan117's picture

A revaluation in the Yuan will give the Chinese an increase in purchasing power.  A revualuation will occur if the Chinese stop buying Treasurys, and allows a freer floating currency agains the Dollar.  Then the US will stop exporting inflation, the Chinese standard of living increases, and we get inflation here in the US and a lower standard of living.  That's partially how they will internalize consumption, as goods will be that much cheaper for the average Chinese citizen. 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 19:22 | 662984 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Re~Post Sorry ...

Take the most obvious example, the PBoC itself.  The central bank officially has about $2.5 trillion in reserves.  This by the way almost certainly understates its true position but let’s ignore that for a moment.  The PBoC has funded this position with an equivalent amount of RMB liabilities, which makes it very vulnerable to changes in the value of the currency.

Rate addiction

In fact there were strong rumors last year that the PBoC was technically insolvent as a consequence of the 20% increase in the value of the RMB against the dollar during the 2005-08 period of currency appreciation.  Weirdly enough, although the numbers are huge, it has proven difficult to convince anyone that the PBoC is not the richest institution in the world, and that it is actually very vulnerable to big losses (although I notice that Sovereign Trends’ Terrence Keeley, in an OpEd in the Financial Times Tuesday, seems also to have done the numbers).

The problem for the PBoC occurs not just because of the currency mismatch but also because it needs repressed funding costs to keep it profitable.  How much do the PBoC foreign currency assets earn?  I would guess probably between 3% and 4%, maybe less.  The RMB funding cost, on the other hand, is roughly between 1.5% and 2.5%.  This leaves the PBoC with a net positive carry of between 1% and 2%.

If the RMB appreciates by as little as 2% a year, in other words, the PBoC runs a negative carry on its assets.  Every further 1% increase in interest rates, or additional 1% rise in the value of the RMB, then, erodes its capital by at least $25 billion (annually, if it happens through an increase in interest rates).

Let’s assume, for example, that over the next two years we see a combined appreciation and interest rate increase of 10% (let’s say a 2% increase in interest rates and a 4% annual appreciation), which is, in my opinion, the absolute minimum that China must do to slow down the worsening domestic imbalances.  Assuming no change in the rate earned on reserve assets, which in fact may decline, this means that the PBoC’s net indebtedness would rise by over $250 billion, or roughly 5% of the country’s GDP.

These kinds of number quickly add up.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 23:34 | 663404 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Explain how I'm wrong .... *****crickets**** ....

I already have explained to you, you are just too stupid to understand that people that produce actual things have capital, and people that print paper have nothing.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 00:12 | 663476 chindit13
chindit13's picture

99.5% of working Chinese have a yearly income of 40,000 yuan or less.  Subtract out rent, food, and the karaoke bill, and there is not much left for t-shirts and carnival prizes.

A good deal of Chinese consumption in the last year (cars, homes, etc.) came about because the government forced out bank lending (so much for the reserves, as all they are are newly created yuan exchanged for the trade dollars) equivalent to 50% of GDP.  If excess debt can lead to eternal consumption...well, I believe the US has just demonstrated that it cannot, even without Mako telling us.

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 00:19 | 663487 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Oct. 18 2010

BEIJING (Dow Jones)--China's gross domestic product per capita will exceed US$5,000 by the end of the 12th five-year period, covering 2011-2015, Xinhua News Agency reported Sunday, citing a government meeting.

The country's GDP per capita in 2009 was around US$3,600, an earlier Xinhua report said.

In fact, on a per-capita basis in 2009, China ranked behind Namibia, Jamaica, Belize, Thailand, El Salvador, and Albania.  And the last time the U.S. had per-capita GDP of $6,567 was back in 1932.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:26 | 662497 AR15AU
AR15AU's picture

Halting interest payments would be a violation of contract and have a hugely negative effect on anyone considering lending the US government money.  

China is under no such obligation do deliver its rare earth metals into the marketplace. I think your comments are just a tad naive. China already halted its gold exports, and there was ZERO reaction from the U.S. Prices just rose. Why would rare earths be any different?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:45 | 662561 Pladizow
Pladizow's picture

Gold isnt used to build missles!!!!!!!!!!!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:45 | 662562 Pladizow
Pladizow's picture

Gold isnt used to build missles!!!!!!!!!!!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 23:27 | 663387 thefedisscam
thefedisscam's picture

China has always BAN exporting gold since 1950. The Only exception is some gold Panda coins, and some industrial use for tech exports.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:44 | 662559 breezer1
breezer1's picture

rare earths my ass. as long as they keep us supplied with light bulbs and cheap Christmas junk.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:30 | 663094 OldTrooper
OldTrooper's picture

I'm concerned breezer - really need a new motorized santa this year!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:57 | 662587 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

 

WTF??

China has nothing on the U.S.

Wanna play hardball?

We can simply OUTRIGHT HALT INTEREST PAYMENTS on any Treasuries held in China.

And if that doesn't work, then OUTRIGHT DEFAULT.

Of course, we keep payments going for the rest of the world.

Who is in bigger trouble then?

China?

or the U.S.?

LOL.....

Yes robo, lets cause hyperinflation. What would be so bad about that? /sarcasm off

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:53 | 662613 SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

Not a chance. Immediate US dollar collapse, oil and commodities to infinity. Zero-sum nuclear war.....ain't going to happen.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:56 | 662634 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

Really? You truly believe that MaObama would release nuclear weapons on China beacuse they decide to sell their treasury holdings in an open market?

Really?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:57 | 662831 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

I get the feeling that he wouldn't necessarily be the one making that decision.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:14 | 662883 SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

Nope. But if the Chinese are defaulted on and their country goes to shit, what's to stop them from starting a war....and what's the only type of war two countries like the USA and China would fight?

Trust me, I don't think it would happen. But send 1.5 billion people into the shitter, anything could happen.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:51 | 662958 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

That assumes that the Chicoms would really care about a measly $800B. Consider this. They use their slave labor to produce the latest iCrap. Then they loan the US the money to buy their iCrap at a profit (Come on down to crazy Lu's, were we have gone craaaazy. Financing for everyone!!!!) an charge interest in the process. Then they take our paper (you know the paper that J6P used to pay for the latest iTampon?) to purchase gold, oil, timber and mining rights in Afghanistan, Iraq and half of Africa. Who is the biggest fool now? The beauty of it all is that if we piss them off, they sell our t-bills in the open market, collapse our economy and come off as the victims of US arrogance. Think about it. we spent what? A trillion in Iraq and Afghanistan and got shit for our efforts? They can end our status as a super power (snicker) with a measly 800b? And our 800B to boot! Fucking beautiful!!!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:53 | 662621 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture


Who is in bigger trouble then?

China?

or the U.S.?

Ahhm...the U.S.

All that China has to do is dump 800B in T-Bills in the open market. Instant destruction of the US dollar. Shake and Bake sole world power status. Match point China.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:55 | 662966 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Idiots like you should not speak.

Dump them for WHAT?  You can't just DUMP sovereign UST holdings

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 20:36 | 663104 OldTrooper
OldTrooper's picture

The Chinese could always take their treasuries to Vegas - play roulette, stick them in g-strings, hookers, some chemicals to stay awake, plenty of booze - next thing you know it's all gone!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 22:27 | 663275 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

(In my best MaObama impersonation) Yes you can!!. Is called the open market. The Chinese can either sell their t-bills thru the PD at auction or sell them at a deep discount to other countries and have the same effect.

But, I'm all ears. Tell me exactly how you cant dump sovereign debt?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:37 | 662770 docj
docj's picture

You're of course assuming that ChiComs haven't already war-gamed that particular move out.  Right?

Good luck with that.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:13 | 662878 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

I call your crazy and raise you a crazy?  Oh brother....

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:06 | 662428 Cleanclog
Cleanclog's picture

Too bad we can't win our wars this way.  

Give China credit for cornering things the rest of us need while we fiddle with ourselves fixing NOTHING!

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:56 | 662970 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Give China credit for the same thing that made RSA a gold powerhouse...HAHAHAHAHAHA, you mean a total ACCIDENT of geography?

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:08 | 662434 Brian
Brian's picture

Is there a way to invest in Rare Earths?  Anyone know of good stocks or ETFs for mining companies or for the RE's themselves?

It is assured that the government will be providing subsidies and lots of cash for development of alternative sources, so any of these investments seem like obvious winners right now.

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:09 | 662442 NOTW777
NOTW777's picture

take a look at MCP

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:44 | 662560 Djirk
Djirk's picture

thanks for the tip

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:40 | 662782 huggy_in_london
huggy_in_london's picture

or look at LYC AU

You'll be long rare earths and the aud on that play....both moved a lot already (obviously)

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:34 | 662932 Bring the Gold
Bring the Gold's picture

Take a look here for all the info you need on Rare Earth Companies:

 

https://www.kitcomm.com/showthread.php?t=68479

Wed, 10/20/2010 - 07:03 | 663719 SheHunter
SheHunter's picture

look at MCP and REE for starters

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:09 | 662438 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

We're veering into NatSec territory. Rare minerals today, then processed alloys, then suddenly privately-held chip fabs are being nationalized.

Seems like we're about to find out how much of our own technology footprint is actually home-made. The answer being, nearly none. Outsourcing and offshoring will have then killed us. But those quarterly profits certainly were snazzy, oh yeah.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:49 | 662588 Husk-Erzulie
Husk-Erzulie's picture

Well the only other source as I understand it is in Africa, specifically the Great Rift Valley.  Can you say http://www.africom.mil/ 

Congo, Rwanda, Uganda look for the msm/prop focus to sharpen right up.  Methinks they will be needing our "help" sooner than later.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:18 | 662899 Rodent Freikorps
Rodent Freikorps's picture

No shit.

Can y'all say USN? I knew you could.

All your rare earths are belong to us, should we wish it. Just because we've been unwilling to take it by force does not mean we have to continue such an expensive policy.

We are also poised to take over oil and opium...should we wish it.

What dollar value would you place on US consumer compassion after a few weeks of brown outs and interrupted facebook access?

Bring it.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:18 | 662722 curly
curly's picture

Yes indeed, cougar_w.  Good thing ol' Bubba Clinton let Bernie Schwartz and Loral sell missile guidance systems to the Chinese.

 

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:00 | 662840 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

+100

No dumber move has ever been made.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:09 | 662439 What_Me_Worry
What_Me_Worry's picture

What does it matter?  We don't make anything here anyways.  Might as well keep it in China.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 18:37 | 662938 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

what ya talkin about, boy. we make McMansions, BIG ones at that,

T E X A S  style†

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:09 | 662440 NOTW777
NOTW777's picture

:)  got MCP

took some profits

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 16:09 | 662441 Bruno the Bear
Bruno the Bear's picture

I used to look forward to this kind of news as it gave me an excuse to drink after work.  But the news has been bad for so long, I think my liver is about shot.

Too bad Richard Nixon is dead - maybe he could have helped avoid possing off the Chinese.

Tue, 10/19/2010 - 17:31 | 662760 Glass Steagall
Glass Steagall's picture

“How you rike our krontitative easing, round eye?”

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!