You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Deep Deflationary Thoughts From Van Hoisington Of Wasatch Funds

Tyler Durden's picture







Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:49 | Link to Comment Silver Bullet
Silver Bullet's picture

I couldn't agree with you more.

Deflation now, and if there is any sort of a recovery, inflation later.

In other words, we are between a rock and hard place with no really good options.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment crzyhun
crzyhun's picture

Hmmm. -1

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 13:00 | Link to Comment jm
jm's picture

Saving behavior and prudence aren't cultural.  They are based on interest rates, which the Fed kept too low too long in the states. 

The US will save because the only alternative is to pay down debt or be evicted.  Mean reversion is a lot of history. 

Regarding not living up to the platitudes... in complete agreement. 

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:46 | Link to Comment Chumly
Chumly's picture

We have been and will continue to be in a currency event.  I believe one of the points that can extracted from this very good synopsis of our current crisis is that inflation is present within the current deflation (depression).  The mal-attempt to reflate the economy is not possible.  We have passed the point of no return.  This is a paradigm shift that cannot be quantified because of the global scale of the crisis never seen or imagined.  Any attempt to inflate will only push the equilibrium the blow-off of overcapacity seeks further to the south.

 

Chance the Gardner

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:29 | Link to Comment pivot
pivot's picture

yep, and those excess bank reserves are about to flood the market because they are on such financially sound footing?  good call.

think through why those reserves are where they are.  The world is a logical place and various entities act in their own best interests.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 13:20 | Link to Comment Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

It does not take a genius to see that those excess reserves are there to provide a bid for US Treasuries.

And I am no genius.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:21 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

I'm still not sure what happens after this wild ride (which I anticipate will happen pretty fast). The only thing I can imagine after that dollar spike is the dollar immediately becoming worthless. And at that point, we've got a 'division by zero' error...I don't know if that's hyperinflation or hyperdeflation, or just hyper.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 12:14 | Link to Comment trav777
trav777's picture

ok...there's a fundamental lack of understanding here.

Our currency is based on DEBT.  Debt is a claim against the future by the present.

If the future holds growth, you can pay the debt back.  If it does not, you cannot.  It's really as simple as that.  If you take the simplest debt, borrow $1000 at 10% interest for one year.  You either come up with $1100 at the end of the next year or you default.  Simple shit.  If your lender looks at someone with terminal cancer given 6 weeks to live, how freakin likely is the loan to be repaid?

The US's currency is a debt instrument...it has sanctity in the aggregate only so long as we can repay our debts, i.e., continue to grow.

Everybody still seems to act like this is a blip or a hiccup and that growth will just resume any day now.  That the only thing holding us back is a bunch of paper.  Sorry, the real finite limits of growth are what we are smacking up against here.  Anything based upon or needing growth is specious as a fundamental proposition at this point.

This is larger than the US...it's an existential crisis for debt in the aggregate, for the growth model.  This is the REASON we are in a currency crisis.  It's a crisis because a collective realization has emerged from the fog that the future CANNOT pay off today's debts.  The entire edifice is in functional default.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Silver Bullet
Silver Bullet's picture

Well said.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:24 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

The 'limits of growth' are being attenuated by the debt situation. It's not just that the cancer patient has only 6 weeks to live and can't repay the loan; it's also that the lender is secretly spiking the patient's IV drip with plutonium.

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 13:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:24 | Link to Comment Mark Beck
Mark Beck's picture

Hoisington Holes?

I looked at the June 2009 FED report. Total on-balance sheet assets = around $2T. Obviously, off-balance sheet stuff is not listed in the report. Also, not given are unfunded liabilities on an accrual basis for things like Medicare. So I am not really sure were the report gets its numbers, but its not from this FED report. 

Once again we see GDP as an indication of our ability to address debt. No, GDP does not pay debt, Net tax revenues pay debt. Maybe around $2T total in 2010. 

Actually, the FED has managed to stabilize real estate prices somewhat. So we are no longer in collapse mode, especially in Q3.

----------

At the end of the report, Hoisington recommends investment in Long term Treasuries after presenting data that the US will probably not be able to repay its debts without inflating the currency. 

What? So you want me to purchase and hold a bond, which will most likely be debased to zero before it pays off?

I am sorry but I do not agree with the strategy.

Mark Beck

Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:37 | Link to Comment Grand Supercycle
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 22:33 | Link to Comment musth
musth's picture

There may be deflation in the short run, but the US cannot pay its future debts without inflating the currency. Period. Therefore, instead of timing when the dollar makes its last push, then timing the final peek, I will be watching my long-term account fall, buying in the dips and waiting for the inflation to begin.

I also don't think the "deflationists" factor in who is running the printing press, or the effect major deflation will have to the system. I find it much more likely that Ben will inflate the US out of any deflation concerns.

Tue, 12/08/2009 - 12:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!