You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

China's 2009 Trade Surplus Falls A Record $100 Billion

Tyler Durden's picture




After posting a record crude-oil import month in December, as well as the second highest iron-ore import month in history, China's program economy is roaring back to life, even if the imports are actually sitting in full warehouses, used to build empty cities that consume negative electricity, make washing machines that never launder anything except the government's flawed economic statistics, and create cars that somehow use up ever-less gasoline. Of course, when the government has trillions in increasingly worthless excess dollar foreign reserves that have to be used up for something, it is no wonder that the Chinese government is buying anything and everything it can stockpile, and that can't be devalued by Tim Geithner, hand over fist. As for exports: courtesy of the dollar peg, which makes China's exports as cheap as the US' (assuming the latter had much of anything to export besides financial innovation), China had no shortage of counterparties to purchase its $1.2 trillion in 2009 exports. Yet despite all this, China's trade surplus plunged a record $100 billion, or 34%, to $196 billion from 2008's $296 billion.

Notably, in December China's crude-oil imports hit a record 21.26 million metric tons, or 5 million barrels per day. It is good that at least for one country the "great recession" never happened. In 2009, China imported 14% more oil than in 2008, for a total of 204 million tons. But the real kicker was in iron-ore imports which was 62.16 million metric tons in December, 22% more than November, and an unbelievable 80% more than a year earlier, and the second highest ever recorded. For all of 2009 628 million tons of iron were imported, 41.6% higher than in 2008. Those empty cities apparently really need more peers. And one wonders why Australia's (5.4% more imports in 2009) and Brazil's (5.3% less) economy are humming: it takes a lot to provide the raw materials to build the biggest bubble in the world.

The simple observation is that instead of having to finance the US consumer's continued spending binge by buying hundreds of billions in Treasuries in 2009, China was let off the hook by the Federal Reserve, which did all of its mandated purchase instead. So with all the excess money China went and stockpiled, stockpiled, stockpiled. Now the only question of whether the required end-consumer demand will ever materialize will determine who is correct in the China bubble debate: Chanos or Rogers. As the US consumers are tapped out (save for some Spanish tourists who apparently can't wait to purchase g-strings at A&F), China better hope its own middle class will use its savings to buy everything the government has already made and built, and counted (hopefully not double or triple) in its GDP calculation.

On the other hand, despite having a savings rate that Americans could only dream of, China is also gripped by gambling fever: who really knows what the domestic balance sheet looks like. Yes, having cash is great, but if the liability side of the consumer balance sheet has 0 equity (or only equity in a massively inflated stock market) and the rest are cheap loans, which the government handed out freely in 2009 to the tune of 11 trillion renminbi, then all bets really are off when the profit taking inevitably begins (as it always does).

Here are some more charts that demonstrate why the traditional Chinese model of an export-led economy may be in trouble if the US and EU consumers don't come back (as a reference point, exports to the EU dropped 19.4% or $236 billion, while those targeted at the US sank by $221 billion or 12.5%).

The chart below demonstrates the phenomenal rise in China's trade surplus, which was effectuated primarily on the backs of the US and EU consumers, who had found themselves big spenders in the years after 2003 courtesy of the HELOC piggybank, a surging stock market, and low interest rates.

What is very amusing on the above chart is the massive surge in China's trade balance in the months following the Lehman bankruptcy. Truly with the rest of the world shut down for the subsequent quarter, China was exporting excess billions of "stuff" to somebody. Who that somebody was, would be interesting to find out. Had the export data been normalized for the October-February period, $85 billion in GDP would have been removed from the Chinese economy. Yet what is glaringly obvious is that China will have a very tough time at recreating the same surge in the trade surplus in 2010 and onward, especially if calls for renminbi appreciation continue growing ever louder.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 13:33 | Link to Comment CB
CB's picture

Perhaps China, in desperation for someone to consume all their crap, would eventually force their people out of their savings and assets in order to keep their fun scheme going.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 13:44 | Link to Comment Chopshop
Chopshop's picture

like explicitly producing inflationary pressures through warp-speed printing presses, the stockpiling of a war chest o' natural resources ... promoting egregious leverage by any and all and then introducing margin / futures.  nah, they'd never do that.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:20 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

speaking of war chest, china has it. And they have millions of unemployed single men.

China has warned the USA 6 times in 7 days to not sell weapons to Taiwan.

The contract to sell patriot missiles has been approved by our government.

China may have reason for that war chest they been compiling.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 07:57 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

The amount of money that China spends on "defense" is a drop in the bucket compared to what the US is spending.  And, given the chess match that is on (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LA09Ak02.html) it's clear that China has reason to worry; I mean, not only does the US owe it a ton of money, but it looks like the US is most certain to default on such debt (one way or another), meaning that the US will likely do everything in its power to initiate some military conflict.

Ever since the world has become depedent upon oil its wars have been about oil (in one way or another).  Power needs POWER, and oil IS that power!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 18:32 | Link to Comment Stink_Pickle
Stink_Pickle's picture

CB,

Would this even be possible?  I was under the assumption most of Chinese savings was going for personal retirement in a country where there are not social welfare or entitlement programs.  If my assumptions are true, forcing their people to spend would lead to more and more social unrest as retirees would literally have nothing. 

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:02 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Exactly!

No, China is using its national wealth to party on at the moment.  As the general populace gets hooked on partying, the expansive move toward a US lifestyle (the car culture), it will become harder and harder to maintain the party.  Substitute "bubble" for "party" and you get the idea- eventually KABOOM!

Uprising are far more likely in China than the US.  Which goes to show you who has the greater State control (police state): no wonder TPTB don't like commie China!

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 11:05 | Link to Comment CB
CB's picture

Dear Mister Stink_Pickle: 

You might be right.  China is very *SPECIAL*.  The nature of central banking and the politics of the power-hungry don't apply, just like here in the US.

Sincerely yours,

CB

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 13:52 | Link to Comment anynonmous
anynonmous's picture

Michael Pettis (China Financial Markets) published an outstanding essay yesterday

 

Everyone wants to talk about currencies

 

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:46 | Link to Comment ThreeTrees
ThreeTrees's picture

Interesting article!  It makes me wonder if the US is really where eyes should be focused when trying to detect a destabilizing currency crisis...

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 14:14 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

An outstanding opening paragraph!  Laughed my stones off.

Great article, good insights, I'm going with Chanos.

Also, Goldman's China affiliate is going retail as reported recently by B'berg.

Also, China to approve futures trading and short selling.

Ergo, vampire squid tentacles successfully extending.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 14:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:24 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

Hey there Anonymous 189204 China Apologist.  Your description of China sounds a lot like America over the last decade.  Your time is short my friend, so enjoy the ride to the top of the bubble; it is a long and terrible ride to the bottom.

You were trained to Kow-Tow.  We, the West, were brought up to innovate, question and fight.

If you are not a coward, hiding behind your Anonymity, why not write an article for your local paper criticizing your Communist Fascist Masters.  I could be a little bit of fun... No....?

 

 

 

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 16:40 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Hey Anon, your are just the person I want to talk to. You have a good look into China. Tell me, how do Chinese look into each others eyes as they kill ever infant girl born until the wife finally produces a boy? I mean, is it accepted and expected, or does it just happen and get swept under the rice mats?

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:30 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

waterdog,

Your posts are typically fine, I typically find you reasonable or certainly neutral. This one is off topic and offensive. What ever we believe, why target this poster for this?

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 19:39 | Link to Comment Reductio ad Absurdum
Reductio ad Absurdum's picture

On the contrary, waterdog hit the nail on the head --- it is your post that is inappropriate.

As for the anonymous coward, I only wish we could deport him to China and make his fondest wish come true. He does not deserve the freedoms that other people won for him with their blood.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:42 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

Eugenics- it worked for Hitler, and China copies.  Murdering your female children is part of the greater economic plan.

It is spot on topic.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:56 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

and we are so willing to send our young to war!  Given a choice of abortion or war, i would say , abort me. It beats having to go to Iraq and kill folks who done me and mine no harm.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 21:51 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

I apologize. You are conscious of what you are doing. You want to escalate a verbal engagement with a Troll. After you bring up infanticide, I wonder which of our cultural practices the Troll will bring up? I'll go get pop corn, come back, and watch him manipulate us.

Beer or wine anyone?

Carry on.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:25 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Here in the US it's accomplished via the life-sucking insurance companies.

And, not to be an apologist for the eugenics crowd, but I hardly see babies of the rich being under threat of termination.  Also, for whatever it's worth, I'd think that folks in the US should be a bit more receptive of the notion of reduced population growth in China; at 1.3 billion people China is building momentum to eat the US's lunch; increased population will only mean a greater necessity to compete harder (finish the lunch).

Ah, but this right-to-life stuff is such good diversionary play...

Thanks for playing!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:22 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

Is it a requirement for americans to be assholes?  just asken

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:26 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

while here at home tent cities spring up as a reply to bankers take home pay.

Here in the USA freedom was exported till there is little left.

Our future dreams will be in a nightmare reality.

We have no room to put anyone down as long as we are to cowardly and greedy to stand up to OUR masters.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 19:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 21:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:32 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

Thats about nailed it. Thanks

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:31 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

Same people who re elected Geoge Bush, cant be too smart. Sorry is my hostility showing? apologies all around.

Still, cant we be better than this? Dont our cops abuse our protestors,?

Do our politicians mind us? You truly believe a new crew in washington wont be bought and paid for before they take the oath?

 

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 03:08 | Link to Comment musth
musth's picture

China will be a capitalist society soon enough. When? Who knows, but if history still rhymes China will be a capitalist society. You think all of the new rich capitalist of China are gonna put up with being oppressed for another 200 years?

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:31 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

I thought that China was presently operating in a more capitalistic manner than the US.

But that last line: You think all of the new rich capitalist of China are gonna put up with being oppressed for another 200 years?  What the heck?  Please explain to me how this ISN'T horrible logic?  I mean, you've got NEW and 200 years in the same sentence!  Further, they can hardly be assumed to be oppressed if then are/become "rich."  NOTE: when 2/3 of the world population lives on $3/day or less do you really want to stand out like a sore thumb?  The meek shall inherit the earth...

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 16:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:27 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

Mukka Hai, geoung

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:36 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

Do not forget my little anonymous 189318 friend, that the American people had the gun put to their head by Bernanke and Paulson in the Fall of 2008- that is the only reason these cheating weasles got the billions. Why, even our squeaky clean, new savior supported giving the crooked banks- taxpayers money. 

There is a lot more going on than writing here on ZeroHedge, but it is certainly a way to communicate, since the MSM, like (most of) our politicians have been bought and paid for.

This fight is not over, not by a long shot.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 21:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:41 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

The fundamental problem, one that causes numerous people problems in argument, is that the US system is an oymoron- a "representative democracy."  This system has allowed the common person to feel like he/she is participating, when in reality they are just giving their consent to their political mob bosses: kind of like how the US Congress abdicates is constiutional mandate to declare war (giving it to the Executive).  Like all centralized systems, the US will vanish in corruption.  China's government too will fail, as will just about all others.  And lest people go all giddy over this prospect thinking that it'll free up "business," capitalism too will die a horrible death- when it can no longer grow (due to exhaustion of physical resources): capitalism is the most efficient economic system ever, so efficient it is building it's own perfect noose by which it will hang itself.

Thanks for playing!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:34 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

China is aggressively building oil storage facilities.

i don't know if the recent imports are going to immediate use or stockpiling or both, no way of knowing as they lie even more than the u.s. gov't.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 21:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 00:44 | Link to Comment Wondering
Wondering's picture

Please look up the last decade of defense spending by China.

Please look up the last decade of defense spending by the USA.

We can debate tons of things about China. The idea that they are militarily ready to fight or capable of fighting the USA anytime soon is not one of them that can be debated rationally.

Yes, if some one was to invade them by land they would be able to defend their nation relatively easily. Same is true for the USA.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:50 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

no way of knowing as they lie even more than the u.s. gov't

As you believe, but... if both lie, then how can you determine to what extent?  Seems no more than chest beating (my flag is better than yours; my pony is faster than yours, though no race ever takes place).

The oil aspect is key, however.  I have been bringing this up for, well, way too long now (though just a recent comer here).  This bolsters my argument that the US cannot dig its way out of debt via exports (which then means that it cannot dig its way out, period) because the need to import ever-greater amounts of oil (which is the energy to create).

Commie/China haters can rejoice in the knowledge that China is going to crumble (at least as far as being a big market player goes).  But, this exact same mechanism also applies to the US.  See: corner, back'd in to...

Thanks for playing!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:36 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

I would add to that, from what I have gathered at least, that Chinese local gov'ts are swamped with debt due to the central gov't forcing their hand to finance many activities. 

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:50 | Link to Comment ThreeTrees
ThreeTrees's picture

Never mind the fact that the vast majority of China is still made up of poor backwater rural communities...

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:39 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

trees...  China is building cars and roads, which leads to gas stations and shops, which create employment which bring workers which brings motes which.... 1950 usa looks to be a parallel. That growth may balance out some other problems. So many people will be buying a lot  of things.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:55 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Yeah, and they've been able to exist in a subsistence lifestyle for quite some time.  Let's see how well Americans are able to adapt!

Motral of story: don't think that anyone who isn't reliant upon unsustainable practices is backward. (reminds me of "liberal" types making fun of rural folks- bad idea!)

Thanks for playing!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 16:17 | Link to Comment Crime of the Century
Crime of the Century's picture

Yeah - you guys got that capitalism thing down pat...

http://www.chinahush.com/2009/10/21/amazing-pictures-pollution-in-china/

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:02 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Thanks for brining this to folks' attention.  I'd run across this several months ago.  It's a real eye-opener!

Think about this when you read the Michael Pettis piece (http://mpettis.com/2010/01/everyone-wants-to-talk-about-currencies/) esp this:

Except for small countries whose trade surplus can easily be accommodated, I think the days of rapid growth driven by trade-surplus policies may be over.


“Men argue…nature acts”

- Voltaire

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 14:43 | Link to Comment anynonmous
anynonmous's picture

Bloombergs perspective

Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) -- China’s exports surged in December and imports rose to a record in a stronger-than-forecast trade rebound that may lessen the case for governments to sustain stimulus programs this year.

 

Exports climbed 17.7 percent from a year earlier, the first increase in 14 months, and imports jumped 55.9 percent, the customs bureau said on its Web site yesterday. Year-on-year comparisons are affected by declines from late 2008 as the global credit crisis deepened.

China Trade Rebound Aids Global Recovery as Imports Surge 56% to a Record

and on

the US consumer economy

Jan. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Consumers probably took advantage of holiday discounts in December and manufacturers churned out more goods, pointing to a U.S. economy poised to sustain the expansion into 2010, economists said before reports this week.

 

Sales, Production Probably Rose as U.S. Economy Poised to Sustain Rebound

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 18:48 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Ya, and HFT adds much needed liquidity to the market and Bloomberg reports that Lehman expects government assistance.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 14:37 | Link to Comment MeTarzanUjane
MeTarzanUjane's picture

Yes, China is THE WORST INVESTMENT PROSPECT in the known sphere of cartographic objects.

    WARNING: DO NOT even think about investing in emerging markets or you shall suffer an ungodly financial death.

Keep your money in The Shitter, errr I mean The US Markets.

"Ergo, vampire squid tentacles successfully extending."

--Already noted in many brilliantly sarcastic(but informative) comments, but more accurately written "squid testicles have steroidally extended."

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:05 | Link to Comment MeTarzanUjane
MeTarzanUjane's picture

Oh and least you think that the only thing that China is interested in is stockpiling the raw materials of the world.

China is taking major stakes in the cash starved Japanese companies that appear on this list:

http://271patent.blogspot.com/2009/01/top-patent-holders-ibm-tips-4k-mar...

(I know it's 2008, but I cannot find 2009 yet).

Take a second to think of the importance of that one... Then tell me if you want to avoid that far east bubble.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 15:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 16:04 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Every Central Bank in the world is holding their collective breaths wonder when and where the next financial tsunami will hit. All the while the FED believes they can print longer and more than any other Country because they have the world reserve currency, and rightly so.  So let's wait and see who and what pops first.  I'm still favouring a carry trade tsunami.  Big pop.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 16:06 | Link to Comment the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

In America we have liar loans, but China has the liar economy. is inflation in China still running ahead of their central bank prime rate? That seems to be the working formula (US does it do, we are better at lying about inflation). Raising rates is the tool central bankers use to cool down an overheating economy, but the risks of changing the game are too great, so they will probably dosome government intervention in their credit markets, and that never turns out well.

 

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:05 | Link to Comment Andrei Vyshinsky
Andrei Vyshinsky's picture

We eliminate our over-buying and continue to reduce purchases of even justifiable levels of their manufactures bringing down the trade deficit, they wind up stockpiling commodities instead of buying our debt but with the self-same, very scary over-capacity exposure they have at the moment. I don't see how this manuever helps them all that much, particularly in the short term. Western consumers have gone to bed and plan on staying asleep for a very long time. Bad things happen when your customers disappear.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:06 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Bad things happen when your customers disappear.

Thanks for that most trenchant statement!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 21:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:27 | Link to Comment darkpool2
darkpool2's picture

there is more than a touch of zenophobia when the debate turns on US v China, and too much sizzle is lost in the heat. Its all about relativities and given the incredible sesspool that US politics has become and the out of control leverage at all levels, its not really that that hard to think that the relative balance has tipped in favor of China. I too have a foot in 2 different camps, and loyalty to no-one outside the family unit, so I dont let emotion over-ride common sense.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 17:37 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

This may be one of the UGLIEST ZH threads I have ever seen.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 19:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:34 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

That's gonna happen when you get a US v China debate - when both sides are covered in lies and deceit, you'll never get to the truth. Thus a mute arguement with neither side making any sense.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 21:00 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

You have summed this up well. Thanks.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:18 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Well, it's all working as planned now, isn't it?

Sad, really...  Another example of how well the Edward Bernays machine works...

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, and focus on the Undie Bomber!  Well, only focus on HIM, not on how he's being used in the GAME:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LA09Ak02.html

Imagine that!  An oil connection.  Well I'll be!

The US has only one of two way out of its mess: 1) repay its debts (not going to happen); 2) go to war against its major creditor.

Folks in the US can't be informed that it's option #2 for fear that they will turn on their own internal creditors (the ruling rich)! (Reference: moral dilemna).  Everyone who stands in the way of the US getting conrol over oil production and shipping is, well, an evildoer and hence a "terrorist" (that hates our "freedoms").

Canada too will one day be viewed as supporting terrorism (those damn socialists!) because, well, because the'll be in the way of the US getting their cheap oil fix.

Dynamics, people, dynamics....

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 18:07 | Link to Comment boooyaaaah
boooyaaaah's picture
UPDATE 1-Devaluation ups stakes in Venezuela election year You have 2 third world leaders, Obama & Chavez

Chavez is about 12 mos ahead of Obama in socialist solutions to economic woes

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:20 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Obama is a socialist?  Could have fooled me!

Socialism is taking from the rich and giving to the poor.  I looked on the "poor" list and didn't see "bankers" on it :-(

Thanks for playing!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 19:12 | Link to Comment pros
pros's picture

This "analysis" is not worth much without a breakdown of the components...justTyler's hysteria.

It could be that China is shorting the dollar and playing the commodity carry trade on the margin.

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 19:30 | Link to Comment Pondmaster
Pondmaster's picture

A dumb thought - could China be stockpiling because they know something the rest of the world doesn't . Stockpiling to support an upcoming war machine ? Germany did it pre 1940 , Japan did it , pirate style in Manchuria. ARE WE MISSING A REAL MESSAGE HERE? Just sayin'.  

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:22 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

This may be your answer:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LA09Ak02.html

NOTE: think in reverse (folks in the US have been brainwashed into thinking that all wars have to be offensive)!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:01 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Gold ROCKETING in early Asian trade. $1155 as I write this. HELL YEAH BITCHES!!!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:06 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Believe it or not, lower trade surplus right now is actually a GOOD THING for China. It just means they are selling less of real goods in exchange for worthless dollars from the United States. Up yours Team Obama!

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:30 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

I doubt that that is their strategy.  I mean, what good is it for China to wipe out one of its prime customers?  I'd wager (should one find out from the fly on the wall) that China is buying up oil because, well, because what else is of value out there?  What is it to do with worthless USDs?  That and the fact that the US is continuing to tighten up the oil noose on China (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LA09Ak02.html): but at 5 million bbl/day China is far less sensitive than the US (which has likely dropped down to about 20 million bbl/day); and consider that it's China that has the surplus cash, not the US.

I just don't think that there has to be direct confrontation for this to all end up in the shitter: it's going to happen for certain one way or another because our grow-or-die system cannot operate forever on a finite planet (with finite oil).

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 20:53 | Link to Comment Instant Karma
Instant Karma's picture

So, the West is financially a wreck, Japan is a wreck, and China is a bubble waiting to burst. Fabulous. I'm so optimistic. So, the question is, do I continue to convert my measly US dollars into precious metals (physical and paper), or, should I invest in one of these "survival seed banks?"

My worthless US dollars aren't really worthless quite yet given that just about every other country of size wants to keep its currency weak relative to the dollar. The shit will hit the fan when China revalues the Yuan. All hell will break loose and the commodities will soar (in dollars).

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:37 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Couldn't have summed it up better myself!

I'm telling ya, there's something about "the meek shall inherit the earth" that's worthy of study.  As I used to try to explain to my ex, tell me how much you expect to spend and then we can determine how much we need to make: one cannot control one's position without being able to control one's expenses.  Living lower on the expense totem pole means that you're more adaptable and less likely to suffer disturbances from the imploding system: not saying you won't catch shrapnel, but at least a fire cracker won't be lethal.

Nothing wrong with seeds and growing.  Beats all the destructive mentality, reminds us of what life really is about (this funny economics stuff is so, well, virtual/un-real/Matrixy).

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:21 | Link to Comment dot_bust
dot_bust's picture

Neither China nor the U.S. has any future until the floating currency mess ends and the world returns to the gold standard. 

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:39 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

There were bubbles before we dumped the gold standard.

No, there will be no future until we figure out how to operate more sustainably on the planet.

“Men argue…nature acts”

- Voltaire

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:30 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

China banks eclipse US rivals:

Chinese banks have cemented their position as the most highly valued financial institutions, taking four of the top five slots in a ranking of banks’ share prices as a multiple of their book values.

At the start of the last decade, the US dominated the rankings. The top five were Bank of New York Mellon , Lloyds of the UK, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1c13f7f2-fe16-11de-9340-00144feab49a.html

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:42 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Yup, that about seals it, it's all going down the shitter...

Ratings folks are such fun kidders!  Make believe is so fun, until, that is, someone calls in their maker.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:43 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

calls in their MARKER (ugh!)

Sun, 01/10/2010 - 22:48 | Link to Comment Crude Awakening
Crude Awakening's picture

the trade figures conceal investment flows hidden through tranfers via higher export pricing, usually done by multinationals with manufacturing operations, since there are strict capital controls

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 01:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:44 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Yeah, and it looks, oddly, like you've gone and done it again!

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:41 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

Buffet is just covering his ass, by playing both sides of the street.  Either BNSF will be hauling containers loaded with Chinese Crap for WallyMart, or Warren's new train set will be hauling American commodities, if the revival of American industry becomes fashionable to our politicians.

Either way, there is no moss growing on Warren.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 03:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 09:48 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

Excellent.  Now someone's finally thinking!

But... isn't China also dramatically stepping up internal consumption (for infrastructure) as a policy decision?

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 05:07 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

Bloomberg reporting just now that China has ousted the US as the world's largest automobile market.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 10:02 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

And where are all those anti-eugenics people, why aren't they up in arms over this?  After all, automobiles are the leading cause of death in children.  From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_collision:

Worldwide it was estimated in 2004 that 1.2 million people were killed (2.2% of all deaths) and 50 million more were injured in motor vehicle collisions.[1][41] This makes motor vehicle collisions the leading cause of death among children worldwide 10 – 19 years old (260,000 children die a year, 10 million are injured)[42] and the sixth leading preventable cause of death in the United States (emphasis added)

Mix alcohol and automobiles together (two of the anti-eugenics-type's favorite things) and you get lots of deaths.  Have to have those kids grow up so that we can make money off of them while we kill 'em off!

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 05:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 10:13 | Link to Comment Seer
Seer's picture

China is in the midst of it's development with hunderds of millions in the tranformation stage from rual life to modern consumerism

When will people stop looking at rural life as though it's some disease!?  This life that everyone takes shots at just happens to be responsible for maintaining the majority of lives on the planet, and that includes those of the "modern consumerist!"

China has 1.3 billion people.  You better hope to you know what that it doesn't even come close to turning the majority into mass consumers lest you'd be looking at certain death.

And this points out the obvious, and which I side with the anti-eugenics people (whom I've had fun poking at, because, well, because they deserve being poked at because they're myopic) that it's not right to focus on population sizes.  No, it's total consumption that's the issue!  And clearly China's efforts to control population will be worthless in light of massive increases in per capita consumption.  The "rising tide" happy talk will result in us all drowing! (in toxic waste and failing food systems)

Want to know what levels of growth are safe?  Then watch this:

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000053112/Arithmetic-Population-Energy

Thanks for playing!

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 08:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!