This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Deleveraging Through... Deflation? Has Ending QE Been The Ulterior Motive All Along? Andrew Smithers Thinks So

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Confused by recent proclamations by Hoenig, Plosser, and other unnamed Fed members, who want an end to QE? Even more confused that this could actually happen? Andrew Smithers, former head of SG Warburg asset management before starting Smithers & Co., may have some iconoclastic insight into this development, which at its core is fundamentally deflationary, and a stark refutation to everything the Fed (presumably) stands for. A paradox? Smithers breaks the "Econ 101" mold in this fascinating interview with Kate Welling. The most provocative perspective: Smithers goes against the grain of every economic textbook which says the only way to inflate debt away (deleverage) is by, well, inflation. Instead, what Smithers suggests is a slow, gradual process of deflation, in which incremental cash flow is converted into equity, and pushes debt out. Indeed, this is precisely what we have been seeing especially in the REIT sector where numerous names, courtesy of BofA, have raised equity on the basis of imaginary valuations, which may just become a self-fulfilling prophecy if enough people buy into them, and by throwing cash at these companies, allow them to lower their debt-to-capitalization ratios. Then again, with another half a trillion in equity needed for the REIT sector to fund itself out of a mid-term funding crisis, that's purely a pipe dream. However the bigger picture of the Smithers perspective is that this deflationary approach is exactly what the Fed may be engaged in. By distracting the increasingly more vocal inflation hawks, who anticipate that inflation is and always will be the driving motive of the Chairman, Bernanke could very well be pursuing just the opposite: a slow-bleeding deflationary trend.

The clincher from the interview which took place in November 2009:

I think that you will find that several economists over the next few weeks and months will be expressing concern about quantitative easing...Because the most damaging thing that could happen to the world economy would be a third asset bubble collapse...Probably the best way of ensuring that is by making sure that asset prices simply don't go up much more.  What we need over time is a rebalancing of the economy in which we get deleveraging going on. And there are only two ways to delever: One is by generating cash flow and the other is by replacing debt with equity, either through bankruptcy, via the banking system, or directly, through the corporate sector. Now if you have deleveraging as the main driving force, you can only achieve that goal, really, if you switch the debt from the private sector to the public sector. Otherwise, you get the attempt for everybody to save more and everybody to invest less and you fall clearly into one of those problems that Keynes identified, where the adjustment process, rational on the individual level, just digs the economy, as a whole, deeper into a recession... [For this plan to be effective] we now want a period of slow contained growth, in which we can get a lot of deleveraging going on - without it having to burden the public sector debt by too much. For that, you need time and helpful markets. The sort of ideal market is one that down a bit - that has periodic bounces. So people can take advantage of the bounces to issue a great deal of equity, which also, of course means that the market is more likely to go down thereafter?

Is the entire equity market merely a plaything in one giant Fed-controlled deleveraging ploy? Are equity prices indicative of anything besides what the Fed wants them to be? Some day, when all the Fed's secrets are revealed, we will know for sure. For now, all we can do, is to continue speculating and pointing out the obvious and ever more increasing irregularities in what was formerly at least passable for an efficient equity market.

Full Smithers interview.

Smithers 2009 November -

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:08 | 234811 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Would love to see Uncle Ben not go to the presses, but doesn't that go against everything he has ever said? Sure he is a liar and incompetent but I have a hard time seeing him letting deflation happen. But hell here is to hoping I'm wrong and he will let deflation occur to purge the system. Come on "King Dollar"!

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:51 | 235067 Madcow
Madcow's picture

could be a giant head fake - 

the Fed needs people to believe in a future with inflation - else financial assets (save USTs) have no value. 

 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 02:09 | 235149 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/money-supply-charts

This theory certainly aligns with the above chart. Spike supply then massively pull-back creating Japan like sugar highs all the way down. I'd like to see long term charts of M2, M3 to see how often they actually contract.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 13:59 | 235635 Assetman
Assetman's picture

Smithers thesis is pretty much along the lines of what I think is occuring-- rightly or wrongly.  There's another twist to it, though...

The Fed, I suspect, is likely to cycle between deflation and reflation to meet two different goals.

Let's start with reflation, since we are knee-deep in it.  As Smithers echoes, we are going through a period where massive government liquidity is supporting the prices of risk assets.  While risk assets are "supported", it makes perfectly good sense to convert as much debt into equity as the (manipulated) markets can handle.  Smithers makes a great examplt of the REITS-- where the end result will be-- greater shares outstanding sharing a lower pool of income.  Who cares, when your stock is up 125% since March of '09?

I order to pull this shell game off, the government will need to raise more debt-- lots of it.  So far, foreign sources have been pulling the load, but Uncle Ben knew this wouldn't last forever.  I think the goal going forward is for "equitized" firms (since the balance sheet have been boolstered) to take another deflationary hit.  This means the poor fools who bought into that recent equity issuance will be hit.

But it also means there will be a likely significant flight to quality-- enough to keep the long end of the curve in check and allow the government to issue the mountain of debt it needs.  At some point, when the equity markets yell "uncle"... well Uncle Ben will come back with another round of reflation (QE) that will start the equitizing process all over again.

I'm not sure the strategy will work, but I think the Treserve will try this for as long as it works.  Under this strategy, I see diminishing returns at best (but still returns) and a black swan at worst-- becuase Europe, China, and Japan are all wild cards.

I'm pretty much in agreement with B9K9 and trav on how it all ends-- there is still too much debt, and the USD is ultimately at risk.  I think, though, that the Treserve can play this deflation/reflation game for as long as Europe is dealing with their own sovereign debt issues.  That could be years, folks.

What it means for the rest of us is that our savings will be depleted-- either through our own ignorance (wrong place, wrong time) or through confiscation of retirement assets. 

What better time to wipe out new retail equity holders with a governement-induced withdrawal of liquidity?  The time is quickly approaching...

What better way to take more savings than to scare investors into owning 2.0% coupon US Treasury notes-- or force retirement savings into long-dated Treasury securities-- right before reflation turns to inflation and wipes out bond returns due to higher interest rates?

If the Fed has their way, I beleive all of this is coming.  And yes, most of us will be skimmed every step of the way.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:16 | 234819 curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

Speculate this!

Its all a game.  We are just the pawns and we are will lose....

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:27 | 234835 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

"All the world's indeed a stage
And we are merely players:
Performers and portrayers,
Each another's audience
Outside the gilded cage."

--Rush "Limelight"

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:50 | 234938 Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

"Wheels can take you around
Wheels can cut you down
We can go from boom to bust
From dreams to a bowl of dust
We can fall from rockets' red glare
Down to "Brother can you spare..."
Another war
Another wasteland
And another lost generation"

 

Between the Wheels- RUSH

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:57 | 234945 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

damn Rusty.. if I didn't have such a beat down day I would of got in front of you.. cheers

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:56 | 234943 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

come on now!  Between the Wheels is more apt here

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 02:37 | 235168 Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

`Sunny days

Chasing the clouds away

On our way

To where the air is sweet

Can you tell me how to get

How to get to Sesame Street...``

 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 02:27 | 235159 hidingfromhelis
hidingfromhelis's picture

They say that life's a carousel
Spinning fast, you've got to ride it well
The world is full of Kings and Queens
Who blind your eyes and steal your dreams
It's Heaven and Hell, oh well
And they'll tell you black is really white
The moon is just the sun at night
And when you walk in golden halls
You get to keep the gold that falls
It's Heaven and Hell, oh no!
Fool, fool!

--Black Sabbath: "Heaven & Hell"

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 14:31 | 235680 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

So much for the golden future, I can't even start
I've had every promise broken, there's anger in my heart
You don't know what it's like, you don't have a clue
If you did you'd find yourselves doing the same thing too

Breaking the law, breaking the law

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:18 | 234820 Sancho Panza
Sancho Panza's picture

"This means that when you are really competent and effective you outwardly appear to be incompetent and ineffective, so as to cause the enemy to be unprepared."  Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:24 | 234830 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Well I think Ben knows what he is doing, because a child could understand the basics of the system. Though I've had to spend a lot longer then I would like in academia and there is a chance he is as stupid as he portrays. But evil or stupid it does not matter he is still ruinous to the value of the dollar.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 22:47 | 234989 Sancho Panza
Sancho Panza's picture

True, all of his actions over the past  several years have been ruinous to the dollar.  But with all of the outstanding debt, all he has to do to strenghten the dollar is...nothing.  All he has to do is stop printing.

Eventually, Ben will have to choose between depression and hyperinflation.  When the final decision has to be made, one would be wise to consider Ben's principals' interests.  The Fed loses all power if the dollar goes to zero.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 22:56 | 234999 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

But if we're talking about a catastrophic end game, maybe all Ben wants is a getaway car and a hideout for the rest of his life.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:19 | 235033 Sancho Panza
Sancho Panza's picture

Maybe.  But I wouldn't get caught placing all my chips on one outcome or the other.  Simply knowing that the next 10 years will be nothing like the previous 30 is enough to position a portfolio for above average returns.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 03:42 | 235196 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Very interesting observation in that last sentence.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:00 | 235348 trav7777
trav7777's picture

What did FDR do during the last depression?

He devalued.

There is no way out of the mathematics here - a rise in the real value of the dollar, the drop in tax receipts and all the rest of it will crush the USG.  Period.

How many times do I need to get banned from TF for saying this?

The economy CANNOT pay the gov's debts back in dollars with today's value, much less in more valuable dollars.

If the sovereign defaults, its notes and those of its central bank are going to be worthless.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 12:23 | 235490 B9K9
B9K9's picture

Trav, Treasuries, Agencies and FRNs are all worthless regardless whether default or (hyper)devaluation is chosen (or imposed).

In one case, $1 is reset to -0- by a declaration of repudiation. In the other, $1 becomes worth $.0000000000000000000001 or -0- as a result of hyper-inflation.

As has been stated countless times, oftentimes boring many to the point of tears, there is simply too much debt in the system. But what a lot of people don't seem to understand is that all that debt represents claims (assets) by others. Ahem, cough, that would be ... savings, pensions, reserves, etc.

All going to -0-. Think about it.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 13:37 | 235611 Fox Moulder
Fox Moulder's picture

"How many times do I need to get banned from TF for saying this?"

 Banned for disagreeing with KD?

 I am shocked.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 02:38 | 235169 Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

If incompetence hides competence, Bernake must be a FUCKING GENIUS!!

 

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:22 | 234825 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Very intruiging theory.  Unfortunatley, Bernhanky doesn't know what he is doing.  He may think he does, but, hate to tell ya, he and the Squid don't control the world - yet.  One good nuke from Imadinnerjerk will bring it all down, if the PIIGS don't do it first.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:51 | 234858 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

Haha imadinnerjerk? wow

Anyways...i just dont get why people are still so stuck on this whole notion that the Fed is out to destroy the value of the dollar.

I mean, I do get it because that's how I once thought and fortunately my timing was correct as the "reflation" trade picked up steam.

But in the long run, the entire planet must deleverage.

Hyperinflation? Name one society who used credit/debt as currency and entered hyperinflation...it's never happened. Weimar republic? Irrelevant...the war reperations were due in gold, not Marks.

I was once a gold bug but...having studied Japan and similar events...I believe the value of the dollar can only go up from here.

The USD is very cheap. The struggle to grab these funny pieces of green money has just begun.

Hugh Hendry singlehandedly changed my views on such matters. Glad I woke up just at the right time.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:28 | 234913 Misthos
Misthos's picture

You can't just focus on the Fed and the deleveraging of the private sector.  State Pensions are near bust.  State budgets and municpalities are near bust.  Social Security and Medicare will be consuming more and more...  and annual interest payment on the trillion plus deficits for the next ten years will only grow.

We're not going to pay for all of the above...  but we will end up paying for most of it.  And we will not default IMF style either.

You can't tame deflation or inflation.  It picks up steam and runs its course.  To choose deflation is to destroy the economy today.  To choose inflation is to destroy the currency over a longer period of time.

The choice has been made.  We will print and deficit spend.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:04 | 234954 saturno_v
saturno_v's picture

 

"Name one society who used credit/debt as currency and entered hyperinflation"

 

Argentina, Brazil, Zimbabwe, Jugoslavia, Hungary...need more???

 

"it's never happened. Weimar republic? Irrelevant...the war reperations were due in gold, not Marks"

 

What is your point?? Germany started printing marks and at some point you had the crack-up boom...gold shortage was the initial trigger..reduced tax revenue and the political impossibility (with a potential deadlocked congress) to raise taxes could be the trigger for the USD.

 

For many investors already (me included) the UST are not worth the paper they are printed on (with QE and "mysterious" buyers around), as far as I'm concerned the USD did reach the crack-up boom (loss of faith in the currency) already.

 

We are able to keep the going going at the moment mainly because:

 

1) Every country in the planet is doing it...noboby is in the Gold standard, so there is not system of better reference

 

2) We still have the ultimate backing for the dollar at the moment....10 aircraft carrier battle groups...

 

3) Gigantic delusional mindset from investors....and many funds (pension or otherwise) are contractually forced to buy only securities deemed safe with the stamp of approval from the big 3 rating agencies.....the same ones that slapped "AAA" status on subprime garbage, so there is somewhat a floor to the bid.

 

Deleveraging and deflation should be the normal cure for the problem but no government want to face reality.

Finally, in a deflationary environment (the "value" of money is rising) a debt based currency simply vanish into thin air and debt becomes increasingly hard to be serviced....hyperinflation in the Weimar republic was a godsend for the German industrial and financial elite (owner of real productive assets) which was able to repay their debt with depreciating marks....when the currency was reduced to toilet paper they still owned the factories and real estate...owners of real producing assets come out ahead in a monetary "reset".

 

Everybody wants inflation (except pensioners) and NOBODY wants deflation

 

Inflation advantages:

 

- The working slaves can hope for increasing value for their homes (they plunge in a deflationary environment) and keep spending

- The government can reduce its real debt load and so the financial-industrial elite

- The financial oligarchy enjoy rising asset prices (they plunge with deflation)...and asset go up much faster than wages (the opposite it's true in a deflationary environment)

 

I do not buy this theory that the Fed really want deflation to engineer a debt-equity conversion in order to reduce leverage....too convoluted and not guaranteed to work.

 

What the Fed really want is a long period of sustained (but still under control) inflation..this is what they are shooting for. 

 

Hendry is an Hedge Fund manager...his investment horizon is measured in months not years

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:05 | 235015 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

 

"Argentina, Brazil, Zimbabwe, Jugoslavia, Hungary...need more???"

These nations did not use a credit-based monetary system such as ours. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying our system isn't rigged...but you're confusing currency with debt. You can print currency. You can't force people or corporations to take on debt.

 

"For many investors already (me included) the UST are not worth the paper they are printed on (with QE and "mysterious" buyers around), as far as I'm concerned the USD did reach the crack-up boom (loss of faith in the currency) already."

How many investors successfully shorted JGB?

 

Totally agreed re: aircraft carriers. Don't like it yet don't disagree.

 

RE: crack up boom and loss of faith in currency? Ask those who are on unemployment and with families to feed, debt to pay...what is their number one need? Currency.

 

I believe we are facing grocery inflation in a deflationary environment. Remember, gold could hyperinflate against food. The largest threat is not debt inflation/hyperinflation. There are a number of scenarios which I see playing out before a hyperinflation.

 

Hugh Hendry says this has Japan written all over it and having researched well past his insights, I totally agree. Those with cash will be picking shit up for pennies on the dollar when this deflation has run its course. No government can stop it unless we change our monetary system. Hugh has been risk averse since early '08. His investment horizon is such that he is always wrong...until proven right.

 

 

 

 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 00:07 | 235066 saturno_v
saturno_v's picture

Jdrose

 

Yes these nations used a credit based monetary system (all fiat currencies from the 20th century are)...and the blow up worked always in the same fashion...the Central Bank buys the government debt....

 

Japan never entered CPI deflation.....it always managed to have inflation in that department....but it had asset deflation.

Japan had the highest saving rate in the world, significant trade surplus and experienced deflation in a high growth world economy environment (demand for their products)...so the system could absorb their idiotic monetary policy.

 

They spend ton of money in bridges and train to nowhere...at the end of the day they still had state of the art infrastructure left...we are trillions into it and nothing to show for it..just zombie banks, no bridges...

We all know that, so far, they still can get away with 200% of Debt/GDP..I do not think our limit is that high...

"Ask those who are on unemployment and with families to feed, debt to pay...what is their number one need? Currency."

 

The crack-up boom would start from outside not inside (think, for example, about the mythical failed bond auction goldbugs are waiting for) and that is particularly disruptive in a heavy import dependant economy.....I'm not saying it will happen for sure nor anybody can pinpoint when it will...but if exporters start to refuse US dollars, it is a matter of time that it will propagate to the local population.

 

Starving Argentinians or Zimbabweans wanted dollars, euros or even gold not Pesos or ZWD.

 

Yes hyperinflation and deflation can co-exist in different categories...for example we are experiencing fairly high inflation in food and energy and serious deflation in real estate...even in Zimbabwe price of luxury goods and real estate actually declined in real term (who could afford it??)

Hyperinflation usually hit the hardest in goods the people need the most (food, energy and other necessities)

 

I totally agree that deflation in the current situation is the natural course of event...however  TPTB want avoid that scenario and they will use every weapon at their disposal to do so...deflation is kryptonite for a debt based fiat currency....nobody wants it....if the only solution is to hyperinflate they will...again, owner or real productive assets (the oligarchy) will come out mostly unscathed.

 

Argentina experienced deflation just prior the hyperinflationary collapse.....monetary authorities always think that they can pull the plug just in time....not it doesn't work that way...once the trust is gone, it's gone.

 

The math is very simple...a credit based currency need constant increase in the debt level to sustain itself...deflation is not contemplated.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 08:51 | 235276 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

thanks for your insights...I appreciate it.

 

I really wish I had more time to study..I work full time as an electrician and about 80% of my spare time is invested in designing a highly profitable small metal fabrication business doing business signs and estate gates. My focus is becoming "too small to fail" and targeting wealthy individuals whom I have a lot of contacts with. Especially people in the equine business. Anyways.

 

I'm by no means married to my views. All i can do is read as much as possible and look for the truth which lies some place in the middle.

 

The number one thing which I keep in front of my mind is that we hold the world reserve currency. IF it were to hyperinflate, the ensuing shit storm would be so spectacular as to totally explode the world supply chain. Gold bugs harping on and on and on for this scenario don't fully understand what they wish for, IMO. A new dark age is not something i wish for. However, I have retained some physical AU/AG in case i am wrong.

 

Gold is not the panacea. learning to be self sufficient, having a place to escape to far away from roving bands of mad max style hillbillies, learning basic medical care, etc will prepare you for an event far more  than having a pile of gold which would be sniffed out and stolen from your possession about 3 minutes after you tried to redeem some for food.

 

The powers that be are not so willing to give up their strangle hold over debt holders, i think. I know many people loaded to the gills with debt who are virtually slaves. Americans are so docile as to allow TARP, etc and not do a fucking thing about it. They will continue to lay down and take it up the ass, dry. Deflation is highly beneficial to me who pays up front for everything and has no debt, mortgage, etc.

 

I look at it like we are entering WWIII which is looking like a repeat of WWII, albeit a financial war. No matter how painful it gets here, the rest of the world is in far more trouble IMO. In the land of the blind, the proverbial one-eyed man is king. Agreed?

 

 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 08:07 | 235262 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

"You can't force people or corporations to take on debt."

The government can force you to do a lot of things if they really want. They can put you in jail or they can send you to die in a foreign country.

They can even bail out AIG to save GS.

They don't even need to force you, they can e.g. offer "tax incentives".

And they can change the rules: if the current monetary system stalls, just change it. First, there was consumer credit. Then, there were government deficits. Now, we have QE. Just imagine, there might be further ways to throw fresh money into existence...

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:48 | 235414 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

Okay, I give you that much. I've done a stretch in prison myself, basically a political prisoner as it was drug related. Anyways.

Why or how is our situation today so different than Japan? They've done QE 1, 3, 7, 11, etc. 0% interest rates for a long time.

This time it's different this time, right?

The system will collapse, this much we can all agree on. The quadrillion dollar question is...when?

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 03:48 | 235201 kurt_cagle
kurt_cagle's picture

Not sure that everyone would rather have inflation. Deflation has its own benefits:

  • Reduces the net imbalance between the haves and have-nots. For those on salaries (vs. investment income) deflation may mean a loss of perhaps 10-15% of their earning power, but for investors, deflation is typically far more devastating.
  • Eliminates under-competitive businesses or those whose business model no longer reflects reality, making way for alternative approaches. While the number of businesses started during deflationary periods remains more or less constant, the number of successful businesses after a decade is far higher for those started in deflationary periods, because the poor businesses are weeded out more quickly.
  • Establishes stronger fiscal discipline among both consumers and businesses.
  • Recalibrates notions of value and credit viability to more properly reflect the real world values of assets.

Recessions are the financial equivalent of diets - unpleasant to go through, but the results, in the long run, are usually healthier systems.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 04:06 | 235205 kurt_cagle
kurt_cagle's picture

Of course, this also rests on what seems curiously to have become a heretical notion - that giving more purchasing power to the consumer in the long run is ultimately a good thing. Most contemporary financial investment activity is not in fact to spur the development of better businesses - it is to seek the highest yield and highest dividends from that investments, usually based upon what amounts to gambling on Markov Chains (Drunkard's Walk).

As such, it is in fact typically a drain upon the economy overall. The irony is that someone with a net worth of $100 million dollars spends far less into the economy overall than 2,000 people with a net worth of $50,000, which means that the more super millionaires and billionaires you have, the less economic activity you have. While you can tax the billionaires more, most simply move their real assets into non-taxable vehicles. Thus, in the long run the only way of increasing the velocity of money (economic activity) is to deflate.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 12:44 | 235528 saturno_v
saturno_v's picture

 

Kurt

 

These are exactly the reasons why TPTB do not want deflation.

I agree that deflation should be the way to go.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 04:40 | 235212 Orly
Orly's picture

Don't "wake up" just yet.

As the central banks rotate through currency weakness (first the dollar, now the euro, next the yen...), watch for USD to continue losing strength against the Japanese yen.  Once the euro has tanked against all the majors (and we have about three months more to go in that regime...), the spring will be wound so tight for an upside burst in the USD/JPY pair.

Look to get long the dollar v. the yen at about the end of May.  The bounce off the near all-time lows is going to be the trade of a lifetime.

Make you rich.

:D

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:03 | 235351 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Dude...are you serious?

Look, man, the Fed is CHOCK FULL of crap mortgages.

The USG and the 50 States are BANKRUPT.

The debts CANNOT be repaid in today's dollars!  It's as simple as that.  We're simply bankrupt under any accounting analysis.

Dollars MUST be devalued because the government and all the other sovereigns OWE MORE OF THEM than they can get!

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:56 | 235435 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

Trav I respect what you say, I see you writing a lot of good stuff.

What've we printed...2-3 trillion? What's that in the face of a 15 trillion evaporation? There is a shortage of dollars. I'm not saying the system wont fail.

 

Can anyone get their mind around the fact that markets dont crash...they are crashed?

 

Easy way to fund government debts....engineer a stock market/real estate collapse, driving capital into UST. Did you not know, the Fed is offloading those crap mortgages into the MMMF's? After they wash their hands, look out below in equity markets.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:08 | 234887 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

Hey we just want to get fed and hang around the sty , we don't want no trouble

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:37 | 234848 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

this is more voodoo economics...if this author thinks that deleveraging is moving debt from the private sector to the publc or the fed, he is advocating shell games..."Now if you have deleveraging as the main driving force, you can only achieve that goal, really, if you switch the debt from the private sector to the public sector."....

so i bequeath this quack the double fucktard award for his keynesian horsecrap and his shell game hocum....

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:43 | 234851 Gordon Shumway
Gordon Shumway's picture

Not directly related but I have not seen posted anywhere on the site yet, and though it was pretty awesome

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0nERTFo-Sk

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:46 | 234934 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

That was fucking great!

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 00:40 | 235094 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Thanks for that. It feels good to laugh once and awhile.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 00:59 | 235098 JohnG
JohnG's picture

Keynes mixed the Kool Aid first....

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 09:21 | 235277 Anton LaVey
Anton LaVey's picture

This was posted on ZH weeks ago.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:44 | 234852 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

Bennie is pumping the banks full of copious bucks while bleeding the rest of us dry. He pumps with one hand and strangles with the other.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:03 | 234883 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

EXACTLY..

slow-bleeding deflationary trend FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT THOSE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT TO SLEEP MF

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:49 | 234860 aurum
aurum's picture

do you all realize that we CANNOT have deflation and we cannot have a strong dollar...there is no possible way to repay 100 trillion in obligations without inflation....otherwise we default...its simple math

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:35 | 234910 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

What about those special purpose vehicles ......

Lloyd fire up those engines we have some more ungodly work to do

 - Oh I love it when we get all Greccey Mammon -

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:25 | 235041 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The private sector debt is MUCH larger than the gargantuan federal debt of 14 trillion... The private sector is paying down more debt than even our glutunous government can borrow. Game over, deflation is here.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:51 | 234863 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

excellent, Smithers.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 04:48 | 235213 perchprism
perchprism's picture

 

Loose the hounds!!

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:35 | 234864 greased up deaf guy
greased up deaf guy's picture

edit - the title of the article was corrected.  thanks for the clarification, td.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:55 | 234869 Thoreau
Thoreau's picture

QE is here to stay, at least until the fall of empire; best consider it one of the new Bill of Rights.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 20:58 | 234870 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Sorry, Smithers; close but no cigar. Just another guy saying, "Yeah we needed this massive stimulus, but now we have to take the medicine". Well, that's the problem, Andrew. Ben Bernanke and his ilk in government are allergic to the medicine. It is not possible to burst this debt bubble without pain, very significant, palpable pain among the voting class and, more importantly, among the vote buying elites in financial towers. The elites and the politicians are leveraged to growth, and they've staked their reputation on a return to the glory days.

The addiction metaphor is completely apropos. There is no halfway solution to breaking the grip of monetary and fiscal madness; you either quit today or you don't quit. Tomorrow means never. We lack the will to do it voluntarily, so we'll do it the hard way.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:00 | 234872 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Remember way back when Cramer was mad as hell at Bernanke and telling him "you know nothing" . Well if I remember right Ben started caving into to popular belief and went Cramer's way and we have been down the rabbit hole ever since. Fields of sham,reverse Robin Hood.

Anyone remember what Cramer thought was so bad back then? Lets go back to that.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:00 | 234873 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

C.M. Burns "what do you think about this trip Smithers?"

"Well sir, I think women and semen don't mix."

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:03 | 234878 gigeze787
gigeze787's picture

The post-2008 crash game has always been to let the air out of the balloon as slowly as possible so as not to cause social unrest. Reinflating the stock market half-way back was done to allow banks to recapitalize and to keep the Baby Boomers from rioting over 201Ks. That accomplished...now their houses, especially McMansions, will decline even more. This is the greatest PsyOps campaign ever...directed at the naive all-American serfs who still think they live in a free-market democracy. 

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:12 | 234890 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

In the past I used to think, well Greenspan is one of the good guys, he knows what's right. And I thought I understood and appreciated his explanation that because we don't have a gold standard, he saw it as his job to manage things as a kind of model of how the gold standard would behave, if it were allowed to be.

But now I see that was really a fool's errand.

The inevitability of ever-more-frequent and drastic boom-bust cycles is called into question when you take the Fed out of the picture.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:14 | 234893 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I thought part of that was quite clear from the beginning. It was obvious that by back stopping all the financials,that they were expected to raise capital to improve their balance sheets. So yeh,this is expected from the beginning. However,the only problem is,would there be enough liquidity to satisfy both the public and private sector?And from a pure P&L accounting side:was the total cost of backstopping every publicly traded company(under the excuse of saving jobs,and not the multirich)better than say,letting them fail(they were frail because they were bad business models to begin with),and instead use the trillions in,say tax breaks for real manufacturing jobs?.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:15 | 234895 pooplagrande
pooplagrande's picture

Hmm...that is facinating. If this is the case, I would actually respect Ben a bit (more which is coming from 0...so that is something). Difficult to pull off however and would likely need to have some collusion necessary to make this work (which certainly isn't out of the picture)...but there would have to be a lot of winking going on across the board (e.g. all financial institutions, REITS, etc.).

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:16 | 234896 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

Is there some way of calculating all the wasted human hours and lives anticipating the FEDs next move.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:31 | 234917 deadhead
deadhead's picture

Excellent!  Comment of the week contender!

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 22:03 | 234953 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

probably about .01% of the lives ruined by the Fed's actual actions.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 02:40 | 235170 Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

What else am I going to do while on the shitter..

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 08:07 | 235261 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

Quantitative easing and diarrhoea has always conjured up the same images in my head.

Involving the expelling of badness with possible devastating consequences downstream.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 21:17 | 234898 ArkansasAngie
ArkansasAngie's picture

A controlled landing for whom?

Summer 2008 the dollar was down 30% and there had not been inflation (thanks China) and there had not been a reduction in the standard of lving in the US. 

The only way to keep the pitchforks away is to do this slowly so as nobody figures it out. 

I'm afraid while I believe in free markets ... I do not believe they exist.  Why would I invest in a market that I studied and tried to divine when some clown could push a button and make me wrong because ... he had a grand scheme he was following.

I like statistical fingers of fate better personally

 

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 22:02 | 234949 Doug
Doug's picture

Smithers!  Have the Rolling Stones killed!

But sir....

DO AS I SAY!!!

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 22:31 | 234979 glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

distraction - this has always been about reflating and creating a soft landing but it has not been about deflation. If we have serious deflation then we'll have debt default on the part of the govt.

problem is that it's the impact of the crash that helps to reset everything, and a soft landing only obscurs the impact.

while I think it's an interesting viewpoint I don't give it much credence.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 22:36 | 234984 Madcow
Madcow's picture

This is insane.

Yes - I can see the plan - which is to maintain an orderly deflationary de-leveraging that keeps the USD strong and money flowing into Treasuries ... 

But there's a giant and growing problem - and that is the funding requirements of Government (state, local, federal ..)  While private market cash flow slows with the vaporizing money supply, the Fed is forced to monetize big time. 

There's no way in heck they'll be able to make the spending curve fall faster than the income curve. Money has been spent that doesn't actually exist.

Deflation with a deflating currency.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:21 | 235035 M31Capital
M31Capital's picture

 

I too have found this conversation with Smithers to be fascinating.  While I completely agree with his assessment of value and volatility, to assume the FED and central bankers are colluding to provide a slow drip deflation to facilitate deleveraging is absurd.  He references Japan during his interview, but primarily in relation to their asset bubble - not BOJ policy and the liquidity trap they find themselves in.  There is very little history to go by on a contagion sovereign debt crisis, subsequent to a private sector banking meltdown.  Having a country like Greece go from 13% deficit-GDP to 2% in two years is forced deleveraging, which means the kind of deflation which is not ideal to Smither’s.  As Zero has pointed out, once these off-balance sheet liabilities are completely in play all bets are off.  A slow drip-deflation could easily end up as a deflationary debt spiral.  I doubt Ben has that on his agenda.  The question is, can it even be avoided.

 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:49 | 235417 trav7777
trav7777's picture

The question you have to ask yourself is whether those who work in an institution with a 90 year record of debtmoney inflation can possibly be expected to understand that debtmoney IS the fundamental problem.

The Fed is trying to add the next layer of the debt pyramid but the real economy is not cooperating.  The real economy cannot be expected to service more debt for reasons I have expounded upon repeatedly in the past few months here.

The Fed knows ONLY debtmoney...everything fits into that paradigm and flows from it, the notion that interest rate regimes drive growth, and all of these absurd policies intended to pretend.

Growth will not return; the problem is that our entire system of "economics" is based upon it being a perpetual condition.  There is NO ROOM for contraction or even steady-state in any of the major economics schools.

We are in a climate of declining real income as measured by aggregate economic production.  We're asking and expecting basically a person with declining income to acquire even MORE debt when they are at the point where they cannot service their existing load.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:23 | 235038 Almost Solvent
Almost Solvent's picture

Physical USDs in circulation pale in comparison to outstanding debt. When the real calls come in to repay these debts, the real cash crunch will be felt. Extend and pretend ala Japan is the only way to keep the system fluid & operating. Roll that electronic debt over baby till someone finally forces some real payback in real money. That's when the feature attraction starts.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:27 | 235044 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Save your paper $s boys, for toilet paper is going to be very expensive.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:35 | 235049 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

i think whipsaw is the word he's looking for but probably danced around it spewing tireless rounds of econo-jargod fedreserveese bullshit all to say its another way to steal every last dime the bloodsuckers possibly can. Now that we owe the banks trillions, lets make dollars so scarce everyone sweats blood repaying the debt incurred from being duped by the theiving bastards to which we supposedly owe it.
Anyone with half a bain should sell every last stock, piece of paper, bonds, CDS and whatever other sort of crap these people purvey and go into gold and silver - accept it as currency and to hell with these people.
And Zero Hedge wouldnt be tirelessly yappin about the latest goldmantechnofedclusterfiasco, endlessly charting and measuring their every move, sniffing their heels like a puppydog, waiting to see what direction they'll turn next to write a searing article about the latest injustice.
this system is falling, get out of the way. What we dont know is how long it will take to topple, but when it goes get outta the f'kin way, 'cause its gonna crash and crash hard - and i hope it burys all the worthless fucks runnin the show, Bernanke, Geitner, Blofeld (whatever that goldman fucks name is), Pelosi, boy-O and the rest - A goddamfukinmen!

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:37 | 235052 TimmyM
TimmyM's picture

I think Smithers is sniffing around a bit of truth. Yet, his perspective lends too much credibility to central bankers. They are not nearly as proactive as he implies. I believe the Fed is reacting to markets and public sentiment. Mr. Market and the People still govern with their dollars. The Fed is political and politics is the art of the possible.

The Fed floats trial balloons. The Fed uses incrementalism in word and deed to tiptoe through the markets. The Fed is consumed by a delusion of grandeur, tiptoeing only in deference to its erroneous perception of effectiveness.

Where Smithers is right is that deflation is the necessary medicine but the Fed will accomplish this whether it is intended or not.

"When I die I want to come back as the bond market" James Carvell

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:53 | 235069 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Smithers notes that rising asset prices will lead to another bubble. At the same time he depicts Uncle Sam on the chopping block, suggesting (IMHO) that QE must cease. Next, he suggests that slow, contained growth will allow for deleveraging. I don't think he believes the Fed is going to follow through on the plan by saying the "cure" is being overdone (again).

I support his ideas of a.) escalating bank equity ratios (especially increasing capital requirements with size), b.) not subsidizing industries (i.e. the banking industry in particular), and c.) central banks having an objective of avoiding major recessions but allowing for managing minor recessions (a cleansing perhaps).

I don't like where we (US economy) are at today, but this paper makes the most sense compared to everything else I've read to date. Thank you for posting this article.

Wed, 02/17/2010 - 23:56 | 235070 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Debts will have to be paid down in USA. Running deficits and simultaneously devaluing the dollar will be a process over time.
Thus, leaving limited banking expansion in US, their all loaned up.
Market decisions were made to move the bank finance processing plant assembly line and ramp up new debt production, Asia comes to mind.
Debt collection for bankers from previous produced debtors will be guaranteed, financially supporting bankers move setting up a new finance production processing plant. Previous debt created in USA will be slapped on the back of USA taxpayer.
Move on to extract equity value and process more debt for future revenue is the name of the bankers global game.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 01:05 | 235101 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Bullshit. The economy always inflates for the poor and always deflates for the rich. He's got pespectivitis. It all depends on how each specific caste engages in the economy.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 01:42 | 235131 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

OK off-the wall idea. Let's say the Fed has decided that they can't avoid deleveraging without destroying the $, so will now try to enter a "controlled deleverage period". That will of course impoverish the US and make the holders of US debt wealthy. That seem unlikely a path that the Fed would willingly choose.

What if they delever, with a focus on detonating foreign debt, and scaring credit to the US, while still shrinking the total MZM/M3 world-wide. Then before the money really begins to flow back out internationally, the US invalidates all CDSs and CDOs backed by fraudulent mortgages, which wipes out mostly international banks, and drastically decreases the M3.

Thenafter that step, the only money left in the US and much of the world is physical cash and the money parked in the Fed by the big banks. The US can then create the "new $" and return to Gold as the international reserve currency again. This will make it harder for countries to Peg their currency against Gold, and attempt a begger thy neighbor policy.

I know --- tin hat required here, I said it was off-the-wall

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 02:15 | 235151 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I know this is off topic. Do the foreign central banks hold physical foreign currency, like USD, euros, yen or is it an electronic bookkeeping entry?

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 04:55 | 235214 pak
pak's picture

"the other is by replacing debt with equity, either through bankruptcy, via the banking system, or directly, through the corporate sector."

If the corporate sector was paying negative rates, then maybe yes. Not otherwise.)

It has not worked out that way in Japan. By the time Koizumi took the PM's office (14 years after their bubble exploded) there was more bad debt in the system than ever.

Imho, japanese experience is not directly applicable today because we have some 190 Japans on the world map now.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 05:37 | 235220 Handle with care
Handle with care's picture

Not a convincing article.

There is quite simply not enough income to service all the debt.  Imagining some mythical source of capital to refinance all the companies so their debt to equity looks better doesn't fix that problem.

The only solution is inflation.  The only gameplan is to inflate without spooking the people into taking actions to protect themselves against inflation.

The market is responding to the inevitability of inflation (with a fair amount of goosing by the Fed to encourage those who haven't thought it through and are relying on the current fundamentals)

 

The big problem for everyone not part of the financial elite is that outsourcing and globalisation has reduced the ability of labor to achieve inflation matching wage increases, so expect a reduction in the average standard of living and a bigger share of the national income heading to those already rich

Fri, 02/19/2010 - 03:49 | 237257 Assetman
Assetman's picture

There is quite simply not enough income to service all the debt.  Imagining some mythical source of capital to refinance all the companies so their debt to equity looks better doesn't fix that problem.

No... but utilizing equity capital to reduce debt directly does... and that's been occuring under this wave of "reflation".

The unfortunate thing is that the goverment has been assuming new debt obligations while the private sector has begun its deleveraging. 

Now the goverment needs to tap that source of capital (likely from the equity markets) to meet those needs.  During such a time deflationary forces will deplete reserves-- but also retire debt through default.  Going forward, those bondholders in the wrong place at the wrong time will not be saved.

As long as there are sources of capital that can be tapped into, there will be incentives to use the for the greater goal of reducing bad debt.  It's worked so far, but there are diminishing returns over time.  Savers one way or another will eventually be screwed buy being persuaded or forced into bad investments at the wrong time.

The much bigger problem is maintaining a stream of income to support debt servicing on the remaining debt.  Right now, "earnings" from a very steep yield curve and fantasy accounting are keeping banks from biting the dust.  It may take 2 decades and many rounds of QE to gt banks in the safe zone.  But government has to halt spending increases immdiately, or we will get nowhere.  I'm not sure that will happen.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 07:03 | 235244 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Smithers is right. It's always been about re-flating,
THEN de-flating, then re-flating, then de-flating....wash, rinse, repeat. Look at Japan for the history. After
Ben deflates for a year or so, the sheeple will be begging for the next trillion dollar stimulus, and they'll get it.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 07:04 | 235246 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

King Dollar wins by being the last man standing. We don't have to run faster than the chasing bear, merely faster than everyone else. I would not bet against the USD long term.

In the real estate world, debt is increasingly "acting like" equity by refusing to foreclose, forbearing and entering into alternate arrangements. It may be that debt eventually transmutes into equity via economic alchemy, a stubborn belief that asset values will simply not be allowed to drop. 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:59 | 235443 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Wins?  The dollar sovereign and dollar CB are both bankrupt.  The Fed's #1 balance sheet item is recent vintage residential mortgages.  It knowingly swapped GARBAGE assets at illusory marks for FRNs to banks.  TALF and TAF accepted collateral that could have been mezz tranches of CDO squareds...who knows?  So we destroy the Euro...what does that say about fiat paper at that point if it does go down?  We cause a "stampede" into our Treasuries, great...we CAN'T pay them back!  So, we collapse last, long after everyone else has already repudiated?  So we have the best seat in the nightclub after everyone else ran out bc of the fire that burnt it to the ground...

ALL HAIL DOLLAR, KING...of nothing.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 07:17 | 235248 Noah Vail
Noah Vail's picture

Won't inflation wreck the bond market, driving up interest and increasing govt. debt? Inflation is a trap for a faltering government that leaves it no way out but default.

 

I rather like the sudden devaluation theory as a means of reducing debt, a onet-time big shock that comes just before the final meltdown, and which has half a chance of saving the dollar as well by virtue of being last man standing. Or do you have a yen for the wan?

 

An instant 50% devalution makes for instant 50% inflation. When virtually everyone gets an overnight haircut, how can the bond market react to that? It can't. I think the Roosevelt solution sits on the shelf as Plan B.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 07:34 | 235255 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Some nice charts, but the interview was a waste of time imo.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 08:33 | 235268 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Answer this for me....

Why do we need all of this complex guessing....when in fact guessing is not needed....

It seems as if holder's anxiety is omnipresent instead of basic logic....

The percent change in the total amount in equity and credit has declined over 40% in total at the minimum....

And there are of course categories that would reflect less....and those that would reflect more....however over a 40% reduction would be a minimal negative number....

So this means that the Fed can print away as long as this difference remains....and not have an inflationary impact versus the prices that existed at 100/100....

Prices will now reflect somewhere between 60 vs 100....

60 vs 100 is the print away zone....

The Fed is in essence chaeating the savers....both in terms of interest paid on savings...and keeping prices higher than they should actually be by not allowing deflation to run its proper course....

The Fed has made the decision to steal from savers and give their stealings to those that made the big mistakes....

The Fed is rewarding the stupid and taxing the smart....

.............................................

So tell me....

Just how does this story end ?

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 09:25 | 235278 docj
docj's picture

So to believe this, wouldn't one need to believe that Benron has very quietly tossed under the bus everything he's claimed to have believed all his professional life - up to and including his doctoral thesis which highlighted, among other things, the absolute and to-be-avoided-at-all-costs evil that is deflation?

Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 10:14 | 235307 Arm
Arm's picture

Actually, I believe this is PRECISELY the plan.  More than a plan, it is the only way to go other than reseting the world economy by eliminating the currency/debt monetary system.  Japan is the model, not the worst case scenario.

There are two problems with this approach:

1) Depending on private sector saving rates, it will likely take literally more than a decade to delever.  I place a best case of 7 years.

2) The political factor will not let this approach succeed. As soon as things start looking a tad rosy politicians will intervene in the deleveraging process and throw everything into chaos.  Again, this is very much what happened in Japan.

 

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 12:51 | 235544 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Smithers and Koo are on the same
deflation page, basically. Koo
just is more hopeful about the
Keynesians pumping some air into
the ball, periodically.

Fri, 02/19/2010 - 02:58 | 237236 Arm
Arm's picture

Yes.  I neglected to mention that there is also the problem of different monetary velocities which Koos does not address.  Basically, government cash does not reach consumers' pockets directly it has to go through banks and through direct building contracts.  This means that the middlemen keep most of the cash so the effect on consumption is not likely to be stellar.  In the case of banks, they keep the cash and speculate with it (what? you want them to lend to broke deadbeats and lose it?)

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 11:10 | 235335 BernankeCo
BernankeCo's picture

Larry Blankfein sanctimoniously explained Adam Smith’s invisible hand. 

The future for the USA is very bleak; a future resembling that of a socialist country like Canada or UK, but far worse.

With mass complacency to big government, nanny state initiatives people's constitutional rights will slowly be eroded.othing!" We live in a Financial Aristocracy and D1CTAT0RSHIP!

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 12:08 | 235464 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Dude. Seriously? You need to stop spamming and get a real job. For crying out loud. If www.iamned.com is that good, people will gravitate towards it. If not, it will close up shop. Stop spamming your crap around these pages.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 12:31 | 235504 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Of course they were THRILLED that the insolvent overleveraged crooked banks (and others) were able to trade debt by selling equity shares. (Does anyone really know how many shares of Bank of America are outstanding!) I contend that once the max junk debt has been converted to equity (commercial property now)...the equity values fall...a lot. The delayed deflation will rear its head in falling equity prices. We are only halfway thru deflating the private debts with some scary wild cards outstanding such as lack of regulation, no too big to bail policy, fraudulant/unregulated derivatives trading, gov. debt and entitlements.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 12:49 | 235540 RSDallas
RSDallas's picture

Great article and even better debate. I'm in the deflation camp despite the QE from Ben.  There is to much debt and an inability to service this debt debt on top of the low amount of equity being held by financing entities on top of the current "REAL" value of the assets being held for the debt.  This imbalance has to re-balance. 

You see the "dumb" money (the money that was borrowed and lent for stupid and unsound reasons) has to be replaced with "smart" or "rational" money in order for our economy to heal. 

Smart money creates jobs and wealth and stupid money destroys wealth and bankrupts companies.

I'm not sure why this concept is so hard for the so called intellects, white house goons and economist to understand.

Thu, 02/18/2010 - 13:57 | 235632 Hondo
Hondo's picture

The deleveraging process needs to happen.  All this article is saying is that let it happen at a slower more controlled rate (assuming they can control anyting) rather than all at once.  Nothing more than what they have allowed the banks to do each and everytime by steeping the curve.  Offset the losses with earnings over time.  His bit about rigging stocks (which I can't refute that they are not doing) to dupe fools (savers) into paying for part of the cost of deleveraging.  Under this plan I like cash better.

Mon, 04/19/2010 - 08:31 | 307592 Tom123456
Tom123456's picture

ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. The company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. cheap vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customers to easily upgrade their software, install it or even solve their problems. ucvhost offers the following different packages to its customers

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!