You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

DOE Highlights Collapsing Energy Demand

Tyler Durden's picture




Some charts courtesy of the DOE demonstrating just how deep the energy, and by implication, the overall economy slump is, relative to prior years:

Implied Demand of Total Products: we are now essentially at the level just after the economic cataclysm that was Lehman's collapse, and trending lower.

Distillates are significantly below a 5 year average, and far below anything seen in 2008.

Jet demand demonstrates why all expectations for an aerospace revival are still far too premature.

Full presentation below:

 


h/t Geoffrey




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 16:11 | Link to Comment AR
AR's picture

And... NatGas is up 150+% in 2 weeks (with vol up 140%). The November could retest the 5.20/40 breakdown area from early August, but, with storage supplies at record highs, probabilities are it can easily retrace and retest the lows set on September 4th of 3.30/60 area.  Good luck everyone.

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 17:03 | Link to Comment SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

Yes, Goldman and the boyz pushing commodity prices up again.

Interesting, is it not, that all of their hard-earned "Profit" on commodity speculation comes from the pockets of either:

1) Citizens

or

2) Companies

 

in the form of higher prices. When will people catch on? When will we stop these leaches, parasites from stealing the nation's wealth?

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 17:34 | Link to Comment Anal_yst
Anal_yst's picture

You forgot 3) Governments.

 

Where the hell else do you expect them to earn "profit," preytell?  By pulling it out of thin air? 

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 19:33 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

That's what they're doing. It's not like they are producing anything of value, ever.

Oh wait, I didn't see your sarcasm light was lit.

cougar

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 20:20 | Link to Comment Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

   cougar

 

     "It's not like they are producing anything of value, ever."

 

 - thats a damn good point, what tha hell does a "bank" produce?

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 20:22 | Link to Comment Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

... value out of thin air ..?

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 21:03 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

For revealing magician secrets the ghost of Houdini will come and gut punch you. LOL

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 21:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/25/2009 - 00:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 23:28 | Link to Comment bulldung
bulldung's picture

Government = taxpayers=employed citizens[endangered species]

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 17:39 | Link to Comment Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

Yes, good point on the Nat Gas insanity.

I have said many times before and I will re-iterate now that it is NOT POSSIBLE to properly plan and run a business in this type of environment where commodities markets are nothing more than casinos. It simply cannot be done.

Countless businesses have and will continue to go bust for no other reason than they "guessed wrong" on which way the price of their key raw material inputs would move.

There can be no real economic recovery under these conditions. Period.

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 19:36 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Recovery re-shmuvery. There ain't no economy, it blew up a year ago last week. It's short-term profits or get the f*ck out.

I hate it when people don't get with the program.

/sarcasm

cougar

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 21:44 | Link to Comment Steak
Steak's picture

"it is NOT POSSIBLE to properly plan and run a business in this type of environment where commodities markets are nothing more than casinos."

Sure its possible.  You just have to play their game.  The hedging contracts that are necessary operate very much like a tithe to the financial overlords.  For every Gary Kelly you have thousands of CEOs who know nothing about hedging pouring money into complex products.  And even Kelly got hosed late 08.

Any free marketeer worth their salt would see that the financial industry exacts an enourmous tax on the broader economy.  Counting the bezzle the average folk's tax burden is enormous.

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 23:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 20:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 16:18 | Link to Comment Screwball
Screwball's picture

RIMM missed, down big after hours.  Could sanity finally find its way into this market?

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 16:31 | Link to Comment pivot
pivot's picture

hopefully.  i would think that with the bulls fully entrenched, there should need to be a couple more whipsaws back and forth here at the top... lots of people still want to buy the dips which is a hard mentality to sell through.  it will happen though, just need "enough" top-tick bagholders to pile in trying not to "miss it".

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 19:38 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

[can sanity...] Um, no.

When the Dow starts blowing 700 point chunks, then we'll talk about sanity.

cougar

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 16:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 16:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 23:32 | Link to Comment bulldung
bulldung's picture

+ 10, ROFL

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 16:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 19:44 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Reports are that the NG delivery systems are current awash in supply. For the price to go up any time soon there will have to be Enron-esque manipulations of both perceived supply and actual delivery. Maybe a wee terrorist threat to some facility to justify a 6 month shutdown, eh? Or how about mysterious delivery issues in the NorhtEast? Or how about they misplace the keys to the switchroom somewhere? Damn, where did I put them this time?

Way too easy. And the sheeples won't think to question it.

cougar

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 19:47 | Link to Comment PBS
PBS's picture

I have to disagree.  The soft prices will continue through the winter.  Most of this ramp up over the last two weeks has been based on a couple of factors.

1) The storage injections in the last month have dropped enough that it doesn't look like produces will need to shut in their gas.  This is providing some confidence and speculation that maybe there will be a floor under prices.

2) A lot of traders were playing the spread on the October and January contracts and needed to cover shorts on the front month.

Don't get me wrong; some of this is good old fashioned speculative mania, but I don't see prices hitting double digits any time soon.

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 17:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 23:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 17:40 | Link to Comment Anal_yst
Anal_yst's picture

Yes, short TXT and friends, esp with el President of the company stepping down.

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 18:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 18:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 20:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 20:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/24/2009 - 20:51 | Link to Comment digalert
digalert's picture

I can't believe anything these days. Corruption is thread so deep worldwide and the money at stake so great that nothing suprises me. Goes for uncle Bernanke also.

Fri, 09/25/2009 - 03:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 09/25/2009 - 03:48 | Link to Comment TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

Production has been peaking for a long time. Peak oil is very close to 2009, if not earlir. The point is, in this deflationary environment, the asshole bankers have used the peak resource crisis as a means to maintain the prices at the current level. You would be a moron if you bet against oil after production has been going down for several years. Or you would be a idiot to bet against copper if you knew that the efficincy of mining is steeply declining.

Its a brilliant plan, to use resource scarcity to battle deflation. Bu we dont pay them to run our world. We shouldnt pay them. We run our own world, and if that world would include higher energy and comoddity prices then so be it. It would force us to be more efficient. Lower prices dont help if theyre creating the wrong incentive.

Fri, 09/25/2009 - 07:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!