• Phoenix Capital Research
    09/02/2010 - 15:21
    Honestly, I cannot predict when Bernanke will unveil QE 2. All I can say is that it largely does not matter in the grand scheme of things. Yes, it will cause some short-term volatility. But ultimately QE 2 will simply be a catalyst that speeds up the processes that are already underway. Those processes are: 1) Systemic collapse 2) Destruction of fiat money 3) Massive loss of wealth
  • madhedgefundtrader
    09/01/2010 - 23:06
    The 3 1/2 point sell off in the futures for the 30 year Treasury bond (TBT), at the end of last week was the sharpest drop in 18 months. All it took to set was for Q2 GDP to come in at 1.6%, and for Ben Bernanke to remain silent about any plans to flood the markets with more liquidity. After yields bottomed in 1956, bonds suffered negative returns for 30 years! Here come the 18% mortgages. One more equity puke out in September could easily give us the real thing. (TBT), (TMV), (TIPS).

Closing Out 2009 In Style: Cash Management Bills Price At 0.000%

Tyler Durden's picture




It is only fitting that one of the most schizophrenic years in recent capital markets history should close with a $5 million CMB auction pricing at 0.000%. And so the circle of chasing risky and risk-free assets with equal passion is now complete. Even as high yield bonds have returned over 50% YTD, investors can't get enough of parking cash in yield free US government-backed pieces of paper. Many have claimed this phenomenon is indicative merely of capital allocation ahead of January 1. Well, that is in a few hours. And with the next 4-week Bill/CMB auction likely to take place within a week, we will promptly see if this is indeed the case. If we end up with another 0.000% soon, then the structural problems at the near-end of the curve will end up being much worse than most have expected. That, and negative 1 month rates coming a-plenty.

 

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (3 votes)



by ZeroPower
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 14:44
#178050

Another sweet 0% auction.

Im looking forward to higher rates to come in Q1 and Q2 before hyper inflation kicks in, in which case i can only wonder what kind of rates we'll be getting. Q4 2010 anyone?

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 14:57
#178074

the only thing we'll see is "hyper"-deflation.

US has capacity utilization at 70%, the consumer is already heavily in debt, unemployment above 9% for long time ahead, bank's balance sheets are only kept alive by Fed's QE - I don't think there's much more room to increase lending, and last but not least we have total credit contraction in the economy for the first time since the great depression...all this sum up to deflation at best, I don't see where you came up with the hyperinflation...

by ozziindaus
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:18
#178211

Agree 100% but I'm not sure what the hyper in hyper-deflation means

by dnarby
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:05
#178370

Cash is king, equities sink, gold hangs tough, services & gov't payouts decline, and eventually...

Inflation.

Might also be some shortages and rioting and reform along the way too, you never know.

by Cursive
on Thu, 12/31/2009 - 00:38
#178637

This is truth.  Very succinct truth.

by lookma
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:22
#178384

Hyperinflation and inflation are really only nominally similar, as they are quite distinct phenomena.

Hyperinflation is more a currency event, not really just a monetary phenomena like inflation.  Deflation and a hyper go together. Credit expands too much, bubble pops, asset deflation happens, firms collapse/teeter, g responds by pumping money, people and foreigners loose faith, malinvestment prospers and economy stagnates so firms need more propping up, less buyers for G debt, investors leave US dollar assets etc., rinse, wash and repeat. 

More private lending is what is needed to save the exponential growth credit monster.  It is collapsing and G is trying to keep it afloat.  If the private sector credit doesn't pick up the G risks in effect burning up the currency trying to keep the scheme alive. 

Hyperinflation in this context is caused by monetary panic in the face of credit/asset deflation.  Maybe its avoided by a one time hyperinfaltion (a currency devalaution) but this system is not stable.

 

by Brother Revegen...
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 14:45
#178052

hehe debt-free money :)

by Cognitive Dissonance
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 14:52
#178064

After the commission or transaction cost, isn't that actually a negative rate? I've been sitting here wondering how I would explain to my client how wonderful it would be to purchase a Treasury Bill that pays 00.0%. Subtract out the transaction cost and/or my management fee and I'd have a tall story to spin.

Not only is there a fool born every minute but the current batch seems to be multiplying quite rapidly.

by ozziindaus
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 15:41
#178149

Think of it as the premium on an Insurance policy. You are prepared to pay the premium not to make money, but to prevent losing it. If I was as sure as these investors on the ensuing risk in everything else, then I would do the same.

by Cognitive Dissonance
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 15:58
#178176

So a short term Treasury Bill is more secure than a bank CD, particularly a 30 or 60 day CD, which while paying next to nothing, it's still paying more than 0% and is local and easy to grab quickly? Plus the worse that can happen with most CDs if broken early is you lose the interest. If you sell the Bill early and interest rates have gone up, you can lose principal.

I personally see this as the advisor not wanting to let assets leave the nest they control.

by ozziindaus
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:14
#178205

CD's entail risk by bank insolvency. FDIC will cover up to $250K. I guess the spread between the CD (with FDIC guarantee) and the T-bill (with US Treasury backing) directly reflects the respective risk between government agencies. 

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:09
#178200

Tell you client that the faster he or she falls behind, the more time they have to catch-up.....

by phaesed
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 17:14
#178296

you don't purchase this for a client

you purchase this if you're a MMF or a bank.

by Cognitive Dissonance
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:28
#178396

I know. I was being rhetorical and sarcastic to some extent. But I've also been in a position on numerous occasions where a client wants to purchase a Bill or Note and the yield was so low I ate the transaction cost and still the client was yelling about the trickle of income.

Many people just don't understand that it's a two fold rape. The banks were bailed out and the taxpayer is paying for it in many "hidden" ways.

by phaesed
on Thu, 12/31/2009 - 20:53
#179568

I think most people are realizing it's rape period.... don't matter if it's two fold, a gangbang by Timmy, Zimbabwe Ben and Lloyd B is still a gangbang rape.

by RobotTrader
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 14:55
#178070

Yeah, Japan's debt to GDP is a lot higher than ours.

And look at their paltry rates, pinned a generational lows for years on end.

For some reason, they cannot get the Animal Spirits going, no matter how cheap money is.

 

 

 

 

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 15:22
#178118

I was watching a Youtube "Glenn Beck, I know Glenn Beck, anyway, an interesting analogy to the 0% parking is like in an earthquake when the safest place is in a doorway. The 0% is a perceived "safe place" before shit hits the fan.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 15:40
#178148

It's only fitting that Turbo Timmy, gets the same treatment at the FED window, as the TBTF's.

by johngaltfla
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:06
#178187

I'm always amazed at the morons in the Bubblemedia who call the flight to real negative yield instruments "year end" window dressing even though that flight started in September. Maybe just maybe the alternative explanation that nobody trusts the corporates, equity or commodity markets because of instability in our banking system and government policymakers might just be the cause.

I'm just sayin'......

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:22
#178219

I remember one time I dropped a tab of acid and wound up in a graveyard at midnight. It was hilarious and I don't know why, but man I had to laugh. It was like it was all a huge cosmic joke of the most EPIC proportions.

A Tragecomedy deluxe.

I'm having powerful flashbacks of that night right now.

-MobBarley

by wawawa
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:25
#178225

High Rate = 0.000%    What does it mean?

I do not get it, please some explain in simple language.

by Orly
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 17:55
#178360

Do as the rest of us did and read ZeroHedge until your eyes bleed.

Eventually, you will begin to understand.

 

:D

 

P.S. Thanks a mill for everything you do, Tyler and the gang!  Happy New Year!

by Zina
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 16:36
#178244

OK, my forecast for 2010: neither hyperinflation nor deflation. What's ahead is STAGFLATION, like in the 70's. High (but not skyrocketing) unemployment rate (less than 12%), and relatively high inflation (but not hyperinflation - less than 15% annual inflation rate). And it's not only 2010. The following years will not be so different.

by Orly
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:08
#178375

I agree with that assessment.

For all the doom and gloom, it seems like the Feds have enough "superglue" to keep this racket together indefinitely.  They can actually pull a lot of ropes at once and keep the gig defying gravity for longer than most people will stay solvent.

What happens then, say 2014-15, is that a new great technology (I am thinking a NatGas transportation system and its related components...) series of practical and universal inventions is created and exported from Ames, Iowa to everywhere else in the world.

In the meantime, the dollar swings like a pendulum every two and a half years against all the major currencies.  Like a clock saying 'tick-tock.'

If you're not a 4X trader yet, you perhaps should look into it, because the next ten years or so of the re-stabilisation of the global financial system is going to bring more opportunities for the home-gamers than any other time in history.

The next decade will be the stuff of 4X legend.

Or not...

:D

by Zina
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:44
#178418

And that was DJIA in the stagflation era of the 70's:

http://grighter.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/djia-1960.jpg

Can we expect DJIA oscilating in the range between 5000 and 6000 points during the next 10 years?

 

 

by JACOB5CD
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 17:30
#178318

YOU KNOW WHAT THE GREAT THING IS? THE THE REPUBLICANS WHO GOT US HERE  WILL GAIN A MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE IN THE MID TERMS. SO MY GUESS IS THAT WE ARE REALLY FUCKED

by dnarby
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:07
#178373

Pry the gum out of your caps lock and vote independent.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 23:08
#178599

Stupid Republicans will neutralize stupid Democrats. Hopefully, it will be more difficult to pass any additional legislature because I'm worried.

by john_connor
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:02
#178365

So my question is will long bonds and stocks be able to rally simultaneously in the new year?

I doubt it. 

by deadhead
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:06
#178372

as long as the infamous "household sector" hangs in there!

by phaesed
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 18:16
#178381

Well either way, none of us will really know until 5 days from now. Damn, this is going to be an interesting new year. At this point, we've fleshed out a lot of both sides of the argument... sorry to those I offended and thanks to those who argued either side... it's the discussion that's important.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 22:11
#178571

I hope it's gonna be a FAZerrific new year

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.