This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

China Has Lost Over $100 Billion In Dollar-Adjusted Terms On Its UST Holdings In A Few Short Months

Tyler Durden's picture




 

As readers will recall, at the end of July, which was the most recent TIC data update, China owned $847 billion in US Treasury bonds. Since then, the world's reserve currency, which is what said Treasuries are denominated in, has lost 4.7%, or $40 billion in real terms. Yet an even more jarring observation is that from its June highs, the USD has dropped 12.4%. Expressed in real terms from the perspective of China's State
Administration of Foreign Exchange, this means that our biggest creditor
has lost over $100 billion when adjusted for the purchasing power loss
in the dollar.

But what about the actual absolute price increase in bonds skeptics will say? Well, since the dollar peak, the 10 Year has increased by "only" 5.75%, meaning that the real loss is more than double the capital appreciation (we ignore the fact that Treasury's expressed in gold have lost 5% year to date: that would really piss of Beijing).

Of course, for China to be able to capitalize on the absolute increase in values over the time period from the dollar peak, it would mean it has to find a willing buyer for over $800 billion worth of USTs, which can only be the Federal Reserve. And for that to happen, would mean outright monetization of everything by Ben Bernanke, which would also mean an active devaluation of the dollar, and something like a total loss to all our foreign creditors.

So the question is: how much longer will Beijing tolerate the USD devaluation by Ben Bernanke? Instead of Congress being so focused on getting China to revalue the Renminbi, perhaps they should be more concerned what happens when China realizes its investment in US securities now carries the threat of total loss at the pace Bernanke is destroying the reserve (for now) currency.

And this calculation should also be applied to the Fed as well: instead of parading how much money the Fed has made on behalf of taxpayers on its $2.4 trillion UST holdings, perhaps Bernanke can adjusted this number for the dollar value loss. Somehow we think the result would not be quite as attractive.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:48 | 627050 whatsinaname
whatsinaname's picture

whats lost in price will be covered in yield (when rates zoom to 15%) !!

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:12 | 627126 Fidel Sarcastro
Fidel Sarcastro's picture

That wouldn't happen.  China owns bonds/notes today that yield @ 2%.  If "tomorrow" new bonds & notes yield 15% NOBODY will buy China's.  They're screwed.  People will only buy the newer issues that yield the higher rate.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:49 | 627054 egdeh orez
egdeh orez's picture

Why would China be pissed?  They knew this was coming.  To say that they'd have an issue with the devaluation of the USD is to say that their exports wouldn't be positively affected by a weak USD or RMB.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:53 | 627068 tmosley
tmosley's picture

I know when taxday is, but I'm still pissed when it gets here.

If I were China, I would have dumped that crap years ago.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:00 | 627087 egdeh orez
egdeh orez's picture

If they dumped treasuries years ago, they would've killed their currency peg and wouldn't be able to sell US all sorts of useless junk.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:09 | 627115 tmosley
tmosley's picture

And then they wouldn't have been able to get all those little green pieces of paper that they then used to buy more treasuries that are still going down in value.

That sounds like a net positive for them, doesn't it?

Currently the US dollar is propped by two factors.  The first is that you can buy oil with it.  The second is that you can buy "cheap Chinese crap" with it.  These Chinese need the dollar so they can buy the things they make themselves?  I don't think so.  There might be some incentive for them to accumulate dollars to buy oil, but that many?  I don't think so.  They aren't just shooting themselves in the foot, they are opening up on the foot with a helicopter mounted gatling gun, with the occasional Hellfire missile thrown in for fun.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:52 | 627057 Everyman
Everyman's picture

Ben Bernake should be put to death!  That SOB and his policies.  Do you know that oil spiked and is no up about 17%?  Just wait till that little bit of "inflation" hits the comsumer.  There is gonna be shooting, and it is all deserved.

Stocks are going up, but they are only changing to the devaluation and debasement of our dollar.

What stupid SOB came up with this "plan?

Is there even a "plan"?

I and many others have just had about enough of the market manipulation, and they need to bring this to a screeching halt before any more damage in inflicted on the American Citizens.

CNBS was absolutely pathetic today, and you could see it in their faces, that this "rally" was embarassing to them as cheerleaders.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:00 | 627090 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Maybe they looked embarrassed because they are on CNBC or because they realize they are morons. 

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 20:20 | 627784 DosZap
DosZap's picture

I keep bringing up the PLAN, and certain folks what specifics.

The PLAN, is exactly what Berniase is doing.

People who think for one second, the moves being made are by coincedence, and are not MEANT to take us down, are idiots.

It's part of the PLAN.

How many people on this Forum, could not have done a better job,turning this ship for the BETTER, than this spawn of Satanica.?

My coin, is very damned few.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 21:06 | 627862 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Yup there's a plan. To break the balances that exist. It all started with Reagan once he broke tecumseh's curse. That lead us to 20 years of corporate growth. Then we started this nearly 13 year cycle to absolute domination.

It's growing at a very rapid pace. The bushes are most of it but it's fricking huge. I guess we'll know in 2012 if Jeb Bush gets elected or Patraeus gets elected who's the most destructive person in all of humanity.

Here's a good timeline for the cycle kick off countdown.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

Wed, 10/06/2010 - 02:37 | 628466 Captain Courageous
Captain Courageous's picture

Quite the HARD-ON you have there for past Conservatives.

a ONE INCH hard-on, but I guess a hard-on nonetheless.

Of course the current, big-earred Monkey King and his corrupt Government full of Soros funded radicals are all spotlessly white (pardon the pun).

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:51 | 627062 vote_libertaria...
vote_libertarian_party's picture

Did anybody see the Chinese leader yesterday say he was going to be a big investor in Europe? 

 

Diversifying out of US???  Hello higher interest rates...oh...wait...Benny Boy can buy everything with his magic credit card.

 

No problem-o

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:53 | 627065 NOTW777
NOTW777's picture

there will be pay back - bet on it

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:53 | 627066 Chemba
Chemba's picture

too bad for them.  they don't want dollars, they don't need to sell us anything.  let's see how strong the china miracle "booms" when they stop selling the USA trinkets and trash for usd

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:51 | 627234 midtowng
midtowng's picture

It's only in China's interest to buy Treasuries and devalue their currency as long as there are jobs in America they can take from us. Once those jobs dry up then China has nothing to lose by selling their Treasuries.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:53 | 627070 RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

I'm sure that China as been a huge buyer of all those IBD Top 100 mo-mo stocks as well.

So overall, they are probably doing OK.

How else can you account for some of these getting HeatMapped by 6% in a matter of hours?

Like SHOO, LZ, WYNN, etc.???

Remember, they are by far the most ardent gamblers and speculators on the planet.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 19:42 | 627693 doolittlegeorge
doolittlegeorge's picture

absolutely.  not only that but "you're talking population flows" here.  this is well documented but not "intepreted" correctly for any of you who actually read a newspaper.  we're talking "millions moving into the coastal cities." every month and "whatever China thinks about the dollar it also thinks highly of our food which is a lot cheaper now too."  Hence railroad stocks going through the roof while "the end of the world" is written chapter and verse (with footnotes, bibloigraphy, indexes, graphs, interactive charts and girls in bikini's thrown in just to wake up the sleepy heads) here.  the problem of course is "jobs" which "is not included in railroad propserity."  it is when talking "trucker prosperity"--i've tried that area and it sucks.  as an addendum:  railroad prosperity goes even HIGHER when social unrest is unleashed.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:55 | 627074 LoneStarHog
LoneStarHog's picture

U.S. Peso -- The RearServe Currency -- You hoard them, you will get your rear serviced.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:59 | 627076 hambone
hambone's picture

BUT WHAT ABOUT JAPAN???  Yen at 83 is death to an exporter.  They are getting killed and being proven at every intervention to be completely powerless to stop or even slow their demise.  I'm betting they are the one that will go over the edge first and then all bets off?

Either they go full retard and destroy the Yen (and all Japanese savings) to save the exporters or ???  Nothing but full retard will do!!!

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:56 | 627077 NOTW777
NOTW777's picture

bad behavior begets bad behavior;  many countries will observe and copy ben

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:56 | 627079 HarryWanger
HarryWanger's picture

Yes, and they'll continue to buy more. 

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 15:58 | 627083 Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

'Triple Short' Bob Prechter lost more than China. Short some more gold, Bob.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:00 | 627089 geminiRX
geminiRX's picture

Remember when a hundred million was a lot of money......

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:01 | 627094 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Yes, b4 2000

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:01 | 627093 trav7777
trav7777's picture

who gives a fuck what China thinks?  Let them do their mercantilist predation on Europe now.

It's only ok if THEY have a weak currency, I guess.  Fuck them.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:06 | 627109 Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

And gas is $25 and a Happy Meal is $40.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:33 | 627178 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Will it still come with a led painted toy?

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 17:27 | 627355 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

yes but Ronald will have a new accent

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 18:56 | 627596 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Ahm wovin it.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 20:27 | 627799 DosZap
DosZap's picture

And much shorter, new kids meal will be the  Hoppy Meal.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 19:43 | 627696 doolittlegeorge
doolittlegeorge's picture

you drive a car with that face on?  if so what kind and how fast?

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:05 | 627104 Timmay
Timmay's picture

Cha-Ching!! (Pun intended)

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:17 | 627140 InconvenientCou...
InconvenientCounterParty's picture

Chess analogies on/ China keeps the U.S. queen contained with a rook for the time being. Helicopter Ben sending the pawns out to sacrifice.

It's not the force, it's the force multiplier. The $847B UST's is a political force multiplier. China will lever the whole thing when they are ready to begin expanding for real. By the time they start hinting about something in the open, it's practically a done deal.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:21 | 627147 Fourth Horseman...
Fourth Horseman of the Apocalypse's picture

As the RMB is tied to the USD, the fall in USD means that RMB has fallen against every currency except the USD.  Beijing will no longer be able to argue that RMB has revalued against its trading partners this year.  This in turn will likely mean more pressure from Europe and Japan on Beijing to revalue the RMB when the G-20 Finance Ministers meet on October 21-23.

The devaluation of the RMB has also been accompanied by a spike in food and energy prices.  China really does not need added inflation pressures at this point.   

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:23 | 627152 Lord Peter Pipsqueak
Lord Peter Pipsqueak's picture

God help America when the Chinese can afford to buy "all their own crap",because by then,most Americans won't be able to afford food.

Who will Bernanke sell his treasuries to then?'cause China certainly won't be buying them,they won't need to.

 

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:24 | 627157 gwar5
gwar5's picture

I don't think they care. They've been able to run our economic and foreign policy to their advantage. They got the Iraqi oil contracts, not Exxon, after we died for it.

They'll get the world's resources hereafter for the next century because our funny money won't be an acceptable currenncy of exhcange. Well played.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 21:40 | 627935 thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

The Chinese definitely care. Every penny matters; we are more jewish than Jews.

I agree with everything else, though.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:31 | 627172 Dr. No
Dr. No's picture

I really dont think it matters how much they "loose".  They could ride the dollar down to zero for all they care.  They have successfully built a world economy regardless of what some promissory notes are worth in a file folder somewhere.  They have the goods.  Who cares about the paper.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 17:06 | 627232 hambone
hambone's picture

Still say China needs US consumer more than US needs Chinese T buyer. 

China cannot find another consumer of anything near US quality (willing to spend to infinity for higher cost goods to ramp up Chinese wages, standard of living while debasing their own)...however US can write off Chinese owned T's as worthless via printing and put up tariffs and go protectionist.  America runs a modern day Marshall plan for America, builds the factories (higher tech of course), goes clean / green domestic energy, mans the factories, and ultimately looks to out Germany Germany.

China is the biggest loser, no?  Worthless T paper, massive overcapicity (factories, homes, highways, commodity hordes, etc.) and 1.1billion people looking for the pie in the sky they thought industrialization would bring them.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 17:29 | 627367 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

Who needs who is kind of like asking which prisoner gets the better looking bunkmate. We're both screwed

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 17:33 | 627382 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:55 | 627245 bada boom
bada boom's picture

I am sure someone has made some back door promises to cover all that, and perhaps a little more for the inconvenience.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 16:56 | 627250 PeterSchump
PeterSchump's picture

Good!  Why should we be the only ones to suffer.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 17:07 | 627290 Mercury
Mercury's picture

If you wake up one day and decide that you would rather have streams of oil flowing your way instead of U.S. dollars (which, as luck would have it, happens to be what oil is denominated in) and you owned a bunch of USTs now - what would be the best way to get from point A to point B?

OK, after you called Goldman Sachs I mean.

Identify a third party Treasury buyer?  Who's the biggest believer in US Treasuries right now (besides Bernanke)? and how many billions of dollars worth of oil could you really, safely lock in for delivery in the medium term do you think?

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 17:10 | 627301 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

They would have waisted it anyway. Obama can send them a really nice Christmas card to make them feel beter.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 19:48 | 627708 doolittlegeorge
doolittlegeorge's picture

oooooh, that be nice.  a picture of a pretty ohio winter scene with barns and snow and children playing and mom knitting and dad smoking a pipe...

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 18:45 | 627568 MarkTwainsMustache
MarkTwainsMustache's picture

I hope Fidel Sarcastro was being sarcastic and not really being that ignorant...bonds, just like stocks, are priced at the margin

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 19:04 | 627621 Rahm
Rahm's picture

           ---------^-------
L        /                     [] \
O ===          FRB          /
L         \-------------------
               __I___I__,

 

             |   |
              |    |
            __X_
           /   $   \
           \____/

                          |    |
                        |    |
                       __X_
                      /   $   \
                      \____/

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 19:32 | 627679 HFTrabbit
HFTrabbit's picture

Are there any updates on the whereabouts of that head chinese financial guy that went missing a couple of weeks ago?

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 20:31 | 627804 DosZap
DosZap's picture

His HEAD, or the body?.

7.62x25 Tokarev

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 21:44 | 627940 thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

++

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 19:39 | 627687 HFTrabbit
HFTrabbit's picture

assuming that the 10 year yield is going to 1.5%, will the Zhongguo Zhengfu have covered their massive short exposure by then??

If not, 2011 might be a prime opportunity for a trade war as the Chinese try to get an evil out on the Fed to make them pay for the sh$t storm that they have caused in the treasury market.

Tue, 10/05/2010 - 21:10 | 627876 non-anon
non-anon's picture

I envision a day when our current masters turn over the keys to our new masters.

Wed, 10/06/2010 - 04:14 | 628526 sbenard
sbenard's picture

Ouch! And when the day arrives that China makes the decision to liquidate its USTs, apocolypse now!

Thu, 10/07/2010 - 02:03 | 631058 honestann
honestann's picture

In gold we trust.

In gold the Chinese trust.

Just wait until the Chinese behave that way!

HumptyDumptyDollar fell down... and will stay down for the count.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!