You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

The CIA Chimes In On Gold Control; Highlights Historical Gold-To-Foreign Holdings Shortfunding

Tyler Durden's picture




After yesterday we highlighted a declassified document by the Department of State, in which it was made clear just how critical it is for the US to remain "Masters of Gold", today we present a comparable memorandum from the same time period (December 1968) this time by the CIA, which presents comparable key high-level gold-related deliberations by the then-administration.

Some of the key points:

We lose influence in world affairs whenever:

  • The dollar is weak in exchange markets
  • There is a major outflow of gold; and/or
  • We are obliged to pressure countries into holding dollars or giving us payments assistance

Our position can also be improved by action on the international monetary system itself to:

  • Decrease vulnerability to confidence crises
  • Increase world monetary reserves (liquidity); and
  • Improve tools for adjusting payments surpluses and deficits

With $33 billion of foreign dollar holdings ($16 billion in official hands) and only $10.7 billion of gold in the U.S. reserve, the risk is clear. To contain these pressures our strategy is:

  • To isolate official from private gold markets by obtaining a pledge from central banks that they will neither buy nor sell gold except to each other;
  • To bring South Africa to sell its current production of gold in the private market, and thus keep the private price down.

And here are the seeds for the need for a fiat currency: growing an economy when monetary supply (and, by implication, currency devaluation) is limited, can only pad the growth rate for the core economic entities so much.

Increasing liquidity

 

Trade won't be able to grow, and the system will remain vulnerable to speculation unless there is regular growth in the international money supply.

Gold can't provide the needed increase: industrial and speculative demand is too high. U.S. payment deficits can't either: foreigners are unwilling to hold more dollars when we run large deficits and unable to increase net reserves by accumulating dollars when our deficits are small.

Our strategy is to supplement gold and dollars with a new international asset, Special Drawing Rights (SDR).

And, of course, if the SDR does not work, the fall back reserve currency can always just be printed in limitless amounts, thus allowing massive liquidity-based expansion in the trade system, which will further allow the U.S. to grow its trade deficit to record amounts. Just fast forward 41 years.

Indeed, this document was presented before the gold standard was officially abolished. However, in the very near future Zero Hedge will disclose documents that highlight how even in the post-1971 world, gold was still perceived with the same liquidity management and "strategic control" interest as ever before.

 

h/t Geoffrey Batt




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:07 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

China to invest in Fed's PPIP? (indirectly)

 

Oaktree to Receive $1 Billion from CIC

"Oaktree is expected to invest CIC's money over the course of several years in distressed debt and other fixed-income assets, and it adds to other inflows to the firm this year, people familiar with the matter say. ...

Oaktree was among nine big asset-management firms chosen by the U.S. Treasury as fund managers for the Public-Private Investment Partnership, or PPIP, the government program designed to rid banks of toxic assets."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125390976193641883.html

 

 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:09 | Link to Comment London Banker
London Banker's picture

"And they who control the credit of the nation, direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands, the destiny of the people." - Rt. Hon. Reginald McKenna

And private ownership of gold was illegal in the USA until 1975 and in the UK even longer.

I am not a gold bug, but neither am I convinced that confidence in banks or the government is in my best interests at this time, leaving few alternatives.

 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:40 | Link to Comment Lionhead
Lionhead's picture

Yes, we are quite in the "hollow of their hands." Collectively, we allowed it to happen seduced by easy credit & debt. A human tragedy...

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 18:28 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

I noticed him here the other day - I think he is "the" London Banker - I think it woud be great if he could take the time to pen an article - his followers really miss his blog

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:40 | Link to Comment London Banker
London Banker's picture

Yes, it's me old friend.  I've started commenting here - and still comment over on Roubini's blog.  I can't blog as I once did in my current position, but still enjoy the give and take of comments.

It's nice to know I'm missed.  Perhaps I will be underemployed and blogging again in the future . . . but there's still too much to do in the real world for now.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:41 | Link to Comment London Banker
London Banker's picture

Yes, it's me old friend.  I've started commenting here - and still comment over on Roubini's blog.  I can't blog as I once did in my current position, but still enjoy the give and take of comments.

It's nice to know I'm missed.  Perhaps I will be underemployed and blogging again in the future . . . but there's still too much to do in the real world for now.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 19:28 | Link to Comment Bubby BankenStein
Bubby BankenStein's picture

Enjoyed your postings at RGE.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:15 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

OT.

Someone may have left The Fed a message. I do not approve of this and it is probably backwards yokels, but still:

Feds probe US Census worker hanging in Kentucky

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090924/D9ATL1BO0.html

The 51-year-old Sparkman was found hanged from a tree near a Kentucky cemetery and had the word "fed" scrawled on his chest, a law enforcement official said Wednesday, and the FBI is investigating whether he was a victim of anti-government sentiment.

 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:42 | Link to Comment glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

and so it begins

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:05 | Link to Comment Screwball
Screwball's picture

I've been following this a bit.  Not much to go on really, but from what I have read, and having been through that area, it could be anything.  It is possible this guy may have ran across a meth/pot/moonshine camp.  This area is also highly against the FED, as in the government.  Goes way back to the moonshine era.  I'm curious to see how this shakes out once we have more details, if they ever come out.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:28 | Link to Comment SloSquez
SloSquez's picture

Being so close to harvest season, I suspect he happened on a pot farmer who was not going to have his kids go without Christmas again.  IMHO.  Sad as it is, the people on that end of the state are extremely suspicious of anyone who remotely looks Federal.  When you see those little "No Trespassing" signs, quite a few of the ones in this area of the country really mean it.  I'm not codoning this type of behaviour at all, I'm just stating a fact.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 01:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:21 | Link to Comment Mos
Mos's picture

Holy conspiracy theory batman!

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 07:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:35 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

I'm so glad we have better politicians and businessmen today. I mean South Africa was so poor back then and now with all this gold buying help and the help of all these prominant wealthy philanthropists. They are rich and lack nothing. They even have Al Gore to help stave off global warming. We love them so much we don't even want them to have to sweat too much while they are mining the few bits of gold and diamonds needed to maintain their wealthy lifestyle.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:43 | Link to Comment RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

Observations from Rasputin:

"Here is what the buggy whip and silver spoon "hoarders" had to face these past five days:



1. The Fed Politburo stating that one day, they swear, they are gonna stop buying Treasuries and Agencies

2. The Fed further announcing that they also, they swear, are sorta start pulling back on some of the Alphabet Soup programs

3. Uncle Sugar issuing 100 billion fiatscos of new debt (always an occasions to crush PMs and drive people into Treasuries)

4. The massive commercial short positions in PMs

5. The G20 goons releasing a statement that any day now, they
swear, they are gonna return to fiscal and monetary sobriety and,
furthermore, "a strong U.S. nightcrawler is in the best interests of
the U.S., blah, blah".

6. Finally, Fed Head Warsh comes out swinging with both and
editorial in the WSJ and a speech that are one-hundred eighty degress
OPPOSITE of the Fed's own FOMC release two days earlier and threatens
that the Politburo may just spike interest rate to da moon if the Fed
feels that "asset prices" (translation: gold) get too frothy.



(Ras): Usually ANY ONE of these events would be sufficient to
crush the GHS/SHS crowd and collapse buggy whips by fifty fiatscos and
silver spoons by two fiatscos. Yet to my utter astonishment, useless
yellow rocks only dropped less than seventeen fiatscos and spoons
dropped by one measly fiatsco.

This unusual resolve shown by the "Seditionists" in the face of
such massive, coordinated attacks impels me to believe that perhaps
things aren't quite as rosy as the Fed and G20 would have us believe."

 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:50 | Link to Comment Lionhead
Lionhead's picture

Amen, and more time go on, the less effective their statements & pronouncements will have as their credibility fades into the sunset. The double dip will eventually drive the stake into their heart as they finally accept they cannot create demand for their useless credit.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:07 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

I hope double dip will do it, but honestly, how can any of us have any hope that this charade will finally stop, it has gone on for so much longer than I had ever dreamed possible? It just keeps getting more and more surreal, the truth spills over the edges of the petri dish, and still it goes on.

I wonder if it can keep on till after my death? I wonder if my son will think his mom is just a nut because it all keeps going on, and then it falls on his head, not mine.

I want justice and to see things set straight but I am starting to think it is logistically impossible. These complex systems we have inherited (WE DID NOT CREATE THIS WE WERE BORN INTO IT) will spin on and on and then collapse. Can't rebuild it while we have to depend on it for our livelihood. Ya gotta shut it down at some point. But in the shut down, how do we take care of everyone? So much coordination needs to happen that won't.

Short version of this post? We are so SCREWED.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:24 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

I have moments of despair myself, but they are tempered by my knowledge that we (humans, U.S.A., etc) have gotten through much worse than this is history.  Keep working towards the goal: truth and genuine liberty, and a financial and governmental system based on truth and individual liberty and property rights.  Reclaim your birthright.  The genius of America is (was?) its unleashing of the human spirit.  That is how we succeeded so brilliantly.  There is no reason we cannot do it again.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:42 | Link to Comment Danz Gambit
Danz Gambit's picture

No, I think he got it right - we are screwed.

 

Want cheered up (not), read this little ditty

http://www.oilcrash.com/articles/arnett05.htm

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:46 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Ridiculous.  We'll find something else to use.  Will the process be painful?  You bet your ass it will be.  But what you (seem to) want is for some super-body to be put in charge of resource allocation, especially energy, and your supporting assertion is that if we don't we're headed "back to the Olduvai". 

The proof you are wrong is in the article: "1979 US per capita energy use peaked".  We found ways to do more with less energy input.  Imagine, those clever humans.  Since that time, air quality advances and water quality advances are notable. I remember the 70's.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 19:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:53 | Link to Comment DiverCity
DiverCity's picture

Hear, hear.  Most folks don't understand the energy contained in carbon in the form of oil.  They think, erroneously, that fusion or some other newfangled sci fi substitute will make everything all better.  It very likely won't.  We must learn to live some other, more primitive way.  But don't despair;  instead, rejoice.  We'll all be much happier if we can keep the evil heavy hand of government off of our backs.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 07:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 11:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 19:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:25 | Link to Comment Bubby BankenStein
Bubby BankenStein's picture

I just finished telling my daughter about the Bloomberg FOIR and 1207.

We expect knowing the truth will be shocking and potentially destructive to the "System".  The "System" players will fight to the death to keep the secrets secret.

We demand the truth no matter how serious as repercussions could be.  I would rather step up to the problems now.

How else can a viable replacement be built.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:28 | Link to Comment Lionhead
Lionhead's picture

Yes, we're all screwed. The solution lies with the public; take back the gov't, abide by the Constitution, punish the offenders. Or allow the spin to continue until it does eventually blow up & collapse taking everyone down with it. We created it, or allowed it to happen unknowingly, now we have to stop it as it is reality.

I'm old, maybe 20 more years on the planet, but I can say I truly feel for all my nieces, nephews & their children as well as yours. They have to face the problems ahead and the solutions will entail sacrifice & courage. ZH has done much to reveal the problems. Now we all have to get the political ball rolling to take the first steps of the solution.

You're not nuts; your son should be proud of you to acknowledge & accept the truth. The others are nuts as they allow the lunacy to continue unabated.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 20:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 21:19 | Link to Comment whopper
whopper's picture

It is like Alien....it keeps morphing into something worse. 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:55 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Well as long as they swear. I can see their resolve from here. They know how the system works. They know they have to weasel out of it.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:17 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

RT, how do you embed images into your comments?  I tried it by turning off the rich-text editor, then inserting HTML tags, then turned RT editor back on, my photo was then embedded in the editor, but when I submitted it the image does not show up.

I am Chumbawamba?

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:46 | Link to Comment Bubby BankenStein
Bubby BankenStein's picture

It's really interesting how serious the concerns were about monetary stability in 1968.

I would imagine the secret communications going on today are exceptionally disturbing.

When Bernanke was asked who received the $500B swap lines he looked like he let a big wet fart.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:56 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

Hey Robo - do you have a link to where Rasputin posts?

thanks

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:09 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

think it is wall street cheatsheet...

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:19 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:51 | Link to Comment Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

Perhaps you missed the last sentence which points out that we will shortly disclose information which confirms that we are barking up the right tree. stay tuned.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:04 | Link to Comment theGhostofXmasPast
theGhostofXmasPast's picture

While I will be curious to see Tyler's docs, it is really intriguing to me how many people absolutely don't get that gold IS money. Spend just a little time reading about money, it's history, etc., and you will find that the sum total of human decision making over the past 3000 years has anointed gold with the unique roll of money. There really is no getting around it.

Simply because we have experimented for 38 years with yet another attempt to make a fiat CURRENCY into actual money doesn't mean it has actually occurred. The dollar is a currency, not money, and ultimately it is only the dollar's ability to be exchanged into true wealth that gives it any value whatsoever. Remove the confidence factor from any fiat currency, and you go Iceland overnight. Period. You really shouldn't try to argue with millennia of history.

So, gold is still money, and it will stay money for a long, long time. That's why the Fed, ECB and ever other central bank are so f'n concerned about gold. And why the Chinese are buying it as fast as they can.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:26 | Link to Comment perpetual-runner-up
perpetual-runner-up's picture

"Land/Real Estate ownership has value.
Food/Water supplies has value.
Pussy has value.
Refined crude oil has value.
Easy transportation has value."

so if you have too much of any of the above and someone wants to trade for something...and you have enough of all that normally they would trade (hence you are wealthy), what do you trade your excesses for that can store the value and trade to someone else that may not need anything you have, but has too much themselves???

 

Gold retard....

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 19:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:35 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Keep lying. Gold is going to explode. It's the way out from under the screwups. You can't herd people away from it.

See ya in heaven. I'll be the one with the belt sander, the gag ball and the lemon juice.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 19:16 | Link to Comment Bubby BankenStein
Bubby BankenStein's picture

You receive high honours for the Dumb Fuck of the day and your Trophy is ready.

Transport your real estate?

Sell your Pussy?

Fill your bathtub with oil?

Since the shit will never hit the fan you will always be able to buy a Coke for a nickel like I did in 1968.

As for the quality of higher education, where did you get yours? 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 19:48 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

US Dollars are for people interested in preserving their wealth over a lifetime horizon and passing on a solid legacy.

HAHAHA.  You are suck a fucking horse's ass.  It goes without saying, but it needs to be said so even the dumbfucks can follow along.

I am Chumbawamba.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 21:02 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

"US Dollars are for people interested in preserving their wealth over a lifetime horizon and passing on a solid legacy."

 

Ha, ha!!

 

I nearly shit a brick when I read that too.

That may be the most un-intelligent thing I've ever seen posted by a commenter on this blog.

Soooooooooooo, losing over 94% of it's value in less than 100 years is a preservation of wealth?

 

That post is the feces that is produced when shame eats too much stupidity!

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:33 | Link to Comment pivot
pivot's picture

what is the answer to the following math problem:

100 years ago you use your USD to buy an asset that returns 8% per year.  Have you still lost 94% of the value of your USD?

All the arguments about gold vs. dollar are a little silly.  In a pinch either could be used as currency, assuming they are mutually agreed to have value.  Sure everyone thinks gold is pretty, but if a wad of $100 bills is easier to carry than a brick of gold, then maybe you prefer dollars.

the fact is no one really knows what would happen if the end of world scenario happened, and most likely the vast majority of people would be "back to square one" in one way or another. Invariably, anyone that had adequately prepared would be the most attractive target to the masses.  I think that i'd rather be part of the unprepared masses, knowing that one of the easiest ways to survive in a lawless society is not to stick out.  The other thing i keep going back to is the whole idea of "what if the world doesnt end".  Make sure whatever your plan that you aren't putting productive resources into preparing for an eventuality that is highly uncertain.  Its kinda like buying a life insurance policy thats 100 times larger than it needs to be.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 02:10 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

What is a dollar?  I mean, beyond a piece of paper.  This clarification of the question in itself should tell you all you need to know.  A dollar, without backing, is just a piece of paper.  So the real question should be asked: what is a dollar backed by?

And the answer is: nothing.

So, sure, you can buy stuff with it.  But when the music stops, if you're still holding paper currency, you're fucked.

Now, here's where it gets complicated, because (most) humans are not wired to intuitively understand the concept of currency debasement over time.  But to comprehend is simple:

In 1913, the dollar could buy you N.  In 2009, the same dollar can buy you N-94%.

In the 1970s, I could put a penny in a gumball machine and get a gumball.  Today, I could put a penny in a gumball machine and, if I have a paperclip or some flat object, I might be able to get my penny back out of the coin mechanism, which now will only accept quarters.  Quarters, I might add, that if their metal content was valued would come out to a fraction of the face value.

http://coinflation.com

Currency debasement is why you do not hold paper dollars backed by nothing but empty promises by douchebag politicians.  At least you do not hold them in times like these, where confidence in the dollar is at a low point.

Hyperinflation is a crisis of confidence (or lack thereof) in the currency.  If you understand this, you understand why gold priced in all fiat currencies around the globe has been rising over the past several years.  I do not know of any currency against which gold is falling.  That tells you all you need to know.

I am Chumbawamba.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 03:47 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

I agree with the above, but would like to add that gold has gone down in price in Swedish crones.  The price has remained stable during the entire year and retracted somewhat the last few months.  This will certainly change when the Baltic States blow up and Swedish bank that are heavily invested there do likewise.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 04:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 11:49 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

@ pivot

There are a few problems with your premises.  I see these same types of points being made all the time.

 

Let me try and explain:

 

If 100 years ago, you used US dollars to buy an asset, and that asset held it's value AND had a return, that would be great for you, however, it would have NOTHING to do with the USD as a store of value.  No one is arguing that you cannot use the USD to buy stuff.  However, when you do buy something with it, it is the ASSET that now holds your value.

 

Let's just say instead of buying that asset 100 years ago, you decided to put the same amount of paper money in a safe deposit box.

Would you still be able to buy that same asset today with that same amount of money?

Of course not.

Why?  It is because the paper currency has lost nearly all of it's stored value since then.  It's inherent value is UNSTABLE, and varies with the whim of central bankers, bureaucrats, and politicians.

However, if 100 years ago, you took that same amount of paper currency, converted it into gold coins, and then put them in your safe deposit box, you would now still likely be able to purchase that same asset with it today.

 

For example;

It is 1900.  An asset is for sale for $100.  One person has 100 paper dollars, another has 5 X $20 Dollar 1oz Double Eagle gold coins.  If both change their mind and instead put their money under their mattress until today, that same asset will now likely be selling for around $5000. 

The grandson of the guy with the 100 paper dollars is SOL, however, the grandson of the guy with the gold hands over the 5 gold coins and purchases the asset, just like what could have done over 100 years ago.

As I said above, it's not a question of it being able to buy stuff (the gov't can simply just declare it by fiat), the question is whether the same amount of saved USD today will buy the same amount of stuff in the future.

(On an interesting side note, 100 years ago, even if you used your paper USD to buy an asset,  YOU WERE ACTUALLY USING GOLD TO BUY THE ASSET.  The USD was just a paper representation of GOLD.

Like a coat-check ticket, the piece of paper in your hand represented the gold that was standing behind it.  This is a perfectly well functioning system.  There is nothing wrong with paper currencies from this standpoint. However what then happened is akin to going back to the coat-check window, handing them your ticket, and the coat check girl saying, "Why sir, that ticket IS your coat.")


"I think that i'd rather be part of the unprepared masses"

Not sure if this is such a great idea.  If there is a currency crisis, the vast majority of the masses will have all of their wealth destroyed.  Head in sand is never a good contingency plan.

 

"the easiest ways to survive in a lawless society is not to stick out."

This is true.  However, this has nothing to do with being able to have your wealth stored safely.

 

"The other thing i keep going back to is the whole idea of "what if the world doesnt end".  Make sure whatever your plan that you aren't putting productive resources into preparing for an eventuality that is highly uncertain.  Its kinda like buying a life insurance policy thats 100 times larger than it needs to be."

Wise words.  However, you'd have to also agree that not purchasing any insurance is equal folly.  Just because your car has a spare tire, doesn't mean that you're hoping to get a flat everyday.  In fact, most people with spare tires are perfectly content if they never get a flat.   In the same way, holders of gold will be be perfectly happy if the paper fiat currency world does not end.  However, they realize that it is a distinct possibility and have chosen to prepare for such an event.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ubJp6rmUYM

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 12:11 | Link to Comment pivot
pivot's picture

these points are all fair, and some that others have made are fair too.  I would point out that it is a little bit of double-talk w/ regard to the 100 years ago asset purchase.  You are correct that it is the asset earning a return and not the dollar, but so what?  There are tons of company stock that you could have bought a long time ago (maybe not 100 years ago) and made substantially higher return if recovered from the safe deposit box today.

All i'm pointing out is that there are other assets available other than gold that could be more attractive due to a history (and likely future) of higher compound returns than gold.  Think about a company that does all its business in gold.  Would you expect a higher return on a share of that company than on gold by itself? of course.

I completely agree that there may be some place for gold in one's portfolio, though i think this would be substantially less than the hysterics would recommend (couple % maybe?).  I have still not heard a compelling reason why this level should be more.

It is important for investors to use their heads and think through scenarios to many possible future outcomes.  I personally have assigned a low probability to the end of the world, and have assigned a similarly small probability to the benefits of having "lots" of gold in such a scenario.  Few people have truly lived in an anarchist, mad max type of world (i have not) and one thing i do believe about such a situation is that the world will be such a different place that it will prove to have been almost impossible to have guessed the right course of action ahead of time.  best of luck

 

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 18:14 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Yes.  All good points. Well said.

One final thought though.  I don't think it's good to look at gold as an investment at all.  As you said, there is no interest, no dividends, and no compounding.  I, as well as many others I'd imagine, try to look at gold as purely a store of value - a "savings account". 

At the very moment I trade some FRN's for gold, I "LOCK IN" the purchasing power of those dollars I had. 

Now, that purchasing power cannot be legislated away by any government anywhere on earth.  There is no "counter-party risk".  It's value is not dependent on someone elses decision or trustworthiness.

 

I, like you, also assign a low probability to the end of the world.

However, there is a 100% absolute guarantee that at some point in the future, the dollar will lose essentially all of it's value.

The real question is the probability of when it will occur.

When it does, we certainly will not instantly become a "Mad Max" world.  We will become what every other economy becomes when it's currency fails.  Things will still be bought and sold.  However, the barter system and the small, battery operated digital scale will replace the cash register.  Just like it did in Zimbabwe in the video I referenced above (although I think there will be a lot more suffering here as most Americans look at the supermarket the same way a domesticated dog looks at his food bowl - they assume that food will always just appear there). 

 

I give us a 50/50 chance of making it through the next 5 years. 

 

But, what do I know.  I'm just some dude.

 

Good talk man.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 13:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 13:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 19:54 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Yes.  It makes absolutely no sense to be paid hundreds or even thousands of dollars for a day's work, when hundreds of billions of these very same dollars are being clicked into existence effortlessly at the whim of one man.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 20:29 | Link to Comment theGhostofXmasPast
theGhostofXmasPast's picture

Good Lord! You know, we could have an honest debate about the merits of gold vs paper currency/dollar, but why do people like this guy always have to degenerate into idiocy? JEWelers? Please, leave the anti-semitic remarks somewhere else. Tyler, please, bounce remarks like this. Bounce a bunch below, too, for being off topic and full of hate-filled rhetoric. Come on, people, do you want to make sense of this stuff or degenerate into the typical Internet Flame-fest?

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:01 | Link to Comment DiverCity
DiverCity's picture

I'm Jewish, but STFU about bouncing remarks you totalitarian moron.  You're part of the anti-freedom problem, not the solution.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 20:41 | Link to Comment svendthrift
svendthrift's picture

The dollar is down 15% since March. It is no longer a store of value.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:38 | Link to Comment pivot
pivot's picture

and gold is down 3% in about 4 days. was USD a store of value when it rallied late last year? consider editing your comment so it doesnt look so stupid.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 02:15 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

No, the dollar is merely up against gold, the ultimate store of value, as determined by humankind over thousands of years.

I'd invite you to edit your comment so it doesn't look so stupid, but that's simply not possible.

I am Chumbawamba.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:17 | Link to Comment The Deacon
The Deacon's picture

"US Dollars are for people interested in preserving their wealth over a lifetime horizon and passing on a solid legacy."

 

I quote from Charlie Wilson's War in my best East Indian accent.  "Is this some sort of joke? Are you making a joke?"

 

This poster must be BB or Gordon Gecko having a little fun.

 

Surely he cannot be serious.

 

How much value has the USD maintained since the FED was created?  5%

 

Maybe its a CIA dude getting IP addresses of those who ridicule his views on gold...

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 09:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 07:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 07:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:10 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Hey wormie, I see you are back. Just because bloggers skip your trash does not mean we missed it. You were not alive in 1968.

Coins of the realm could be classified as money however, it never has been used as money since paper currency was invented.

If gold was money, so were pigs, goats, cows, chickens, corn, wheat, coke, horse, weed, and grain alcohol. You get my drift wormie?

Gold was a product used for barter. If your simple vocabulary wants to call it money that is fine.

Your comments are still very shallow and without merit- in other words trash, and I mark it as so.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 05:00 | Link to Comment i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

Gold and silver also became money because our women like it :^)

That it happens to have history working for it in the financial transaction world is just icing.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:41 | Link to Comment perpetual-runner-up
perpetual-runner-up's picture

u do realize that the only other superpower ever in existence collapsed in a matter of a few months....with its old currency devalued to almost worthless and the world didnt end...

 

that said, it didnt end well for those holding the currency....or the debt....

 

in terms of that currency, what did gold peak at in roubles (1961-1997 version - if required to convert into dollars to purchase)...say in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 21:07 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

 

He's talking about the USSR numbnuts. 

Did you happen to pay any attention to that thing called the 20th century as it went by?

 

 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 21:35 | Link to Comment perpetual-runner-up
perpetual-runner-up's picture

rusty,

thanks...

i was too depressed by that comment to reply...

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 05:24 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

YoYo. Go easy. He's only 14 and thinks woodstock is ancient history from the olden days.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 18:19 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Nice comeback Potsie.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 22:45 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Another fuckwad anonymous dollar douche.  Is there a whole team of you at the Federal Reserve or something?

I am Chumbawamba.  Fuck You.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 05:03 | Link to Comment i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

lol - i like the updated sig

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 07:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 14:55 | Link to Comment Slewburger
Slewburger's picture

"Indeed, this document was presented before the gold standard was officially abolished. However, in the very near future Zero Hedge will disclose documents that highlight how even in the post-1971 world, gold was still perceived with the same liquidity management and "strategic control" interest as ever before."

-TD 2009

 

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S."

- FDR 1933

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:08 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

An interesting article on David Milibands stand on Iran and potential arms conflict. ( I hope the Brits vote the fucking scum-maggots called the New Labor into the political stone age, and the same goes for the fucking Tories. Goddamn, the West has become a cesspool of political idiots, thieves, cowards and blatant morons with genocidal and racial motives. ) Also, there is only a glimmer of hope that the West will hold the status quo in the upcoming years. Enough is enough. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/26/miliband-iran-nuclear-plant

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 21:38 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

Very interesting. Let me know when Israel is going to admit to possessing hundreds of nuclear warheads.

The hypocrisy is breathtaking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbjgDERSuiI

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 09:05 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Hunkered down, money on the sidelines.  It would interesting to know and understand what REAL wealth is invested in - what are its holdings, and how are their values protected/hedged, if at all? 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 17:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 20:07 | Link to Comment perpetual-runner-up
perpetual-runner-up's picture

I do think there is a secret war being waged to take china down a notch....but the risk we have with our lack of manufacturing as well as the direct investment in production in China that our US companies have invested has given the wealth transfer from a scenario like your back....as in if we crush the dollar to pay our debts to china back cheaply, they will simply take our factories (and IP and all assets in bank accounts) built by US companies as "security deposit"...

 

I dunno which way it will go...but I am happy to be cautious with things like PM and happy to lose the bet in exchange for a complete and same recovery in the US of both our infrastructure and balance sheet...

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 15:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:15 | Link to Comment Jendrzejczyk
Jendrzejczyk's picture

There are those that believe our fiat currencies are indeed backed only by the citizens' productivity. Each time the government borrows wealth, it is basically enslaving another generation.

 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:52 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

nothing that a bit of deflation won't cure - just like high end real estate, which in some areas of South FL has had quite a good run in terms of volume in the past 8 months. When your alternate investments get wiped out having a $2m tub floating in the back yard is no longer a necessity.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 19:36 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

Are all those boats in Florida re-po's? I'm feelin some sadness.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 16:44 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

"Would you believe me if I told you that BOTH the Fed and Treasury...
...claim to own the same U.S. stockpile of gold, in what is apparently a case of "double counting"?"

 

http://wallstreetbear.com/board/view.php?topic=60796&post=201247

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 18:49 | Link to Comment Mazarin
Mazarin's picture

One thing is certain: even when valued at market (~$980+) the USA's gold reserves are a very small % of its balance sheet. $11 billion or $250 billion, take your pick, still a drop in the bucket compared to the economy, the Fed's balance sheet, or our national debt. 

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 18:39 | Link to Comment Mazarin
Mazarin's picture

Middle of page 3:

"As more and more SDRs (special drawing rights - the NEW world bank alternate fiat currency) are created over time -- and official gold holdings fail to grow--they (the ADRs) will gradually become a major element of the system. This is the long term cure for the gold neurosis."

Heheheh. As Gold is the long term cure for "inflationist" mega-kleptomania.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 14:43 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Does anyone really understand SDR's. I don't and I don't know anyone that will explain it. It seems like some sort of trade voodoo to me. If it was a currency clearing house I'd understand it. But then why is being sort of bonded out like a treasury. It just all seems odd to me.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 21:30 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

GATA acknowledges Zero Hedge:

http://news.goldseek.com/GATA/1253908391.php

By the way Tyler, thanks for your posts on this extremely important matter.

Sat, 09/26/2009 - 23:22 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

I would like to urge all of you to stop what you're doing and watch this presentation by Pastor Lindsey Williams:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbakN7SLdbk

It will take you more than an hour (conveniently broken into 8 ten minute clips), but it is very worth it.

If you only watch one thing, please watch starting at 2:20 on Part 8:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC61X78-OI0&NR=1

He discusses the fate of some of the folks who signed the Declaration of Independence.

The presentation is about how the world is controlled through oil, and how the dollar is tied to oil sales, and is the only reason why the dollar has lasted as long as it has.

Ok, I'll say it: it's a must watch.  No, seriously.  Stop what you're doing and watch it.

I am Chumbawamba.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 00:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 00:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 22:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 01:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 05:47 | Link to Comment Gunther
Gunther's picture

Chumbawamba,

I watched the part 8, and got to the argument that there is enough oil in Alaska that is not lifted for political reasons.
If you follow theoildrum.com then they believe we are close to or past peak oil. They are geologists and oilmen (and women) who understand their business. Except for a miracle the oil production will not go up from here.
Put in very simple teems, to produce oil, someone has to find it. Findings peaked around 1970.
Now most of the then-found oil got pumped and we will have to live with the declining output.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 17:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 09:00 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Read "The Long Emergency" by James Kunstler.  If you have not, and are just sort of thinking either that there is plenty of oil out there, or that science will stop by and save the situation, it may be a revelation to you of what the real problem is with rapidly depleting oil reserves. A great book and a great eye-opener.  There are solutions - not to keep the party going, by the way, and yes it will be hard, but once you start to grasp the magnitude of the problem, you can start to understand the shitstorm that will arise as we head down the slope of "cheap oil," the ultimate fuel. No other fuel comes close for its usefulness, raw power, transportability, etc.  

Strange things start to happen when the gas gauge says "half empty" and there are no gas stations in sight.  Things like pulling over another car at gunpoint and siphoning their tank.

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:41 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Pulling people over at gunpoint?  But my good man, isn't that against the law?

Sun, 09/27/2009 - 10:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 11:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 12:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/27/2009 - 23:11 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

One word.

 

Wow.

 

Jim Rickards with some truthiness.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1275511738&play=1

 

 

Mon, 09/28/2009 - 00:45 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Rusty, is this guy propaganda? Why do you trust him. If what he is saying is true, then we all know what to do, don't we?

Provacative post, thanks.

Mon, 09/28/2009 - 07:41 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Well what is important is when he says. When YOU own gold it limits the central banks ability to pring money. Which says very clearly and very loudly that we are still working on an underlying gold system with the fiat fractional reserve system acting as the magic bs show in front of it.

The "problem" he talks about that occured in the 60's is the problem of how the bs system that matches up to the real system eventually breaks. So SDR's is supposed to be a system that finds some way out of the breakng of the BS system. Which means the original ponzi theme is somehow maintained they just have some way to obfuscate it well enough to make it last longer.

http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_REVUE=ECOI&ID_NUMPUBLIE=ECOI_100&ID...

The way it's extended now is through turning some countries into periphery while maintaining the core. SDR's must have some way to make the IMF the CORE and turn ALL nations into the periphery. But since only the central bankers will know how it works they aren't likely to tell. Which means all the power will go into a completely divorced uncontrollable system even worse than what we have now.

So here's the evolution of the scam.

Banks loaned out fractional reserve exploding m2 and m3 money supply until it dwarfs m0 (Cash).

Somebody gets nervous, run on banks. Closed banks, people lost money.

The Fed. All the excess indebtedness of the banks gets aggregated into one spot. The national deficit. Then the system won't break until servicing the debt becomes a rediculous prospect and having this type of system is no longer advantageous to the politicians. Up to that point the politicians get to spend money and simply "charge it" without annoying steps like getting political support for it, setting up taxes for it, etc. You can govern without actually being bothered with interacting with the people other than to pick up juicy stories they tell you and then repeat them at your speaches. "I met an 78 year old grandmother of 3 who's daughter worked 3 jobs and died of ..., struggling to care for her 3 orphaned grandchildren...."

So now that our system is close to collapse we'll degrade dollar a bit and prop up england a bit and then replace the FED scheme with ...

IMF/UN/World Bank/SDR's/Trilateral commission?

They'll try to be the global peace makers. Big deals will made about how they have no "teeth" and can only issue warnings etc etc. So it'll be given more and more power until it's able to starve any nation it wants, pull every nation against any nation. It'll look like peer pressure at first then it will eventually become an independant agency bullying everyone.

Mon, 09/28/2009 - 09:51 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

 

Well, it certainly could be propaganda, but I think we all know what he's saying is true.  I really don't know much about this gentleman.

 

My surprise is that he would be allowed to voice such concepts on Cheerleader Central at all.

Mon, 09/28/2009 - 07:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 02/24/2011 - 01:48 | Link to Comment shawnlee
shawnlee's picture

Well, it certainly could be propaganda, but I think we all know what he's saying is true. I really don't know much about this gentleman.

My surprise is that he would be allowed to voice such concepts on Cheerleader Central at all.

stuhrling watches|642-415|HP2-E31|tiffany charms sale

Sun, 06/05/2011 - 08:39 | Link to Comment sun1
sun1's picture

I have to admit that I have never heard about this information I have noticed many new facts for me. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful and attractive information and I will be waiting for other interesting posts from you in the nearest future.keep it up. cheap car insurance

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!