You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

China's USD Exit - An Instruction Manual

Tyler Durden's picture




Insightful commentary from Warren Pollock on how China is quietly getting the hell out of dodge.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:29 | Link to Comment Sancho Ponzi
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:53 | Link to Comment I need more cowbell
I need more cowbell's picture

What currencies did you buy? A basket?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 17:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:52 | Link to Comment Ruth
Ruth's picture

Yeah and got nominated for a Pulitzer..."Too bad Pulitzers aren't handed out for blog-entries. This year's award would go to Zero Hedge for its "The 'Money on the Sidelines' Fallacy" post."

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:59 | Link to Comment Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

OT: I'm getting really tired of the computer generated evonyonline chick. Can you have Google Ads replace her with some CNBC babes?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 17:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:42 | Link to Comment Manipulism
Manipulism's picture
When China prepares its « Great Escape » from the dollar-trap for the end of summer 2009

http://www.leap2020.eu/when-china-prepares-its-great-escape-from-the-dol...

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:13 | Link to Comment Bob
Bob's picture

Beautifully clear-headed analysis (right through the footnotes)!  Thanks for the link . . .

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:14 | Link to Comment Fish Gone Bad
Fish Gone Bad's picture

Thank you for this article, it re-inforces my theory that the Chinese were contributing to the bidding up the insolvent banking stocks.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:54 | Link to Comment Trader Joe
Trader Joe's picture

The other side of the coin

_______________________

"The conventional wisdom has it that the massive foreign currency reserve held by China's government is primarily due to the US trade deficit, and that the US economy will be in big trouble should China ever decide to stop financing the trade deficit. As is often the case, this piece of conventional wisdom is wrong."

 

More here http://www.safehaven.com/article-14098.htm

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 21:20 | Link to Comment Printfaster
Printfaster's picture

Not bad.  He recommends RGLD at 32.  About 30% gain in one year.

Do you know of any others that can forecast as well?

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:52 | Link to Comment Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

I guess the Coolie strategy failed....

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:56 | Link to Comment bobby02
bobby02's picture

"China's USD Exit," "hyperinflationary debt collapse" are looking like pretty crowded trades.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:37 | Link to Comment EQ
EQ's picture

I have to laugh at this.  This guy is a very smart guy but his logic behind the U.S. not being the world's reserve currency is laughable.  As is his clear bias in supporting a position that the dollar is going to collapse and that somehow the Chinese are brilliant for getting out of the dollar.  The reality is the Chinese government runs an idiotic economic policy fueled by corruption.  They are going to be laid bare as the biggest fools in the global economy and if they are scaling out of dollars, it is for equally stupid reasons.  That includes accepting foreign currencies in lieu of dollars and stashing commodities.  Both are losing propositions. 

This whole argument is one supporting personal bias and emotions rather than reality.  This entire argument will be proven wrong. 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:09 | Link to Comment Icarus
Icarus's picture

There are many bad things about a corrupt government, but it excels at capital preservation.  It's their money, not their country's. 

You need to wake up. The US has a growing structural deficit, crippiling debt liabilities, and an increasingly useless populace.  They are no longer the beacon of stability they once were.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:45 | Link to Comment EQ
EQ's picture

Let me rephrase this remark.  I assign no intelligence or brilliance to the corruption of the US government.  Assigning brilliance to the even more incompetent Chinese government is a greater fallacy.  The dollar's future action is not going to be divined by the stupidity of whatever China is doing.  It will be determined by a factual analysis of the data.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 18:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 09:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:14 | Link to Comment Icarus
Icarus's picture

Don't get me wrong, China is a bubble.  But it's also possible to grow into a bubble, they don't always need to pop.

I don't follow you line of thinking, are you trying to say China should invest in the US to save it from itself?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:08 | Link to Comment Yossarian
Yossarian's picture

The US and to a lesser extent Europe, UK, and Canada are global reserve currencies because the strength of the legal system and general respect for property rights.  As long as that remains the case- and this is not guaranteed- I don't see this situation ending anytime soon.  Sure there is a long-term decline provided developing nations display the same traits (they have certainly come out appearing more responsible than western leaders) that Western nations have cultivated but I don't think this decline will be nearly as rapid as some others believe.  That being said, I have been surprised how negligent our political and business leaders have been as stewards of our economy.  But do I have enough confidence in the Chinese financial system to lend them money especially when doing so implies an open capital account and thus a strong RMB in the face of massive industrial overcapacity?  Just how much domestic demand will emerge when so much of this "excess savings" exists on the government and SOE balance sheet? 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:22 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

"The US and to a lesser extent Europe, UK, and Canada are global reserve currencies because the strength of the legal system and general respect for property rights. "

The CAD is a global reserve currency?  Why isn't the AUD, do they not respect property rights?  Or the NZD? 

The USD is a global reserve currency because most international trade is conducted in USD, which in turn came about because the US had one of the most robust and dynamic economies in history.

Now that that's over, having one country's currency dominate world trade no longer makes sense.  We will eventually move to a single world currency, probably sooner rather than later.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:30 | Link to Comment Bob
Bob's picture

I think history is pretty clear on how the hedgemony of the USD came about: The US economy was the only one standing after WWII and we pushed that advantage to the limit at Bretton Woods.  If we had not allowed profligate incompetence and unrestrained gangsterism in the markets, we'd still enjoy a mammoth advantage that no one could arguably "exit" from by any means. 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:08 | Link to Comment SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

I don't believe the "crowded trade" argument is valid in the case of the falling dollar.  It's more a self-fulfilling prophecy.  In my opinion, the "crowded trade" phenomena was an orchestration of the banks who ultimately control the market.  In other words, once they have your money (and everyone else's), the pull the rug out from underneath.  In the case of China and the dollar, I don't believe China's going to play games.  They will do whatever they do and the fact that a bunch of folks have lined up to protect themselves by piling on one side of the trade isn't going to mean squat to them.  They are not trying to take our money but rather want to protect their own.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:17 | Link to Comment Bob
Bob's picture

Of course they want to protect their own.  The question seems to be how long they'll need to continue protecting us from the consequences of our own misdeeds to optimize their imperfect predicament. 

This I found compelling: 

http://www.leap2020.eu/when-china-prepares-its-great-escape-from-the-dol...

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:27 | Link to Comment Manipulism
Manipulism's picture

I am a subscriber of Leap and must say they are often right.

Their sight is a bit different as the most anglo sights of things.

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:26 | Link to Comment Bobby Fischer36
Bobby Fischer36's picture

For your consideration

Simpletons like me knew that we were within a housing and credit bubble. Just did not realize the magnatude. (Soft landing were a given)

I would argue that Wall Street and our goverment knew what was coming because in 2005 bankruptcy laws were changed to tighten the nose around consumers and their ability to walk away from debt. Lobbyists asked and our politicians agreed. So if Wall street and goverment knew than key financial players around the world knew. Especially those (Chinese) holding billions of dollars of our debt. It just seems obvious that something bigger is going on or is going to happen.

As my avitar suggests how many moves are we before check mate?

Comments?

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:47 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

I agree with your characterization of the 2005 bankruptcy "reform".  Central banksters who say thewy can't see bubbles coming need to be held accountable.  RICO?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:12 | Link to Comment ED
ED's picture

That would be interesting to know indeed.

On the other hand - if anyone tries to tighten their nose around me, they will soon find it bloodied and bruised!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:31 | Link to Comment Manipulism
Manipulism's picture

Maybe they have a plan.

Maybe they are working on or have a new economic modell in mind because they know that this shit cant go on forever.

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:24 | Link to Comment Yossarian
Yossarian's picture

You conveniently left out the following sentence: "As long as that remains the case- and this is not guaranteed- I don't see this situation ending anytime soon." 

I am as bearish on the direction of this country as anyone but it seems that the only non-Euro/Anglo country large enough in terms of trade to challenge for reserve currency status is China and I am not prepared to move all my assets into that country.  Can someone tell me how the bankruptcy process would work with a stock in the A-share market? 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:30 | Link to Comment I need more cowbell
I need more cowbell's picture

Yes, I think we are all, globally, pretty much equally fucked.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:48 | Link to Comment e1even1
e1even1's picture

"Wouldn't the devaluation of the dollar and the increase in the price of comodities since March account for a large portion of the stock market rally on a valuation basis?"

give joe a cigar.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:12 | Link to Comment channel_zero
channel_zero's picture

As a follow-on question for the less knowledgable, common sense from an average joe like me would suggest that at some point the rally has to die.  There's no valuation or volume to suggest it's sustainable.

What happens to commodities when the stock market rally goes bust?  Or does it ever?

 

These may be dumb questions, but even a couple of places to start looking for answers would be a great help.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 18:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 21:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:41 | Link to Comment Manipulism
Manipulism's picture
From <!-- //Retrieve yaoo Cookie Value var yahoo = "no"; var IsYahoo="no"; if (GetQueryString("yahoo")=="yes" || get_cookie('YH') == "yes") IsYahoo="yes"; if (IsYahoo == "yes" || get_cookie('YH') == 'open') { set_cookie ("YH", "yes", "", "" ); yahoo = "yes"; } else { set_cookie ("YH", "no", "", "" ); yahoo = "no"; } window.onunload = setYahooCookie; //--> August 3, 2009 China moves to internationalise its currency

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article6736681.ece

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:51 | Link to Comment Bob
Bob's picture

Yeah, we may think we've got the Chinese in the USD equivalant of a SuperMax prison, but every system has its weaknesses . . . and a determined prisoner with lots of resources and potential friends on the outside will maximize them to the fullest. 

I don't think their escape is much in doubt, it's just a matter of when.  They're clearly working on it. 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:12 | Link to Comment topshelfstuff
topshelfstuff's picture

There is some great dialog here, yes Anonymous 23909 & 23913, great points. As for Anony 23907, I think you forget that there is such a large percentage of China's Manufacturing that is Not Owned by China/Chinese. Most of the Foreign Ownership being the US. Aside from the rest of the world getting an ever Increasing piece of the Pie, while our piece gets smaller, whose Factory, Manufacturing Facilities will be the first to be closed, should that become necessary?

In a way the US Corp's in China act as a form of collateral on the approx. $800BB in US Paper. Hasn't anyone considered this? Isn't that really the reason behind what I call "RED HERRING"

That is the call, the near Demand, for China to reValue the renmimbi / Yuan. This has been the job of all the Treasury Sec's, the FED, Big Business, you know the group...the job being to hammer the table for a 40% Increase. But why is it that nobody has pointed out that a 40% Increase in the Value of the renmimbi would result in a 40% Discount on all the Commodities, the Raw Material, that Manufacturing needs. The Commodities that China is already the big gobbler of.....so who gains, Cui Bono, isn't it the very same kruks.....they are asking China to make the Exchange Rate 4CNY to $1/USD, instead of the current 6.83 to $1.00, and make 4,000 renmimbi equal $1,000 USD, about the price of one ounce of gold right now, Cui Bono, the usual few. It was july 2005 when China removed the Peg of some 8.28 to $1.00/US, when it took 8,230 Yuan for each $1,000, how well did that work out and who gained, who lost..............................................................think about that please

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Bob
Bob's picture

RE: Red Herring.  I've said the same thing.  What could be more simple than seizing US assets in China as collateral should we manage to significantly devalue our debt to them by any means?  Tit for tat, baby.  Even a Wall Street banker could grasp that one.  What could we do about it?  We couldn't invade them.  Could we rally the rest of the world against them?  Yeah, fat chance of that when we've robbed the rest of just as much.  Let's face it, we're gonna have very few friends in the future.  Right now they're all maintaining appearances, the way the office staff always roundly laughs at the boss' jokes.  Let us get "demoted", however, and we'll see how that goes.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:21 | Link to Comment glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

logic dictates that when you have the hot potato you want to get rid of it, nothing unusual about that.....just don't give it to me, i don't want it!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 18:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!