You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

The Dollar Is Now The Laughing Stock Of The World

Tyler Durden's picture




We are currently combing for Youtube clips of Weimar Republic pundits (or even Robert Mugabe's finance minister) ridiculing the dollar and the Fed's "strong currency" posturing (heaven forbid Ron Paul succeeds and the Fed's threat that the dollar may actually turn weaker transpires: what shall we ever do then?). And while it would appear video recordings, let along internet access, were a little problematic in the 1920's, we present the following obeservations on the dollar courtesy of our German colleagues at Berninger.

 




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:41 | Link to Comment SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

Has anyone seen any interviews where Bernanke was directly asked what he thought about Gold?

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:28 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

Hope that counts:

The conclusion that deflation is always reversible under a fiat money system follows from basic economic reasoning. A little parable may prove useful: Today an ounce of gold sells for $300, more or less. Now suppose that a modern alchemist solves his subject's oldest problem by finding a way to produce unlimited amounts of new gold at essentially no cost. Moreover, his invention is widely publicized and scientifically verified, and he announces his intention to begin massive production of gold within days. What would happen to the price of gold? Presumably, the potentially unlimited supply of cheap gold would cause the market price of gold to plummet. Indeed, if the market for gold is to any degree efficient, the price of gold would collapse immediately after the announcement of the invention, before the alchemist had produced and marketed a single ounce of yellow metal.

What has this got to do with monetary policy? Like gold, U.S. dollars have value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021121/default.htm

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:35 | Link to Comment Slewburger
Slewburger's picture

Potassium iodide... booze... nudie playing cards.

In that order of course.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:47 | Link to Comment AnonymousMonetarist
AnonymousMonetarist's picture

http://anonymousmonetarist.blogspot.com/2009/11/our-top-story-tonight-yippee-ki-yay-mr.html

I hereby proclaim my intention to seek a constitutional convention whereby we the people will move to implement the Garrett Morris amendment.


This amendment will seek to codify the following:

All terrestrial broadcasts of Bubblevision and Hee Haw will hereby include captioning for the learning impaired....


The Garrett Morris amendment would gapfill about half of Bankfiend's '2%' fat tail.

The other half seems to be rising of its' own volition.

When Timmy G recently mumbled that CDS was not the raison d'etre for the AIG bailout and 'Mad Dog' Feinberg said 'I'm looking at you Goldie' even the most anesthetized folks got their pencils out.

Coincidentally, Jaime (shine on you crazy) Dimon was immediately wheeled out as a possible successor given Geithner's opprobrium, proclaiming that he would love to serve his country beyond taking out the Spooz offer.


Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:32 | Link to Comment Assetman
Assetman's picture

Man, I really like that "Hee-Haw"... and I'm partially literate.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:25 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

+1

I think Gono was saying how he had lead the way, and Bernanke was following.  BTW, there are a interviews with him circulating (search Gideon Gono) and he is truly like Bernanke meets Baghdad Bob.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:36 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

Love the post, but there was no references at all. "Hand to God this is true" doesn't go to far some someone like me who stopped believing in santa claus a long time ago =\

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:33 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

-

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:49 | Link to Comment aldousd
aldousd's picture

Paul Krugman would like to sling some mud your way. (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/proposed-extensions-of-godwins-law/)  Clearly you should run and hide, because his credentials alone are scary. And with that beard too... man, lookout.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:15 | Link to Comment Andrei Vyshinsky
Andrei Vyshinsky's picture

Not Princeton professor, Nobel Prize winning, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman! Paul really isn't out there shoulding all over himself again today, is he, this time about Godwin's Law? And I'd so hoped he'd confine himself to a discussion of at least one of the eight recessions he'd predicted in the last decade. Such a schmendrik, Krugman. Looks like they give the Nobel Prize to just about anyone these days. They gave one to Obama, a peace prize I believe it was, and its said that on December 1st he'll be announcing the escalation of the Afghan atrocity by authorizing 34,000 more poor white southerners to teach the Afghans to say "Eye-Rack". What should they have done, given him the "war prize" maybe? Maybe we should ask Paul Krugman.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:38 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

Paul Krugman's Beard + Essays = Least Interesting Man in the World.

He may not always drink beer, but I wonder which kind he does when he so chooses.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 18:48 | Link to Comment Slewburger
Slewburger's picture

A hot tall Shlitz Gay.

That guy has diarrhea of the mouth and might as well be Uncle Ben's batty boy.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:52 | Link to Comment D.O.D.
D.O.D.'s picture

"in-wester"

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 21:08 | Link to Comment The Rock
The Rock's picture

lol

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:54 | Link to Comment Shameful
Shameful's picture

Wait it's just now that the dollar is a laughing stock?!?  Boy did I show up to the party early!

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:06 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I think this is a twist on the old adage "I can call my brother a slime ball scumbag but you can't". Because the USD is the worlds reserve currency, every country is somewhat related to the USD in one form or another.

So while it's common knowledge among the "family" countries at the Thanksgiving table that Joe belongs in jail (or worse) we all will defend Joe if someone outside the family says what we'll know to be true.

Now that the outsiders are becoming braver in their denouncements of Joe and are ignoring our clenched fists and red faces, we're actually a bit relieved we no longer must defend the indefensible scumbag brother Joe.

Interestingly, I believe this will lead to a bit of a short term rally in the USD (3-6 months) leading inevitably towards the deeper (final?) plunge later in 2010.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment Shameful
Shameful's picture

You be right about that.  After all it wouldn't do for the world to realize we have been floating bad checks all these years and I would hardly bad mouth the dollar to a foreigner I was trying to pass it too.  I wish I had a better insight into how the world sees us and the dollar, like in Asia for example.  We get the English version which is doubtlessly sugar coated, and my growing knowledge of Mandarin is not quite up to the challenge of reading news sources in Mandarin.

I agree with the possibility of a dollar rally, and have been expecting it for a few weeks now.  The whole ICE scandal last week has me thinking it might not occur though, or maybe it was just to early for them who knows.  Though I still expect the dollar to steadily lose purchasing power and likely to hit a crash sometime in the next 1.5-2.5 years. 

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:57 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

anyone got a chart of the dollar slide with correspondence dates and various 'strong dollar policy' quotes from various Fed members and government spin merchants?

The have been saying that for a pretty long time now

 

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 14:59 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

In 2007 the  Zimbabwe delegate was chosen as the head of the United Nations “Commission on Sustainable Economic Development” (seriously). 

One wonders if the next head of that Commission will be the US delegate?

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:39 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

it will be a great job for Geithner.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 19:50 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

as long as it keeps him out of a position of responsibility, fine with me.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 00:01 | Link to Comment knukles
knukles's picture

So Perfectly Oxymoronic  

the Zeitgeist of It ALL

Must be.........God's Work

 

Sustainable Economic Development

Perfection in a Twisted World

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:03 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

This strong dollar policy is really hitting the Nikkei!

The Nikkei used to be over a 1000 points higher than the dow a few months ago..

Nikkei now 9402!

 

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:01 | Link to Comment Green Sharts
Green Sharts's picture

I've been wondering if the Nikkei is the canary in the coal mine with regard to world equities.  It has disconnected from the risk assets versus $ trade in the last few weeks.  The Topix, which is a market cap weighted index that is more representative of the Japanese equity market, is down YTD.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:32 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

Shanghai Composite fell 3.5%

Shenzhen Composite Index fell 4.3%.

Hang Seng fell 1.53%

Nikkei fell 1.01%

Sydney fell 0.65%

in the last traded sessions but on go the US indices merrily on its dollar fall induced euphoric every trundling higher ramp

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:09 | Link to Comment Whizbang
Whizbang's picture

just have to ask, who is this? and what is the difference between negative inflation and deflation?

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 19:57 | Link to Comment FreeStateYank
FreeStateYank's picture

I've donned my tinfoil hat of late and have been wondering the same thing.

 

Did anyone notice Monday's opening? Tons of early trade activity-virtually all of my holdings started the trading sessions up by a very noticable amount, from Friday's close.

 

I'm very new to this game, but it seems to me that levels are being maintained in favored cos.

 

Or is it the waves penetrating the foil?

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:32 | Link to Comment hidingfromhelis
hidingfromhelis's picture

We'll still be hearing about the "strong dollar policy" as we pass through parity with the Mexican Peso. 

 

War out!

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:40 | Link to Comment time123
time123's picture

I hear too much chatter about the dollar collapsing. It may be a contrarian indicator, at least for the short term.

admin

http://invetrics.com

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:42 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

good luck timing the spike.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 15:42 | Link to Comment faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

whatever you do, don't share this video too much because he's showing us his proprietary chart there, that he usually sells.

lol

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:26 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Jawohl!  Mein chart ist sehr gut!

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:05 | Link to Comment EB
EB's picture

Can we swap him into the California gubenetorial slot like a Goldman CDO? 

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:08 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

SNL Obama Press Conference in Beijing - Fred Armisen - 21 Nov 2009.mp4

This Saturday Night Live's second critical satire of President Barack Obama - air date, 21 November 2009, starring Fred Armisen and posted by David Kusumoto (winstonsnow), San Diego, is one of the funniest ridicules of the dollar around  (a little Saturday Night raunch thrown in, of course)… 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01vjlJZRw5Q

The same 5-star video, with more than 300,000 views, was removed about an hour ago in this country “due to copyright restrictions.”  View it while you can….

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 19:20 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

Actually, I don’t hang around here for the raunch.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:25 | Link to Comment Daedal
Daedal's picture

I'm pretty sure you can see it on HULU.com (it was up there last night). While on the subject of SNL, this Saturday included the hilarious music videos "Reba Mcentire" & "What's Up With That" -- must watch, but def see the Obama Press Conference in Beijing first!

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 20:31 | Link to Comment FreeStateYank
FreeStateYank's picture

Superb! Thanks for the link. Laughed 'till I cried.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 18:40 | Link to Comment snorkeler
snorkeler's picture

Hmmmm sounds familiar?  Oh right!  The UAW story! 

 

Fortify your job security until there is no more job for you to fortify your security in.

 

Pure fucking genius

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 19:26 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

And every swinging government dick in Cali is on furlough. The elected critters are absolutely, positively terrified to recommend layoffs. Public Sector unions run this government. Bennies are up 40 % in 9 years.

Well, with a $21B deficit looking them in the face ...... again.....we Californicators can look forward to more IOUs. And I've made sure I owe them at tax time, not the other way around.

Cali = GM  ( gubmint style )

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 20:54 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

The way I see it, Rainman, for California it becomes the law of diminishing return.  And the Democrat-controlled legislature is well aware of its problem.  The larger the government programs grow, the greater the pressure for higher and higher fees; but flight from these taxes begins to reduce the tax base.  In other words, the higher the tax burden the greater the chance of smaller return. 

Even the most liberal legislators are forced to tell the public employee unions the truth.  Push too much and the businesses move to Nevada and more and more professionals leave the state.

An additional problem for Democrats facing their lobbying groups is that climbing tax rates hurt their re-election chances.

There’ll come a day when California is going to have to cut down below the fat and into these heavy unions, and the biggest chunk of the budget is education. 

The number one political donor in 2008 in the U.S. was the National Education Association at $56.3 million.  Four of California’s Indian gaming interests made the top ten donors in the United States.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 16:23 | Link to Comment Prophet of Wise
Prophet of Wise's picture

The new national anthem to the US dollar ($) http://www.youtube.com/user/DcxDog

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:29 | Link to Comment arkady
arkady's picture

Can anyone explain how the Fed is going to unload the 997 billion dollars worth of MBSs it has acquired?   Whereas previously a boatload of treasuires could be sold on one of the biggest markets in the world, what is going to happen to these securities?

I am stunned by this and am wondering what the end game will be.  What if the MBSs lose 50% of it's value?  Would this essentially mean that the Fed took half of our money and handed it over to Wall St. or whoever the hell originated these worthless securities?   We are talking MAJOR theft here...

I am also curious, if these MBSs and Agency paper was already paid for in reserve notes, then did our currency circulation rise as of that moment?  According to the data it does not appear to be so, but they must have been paid with something. 

This of course begs the question of why the rates will EVER be raised now that Ben has a seriously vested interest in propping up the housing markets.  This looks like a Japanese style malaise, but worse...

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:44 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

In all sincerity, that crap will just sit there, pretty much forever. 

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 20:10 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

And it will zoom far north of a tril......that's for sure.

They'll fire sale it back to the bankstas .....and the cycle will begin again.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:51 | Link to Comment A Man without Q...
A Man without Qualities's picture

They aren't.  These securities will be locked in the attic like the crazy first wife and nobody will even mention the topic again.

Fed buys MBS paper with newly printed FRNs, which then are used to purchase nice shiny Treasury bonds.  

Everyone's a winner and all problems are resolved, apart from the ones that aren't.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 18:59 | Link to Comment arkady
arkady's picture

What is the price for holding these securities forever?  I mean forever is a loose term...they will mature..eventually. 

So these newly printed FRNs should be going to Wall St. or whoever the hell is selling these MBSs in the first place and that money would then technically be circulated - yet the circulation of currency does not correspond at all to the influx of mbs/agency paper. 

In my simple understanding buying MBSs with printed FRNs should have resulted in massive circulation increases and price inflation, but it has not...

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 18:27 | Link to Comment Brett in Manhattan
Brett in Manhattan's picture

As others have astutely pointed out, these MBSs will never see the light of day.

The Fed will raise rates when it's the member banks interest to do so, vis a vis, they've got all the toxic assets off their books and they're net short equities, so it becomes profitable to crash the market.

While the market declines, rates will be rising and the public will be goaded into selling, the same way they're being pushed into the market, now, with interests rates so low.

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 19:02 | Link to Comment arkady
arkady's picture

Agree 100% on the interest rate/market correlation, I think its a more reasonable outlook than new highs on the back of a useless dollar. 

However that does not quite account for the fact that raising rates along with a market collapse will drag down real estate and cause another foreclosure spike destroying the value of the MBSs further...what is the price to pay for this?  Or has the price already been paid in freshly minted notes?

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 11/24/2009 - 17:39 | Link to Comment rr_
rr_'s picture

Wear their scorn as a badge of honor!

Tue, 11/24/2009 - 20:38 | Link to Comment FreeStateYank
FreeStateYank's picture

Could Maiden Lane been the equalivalent of a 'bad bank' and the paper offloaded there, then swapped with treasuries, then the paper swapped with REITs for $$ at a much lower face value? So the velocity didn't show up at the higher amount?

 

I really don't understand all of this and never knew what a derivative WAS until fall 2008. Any clarification appreciated, thx.

Surely there are at least two sets of books?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 00:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!