You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Congress Actually Stands Up to Banks . . . But What About the Senate?

George Washington's picture




Washington's Blog.

My friend on the Hill has confirmed the Washington Post's claim that
the big banks have lost their bid for exemption from state regulations.

But only in the House. My friend says that the too big to fails are going to try to kill the bill in the Senate.

As the Post summarizes the battle in the House:

 

The
House Financial Services Committee is expected to vote Tuesday to let
state governments protect bank customers by imposing restrictions that
go beyond existing federal laws, according to congressional and
industry sources.

 

The move would roll back a doctrine called
preemption that has allowed big banks to answer solely to federal
regulators. The banks argue that operating under a single set of rules
is more efficient and results in lower prices for customers. But the
Obama administration, which is pushing for the change, regards
preemption as a cause of the crisis because it prevented state
regulators from quashing obvious abuses.

 

The change essentially would unleash 50 additional regulators on the largest banks.

 

Large
banks have fought bitterly against the proposal, which they regard as
one of the most problematic components of the administration's
financial reform plan, but they have been unable to sway House
Democrats.

Call your Senator and demand that state banking regulations be allowed to be as tough as the state wishes.

 





Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 10/20/2009 - 00:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 10/19/2009 - 20:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 10/19/2009 - 22:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 10/19/2009 - 20:50 | Link to Comment digalert
digalert's picture

Write my senators? Hah, been there done that. Mine are in the bag bought and paid for, Feinstein and Boxer. My question is how is this going to get out of the house with the other California anti-American crook Peloski.

Mon, 10/19/2009 - 22:11 | Link to Comment Rollerball
Rollerball's picture

Yeah, I'm tired of "thank you for your ... " automatic responses. They are all bought and paid for, and the 2010 seats are hedged. Congress should be a volunteer organization, each member with a JD and having "interned" with the ACLU for at least a year, before being eligible for office. Then, upon nomination/election, forced to submit to monthly lie detector tests.

Mon, 10/19/2009 - 18:55 | Link to Comment starfish
starfish's picture

http://www.conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm

That is a link to all the names and addresses as well.

They have a xcel download with all the fax numbers, I think that is going to be the easiest way to get to all of them at once. (since they use web based email forms now)

Maybe someone can fill me in on fax broadcasting? You know, so I can send all 543 of them a message every day.  Let me know!

Mon, 10/19/2009 - 18:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 10/19/2009 - 17:51 | Link to Comment Yankee
Yankee's picture

I'm embarrased to admit that I didn't see this earlier.  Lazy

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/opinion/19krugman.html

Mon, 10/19/2009 - 17:39 | Link to Comment Yankee
Yankee's picture

Son bitch!, I like that - recall the Oriental expression Chu U

Mon, 10/19/2009 - 17:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/20/2009 - 00:44 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

Yep.

But for some reason I still hope.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!